What Is A Labubu? Viral Toy Dominates TikTok As Craze Drives Prices Into The Thousands
Labubus, plush monster dolls with razor-sharp teeth and mischievous smiles, are the latest product to go viral on TikTok, where obsessed consumers are racking up millions of views showing off their collections as re-sellers charge astronomical prices online for the frequently out-of-stock toys.
Labubus are small monster-like toys inspired by Nordic mythology sold by Chinese retailer Pop Mart, which typically sell for between $20 and $30 and come in 'blind boxes,' so the buyer doesn't know what color or design the doll has until the box is opened.
The collectability and the unpredictable nature of 'blind boxes' have contributed to the toy's meteoric rise on TikTok, where users show off which doll they've unboxed and strive to find the 'secret' Labubu, a rare version of the toy that consumers have a 1-in-72 chance of unboxing.
The hashtag #labubu has been used in 32,000 TikTok posts over the past week in the United States alone and in more than 1 million posts overall, according to TikTok analytics.
Labubus can be difficult to get hold of: Much of the supply is completely sold out on the Pop Mart website, and the few Pop Mart locations in the United States have seen lengthy lines.
Celebrities and influencers have boosted the Labubu trend online, as singers Rihanna and Dua Lipa have been spotted wearing them, as well as members of the K-pop group Blackpink, which helped spark the toy's craze in Asia.
Re-sellers have taken advantage of the Labubu craze, jacking up the price many times over on online re-selling platforms. Some of the most expensive Labubu toys on eBay are being sold for thousands of dollars, with some as high as $7,000 for limited edition versions of the doll. On StockX, where users can place bids on items, some Labubu editions, like a doll sold in partnership with Vans, are selling for more than $3,000 for a single toy. The scene at Pop Mart stores can also be chaotic, as some TikTok users have posted videos depicting customers brawling and yelling at one another over the viral toys. One user posted a video describing what she called the 'Labubu Hunger Games,' in which she arrived at a California mall early in the morning to catch a Labubu product release. In the video, the user was one of the first to line up, where early arrivals were given numbers to keep order in the line, though some people yelled at one another as some people allegedly cut the line.
The Labubu toy was designed by artist Kasing Lung, who is based in Hong Kong but was born in the Netherlands. He took inspiration from Nordic mythology to design the characters, which first debuted in a picture book, 'The Monsters Trilogy,' in 2015. Lung struck a licensing deal with Pop Mart in 2019, through which his designs were transformed into collectible toys.
At least 462 Labubu toys have been confiscated by customs authorities in China as sellers smuggle them into the country, CNN reported last week. Labubu toys are also selling out fast in China, and authorities confiscated the toys because they were intended 'for profit by resale.'
Labubu toys are just the latest product to take over TikTok, much like Stanley cups, which went viral last year. Like Labubus, voracious Stanley consumers lined up outside stores in anticipation of new cup releases, and some have been filmed getting into brawls with one another. The Stanley craze has inspired wild behavior, like one woman who stole more than $2,500 worth of the viral cups in January 2024, and other scammers who have tried selling knockoffs as the real thing.
As with the Stanley cup trend, some TikTok users have criticized the Labubu trend as an example of overconsumption. In one TikTok video liked nearly 250,000 times, a user criticized people for purchasing Labubus in bulk and buying from resellers as participating in overconsumption, alleging they wouldn't like the dolls if they weren't popular. In another video liked 350,000 times, a user urged people to 'be original,' stating: 'I genuinely don't believe that you people like that. You're only buying it because other people are buying it.'
These toys are so hot that Chinese customs agents have seized hundreds of them in recent weeks (CNN)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Franklin County home listings asked for more money in May - see the current median price here
The median home in Franklin County listed for $364,900 in May, up 1.2% from the previous month's $360,720, an analysis of data from shows. Compared to May 2024, the median home list price increased 13.2% from $324,723. The statistics in this article only pertain to houses listed for sale in Franklin County, not houses that were sold. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Franklin County's median home was 1,968 square feet, listed at $183 per square foot. The price per square foot of homes for sale is up 2.2% from May 2024. Listings in Franklin County moved briskly, at a median 36 days listed compared to the May national median of 51 days on the market. In the previous month, homes had a median of 38 days on the market. Around 196 homes were newly listed on the market in May, a 7.7% increase from 182 new listings in May 2024. The median home prices issued by may exclude many, or even most, of a market's homes. The price and volume represent only single-family homes, condominiums or townhomes. They include existing homes, but exclude most new construction as well as pending and contingent sales. In Pennsylvania, median home prices were $325,000, a slight increase from April. The median Pennsylvania home listed for sale had 1,708 square feet, with a price of $196 per square foot. Throughout the United States, the median home price was $440,000, a slight increase from the month prior. The median American home for sale was listed at 1,840 square feet, with a price of $234 per square foot. The median home list price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. Experts say the median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average list price, which would mean taking the sum of all listing prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high price. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on Chambersburg Public Opinion: Franklin County home listings asked for more money in May - see the current median price here
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Materialists' Totally Set Dakota Johnson's Character for Up Failure and You Can't Convince Us Otherwise
Materialists poses the question of whether or not we should be going for love or for money and the choice Dakota Johnson's character makes has people on internet divided The film also stars Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans Materialists is in theaters nowMovies have long wanted to convince us that we should be marrying for love. From The Notebook to Titanic, films have always suggested that women should follow their hearts and go for the sweet charmer with no money instead of the well-established gentleman who has financial stability. (Granted, Billy Zane's character in Titanic was awful, but stay with me here.) Well, Materialists has repurposed that trope once again, and the internet is seething. The film follows Lucy (played by Dakota Johnson), a successful matchmaker who has managed to find love for everyone except for herself. Her skills are immediately tested when she finds herself in a love triangle with Harry (played by Pedro Pascal), a successful billionaire who errs on the side of superficiality but is offering her the world, vs. John (played by Chris Evans), her ex-boyfriend, who offers her lots of love and affection, but works from gig to gig while trying to get an acting career off the ground. The film takes us through all the hijinks of a romcom as both men have their pros and cons and try to woo her. In the end, Lucy goes for John, the broke boy who loves her dearly, but can't provide her with the lifestyle she always dreamed of. And while the internet is upset over the fact that Pedro Pascal doesn't get the girl, the truth of the matter is, Lucy was set up for failure from the jump. As PEOPLE editor Bailey Richards pointed out. Regardless of whom she was going to end up with, Lucy was going to be settling. "I don't think she should have ended up with either of them," Richards says, considering Bailey's options. "Marry this hot, caring man who will pay for everything for you for the rest of your life — any materialistic whim you may have. He doesn't love you, but he will pay anything. Or a hot, caring man who does love you, but makes no money ... he will drop anything, at any given moment to do whatever for you." We can all agree that the only real winners are Lucy's children (if she wants any), who will 100% win the genetic lottery regardless of which guy she chooses. However, when it comes to meeting the standards Lucy deeply desires, she's bound to lose regardless. So, instead of settling for the loverboy with no money, Richards believes Lucy should have actually axed both men. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "After everything that she, as a matchmaker, as a woman, goes through in that movie, she just needs to break from romance altogether and do some introspection, the kind that requires you to be single and be alone," says Richards. Personally, the right choice for me is always Pedro Pascal. But I have to agree with my colleague here. Relationships are hard, even when you find everything you want in a person, so why give yourself more heartache by settling for someone who doesn't meet your standards? Read the original article on People
Associated Press
29 minutes ago
- Associated Press
SHAREHOLDER REMINDER: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of Compass Diversified
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $100,000 In Compass To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you suffered losses exceeding $100,000 in Compass stock or options between May 1, 2024 and May 7, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 20, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Compass Diversified ('Compass' or the 'Company') (NYSE: CODI) and reminds investors of the July 8, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Company's subsidiary, Lugano Holdings, Inc., maintained unrecorded financing arrangements and irregularities in its sales, cost of sales, inventory, and accounts receivable; (2) the irregularities and undisclosed details in Lugano Holdings, Inc.'s financial statements rendered the financial statements of the Company as a whole unreliable, and would require restatement; (3) the Company failed to maintain adequate internal controls related to its financial statements; and (4) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. On May 7, 2025, after the market closed, the Company disclosed that its financial statements for fiscal year 2024 should no longer be relied upon in response to an ongoing internal investigation into the Company's subsidiary, Lugano Holding, Inc. The Company revealed that the investigation 'has preliminarily identified irregularities in Lugano's non-CODI financing, accounting, and inventory practices' and that "[e]ffective May 7, 2025, Lugano's founder and CEO, Moti Ferder, resigned from all of his positions at Lugano and will not receive any severance compensation.' On this news, Compass Diversified stock price fell 8% during after-hours trading on May 7, 2025, thereby injuring investors. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Compass' conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the Compass Diversified investigation, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit
