
Mercedes-Benz rethinks EV plans, will retain combustion engines due to slower adoption
Mercedes had previously declared it would be all-electric 'where market conditions allow' by 2030 Notify me
In a major strategic pivot, Mercedes-Benz has become the latest in a long list of traditional automakers reassessing their lofty electric vehicle (EV) goals. "We will keep building combustion engines well into the 2030s, longer than originally envisaged," confirmed company CEO Ola Kallenius recently, as global EV uptake lagged behind expectations.
A change in course
Kallenius told German publication Auto Motor und Sport that the brand has made a 'course correction" in its transition strategy. Mercedes had previously declared it would be all-electric 'where market conditions allow" by 2030. But now, the automaker acknowledges that high-tech hybrid and combustion engines will remain in its lineup for the foreseeable future.
'In today's climate, it's most logical for an established automaker to pursue both paths—EVs and internal combustion engines—without abandoning either," Källenius said, emphasizing the need for flexibility in light of regional demand variations and infrastructure gaps.
Also Read : Weak demand for Mercedes G580 EV spurs plans for smaller G-Class with hybrid powertrain EV market growth persists
Though such announcements as that of Mercedes might stoke fears of the sustainability of electric mobility, market figures have a more differentiated tale to tell. Worldwide sales of EVs continue on a sharp growth trend. As per the International Energy Agency, sales of EVs increased more than 25 per cent in 2023 to 17 million units globally.
BloombergNEF's most recent Electric Vehicle Outlook again forecasts a 25 per cent increase in plug-in hybrid and EV sales in 2025, reaching as high as almost 22 million units. Significantly, China is still reigning supreme in the EV market, and it is forecast to represent nearly two-thirds of these volumes. China remains crucial, despite headwinds
Mercedes-Benz continues to rely heavily on China as its most important market, even as the brand faced a 7 per cent year-on-year sales decline there in 2024, down to 683,600 units. Still, the company is adapting to local consumer habits. 'For many Chinese buyers, their vehicle is more than just transportation—it's a personal living space," Kallenius explained, possibly alluding to the increasing digitalization and screen-heavy interiors in recent models.
Also Read : Audi delays ICE phaseout, to launch new petrol and hybrid cars till 2033 and beyond The road ahead
With Mercedes now echoing the sentiments of fellow German automakers BMW and Audi, it's clear that Europe's luxury carmakers are hedging their bets. All three will hold on to a dual-technology strategy—blending internal combustion engines and EVs—for the foreseeable future.
This comes as a concern for how these firms will meet the European Union's planned 2035 ban on the sale of new combustion-engine cars. Some industry players are hoping in silence for delays in regulation, but EU policymakers have demonstrated little such inclination.
Meanwhile, Mercedes-Benz looks to be bridging both worlds, walking a delicate path that is at once innovative and pragmatic.
Check out Upcoming EV Cars in India, Upcoming EV Bikes in India.
First Published Date: 23 Jun 2025, 09:28 AM IST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
China tightens internet control with new virtual ID for logins, says it is voluntary and will reduce data leaks
China is preparing to launch a new state-issued virtual ID system that will let people in the country log into websites and social media apps with a single, government-approved credential. However, the system has raised fresh concerns about surveillance and online freedom. According to a CNN report, the new national internet ID system will be introduced in mid-July, and while it is currently voluntary, many fear that it could become difficult to opt out eventually. The Chinese government says that the plan is meant to protect citizens' identity information and support the healthy and orderly development of the digital economy. advertisementUnder the new system, users will not need to repeatedly submit personal data to different platforms. Instead, there will be one internet ID, which will be created and issued by the state, and it will allow users to sign in across multiple websites and services. Already, more than six million people have signed up, Xinhua reported last month, in a country with over one billion internet users. Authorities claim that the ID will act as a 'bullet-proof vest for personal information', arguing that it reduces the risk of data leaks by centralising verification. However, as per the CNN report, many in the country argue that it does the exact opposite. The launch of the virtual ID and the concerns around its security come in the wake of a global cybersecurity breach, which was revealed last week, where more than 16 billion passwords were leaked online. Reports suggested that most of these credentials were fresh and stolen using malware, highlighting just how dangerous centralised data systems can be. advertisementThe plan follows a typical pattern in China's internet regulation playbook. The proposal was first introduced in March 2024 by a police official, and was then opened for public feedback. Despite criticism from legal scholars, and right advocates during the consultation, the final rules released in May remained largely officials maintain that users can choose whether to participate, the state is urging various industries and online platforms to integrate with the system. Hundreds of apps have reportedly already been trialling it, even before the rules officially take as China's state-backed internet ID system raises alarm bells about government surveillance, Sam Altman's eye-scanning Orb, which is being used to generate a World ID, has prompted similar concerns about biometric tracking, albeit from a private company. Altman's Worldcoin project, which assigns people a unique digital ID after scanning their iris with a silver, spherical device called the Orb, claims to verify a person's 'humanness' without collecting or storing personal data. The idea is to offer a way to prove someone is not an AI bot, without revealing their identity. But as the Orb expands globally, including recent launches in the UK and United States, people are increasingly questioning whether such biometric verification tools are just another step toward a future of normalised surveillance, especially when deployed at parallels to China's virtual ID system are hard to ignore. In both cases, a single digital credential aims to simplify verification across multiple platforms, offering convenience while centralising sensitive data – iris scans in Worldcoin's case, and identity details in China's. Proponents of both systems say they improve online security and reduce fraud. But experts warn that the trade-off is privacy. In China, the government can monitor and restrict dissenting voices in real time. With World ID, even if the data is decentralised and encrypted, the growing network of Orbs raises fears of creating a global biometric database, especially in the absence of independent oversight. As AI and bots become harder to distinguish from real users, and large-scale data breaches expose billions of records, tools like the Orb and China's internet ID represent a new frontier – where verifying identity online may come at the cost of autonomy and anonymity.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Magnet crunch: Indian firms pitch supply chain plans to curb China's rare earth dominance
Facing a severe supply crunch of rare earth magnets after export restrictions imposed by China, several companies, including homegrown advanced material entities, have approached the Indian government with proposals to build in-house magnet supply chains, ToI reported. These companies have made presentations to the government, including the Ministry of Heavy Industries, assuring that they will build supplies within India to reduce dependence on China. 'The companies include Midwest Advanced Materials, Entellus Industries, and public sector Indian Rare Earths (IREL),' sources told The Times of India (ToI). The sources added that Heavy Industries Secretary Kamran Rizvi has also taken presentations from companies as the government begins planning strategies for building indigenous capabilities in magnet production. 'Midwest Advanced Materials made a presentation about their plans to produce rare earth magnets in India with a capacity of 500 tonnes per annum. They forecast that by end of 2026, they will be able to produce custom-made rare earth magnets for the industry,' one of the sources said. Entellus, a UK-headquartered company with major operations in India, also made a presentation, detailing their plans to produce rare earth magnets. 'They have told officials that their plant is ready to produce the magnetic powder but will still take some time to produce industry-grade magnets,' the source said. IREL, among the last to make its presentation, informed the government that it would be able to match China's pricing once production begins. 'However, the company said that ore present in Indian geography is 100 times less than in China, the US, and Australia,' the source added. Companies also informed the government that magnet production in India had been shut down over the past two decades due to a flood of cheaper Chinese imports. 'The industry members requested government to support companies in setting up magnet production by providing incentives and monetary benefits,' the source said. Secretary Rizvi, however, urged the companies to make 'realistic statements about magnet production', warning that inaccurate claims could hurt potential customers in the auto sector. The auto industry has also asked the new local producers to commit to clear timelines on supply, pointing out that their production lines rely heavily on quick procurement. Rare earth magnets are critical for permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs), which are widely used in electric vehicles for their compact size, high torque, and energy efficiency. Hybrid vehicles also depend on these magnets for efficient propulsion. Over the past few months, the situation for the Indian auto industry has worsened. No Indian auto component or vehicle company has received approval from the Chinese government to procure rare earth magnets. According to sources, there is 'no clarity as yet' on any timeline for a confirmed meeting with Chinese government representatives, despite efforts by Indian officials. The applications for sourcing magnets have been filed mainly by component makers who manufacture high-tech, fully built assemblies such as speedometers, electric motors, e-axles, electric water pumps, automatic transmission kits, speakers, sensors, and ignition coils. The push for a meeting with Chinese authorities is being driven not just by industry bodies like the Auto Component Manufacturers Association and the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, but is also being facilitated by ministry officials. Last week, ToI reported that no Indian auto component or vehicle manufacturer had received approval from China to source rare earth magnets. The paper cited sources who reiterated 'no clarity as yet' on when a meeting might be held. The companies that have applied for magnet sourcing include Uno Minda, Bosch, Mareli, TVS Group, Motherson Sumi, and Sona Comstar. 'There were no approvals so far, according to the latest assessment we carried through interactions with industry representatives,' one source told ToI. 'The situation is grave, and there is now massive uncertainty regarding manufacturing schedules and factory output.' China's restrictions were formally issued through a notification dated April 4 this year. The new rules apply to medium and heavy rare earth metals, their alloys, magnets, and related products. Exporters are now required to obtain a licence under the country's export permit system. To avoid misuse in defence and weapons manufacturing, the Chinese authorities now require an End User Certificate (EUC). This certificate must first be approved by India's Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and the Ministry of External Affairs. It must then be endorsed by the Chinese Embassy in India before a licence can be issued. Separately, Economic Times reported on June 20 that India has finalised a ₹3,500–5,000 crore scheme to incentivise the production of rare earth minerals and derived magnets in the country. The scheme is expected to be approved in a fortnight, a senior government official told the publication. 'The priority is to start domestic-critical mineral production in the shortest time period,' the official said. The sops under the proposed scheme will be granted through a reverse auction process, the official said. The decision to offer these incentives comes after an internal ministerial review raised concern over India's dependence on Chinese imports for critical materials.


Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, US official says
AI firm DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, a senior U.S. official told Reuters, adding that the Chinese tech startup sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under U.S. rules. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent shockwaves through the technology world in January, claiming its artificial intelligence reasoning models were on par with or better than U.S. industry-leading models at a fraction of the cost. 'We understand that DeepSeek has willingly provided and will likely continue to provide support to China's military and intelligence operations,' a senior State Department official told Reuters in an interview. 'This effort goes above and beyond open-source access to DeepSeek's AI models,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to speak about U.S. government information. The U.S. government's assessment of DeepSeek's activities and links to the Chinese government have not been previously reported and come amid a wide-scale U.S.-China trade war. Among the allegations, the official said DeepSeek is sharing user information and statistics with Beijing's surveillance apparatus. Chinese law requires companies operating in China to provide data to the government when requested. But the suggestion that DeepSeek is already doing so is likely to raise privacy and other concerns for the firm's tens of millions of daily global users. The U.S. also maintains restrictions on companies it believes are linked to China's military-industrial complex. U.S. lawmakers have previously said that DeepSeek, based on its privacy disclosure statements, transmits American users' data to China through 'backend infrastructure' connected to China Mobile, a Chinese state-owned telecommunications giant. DeepSeek did not respond to questions about its privacy practices. The company is also referenced more than 150 times in procurement records for China's People's Liberation Army and other entities affiliated with the Chinese defense industrial base, said the official, adding that DeepSeek had provided technology services to PLA research institutions. Reuters could not independently verify the procurement data. The official also said the company was employing workarounds to U.S. export controls to gain access to advanced U.S.-made chips. The U.S. conclusions reflect a growing skepticism in Washington that the capabilities behind the rapid rise of one of China's flagship AI enterprises may have been exaggerated and relied heavily on U.S. technology. DeepSeek has access to 'large volumes' of U.S. firm Nvidia's high-end H100 chips, said the official. Since 2022 those chips have been under U.S. export restrictions due to Washington's concerns that China could use them to advance its military capabilities or jump ahead in the AI race. 'DeepSeek sought to use shell companies in Southeast Asia to evade export controls, and DeepSeek is seeking to access data centers in Southeast Asia to remotely access U.S. chips,' the official said. The official declined to say if DeepSeek had successfully evaded export controls or offer further details about the shell companies. DeepSeek also did not respond to questions about its acquisition of Nvidia chips or the alleged use of shell companies. When asked if the U.S. would implement further export controls or sanctions against DeepSeek, the official said the department had 'nothing to announce at this time.' China's foreign ministry and commerce ministry did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. 'We do not support parties that have violated U.S. export controls or are on the U.S. entity lists,' an Nvidia spokesman said in a prepared statement, adding that 'with the current export controls, we are effectively out of the China data center market, which is now served only by competitors such as Huawei.' DeepSeek has said two of its AI models that Silicon Valley executives and U.S. tech company engineers have showered with praise – DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1 – are on par with OpenAI and Meta's most advanced models. AI experts, however, have expressed skepticism, arguing the true costs of training the models were likely much higher than the $5.58 million the startup said was spent on computing power. Reuters has previously reported that U.S. officials were investigating whether DeepSeek had access to restricted AI chips. DeepSeek has H100 chips that it procured after the U.S. banned Nvidia from selling those chips to China, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, adding that the number was far smaller than the 50,000 H100s that the CEO of another AI startup had claimed DeepSeek possesses in a January interview with CNBC. Reuters was unable to verify the number of H100 chips DeepSeek has. 'Our review indicates that DeepSeek used lawfully acquired H800 products, not H100,' an Nvidia spokesman said, responding to a Reuters query about DeepSeek's alleged usage of H100 chips. In February, Singapore charged three men with fraud in a case domestic media have linked to the movement of Nvidia's advanced chips from the city state to DeepSeek. China has also been suspected of finding ways to use advanced U.S. chips remotely. While importing advanced Nvidia chips into China without a license violates U.S. export rules, Chinese companies are still allowed to access those same chips remotely in data centers in non-restricted countries. The exceptions are when a Chinese company is on a U.S. trade blacklist or the chip exporter has knowledge that the Chinese firm is using its chips to help develop weapons of mass destruction. U.S. officials have not placed DeepSeek on any U.S. trade blacklists yet and have not alleged that Nvidia had any knowledge of DeepSeek's work with the Chinese military. Malaysia's trade ministry said last week that it was investigating whether an unnamed Chinese company in the country was using servers equipped with Nvidia chips for large language model training and that it was examining whether any domestic law or regulation had been breached.