Meet J-36, China's 6th-Generation fighter jet: Capable of dropping heavy bombs, long-range covert strike and...
New Delhi: Pictures of the massive 'J-36' stealth fighter developed by China's Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) emerged on Chinese social media, offering a glimpse into its advanced design. Referred to as the JH-XX, the aircraft is believed to be part of a new generation of long-range, strike-capable platforms being tested by the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF).
The leaked pictures showcase a distinctive canopy design and, notably, a side-by-side seating arrangement and three open ventral weapons bays are visible in this fighter plane. It is important to note that despite the visual evidence, the exact role of the J-36 within China's military doctrine remains unclear. According to some analysts, the J-36 could serve as an air superiority fighter, while others suggest it is intended as a deep-penetration strategic bomber. Here are some of the key features of J-36 stealth fighter: According to the images available online, J-36 stealth fighter is likely to have a side-by-side two-seat cockpit.
The J-36 appears larger than the J-20, suggesting it's not just a fighter jet but also capable of acting as a strategic nuclear bomber.
The picture available on the social media reveals that the outline of the dual canopy and a dorsal air intake designed to feed the aircraft's central engine.
Reflections on the cockpit glass suggest large Head-Up Displays (HUDs) in front of both seats.
China is likely developing the J-36 as a multi-role deep penetration platform, meaning it can drop heavy bombs while operating like a fighter.
The J-36 is believed to possess very long-range covert strike capability, similar to America's NGAD platform.
According to the reports, there are three engines present in the aircraft. This is possibly the same model used in the J-20 stealth fighter. The presence of three engines supports the notion of a heavier payload and longer range, essential for strategic strike missions across contested environments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mercedes-Benz rethinks EV plans, will retain combustion engines due to slower adoption
Mercedes had previously declared it would be all-electric 'where market conditions allow' by 2030 Notify me In a major strategic pivot, Mercedes-Benz has become the latest in a long list of traditional automakers reassessing their lofty electric vehicle (EV) goals. "We will keep building combustion engines well into the 2030s, longer than originally envisaged," confirmed company CEO Ola Kallenius recently, as global EV uptake lagged behind expectations. A change in course Kallenius told German publication Auto Motor und Sport that the brand has made a 'course correction" in its transition strategy. Mercedes had previously declared it would be all-electric 'where market conditions allow" by 2030. But now, the automaker acknowledges that high-tech hybrid and combustion engines will remain in its lineup for the foreseeable future. 'In today's climate, it's most logical for an established automaker to pursue both paths—EVs and internal combustion engines—without abandoning either," Källenius said, emphasizing the need for flexibility in light of regional demand variations and infrastructure gaps. Also Read : Weak demand for Mercedes G580 EV spurs plans for smaller G-Class with hybrid powertrain EV market growth persists Though such announcements as that of Mercedes might stoke fears of the sustainability of electric mobility, market figures have a more differentiated tale to tell. Worldwide sales of EVs continue on a sharp growth trend. As per the International Energy Agency, sales of EVs increased more than 25 per cent in 2023 to 17 million units globally. BloombergNEF's most recent Electric Vehicle Outlook again forecasts a 25 per cent increase in plug-in hybrid and EV sales in 2025, reaching as high as almost 22 million units. Significantly, China is still reigning supreme in the EV market, and it is forecast to represent nearly two-thirds of these volumes. China remains crucial, despite headwinds Mercedes-Benz continues to rely heavily on China as its most important market, even as the brand faced a 7 per cent year-on-year sales decline there in 2024, down to 683,600 units. Still, the company is adapting to local consumer habits. 'For many Chinese buyers, their vehicle is more than just transportation—it's a personal living space," Kallenius explained, possibly alluding to the increasing digitalization and screen-heavy interiors in recent models. Also Read : Audi delays ICE phaseout, to launch new petrol and hybrid cars till 2033 and beyond The road ahead With Mercedes now echoing the sentiments of fellow German automakers BMW and Audi, it's clear that Europe's luxury carmakers are hedging their bets. All three will hold on to a dual-technology strategy—blending internal combustion engines and EVs—for the foreseeable future. This comes as a concern for how these firms will meet the European Union's planned 2035 ban on the sale of new combustion-engine cars. Some industry players are hoping in silence for delays in regulation, but EU policymakers have demonstrated little such inclination. Meanwhile, Mercedes-Benz looks to be bridging both worlds, walking a delicate path that is at once innovative and pragmatic. Check out Upcoming EV Cars in India, Upcoming EV Bikes in India. First Published Date: 23 Jun 2025, 09:28 AM IST
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
A toy maker sued Trump over tariffs and won. Its operations are still in tatters.
On paper, things are looking up for Rick Woldenberg and his Illinois-based educational-toy business. Tariffs on Chinese imports are down from stratospheric levels. Federal courts have ruled the duties were invalid in the first place. And trade deals could further ease import duties. But on the ground, it is a different story. Crucial equipment has been disassembled, packed and trucked hundreds of miles on mountain roads only to be trucked back on short notice. Staff members are constantly re-evaluating a catalog of more than 2,000 toys and games, deciding which to keep producing and which to put on ice indefinitely. And the business recently had to raise prices. 'We're moving at the speed of light here—flying the plane while fixing it," said Woldenberg, who runs the family business. Founded by his grandfather in 1916, it now comprises two companies, Learning Resources and hand2mind. For weeks, Woldenberg and his roughly 500 employees—most at a suburban Chicago headquarters—have hastened to halt shipments, reroute cargo, raise prices and freeze expansion plans. The companies sued President Trump and other administration officials in federal court, winning a reprieve that is now under appeal and on hold. On Wednesday, the companies asked the Supreme Court to intervene in their favor. Through it all, the most pressing questions are how to move toy production out of China, where to move it—and how to get tons of manufacturing equipment there in time to meet deadlines for end-of-the-year holidays. 'It's almost like an evacuation," Woldenberg said. 'We don't have a place to make important items our reputation is built around." Lining up new factories in another country is just the start. Heavy manufacturing-molds must be transported hundreds or thousands of miles by truck or ship and then reassembled. Quality-control processes and safety inspections must be re-created. On Woldenberg's list: Vietnam, India and Cambodia. One place he isn't considering: the U.S. American injection-molding factories aren't set up—or cost-effective—for the painting, assembly and labor-intensive finishing the toys need, he said. Employees have hurried to halt shipments, reroute cargo, raise prices and freeze expansion plans. Woldenberg's production has been centered on China since the 1990s, when his companies started pairing up with contract manufacturers there. Factories compete vigorously for his companies' relatively small batches, and have plenty of the unskilled but experienced workers needed to manually smooth, paint, assemble and package the products, he said. After the tariffs of Trump's first term, Woldenberg began exploring new manufacturing centers and moved production for about 15% of his products to Vietnam and India over nearly three years. Last year, the companies imported $65 million of products, about 60% from China. When Trump won his second term in November, Woldenberg prepared for a trade war with China and drafted a plan to offset tariffs as high as 40%: Cut costs by 10% in every department. Rein in capital expenditures. Negotiate concessions from factories in China. (He said he got about 5% on average 'after a lot of arguing.") Keep his own price increases under 10%. Then, Trump slapped 145% tariffs on goods from China. Woldenberg threw out his plan. With tariffs at that level, he started planning to move production. That meant relocating the company's 1,500 injection molds installed in Chinese factories, weighing what he estimated to be 1.5 million pounds combined. But where? The answer was clear for one of his top products: GeoSafari Jr. Kidnoculars—bright blue, green and yellow binoculars sold under the Educational Insights brand. Amazon alone has shipped more than 9,000 a month lately, pricing them just under $10 each, and ranking it No. 1 among nature exploration toys. A factory near Hanoi already made some Kidnoculars. Woldenberg's team ordered the 13 molds in China to be sent there. They filled a flatbed truck with bulky blocks of metal stacked on pallets and wrapped in plastic. By May 1, the Kidnocular molds had arrived. Production began soon after. 'That's probably the single easiest product to move," Woldenberg said. Cooper the STEM Robot, a newcomer to the Learning Resources lineup, proved trickier. The cheerful, blue-and-black programmable ball with alligator-clip hands has sensors to detect objects and light, and can wheel along a line drawn by a child. It sells for $79.99 online. Woldenberg's team hasn't found a place to build it, or other electronics, outside China. 'Once the inventory that we have is gone, I don't know how we're going to replenish it," he said. Woldenberg doesn't dodge publicity. Under President Barack Obama, he fought tougher lead-testing rules—and in recent weeks has campaigned on cable television to end Trump's tariffs. His daughter, a company executive, posts TikToks explaining the pain of tariffs. The companies sued in late April, challenging the tariffs on constitutional and other grounds. 'It's not really our corporate personality to wait for the building to fall on our head," Woldenberg said. 'No one's going to save me. We are going to save ourselves." In court, he argued that even the president's emergency powers don't let him impose such tariffs without legislation. The government said that losing the case would hurt trade negotiations and that Trump needed to maintain the tariffs to pursue delicate talks over border crossings, narcotics control and rebuilding U.S. manufacturing. While the case wound through the courts, the tariff policy kept changing. In mid-May, the U.S. and China reached a surprise deal, lowering the new U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports to 30% for 90 days. Production in China for Woldenberg was back on, at least for a few weeks. His team moved quickly, turning around a truck about to cross China's border with Vietnam, weighed down by heavy steel molds needed for making Sight Word Swat, the Sneaky, Snacky Squirrel Game and other games and toys. Aborting the shipment cost the company $13,000. Two more trucks bearing company molds had already crossed the border. Woldenberg would have held off moving them had he known a deal was coming. Costs in Vietnam were running 10% to 30% higher than in China for many products, he said. More good news arrived at the end of May. A federal judge ruled that the government couldn't impose the tariffs on imports by Woldenberg's companies. The government appealed within hours. Meanwhile, the tariffs remained in place. For Woldenberg, the temporary deal with China and his initial court victory are promising but not enough. His team is heading to India and Vietnam in coming weeks to oversee new production lines, which take time to get up to speed. Some molds, including those for the Peeksville Hide & Cheep Chicken Coop, are en route to India by ship. The company just raised prices, averaging 5% to 10%. Trump recently suggested on social media that tariffs on China would be 55%. Tariff rates for Vietnam and India are scheduled to rise sharply in July—to 46% and 26%, respectively. Woldenberg says he can't predict whether those will stick, rise or fall, but says he can't afford to import from China if tariffs are 55%. 'We're like a refugee from a war—if the higher ground we sought isn't safe, we will load everything up in a donkey cart and move again," Woldenberg said. 'It's a really terrible way to run a business." Write to Theo Francis at
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
China sees Iran attack as a strategic dead-end for US. A no-win situation
Chinese analysts broadly view the US position as a strategic dead-end, and that the Trump administration seeks compromise but is structurally incapable of achieving it. Chinese public opinion coalesces around decisive views: Trump's reckless military intervention has driven the Middle East to a perilous tipping point. The US and Israel emerge as unmistakable aggressors, while Iran is framed as standing on a moral high ground. Commentators lament a spiralling cycle of violence among Iran, Israel, and the US—a conflict with no foreseeable resolution. China's verdict on the American airstrikes on Iran is clear: Beijing leads on peace; Washington on chaos. Its response to the United States' recent attack on Iran's nuclear facilities was outright condemnation. Russia aligned closely, warning that Washington's global credibility has suffered yet another blow. Public sentiment largely echoes this narrative, with social media users portraying the attack as ensnaring US President Donald Trump in a dangerously complex trap. Chen Feng, an Observer (Guancha) columnist, sums up the dilemma: Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear sites has locked him in a lose-lose trap. Thriving on spectacle and drama, Trump's alliance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was theatrical, flaunting a 'team' dynamic that boosted his bravado. But the show came at a high cost. Iran's swift retaliation, hitting Israeli cities like Haifa with homegrown missiles, exposed cracks in Israel's defences and turned the region's airspace volatile. Attempts at regime change risk uniting Iran's factions instead of breaking them. Chen warns, 'Removing leaders like (Ayatollah Ali) Khamenei won't erase Iran's ideology. What Netanyahu calls 'lasting peace' may spark endless war. With the fuse lit, both he and Trump hold the match.' Adding to this perception of instability, viral content on microblogging site Weibo portrays scenes of Israelis fleeing via Egypt's Taba crossing, invoking historical echoes of Jewish diasporas. Hu Xijin, former editor-in-chief of the Global Times, dismisses Trump as politically untrustworthy; a leader whose promises are tactical manoeuvres and not genuine commitments. He critiques American imperialism as inherently deceitful, a bully to the weak and craven before rivals. For over three years, Hu argues, Russia's nuclear posture has been a check on Western ambitions; and Trump's erratic policies toward Russia, North Korea, and Iran reveal imperialism's frailty under pressure. Liu Zhongmin, a professor at Shanghai Foreign Studies University and vice president of the China Middle East Society, notes a clear downward trajectory for US influence in the Middle East. He argues that the intricate trilateral relationship between the US, Israel, and Iran is becoming increasingly unstable and unpredictable. Also read: Trump tried to belittle India, but his Iran gamble has handed Modi unexpected diplomatic space Rising narrative of defiance On Weibo, the question dominating the discourse is this: how would Iran retaliate? Hashtags like Iran is on fire have drawn nearly a billion views, projecting a rising tide of support for Iran's defiance. The narrative that Iran is 'setting an example for the world' is gaining momentum. While many acknowledge Iran's limitations in striking the US mainland directly, there is consensus that Tehran will retaliate asymmetrically, through unpredictable and potentially destabilising tactics. Wang Jin, director of the Center for Israeli Studies at Northwest University, foresees intensified regional conflict as longstanding red lines crumble. He anticipates that the US will soon claim a diplomatic victory, but warns this could provoke severe backlash within Iran, including escalated attacks on American interests across the Middle East. Despite Iran's increasingly fragile position, facing dwindling foreign support and stretched resources, its resolve appears unyielding. Some commentators advocate for a potential China-Russia-Iran 'grand alliance' to counter US hegemony, a prospect that would further reshape the geopolitical landscape. Also read: Iran has fewer options & more risks than before. Its choices will affect all of Middle East China's calculated role For China, Iran is not just a geopolitical concern but a crucial economic partner. Niu Xinchun, executive director of the China Institute of Arab Studies, highlights the security challenges threatening Chinese investments and business activities in Iran, especially in engineering and technology exports. Zou Zhiqiang, a researcher at Fudan University's Center for Middle East Studies, stresses that China is prioritising efforts to broker a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, alongside pushing for a diplomatic settlement between Iran and the US. A commentator noted China's caution about direct intervention in Iran due to the risks. Yet, Iran's strategic role—as a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) member, key Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) partner, and an ancient civilisation and resource-rich nation—means China cannot remain passive. It must balance non-intervention with leadership by upholding the moral high ground, condemning aggression, promoting peace, and deepening diplomatic and cultural ties. The consensus: avoid military involvement but engage actively to shape the region's future. As the Middle East conflict escalates, with the US now deeply involved, it opens a new front for China-Russia cooperation and an opportunity for Beijing to assert its narrative of resistance against perceived American unilateralism and hegemony. In this discourse, China positions itself as the peacemaker and promoter of stability, in stark contrast to the US, framed as the escalator of conflict. Sana Hashmi is fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)
