Director Danny Boyle admits Slumdog Millionaire 'would never be made today' unless Indian filmmakers were at the helm
Director Danny Boyle has admitted that Slumdog Millionaire 'would never be made today' unless Indian filmmakers were at the helm.
The producer, 68, reflected on the 2008 movie which he directed as he said him and the team in Mumbai who shot the scenes were 'outsiders'.
The film was a loose adaptation of the novel Q & A by Indian author Vikas Swarup and followed the story of teenager Jamal (Dev Patel) from the slums of Mumbai.
He becomes a contestant on the show 'Kaun Banega Crorepati?' and when interrogated under suspicion of cheating, he revisits his past, revealing how he had all the answers.
Danny told The Guardian: 'Yeah, we wouldn't be able to make that now. And that's how it should be.
'It's time to reflect on all that. We have to look at the cultural baggage we carry and the mark that we've left on the world.'
'We made the decision that only a handful of us would go to Mumbai. We'd work with a big Indian crew and try to make a film within the culture. But you're still an outsider. It's still a flawed method.
'I'm proud of the film, but you wouldn't even contemplate doing something like that today. It wouldn't even get financed. Even if I was involved, I'd be looking for a young Indian film-maker to shoot it.'
The moviemaker has recently stepped back into the director's chair to helm the new horror 28 Years Later - written by Alex Garland - 23 years after the pair's first film 28 Days Later hit cinemas.
He recently admitted it was a 'nightmare' filming naked zombies for new horror movie.
Danny has revealed they needed to take extra care not to have 'naked' actors on the set because they had strict rules in place to protect the film's child star Alfie Williams.
Speaking to PEOPLE, Danny explained: 'I mean, if you're recently infected [with the zombie virus], you'd have some clothes, but if you've been infected for a long time, the clothes would just disintegrate with the way that you behave.
'We never knew that [about rules governing nudity on set when there's a child present] going in, it was a nightmare.'
Danny went on to explain the work-around they came up with, adding: 'Interestingly, because there was a 12-year-old boy on set, you're not allowed for anybody to be naked, not really naked, so they look naked, but it's all prosthetics ...
'So it's like: 'Oh my God,' so we had to make everybody prosthetic genitals'.'
Danny revealed he was keen to push boundaries with the elements of nudity and gore in the film and he's glad studio bosses were supportive of his plans.
He told Variety: 'I think one of the wonderful things about horror is that you're expected to maximize the impact of your story. Everybody wants to do that with a drama, with the romance, whatever.
'But with horror, it's obviously gonna be brutal, some of it. What we loved was setting it against an innocence that's represented by the various children in it, and also the landscape, the beauty of the landscape, the nature.
'Having those two forces stretches your story as far as you can go, if you maximize them. That was our principle and the studio was supportive of that, of course they were.'
On Thursday critics weighed in on the new zombie horror movie.
A follow-up to the 'great' 2002 film 28 Days Later, Boyle and Garland assembled a star-studded cast including Harry Potter star Ralph Fiennes, 62, and fellow Brit Aaron Taylor-Johnson, 35, for their latest endeavor.
Two decades on from the original which saw a deadly virus plague London, the new movie finds a group of survivors living on the secluded island of Lindisfarne.
Boyle and Garland's new project has received a heap of positive reviews from critics following early screenings.
Rotten Tomatoes for instance have handed the movie an impressive 94 percent critic approval rating after rounding up the thoughts of more than 91 film reviewers.
The Daily Mail's Brian Viner was incredibly impressed after watching the series' latest gory installment, dubbing the movie the 'best post-apocalyptic horror-thriller film I have ever watched'.
Brian wrote: 'With the terrifying and electrifying 28 Years Later, director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have delivered the best post-apocalyptic survivalist horror-thriller film I have ever seen. Which sounds like limited praise, yet it's a much more crowded field than you might think.'
Robbie Collin in The Telegraph also handed 28 Years Later a rave review, with the critic scoring the 'terrifying' horror movie five stars out of five.
'Garland employs a strain of peculiarly British pulp humour - very 2000 AD, very Warhammer 40,000 - to undercut the ambient dread,' Collin wrote.
'And flashes of Arthurian fantasias and wartime newsreel footage (as well as a pointed double cameo for the now-felled Sycamore Gap tree_ serve as regularly nudges in the ribs as he and Boyle ty with the notion of a 21st century British national myth.'
The film too received five stars from The Times critic Ed Potton, who hailed Jodie Comer's 'impressive as always' performance.
The journalist wrote: 'Is this the most beautiful zombie film of them all? It's hard to think of another that combines such wonder and outlandishness with the regulation flesh-rending, brain-munching and vicious disembowelment.'
The BBC 's Caryn James gave the highly-anticipated film four stars out of five as she dubbed Ralph Fiennes's performance 'scene-stealing'.
'28 Years Later is part zombie-apocalypse horror, part medieval world building, part sentimental family story and - most effectively - part Heart of Darkness in its journey towards a madman in the woods,' she wrote.
'It glows with Boyle's visual flair, Garland's ambitious screenplay and a towering performance from Ralph Fiennes, whose character enters halfway through the film and unexpectedly becomes its fraught sole'.
Empire also awarded 28 Years Later four stars out of five, with journalist Ben Travis writing: '28 Years Later is ferocious, fizzing with adrenaline. The mainland thrums with a pervasive sense of immediate danger; when the infected arrive (and, do they arrive), it is breathlessly tense.'
Reviews in The Guardian and The Independent were slightly more critical however, with journalists scoring 28 Years Later with three stars.
Peter Bradshaw wrote in The Guardian: 'A little awkwardly, the film has to get us on to the mainland for some badass action sequences with real shooting weaponry - and then we have the two 'alpha' cameos that it would be unsporting to reveal, but which cause the film to shunt between deep sadness and a bizarre, implausible (though certainly startling) graphic-novel strangeness.'
While The Independent 's Clarisse Loughley wrote: 'Even if 28 Years Later feels like being repeatedly bonked on the head by the metaphor hammer, Boyle's still a largely compelling filmmaker, and the film separates itself from the first instalment by offering something distinctly more sentimental and mythic than before.'
28 Years Later has become the best horror ticket pre-seller of 2025, with the film expected to gross around $30million in its first weekend.
28 YEARS LATER - THE REVIEWS
The Daily Mail (FIVE STARS)
Rating:
With the terrifying and electrifying 28 Years Later, director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have delivered the best post-apocalyptic horror-thrill I have ever seen.
The Times (FIVE STARS)
Rating:
Jodie Comer is impressive as always in the latest instalment of the post-apocalyptic series
The Telegraph (FIVE STARS)
Rating:
This transfixingly nasty zombie horror sequel, starring Jodie Comer and Ralph Fiennes, is Danny Boyle's best film in 15 years
The Evening Standard (FIVE STARS)
Rating:
Jodie Comer, young Alfie Williams and Ralph Fiennes have a monsters' ball in this supercharged third outing for the 28 Days Later series
BBC Culture (FOUR STARS)
Rating:
Alex Garland and Danny Boyle have reunited for a follow-up to their 2002 classic. It has visual flair, terrifying adversaries and scene-stealing performance from Ralph Fiennes.
Empire (FOUR STARS)
Rating:
The sequel we needed is both the film you expect, and the one you don't. There's blood, but also real guts and brain and heart - visceral cinema soaked in viscera.
The Guardian (THREE STARS)
Rating:
This tonally uncertain revival mixes folk horror and little-England satire as an island lad seeks help for his sick mum on the undead-infested mainland.
The Independent (THREE STARS)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Danny Boyle raves about Cheddar Gorge on 28 Years Later shoot
Danny Boyle has described Cheddar Gorge as "extraordinary" after filming parts of his zombie apocalpyse flick 28 Years Later director added that he felt "privileged" to be shooting in Somerset for the film, which was released on Aaron Taylor-Johnson, who lives near Bruton in Somerset, stars alongside Jodie Comer, Ralph Fiennes and Alfie Williams in the film, which is set 28 years after the accidental release of a virus that caused the breakdown of Boyle said the gorge was "one of the most unique pieces of British landscape". Nick Sheldon, operations manager overseeing the filming at Cheddar Gorge, said: "It's a spectacular location for this film... it was a real privilege to work with Danny on this movie."They turned Cheddar Gorge into a real zombie apocalypse for a few days."I was lucky enough to go to the premiere this week where I got to sit next to Zombie number three. "We were used for the last 10 minutes of the film so the climax is all based in Somerset." Mr Taylor-Johnson said the film has "got a feel that's like no other movie", thanks to the experimental way it was of the film was shot using iPhones, which Mr Taylor-Johnson said "felt initimate".The film is the third instalment of the 28 Days Later series. In the second film, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo's 2007 film 28 Weeks Later, the "rage virus" is seen reaching Europe. Mr Boyle's film sees the infected pushed back and re-confined to British shores. As the rest of the world heals, Britain's remaining survivors have been left to fend for themselves.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
28 Years Later writer Alex Garland reveals the ONE common misconception about the film - but can YOU guess what it is?
28 Years Later writer Alex Garland has revealed the one common misconception about the horror movie franchise. The third installment of the gory franchise was released in the UK on Friday, June 20, to much fanfare after critics described the movie as 'terrifying and electrifying'. Featuring a star-studded cast including Harry Potter actor Ralph Fiennes, 62, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson, 35, 28 Years Later sees Alex and director Danny Boyle reunite to an incredible effect. Their partnership first blossomed more than two decades ago with the series' opener 28 Days Later, starring then little-known Cillian Murphy, 49, as bicycle courier Jim, who had awoken from a coma to discover a deadly virus had taken over London. Though zombie-like in their appearance, Alex, 55, has now insisted that the creatures are not zombies at all, correcting the widespread misconception. Speaking to Polygon about how they portrayed the infected in their new film, Alex said: 'One (option) is: there aren't any infected left and life has gone back to normal, so that would be one sort of film you could do, sort of post-COVD film as it were. 'And the other is: no, the infection is still alive. Well, how could it still be alive? 'These are not reanimated dead people by some sort of supernatural means. They're people who have an illness or a condition or a virus, in this case, and so, how are they still alive? They need to consume energy, they need to drink.' Despite the franchise long being dubbed a 'zombie-horror', its writer has repeatedly fought against the movie being included in such a genre. It has been speculated that Alex's refusal to admit the franchise includes zombies was for fears of it being included in a genre of films considered 'low-brow'. And the star of the first film, Cillian, 49, agreed with Alex while speaking during the filming of SAG-AFTRA's Foundation's Conversation programme last year. 'I wasn't too aware we were making a zombie move, to be honest with you,' the Peaky Blinders frontman said. 'It was right around the time Sars happened and there was all this ''air rage'' stuff going on.' Whether zombies or just infected humans, the inclusion of the terrifying figures in 28 Years Later certainly caused a problem while filming the movie. Director Danny Boyle revealed they needed to take extra care not to have 'naked' actors on the set because they had strict rules in place to protect the film's child star, Alfie Williams. He told PEOPLE: 'I mean, if you're recently infected (with the virus), you'd have some clothes, but if you've been infected for a long time, the clothes would just disintegrate with the way that you behave. 'We never knew that (about rules governing nudity on set when there's a child present) going in, it was a nightmare.' In order to still film scenes featuring naked zombies while adhering to the safeguarding rules, Danny revealed the actors had to wear prosthetics. 'Interestingly, because there was a 12-year-old boy on set, you're not allowed for anybody to be naked, not really naked, so they look naked, but it's all prosthetics,' he added. 'So it's like: "Oh my God," so we had to make everybody prosthetic genitals.' The 28 Years Later mastermind said he was keen to push boundaries with the elements of nudity and gore in the film and he's glad studio bosses were supportive of his plans. He told Variety: 'I think one of the wonderful things about horror is that you're expected to maximize the impact of your story. Everybody wants to do that with a drama, with the romance, whatever. 'But with horror, it's obviously gonna be brutal, some of it. What we loved was setting it against an innocence that's represented by the various children in it, and also the landscape, the beauty of the landscape, the nature. 'Having those two forces stretches your story as far as you can go, if you maximize them. That was our principle and the studio was supportive of that, of course they were.' The new film - which is now available in UK cinemas after its June 20 release - has received a host of rave reviews from critics. Rotten Tomatoes for instance have handed the movie an impressive 94 percent critic approval rating after rounding up the thoughts of more than 91 film reviewers. The Daily Mail's Brian Viner was incredibly impressed after watching the series' latest gory installment, dubbing the movie the 'best post-apocalyptic horror-thriller film I have ever watched'. Brian wrote: 'With the terrifying and electrifying 28 Years Later, director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have delivered the best post-apocalyptic survivalist horror-thriller film I have ever seen. Which sounds like limited praise, yet it's a much more crowded field than you might think.' Robbie Collin in The Telegraph also handed 28 Years Later a rave review, with the critic scoring the 'terrifying' horror movie five stars out of five. 'Garland employs a strain of peculiarly British pulp humour - very 2000 AD, very Warhammer 40,000 - to undercut the ambient dread,' Collin wrote. 'And flashes of Arthurian fantasias and wartime newsreel footage (as well as a pointed double cameo for the now-felled Sycamore Gap tree_ serve as regularly nudges in the ribs as he and Boyle ty with the notion of a 21st century British national myth.' The film too received five stars from The Times critic Ed Potton, who hailed Jodie Comer's 'impressive as always' performance. The journalist wrote: 'Is this the most beautiful zombie film of them all? It's hard to think of another that combines such wonder and outlandishness with the regulation flesh-rending, brain-munching and vicious disembowelment.' The BBC's Caryn James gave the highly-anticipated film four stars out of five as she dubbed Ralph Fiennes's performance 'scene-stealing'. '28 Years Later is part zombie-apocalypse horror, part medieval world building, part sentimental family story and - most effectively - part Heart of Darkness in its journey towards a madman in the woods,' she wrote. 'It glows with Boyle's visual flair, Garland's ambitious screenplay and a towering performance from Ralph Fiennes, whose character enters halfway through the film and unexpectedly becomes its fraught sole'. Empire also awarded 28 Years Later four stars out of five, with journalist Ben Travis writing: '28 Years Later is ferocious, fizzing with adrenaline. The mainland thrums with a pervasive sense of immediate danger; when the infected arrive (and, do they arrive), it is breathlessly tense.' 28 YEARS LATER - THE REVIEWS The Daily Mail (FIVE STARS) Rating: With the terrifying and electrifying 28 Years Later, director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have delivered the best post-apocalyptic horror-thrill I have ever seen. The Times (FIVE STARS) Rating: Jodie Comer is impressive as always in the latest instalment of the post-apocalyptic series The Telegraph (FIVE STARS) Rating: This transfixingly nasty zombie horror sequel, starring Jodie Comer and Ralph Fiennes, is Danny Boyle's best film in 15 years The Evening Standard (FIVE STARS) Rating: Jodie Comer, young Alfie Williams and Ralph Fiennes have a monsters' ball in this supercharged third outing for the 28 Days Later series BBC Culture (FOUR STARS) Rating: Alex Garland and Danny Boyle have reunited for a follow-up to their 2002 classic. It has visual flair, terrifying adversaries and scene-stealing performance from Ralph Fiennes. Empire (FOUR STARS) Rating: The sequel we needed is both the film you expect, and the one you don't. There's blood, but also real guts and brain and heart - visceral cinema soaked in viscera. The Guardian (THREE STARS) Rating: This tonally uncertain revival mixes folk horror and little-England satire as an island lad seeks help for his sick mum on the undead-infested mainland. The Independent (THREE STARS)
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Nine games loved by millions made FREE before they disappear from download – last chance to claim them
VIDEOGAME maker Sega will soon pull nine beloved retro games from app stores, according to reports. But not before making them completely free. 6 6 6 The Japanese company has revealed it is ending support for the titles, which were ported to iOS and Android several years ago. Before they disappear, Sega has made them free to download and has removed all in-app purchases, according to Android Authority. The games will still be playable after Sega ends its support - so you might want to go download them before they vanish from app stores. They work offline too, so you don't even need to be attached to Wi-Fi. Here's all the games that are affected: There doesn't appear to be an official announcement from Sega; however, the prices have already been removed on both the Apple and Android app stores. An in-game pop-up says: "Support for this game will be discontinued, but you can continue playing offline!" These games were part of the Sega Forever programme, which made classic retro games available on modern platforms. Watch Nintendo's retro 1991 SNES console TV ad starring Paul Rudd However, this programme was shut down in 2023. Sega reportedly already delisted other titles included in Sega Forever, including Altered Beast Classic and The Revenge of Shinobi Classic, from app stores in 2023. There doesn't appear to be an official deadline for their removal from app stores. So you should install them now while you have the chance. "Love me some retro action…. Or as I like to call them, 'games from my youth'," one person wrote on X. Another added: "Free is free! And some real classics in there." While a third person wrote: "Bro why is this not always the way. Literally every closed 'eshop' should just go out like this when they do (but they shouldn't)." 6 6 6
