
Badenoch: Scrap net zero windfall tax on oil companies
Kemi Badenoch will call for the windfall tax on North Sea oil and gas to be scrapped.
The Conservative leader will say that the energy profits levy (EPL) on oil and gas profits could no longer be justified, and there would be nothing 'left to tax' if it continued.
In her keynote speech to the Scottish Tory conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch will accuse Labour of ' killing' the industry.
She will also warn that thousands of North Sea workers will be made unemployed under Government plans to keep the levy in place until 2030.
Mrs Badenoch will say in her speech that this would also mean importing more oil and gas from overseas, before concluding: ' Labour must remove the energy profits levy.'
She is also expected to repeat her demand for Energy Secretary Ed Miliband to lift his ban on issuing new exploration licences, amid warnings that 1.5 billion barrels of oil could be left under the seabed.
Her intervention comes ahead of next year's Holyrood election, with the Tories trying to woo thousands of North Sea workers based workers in Aberdeen, the oil capital of Europe.
They are facing a strong challenge from Reform UK, which has lambasted Labour's green energy agenda.
Nigel Farage visited the city last week, and said that efforts to achieve net zero were 'complete and utter madness'.
The windfall tax was first proposed by Labour in opposition, but was adopted by the Conservative government under Rishi Sunak in 2022 in response to the surge in oil and gas prices caused by the Ukraine conflict.
Mr Sunak initially said it would only remain in place while the windfalls lasted. However, he – and then Labour – subsequently decided to retain it, even though oil prices have fallen from a peak of $139 a barrel to about $70 now.
The EPL is currently a 38 per cent levy on top of existing taxes, bringing the effective headline rate for oil and gas producers to 78 per cent.
The North Sea transition taskforce, backed by the British Chambers of Commerce, warned in March that this was ' throttling' investment.
Analysts Stifel estimated that the 'self-defeating' tax will cost the Treasury £3 billion in tax receipts between 2025 and 2030.
Harbour Energy, the UK's largest independent oil and gas producer, announced 250 job cuts in Aberdeen last month. The firm blamed regulation and the Chancellor's 'punitive fiscal position'.
Mrs Badenoch admitted during last year's Tory leadership contest that her party's decision to extend the tax had been a ' mistake '.
However, she is expected to go further during her first speech to the Scottish Tory conference as UK leader by calling for the EPL to be scrapped immediately.
She will say: 'When the oil and gas windfall tax, the energy profits levy, was brought in, the oil price was near a historic high, at the exact time as energy bills for the British people were sky-rocketing.
'But there is no longer a windfall to tax. It has long gone. And the longer this regressive tax on one of our most successful industries remains, the more damaging it becomes.
'Labour have extended and increased this tax. They are killing this industry. And, frankly, if it is allowed to remain in place until 2030, as is Labour's current plan, there will be no industry left to tax.'
She is expected to conclude: 'Thousands will have been made unemployed, and all while we import more gas from overseas – from the very same basin in which we are banned from drilling. So today I say enough.'
Mrs Badenoch said Labour must 'speed up the process of replacing it with a system that rewards success and incentivises investment.'
The Tory leader will argue that the Government should instead 'champion our own industry' by overturning bans on further exploration, and supporting oil and gas technology exports.
'We must let this great British, great Scottish, industry thrive, grow and create jobs – ensuring our energy security for generations to come, driving growth and making this country richer in the process,' she is to say.
'Scotland at the heart of our energy future for the next generation as it has for the last.'
'A just transition'
Dame Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, said: 'The Tories are on the side of oil and gas giants rather than working Scots, but Scottish Labour will work with the UK Government and use devolved powers to deliver a just transition for the industry.
'With Kemi Badenoch desperately attempting to rally the few remaining Scottish Tories, it seems like it won't be long until they can fit all of their MSPs in a single taxi.'
Gillian Martin, the SNP Energy Secretary, said: 'The Scottish Government is clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with climate change commitments and energy security.
'We are deeply concerned at recent announcements of planned job losses in the North East and have called on the UK Government for the earliest possible end to the Energy Profits Levy (EPL) – which was supposed to be a temporary measure.
'We also continue to call on the UK Government to approach decisions on licensing and consenting for North Sea oil and gas projects on a rigorously evidence-led, case by case, basis – with climate compatibility and energy security as key considerations.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Now ban the IRGC, Labour MPs tell Starmer
Sir Keir Starmer must now ban Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) after proscribing Palestine Action, Labour MPs have demanded. The Government announced it will list Palestine Action as a terrorist group after its activists breached security at an air base on Friday and damaged two RAF planes. Labour backbenchers are now calling on the Prime Minister to take the same approach towards the IRGC as Iran's war with Israel entered its second week. Initially founded as an ideological custodian of Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, the IRGC has since become a major military, economic and political force. Labour called for the IRGC to be proscribed while it was in opposition, but has failed to commit to the move almost a year on from winning the election. Luke Akehurst, the Labour MP for North Durham, said: 'I thoroughly welcome the move to proscribe Palestine Action after their violent attacks on defence companies and, most alarmingly, on RAF Brize Norton. 'It's now urgent, given the conflict in Iran, that the Government moves to proscribe the IRGC, which is a terrorist organisation that represents a significant threat, including here in the UK.' Charlotte Nichols, the Labour MP for Warrington North, added: 'As much as I have no time for Palestine Action, it's quite clear who the bigger threat to our national security is. 'They should have done it a long time ago, but the second-best time is now.' The IRGC is openly supportive of the Iranian proxy groups Hamas and Hezbollah, both of which have been proscribed by the UK Government. Like Hamas and Hezbollah, it has a hardline Islamist ideology. The IRGC has also publicly stated its ambition to seize all Palestinian territories and Jerusalem from Israel. On Saturday, Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, also threw his weight behind calls to proscribe the organisation. Mr Farage told The Telegraph: 'The Iranian regime has clearly been funding propaganda hubs and promoting terror throughout the UK. 'It's high time action was taken by the Government to safeguard our institutions and communities from Iranian influence. The Government must finally proscribe the IRGC.' Palestine Action is a direct action group that has conducted a campaign of vandalism and trespass against companies and property it claims are linked to 'Zionism' since the Oct 7 massacre of Israeli civilians by Hamas. The group was founded in 2020 and has targeted an Israeli-owned arms company as well as a number of universities. It claimed responsibility on Friday after two vandals broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire, spraying red paint into the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft. The attack is being investigated by counter-terror police. Proscription will mean that assets and money can be seized from Palestine Action, something that supporters of a ban on the IRGC argue would help efforts to fight Islamist ideology and terror plots on British soil. The Israeli military said on Saturday that it had killed a second commander of the IRGC's overseas arm during a precision strike on his vehicle in western Tehran.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Reform on course to win next election with over a third of voters backing Nigel Farage, bombshell new poll reveals
REFORM are on track to win the next election, according to a new poll. More than a third of voters said they will support Nigel Farage's party, as reported by the Telegraph. Figures revealed 34 per cent of poll takers voted for Reform, ahead of 25 per cent who were in favour of Labour. It also emerged only 15 per cent of users elected the Conservatives. This marks the biggest breakthrough for Reform in a poll and in response Mr Farage told The Telegraph: 'This poll shows Reform can and will win the next general election.' The news outlet estimated if the poll was taken in four years time, Farage would win more than 400 seats and a majority. It could see the party leader win his place as the UK's next Prime Minister. The research also suggested Labour would lose around 270 seats, while the Conservatives would have less than 10. Despite the stats, it is important to bare in mind opinion polls and seat numbers are very hard to correlate. A Reform UK source said: 'This is big Reform majority territory.' Meanwhile, Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK politics at Ipsos, said: 'The last year has indeed been a long time in politics, with our first voting intention poll since the election showing just how much the political landscape has transformed since then. 'Reform UK has continued to build on its success, helped by high levels of enthusiasm among its own support and among working class voters in particular, and taking votes from both Labour and especially the Conservatives, who show little sign of recovery.' He added: 'The disappointment with Labour is clear, even among those who voted for the party in 2024. "We know from Ipsos research how difficult it has been to shift entrenched public pessimism over the cost of living, immigration, and the state of public services, and so far, Britons do not think Labour is delivering the tangible change they were hoping for in 2024. "This is reflected in satisfaction ratings for the government and Prime Minister that - while not quite the worst Ipsos has ever seen - are well below the average we usually see coming up to a one year anniversary. "Indeed, they look remarkably similar to the poor ratings received by Gordon Brown in 2008 after the financial crash. Labour will be hoping that the Spending Review will start to switch the narrative to a more positive one of renewal, but the challenge they face is significant. "This research also marks a new methodological approach for Ipsos, using our online KnowledgePanel based on gold-standard random probability sampling, and other changes we have made since the general election. "As with any individual survey it is important to remember that margins of error apply, and results should be interpreted in the round along with other sources of data. "As always, Ipsos will continue to review this new approach, and may make further refinements in the future if necessary." 1 is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.


Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
'I didn't sleep. It was constant. I could turn the notifications off, but they were still there'
'I didn't sleep. It was constant. I could turn the notifications off, but they were still there' Welsh MP Alex Davies-Jones has spoken out about being harassed and threatened in a bid to help others Pontypridd MP Alex Davies-Jones was the victim of harassment (Image: Alex Davies-Jones ) Just over two weeks ago, Alex Davies-Jones stepped into a courtroom at Cardiff Magistrates' court. An MP, and government minister, she is used to speaking in formal settings, but this was different, because she was asked to place her hand on a bible, give an oath, and then give evidence to a courtroom as a victim of harassment. Switching the Commons for a witness box was something the UK Government's victim minister didn't want to do, but after a number of incidents she had endured, she felt it was important to do, for herself, for colleagues, for others who one day might enter politics. She was out campaigning in Treforest in Rhondda Cynon Taf, on June 26, just a few days before the general election when she saw two people waiting at the place she was due to meet campaigners. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Before that day - as with many of her colleagues - her office had been targeted with protests held outside, posters stuck to the walls but she also knew leaflets were being posted around the constituency about her. "They were quite insulting and just not very nice, for want of a better description, accusing me of genocide and accusing me of things that weren't true and it was hard to see that," the Labour MP said. After the October 7 attacks on Israel, protests stepped up, and ahead of votes in the UK Parliament there was co-ordinated action by campaign groups but she says that became "sustained" once the general election was called. Article continues below Before this, there has been online or email abuse, but this was the first in-person incident she had experienced, which felt more acute as it was in her constituency. "The vast majority of abuse or threats you have to are not necessarily from real people or they don't seem to be real people because they're online," she said. "The day it happened we had scheduled our campaigning sessions in advance and this was the last one of the day, and it had been published on the Labour Party website where we were going to be for Labour members to join. "I was with a group of about five or six members and more were joining. We met up at the meeting point and they were there, both of them, at the meeting point. They had put up posters on the lampposts surrounding where we were meeting at Hoffi Coffi in Treforest and were handing out the leaflets that I had seen previously about myself so I knew what it was. "I thought there's two things I can do here, I can either try and engage and try and be the grown up and speak to them about potentially de-escalating it and get them to chat to me about this because they tend to be very passionate, or I can just walk away and ignore them. "I made the decision to to go up to them and try and speak to them." Asked if she regretted that now, she said no. "No, I don't, because I still think that trying to engage with people is always better, especially in person. "I immediately realised that one of them was filming the interaction so I was obviously very careful of my actions and what I was saying and was aware that it was being filmed. I tried to engage in a conversation, I tried to explain to them that they were wrong, that I hadn't abstained on the ceasefire vote because I wasn't even in the country at that time. "I tried to articulate all of the action I had taken to support conflict free resolutions in the Middle East, the work I'd done to support Palestinian women who had allegedly been raped by IDF soldiers, the work I've been doing support Jewish women who'd been raped on October 7. I pointed them to debates that I've spoken in Parliament, and I was like talking about what I had been doing in terms of diplomatic work. "It was clear that they didn't agree with me, and it was clear that it wasn't going to be resolved. So I said, look, 'we'll stop it there'. "We walked away from where we were due to be campaigning, and then they started following us down the street. "The interaction was getting more inflammatory, more aggressive, more frustrated, I suppose from their point of view, because they weren't getting what they wanted out of me necessarily. So they started following us down the street. It was awful, it was scary. They were shouting, 'Do you support genocide' and 'You're responsible for murder'. All of this was being screamed down the street as we were walking down the street. They were continuing to hand out leaflets to people as they were passing and screaming this to us. "We tried to get away from them, so we took a different route," she said. Ayeshah Behit leaving Cardiff Magistrates Court after being convicted of harassing Labour MP Alex Davies-Jones (Image: PA ) As they began knocking on doors in a different area, the pair - Ayeshah Behit and Hiba Ahmed - found them. "Every door we were knocking, they were then knocking and speaking to the people about why I was a genocidal baby killer. "It was just awful and I felt responsibility to my team, to my volunteers. I had quite a number of young volunteers never done this before that have been campaigning, and I didn't want them to be exposed to risk." She cancelled the session. "I think if that had been it, I would have said 'it was awful, but it's sadly part and parcel of being an elected representative or standing for an election. People have the right to speak to you and disagree with you'," she said. But that night, she said her office was defaced with stickers, which were highly adhesive and ripped the paintwork off. They were also put on local bus stops, local landmarks, monuments saying she supported genocide and was a "murderer". The Pontypridd MP continues: "Then they posted footage of the interaction that we had in person on social media but they did it in a way that was manipulated. They didn't put our full conversation on but amplified it, made it look like I was lying and that hurt me more than anything because people can say I'm many things, you can disagree with me, but I am not a liar. That really, really got to me because then that was when the huge amount of abuse started, because they incited a pile on for people to contact me, and it was relentless." As a candidate, she felt she couldn't withdraw from social media. "I didn't sleep. It was constant. I could turn the notifications off, but they were still there. I was doing a general election campaign and social media at that moment is key in terms of engaging with local voters and it was it was a bombardment which became terrifying because the escalation of abuse was awful." She has a young family, who has she spoken about publicly, but she said what didn't come out during the court case was that the pair broke bail conditions by emailing her. "One of the emails that was sent to me did make reference to the fact that I have a child and that really scared me because the words were used were 'I know you have a son ' and the way it was conveyed and it was really scary," she said. Hiba Ahmed, 26, (centre), leaving Cardiff Magistrates Court after being convicted of harassing Labour MP Alex Davies-Jones (Image: PA ) "It's really hard because I have chosen to be open and honest about my personal life because I think my personal experiences of being a mother going through IVF, having pre-cervical cancer, going through all the difficulties I have done, some of my colleagues have chosen not to open themselves up and not appear more human because of the risk that the more you open yourself up, the more then you become a target to potential attacks," she said. For the year before her case reached court, she said it was "hanging over me". "You know it's coming. and you psyche yourself up for it. You prepare yourself to go through that process. "I think about it all the time and now, I think about how will my interactions in public with constituents or whoever, what will that be like now? And I do feel like sadly, politics has become a lot more inflamed in recent years. "That's why it's also really important to humanise this, because people think we're just these people on screen or doing things rather than actually real human beings and that's why it's important to humanise this but then that does make me feel conscious of activity when out and about." All MPs have enhanced security offered to them after the killing of Sir David Amess. "I would say it is a different level of threat being a female MP because my male colleagues aren't necessarily subject to the misogynistic abuse that we are, which is more sustained. Research shows we are more prone to abuse compared to male colleagues and I would stress BME MPs are even more open to abuse." The risk factors into her day-to-day decisions. "Every time you plan to do something in person then you have to think about the safety implications. I'm not just responsible for myself. I'm responsible for my team. I'm responsible to whoever else may be coming to an event. I'm responsible for my family if they with me at an event, so you have to be aware and I think that's only responsible to do that of what security implications might mean about advertising your attendance something in advance, or opening something up to everyone to attend, or going to something that could be deemed to be controversial. "There's two sides of this. I've had a lot of praise and thanks from colleagues for pursuing the case because they have said thank you for being brave, because it's important that people realise that this is unacceptable and this did cross that threshold of holding your Member of Parliament to account and harassment and that's what the judge found in the case. "But then there's also the other side of this that I don't want what has happened to me and the normalisation of abusive of elected politicians to put anyone off from doing this job either. I have that responsibility to the next group of MPs coming forward, male or female, because this is still the best job in the world and I don't want that to influence anybody's decision into 'Gosh, this is awful. Why would anyone do that?' However, she does believe her experience of being a victim and having giving evidence in court will shape her experiences. "Now I've got that lived experience of having gone through it all, waiting for the trial to get to court, having been through the witness liaison officer scheme, speaking to police, the different agencies, being treated as a witness in court, giving evidence while your perpetrators in the dock and how that is all played out. "I have that experience now, which has helped me in terms of looking at, 'well, how can I make this experience better for victims and survivors?'. UK Government victims' minister Alex Davies-Jones has spoken about her own experiences of appearing in court (Image: Alex Davies-Jones ) "Ultimately, I don't want to diminish my case in any way, harassment happens to to individuals every day and it is awful and it is terrible, but also there are a number of victims and survivors all waiting years for their trial." She said she wants victims to be at the heart of the system. "One of the things I'm responsible for is the victims code, we are looking at how we give more power to the victims commissioner, so that they're able to hold agencies to account in our Bills coming forward and all of this is now feeding that work and giving me that perspective I didn't have before." Ms Davies-Jones said it has shaped her wanting to make sure victims can "take part in the justice system and do so safely and make them feel like they're able to represent the best version of themselves, so that we have an opportunity for justice to be heard in a courtroom" "Is there more we can do to make sure that victims actually stay engaged in the in the criminal justice system? Because we know court backlogs are so long, and we know that it can be quite difficult and traumatising to actually revisit that crime or your perpetrator in court," she said. There was a protest outside the court on that day, and protestors came to fill the public gallery. The courtroom had to be moved three times to accommodate all interested parties. "I just wanted to tell the truth, and I wanted to explain how all of this had happened. What's happening in Gaza is horrific. It's intolerable. It's awful and likewise, what happened on October 7 and the hostages still being held is awful and for people to think that I am in support of genocide or of murdering children is is it just terrible. I wanted to put that over that of course, that isn't the case. "We can have a difference of opinion about how you approach things and politics and policies but there is a line and when that line is crossed, then the action should be taken." Article continues below