PN calls for review of Article 121

PN chief whip Takiyuddin Hassan said judicial independence is the foundation of a mature democracy. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA : Perikatan Nasional (PN) has recommended that Article 121 of the Federal Constitution be reviewed with the aim of restoring the judiciary's original powers as a co-equal branch of government.
In a statement, PN chief whip Takiyuddin Hassan said judicial independence was the foundation of a mature democracy.
'Malaysians have a right to a legal system that functions 'without fear or favour' – one that is firm, fair, and independent.
'The decisions made now will shape public trust in the judiciary for decades to come,' he said, adding that the judiciary should be protected from any form of interference.
Before 1988, the constitution stated that judicial power was vested in the High Court of Malaya and the High Court of Sabah and Sarawak.
However, an amendment made during the tenure of former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad said the jurisdiction and power of the court 'may be conferred by or under federal law'.
Takiyuddin, a lawyer by training, also called for the Judicial Appointments Commission to be given full autonomy to carry out its duties without political pressure, especially from the executive branch.
He said that recommended candidates must be chosen based on merit, integrity, and seniority, not political affiliations or preferences.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Borneo Post

an hour ago

• Borneo Post

1,015 honoured in Sabah awards

KOTA KINABALU (June 20): A total of 1,015 people are conferred awards in conjunction with Yang di-Pertua Negeri Tun Musa Aman's 74th official birthday. Four are given the highest state award while 78 receive the second highest state award. Leading the list was Policy Advisory Committee to the Prime Minister member Dato Ahmad Fuad Md Ali, who was conferred the 'Seri Panglima Darjah Kinabalu' (SPDK), which carries the 'Datuk Seri Panglima' title. Three other people who received the SPDK award were State Rural Development Minister Datuk Jahid Jahim, Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail and businessman Datuk Lim Yu Ming. Meanwhile, 78 people have been given the 'Panglima Gemilang Darjah Kinabalu' (PGDK) award, which carries the 'Datuk' title, including Deputy Tourism, Arts and Culture Minister Khairul Firdaus Akbar Khan and Deputy Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister Dr Fuziah Salleh, Kapayan assemblywoman Jannie Lasimbang and Pantai Manis assemblyman Mohd Tamin Zainal. In addition, the PGDK award was conferred to Senator Anna Bell Perian, Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) vice president Chong Pit Fah, National Trust Party (Amanah) Sabah chairman Lahirul Latigu and Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) youth chief Christopher Mandut. Also receiving the PGDK were Sabah Electricity chief executive officer IR Mohd Yaakob Jaafar, State Health director Dr Maria Suleiman, Sabah Parks director Maklarin Lakim, Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) president Datuk Joehari Ayub Aman and High Court judge Alexander Siew How Wai. For the third highest award, the 'Ahli Setia Darjah Kinabalu', a hundred people were listed, including former state Unduk Ngadau winners Daphne Iking and Dolly Jimayol, Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah (Gagasan Rakyat) Petagas chief Mohd Isquzawan Israq Arsit and Sabah Masters Athletic Association (Samas) president Ramjit Nairulal. There are 181 recipients of the 'Ahli Darjah Kinabalu' award, while 248 have been given the 'Bintang Setia Kinabalu' award, including state footballer Ronny Harun. A total of 109 people will be receiving the Commendable Service Award. As for the Justice of People (JP) title, ten people were conferred, including Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Sabah chief Datuk Karunanithy Y Subbiah, SMJ Energy Sdn Bhd board non-executive director Datuk Mohd Sofian Alfian Nair and Society of Hope Sabah president Josephine Hadikusumo.

The Star

an hour ago

• The Star

Najib's DNAA: Material documents unavailable because held up in 1MDB trial, says AGC

PETALING JAYA: All aspects will be examined and considered before taking any further action on the temporary discharge of Datuk Seri Najib Razak three counts of money laundering involving RM27mil linked to SRC International Sdn Bhd, says the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC). The AGC said there were some documents which were material for the current SRC International trial, and the prosecution had no choice but to wait until the relevant material documents were obtained after the 1MDB trial proceedings were completed. "It should be emphasised that the material documents are already available but are being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial," the AGC said in a statement on Friday (June 20). "The prosecution has requested time to gather all relevant material documents to be presented as evidence and testimony in the second SRC trial. This delay is not intentional but is to ensure that the integrity of the documents as evidence in the trial is always maintained. "The department is aware that this case has attracted public attention as it involves the former prime minister of Malaysia and throughout the proceedings before the Court, the department has taken action in accordance with the limits of the independence of the prosecution and the legal process. "The case was registered at the High Court on Feb 7, 2019 and has been set for trial five times in June 2020, July to August 2021, March to April 2022, September 2024 and April and May 2025." It said all trial dates of the case have been postponed for the following reasons: (i) Movement control order due to the Covid-19 pandemic; (ii) Application by the accused's counsel; or (iii) The prosecution's own application. The application for adjournment made by the prosecution is because (i) The trial proceedings of the first SRC case were still ongoing at that time at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court levels until fully completed on March 31, 2023; (ii) At the same time, the 1MDB trial proceedings had also begun while the first SRC case was still pending. Both cases above involved the use of some of the material documents that would be used in the second SRC trial. "This department emphasises that the allegations by certain parties that this department carries out "defective prosecution" are completely unfounded. This department always maintains the highest level and quality in line with the expectations of the people. "This department remains committed to upholding the rule of law and will continue to carry out its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for the judicial process," it said. Earlier, Judge K Muniandy allowed the defence's application for a DNAA over three money laundering charges involving RM27mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd, citing the prosecution's lack of preparedness to proceed with the trial, which has been postponed numerous times since 2019. The court was informed that the prosecution had yet to obtain the necessary documentary evidence. The delay, the judge noted, had denied the accused the right to a fair and timely resolution of the case. A DNAA means the accused is temporarily discharged from the charges but may still be prosecuted for the same offences in the future if the prosecution so decides.

New Straits Times

2 hours ago

• New Straits Times

Cuepacs supports gag order but urges fair implementation

KUALA LUMPUR: There has been a rise in public statements on social media that occasionally distort facts, misrepresent government decisions, or damage the image of public servants and the government as a whole, said Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services (Cuepacs) president Datuk Dr Adnan Mat. As such, the government's circular issued yesterday, prohibiting public servants from making any public statements, whether orally or in writing, that could undermine government policies, plans, or decisions on any issue, serves as a reminder of existing regulations. "We view this directive as an important measure to uphold the professionalism, integrity, and accountability of public servants, especially in an era of rapidly evolving digital communication. "There has been a proliferation of provocative, misleading, or incomplete content shared publicly, which may erode public trust in government policies and direction. "Thus, this circular is seen as a proactive step to address these issues and safeguard the reputation of the public service," he told the New Straits Times. He said the circular published yesterday must also be implemented fairly, transparently, and in accordance with due process, without suppressing the right of public servants to voice their concerns through formal and internal mechanisms. He said that addressing the matter with feedback and constructive dialogue was essential, through proper internal channels. "Cuepacs is also concerned about the growing trend of public servants engaging in live streaming during working hours, with content that does not reflect the ethics and professionalism expected in the public service. "Such actions create negative public perceptions and risk further tarnishing the image of Malaysia's civil service, whose primary responsibility is to deliver quality services to the people," Adnan said. However, National Council of Professors president Emeritus Professor Datuk Dr Raduan Che Rose voiced concern that the circular risks undermining open, constructive policy debate, especially on platforms where scholars contribute alternative ideas to improve governance. He recommended that the directive be retracted or revised with clear safeguards. "The council recommends that the directive be revised to distinguish between political commentary and academic or professional policy input, accompanied by guidelines on what constitutes 'undermining' versus 'constructive criticism', and align it with international best practices that uphold professional neutrality while allowing civil servants to contribute meaningfully to public discourse," he said. Raduan said that if scholars fear consequences for honest analysis, it may result in the erosion of public trust in academic institutions, stifle intellectual innovation, and lead to a lack of checks and balances from the civil service itself. "Article 10 of the Federal Constitution includes the right to engage in critical inquiry, research, and evidence-based policy discourse, even when such views challenge prevailing government narratives. "A vague or broadly worded prohibition invites selective enforcement and may infringe constitutional rights," he said. Nonetheless, Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) commissioner Ragunath Kesavan did not flag any constitutional violations. "As an employee, there is a general duty to maintain confidentiality and not to injure the reputation of the employer," he said. However, he added that the circular does not absolve civil servants of their responsibility to report wrongdoings, criminal acts, dishonesty, or abuse. "By law, there is a duty to report any purported criminal offence. Not doing so is, in itself, an offence. "Civil servants must be cautious and vigilant to ensure that they carry out their duties diligently and lawfully. The circular does not apply to cover up wrongdoing," he cautioned, referring to all offences under Malaysian law, including corruption. Yesterday, the government issued a circular titled 'Prohibition on Making Public Statements Under Subregulation 19(1) of the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 (P.U. (A) 395/1993)', dated June 19, 2025, and signed by Public Service Department (PSD) director-general Tan Sri Wan Ahmad Dahlan Abdul Aziz.