US Health Secretary RFK Jr Fires Entire Vaccine Advisory Panel

Washington:
US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday announced he was dismissing all current members of a key federal vaccine advisory panel, accusing them of conflicts of interest -- his latest salvo against the nation's immunisation policies.
The removal of all 17 experts of the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP) was revealed in a Wall Street Journal op-ed and an official press release.
Kennedy, who has spent two decades promoting vaccine misinformation, cast the move as essential to restoring public trust, claiming the committee had been compromised by financial ties to pharmaceutical companies.
"Today we are prioritising the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," he said in a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services.
"The public must know that unbiased science -- evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest-- guides the recommendations of our health agencies."
In his op-ed, Kennedy claimed the panel was "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest" and had become "little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine."
He added that new members were being considered to replace those ousted -- all of whom were appointed under former president Joe Biden.
ACIP members are chosen for their recognised expertise and are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest.
"RFK Jr. and the Trump administration are taking a wrecking ball to the programs that keep Americans safe and healthy," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said in response.
"Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion," Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, a medical doctor who expressed concern about Kennedy's track record during his Senate nomination but ultimately voted in his favour, wrote on X.
"I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case."
'Silencing Expertise'
The decision drew sharp criticism from Paul Offit, a paediatrician and leading expert on virology and immunology who served on the panel from 1998 to 2003.
"He believes that anybody who speaks well of vaccines, or recommends vaccines, must be deeply in the pocket of industry," Offit told AFP. "He's fixing a problem that doesn't exist."
"We are witnessing an escalating effort by the Administration to silence independent medical expertise and stoke distrust in lifesaving vaccines," added Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Paediatrics, in a statement.
Once a celebrated environmental lawyer, Kennedy pivoted from the mid-2000s to public health -- chairing a nonprofit that discouraged routine childhood immunisations and amplified false claims, including the long-debunked theory that the Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism.
Since taking office, he has curtailed access to COVID-19 shots and continued to raise fears around the MMR vaccine -- even as the United States faces its worst measles outbreak in years, with three reported deaths and more than 1,100 confirmed cases.
Experts warn the true case count is likely far higher.
"How can this country have confidence that the people RFK Jr. wants on the Advisory Committee for Immunisation Practices are people we can trust?" Offit asked.
He recalled that during US President Donald Trump's first term, several states formed independent vaccine advisory panels after the administration pressured federal health agencies to prematurely approve COVID-19 vaccines ahead of the 2020 election.
That kind of fragmentation, Offit warned, could happen again.
ACIP is scheduled to hold its next meeting at the headquarters of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta from June 25 to June 27.
Vaccines for anthrax, COVID-19, human papillomavirus, influenza, Lyme disease, respiratory syncytial virus, and more are on the agenda.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

an hour ago

• News18

'Criminal Behaviour': Iran's FM Says US Strikes On Nuke Sites Will Have 'Everlasting Consequences'

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran reserved all options for legitimate self-defence and condemned the "criminal behaviour" of the United States. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, warning that such 'criminal behaviour" will have 'everlasting consequences" and that Tehran reserves all options to retaliate. 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations," he said on X. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour," said Araghchi in his message. The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting… — Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) June 22, 2025 The Iranian minister warned that Iran 'reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people" as per the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, hinting at a possible retaliation for the US attacks. Araghchi's remarks came after Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei gave a stark warning, saying, 'Americans should expect greater damage and blows than ever before." He said Iran's three main nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated", and hailed the strikes as a 'spectacular military success." He warned of further strikes in Iran if the country did not make peace. A report by the Jerusalem Post claimed initial assessment of officials was that the Fordow nuclear facility, which was attacked by US GBU-57 ' bunker buster" bombs, has been 'completely destroyed". However, Iran's Atomic Energy Commission said there were no signs of radioactive contamination, reassuring the public that the US strikes had shown no radiation leaks. It condemned the US strikes as 'barbaric" and in violation of international law, saying Iran's nuclear programme will not be halted. First Published:

Deccan Herald

an hour ago

• Deccan Herald

Republican lawmakers cheer strike on Iran as top democrats condemn it

To those concerned about U.S. involvement— this isn't a 'forever war' in fact, it's ending one. @POTUS was clear: Iran must never have a nuclear weapon. The Republican-led @SenateGOP trusts President Trump to keep America safe, free, and prosperous. Peace through strength. — Markwayne Mullin (@SenMullin) June 22, 2025 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 — John Fetterman (@JohnFetterman) June 22, 2025

The Hindu

2 hours ago

• The Hindu

Trump ignites debate on Presidential authority with Iran strikes and wins praise from Republicans

U.S. President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Mr. Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. 'Well done, President Trump,' Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on X. Alabama Sen. Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical.' The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate — and correct — decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.' The instant divisions in the U.S. Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorization from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first U.S. president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Democrats, and a few Republicans, said the strikes were unconstitutional, and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson. Also Read | Donald Trump says Iran nuclear sites 'obliterated,' threatens more strikes 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity.' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said that Mr. Trump 'misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' Follow the Israel-Iran conflict LIVE updates The quick GOP endorsements of stepped-up U.S. involvement in Iran came after Mr. Trump publicly considered the strikes for days, and many congressional Republicans had cautiously said they thought he would make the right decision. The party's schism over Iran could complicate the GOP's efforts to boost Pentagon spending as part of a $350 billion national security package in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax breaks bill, which is speeding toward votes next week. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies,' Wicker posted on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both were briefed ahead of the strikes on Saturday, according to people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. Mr. Thune said Saturday evening that 'as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Mr. Johnson said in a statement that the military operations 'should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says.' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., said he had also been in touch with the White House and 'I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes." Breaking from many of his Democratic colleagues, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, also praised the attacks on Iran. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' he posted. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.' Both parties have seen splits in recent days over the prospect of striking Iran, including some of Trump's most ardent supporters who share his criticism of America's 'forever wars.' Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio posted that 'while President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional." Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a longtime opponent of U.S. involvement in foreign wars, also posted on X that 'This is not Constitutional.' 'This is not our fight,' said Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Most Democrats have maintained that Congress should have a say, even as presidents in both parties have ignored the legislative branch's constitutional authority. The Senate was scheduled to vote soon on a resolution from Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine that would require congressional approval before the U.S. declares war on Iran or takes specific military action. Mr. Kaine said the bombings were 'horrible judgment." 'I will push for all senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war,' Mr. Kaine said. Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, the chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, also called on Congress to immediately pass a war powers resolution. He said politicians had always promised that 'new wars in the Middle East would be quick and easy.' 'Then they sent other people's children to fight and die endlessly,' Mr. Casar said. "Enough.'