logo
Juneteenth marks end of slavery, but not the start of equality. We can change that.

Juneteenth marks end of slavery, but not the start of equality. We can change that.

USA Today4 days ago

Ben Crump
Opinion contributor
Hear this story
Juneteenth is a sacred day for Black Americans, an occasion to honor the end of slavery and recognize the progress made. But as we celebrate how far we've come, we must confront how far we still have to go. Because while we may have gained legal freedom in 1865, true freedom remains out of reach for too many in our community.
On June 19, 1865, enslaved people in Galveston, Texas, were finally informed of their emancipation, more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation. That moment marked the end of slavery, but not the beginning of equality. Freedom is more than the absence of physical chains. It is the ability to own property, to build wealth, to create opportunity and to pass that opportunity down to future generations.
For Black Americans, that kind of financial freedom has been systematically denied over and over again. The racial wealth gap we see today is no accident. It is the result of policies and practices that have locked Black families out of the American dream.
Prosperity of Black Wall Street was annihilated by White mob
After emancipation, formerly enslaved people were encouraged to deposit their savings into the Freedman's Savings Bank, an institution chartered to help Black people build wealth. But when the bank collapsed due to mismanagement, more than 60,000 Black depositors lost nearly $3 million in savings.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
That early betrayal set a precedent. In the decades that followed, redlining, exclusion from the GI Bill, predatory lending and discriminatory hiring practices continued to widen the gap between Black and White households.
When Black communities did manage to prosper, their success was too often cut down in an onslaught of violence. The Greenwood District of Tulsa, Oklahoma – known as Black Wall Street – was one of the most vibrant Black economic centers in the country. But in 1921, a White mob destroyed it in one of the deadliest acts of racial violence in U.S. history, destroying generations of Black wealth.
That legacy still haunts us.
Today, Black families hold just a fraction of the wealth White families do. About 10% of Black households are unbanked, often forced to rely on payday lenders and check-cashing services that charge punishing fees.
Without access to affordable credit, safe banking and financial education, it becomes nearly impossible to build generational wealth – even when working hard and doing everything right.
Despite these systemic obstacles, the power of the Black dollar remains undeniable. We've seen it time and again, most recently when a boycott of Target sent ripples through the chain and Wall Street over the retailer's decision to remove diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs and back out on its promise to invest in Black-owned businesses.
That wasn't just consumer choice, it was a message.
Black economic power is real. When united, Black consumers can shift markets, influence corporate decisions and demand accountability. Imagine the full potential if we had equitable access to capital and the tools to build wealth. Unlocking that power wouldn't just benefit Black communities. It would strengthen the entire U.S. economy through increased innovation, entrepreneurship and consumer spending.
Teaching Black youth financial literacy builds generational wealth
To truly seize that potential, we must also invest in the future – especially in our youth. Financial literacy should be treated as being just as essential as reading and math, particularly in predominantly Black and underserved schools.
Teaching young people how money works – how to budget, save, invest and grow – is one of the most powerful tools we have to push back against systemic inequities, break the cycle of poverty and build generational wealth. When we equip the next generation with financial knowledge, we give them the power to own their futures.
Individual empowerment, however, isn't enough on its own. To make real, lasting change, we must also confront the systems that have held our communities back.
That means expanding access to banking, credit and capital. It means supporting Black-owned businesses, investing in underserved neighborhoods and holding financial institutions accountable for equitable treatment. It means policy reforms that correct historical injustices and create real pathways to wealth for those long denied it.
When Black communities thrive economically, it lifts everyone. America is stronger when all of its people have the tools and the opportunity to succeed.
We honor our ancestors not just by remembering their struggle, but by continuing their fight. Economic justice is the unfinished business of civil rights. As we celebrate Juneteenth, we must recognize that financial freedom is not a luxury – it is a right, one we must keep pushing to secure, for ourselves and the generations to come.
Ben Crump is a nationally renowned civil rights attorney and founder of Ben Crump Law. Called 'Black America's attorney general,' he has represented families in some of the most high-profile civil rights cases of our time, including those of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Tyre Nichols and Ahmaud Arbery.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SRC to Deliver Counter-UAS Technologies to Qatar as Part of Landmark $1B Agreement with U.S.
SRC to Deliver Counter-UAS Technologies to Qatar as Part of Landmark $1B Agreement with U.S.

Business Upturn

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

SRC to Deliver Counter-UAS Technologies to Qatar as Part of Landmark $1B Agreement with U.S.

Syracuse, NY, June 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Syracuse, NY – SRC, Inc. ('SRC' or 'Company'), a not-for-profit defense research and development company, announced today that it will deliver a suite of its advanced counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) technologies to international buyers as a part of a historic $1 billion foreign military sales agreement between the U.S. government and the State of Qatar. This milestone marks the first international sale of the U.S. Army's Fixed Site–Low, Slow, Small Unmanned Aircraft System Integrated Defeat System (LIDS), underscoring SRC's role as a global leader in the defense against UAS threats. SRC's LIDS technologies are engineered to detect, track, identify and defeat unmanned aircraft systems, which are a growing threat in modern conflict zones. Under this agreement, SRC will deliver mission-critical technologies that enable detection and robust electronic warfare capabilities to international buyers for the first time. These technologies allow for layered defense at fixed-site locations and provide real-time situational awareness and threat response. The inclusion of LIDS in the agreement highlights the urgency with which nations are addressing the rising threat of unmanned systems to critical infrastructure and defense operations. 'We're proud that our proven systems will be deployed internationally to secure critical airspace, defend warfighters and protect high-value infrastructure,' said Kevin Hair, president and CEO of SRC. 'In today's rapidly evolving threat landscape, advanced sensing and electronic warfare capabilities are essential. This achievement reflects the strength of the LIDS team, the trust placed in us by our government partners and the operational relevance of American-engineered solutions.' LIDS supports the rapid detection and engagement of unmanned aircraft, while maintaining low collateral damage to minimize risk to friendly forces and surrounding infrastructure. As a system of systems, LIDS allows for the swift integration of emerging sensors and effectors, ensuring the system can adapt to evolving threats and remain effective across future mission sets. Its modular design supports deployment in both fixed and mobile configurations, offering tactical commanders the flexibility to address a wide range of operational scenarios. As a trusted provider of critical sensing and electronic warfare components, SRC is proud to support the continued advancement and international deployment of lifesaving technologies that empower our warfighters and strengthen global defense readiness. About SRC SRC, Inc. (@SRCDefense), a not-for-profit research and development company, combines information, science, technology and ingenuity to solve 'impossible' problems in the areas of defense, environment and intelligence. Across a family of companies, SRC applies bright minds, fresh thinking and relentless determination to deliver innovative products and services that are redefining possible ® for the challenges faced by America and its allies. Since 1957, SRC's commitment to the customer and the best solution — not the bottom line — has remained a core value that guides its efforts. This passion for quality carries through to the technologies the company invents and manufactures, the laboratories and facilities it builds, the people they hire, and communities where they work. Today, more than 1,400 engineers, scientists and professionals work together at SRC to protect people, the environment and our way of life. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash

GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns

Los Angeles Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns

WASHINGTON — The massive tax and spending cuts package that President Trump wants on his desk by July 4 would loosen regulations on gun silencers and certain types of rifles and shotguns, advancing a longtime priority of the gun industry as Republican leaders in the House and Senate try to win enough votes to pass the bill. The guns provision was first requested in the House by Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Republican gun store owner who had initially opposed the larger tax package. The House bill would remove silencers — called 'suppressors' by the gun industry — from a 1930s law that regulates firearms that are considered the most dangerous, eliminating a $200 tax while removing a layer of background checks. The Senate kept the provision on silencers in its version of the bill and expanded upon it, adding short-barreled, or sawed-off, rifles and shotguns. Republicans who have long supported the changes, along with the gun industry, say the tax infringes on Second Amendment rights. They say silencers are mostly used by hunters and target shooters for sport. 'Burdensome regulations and unconstitutional taxes shouldn't stand in the way of protecting American gun owners' hearing,' said Clyde, who owns two gun stores in Georgia and often wears a pin shaped like an assault rifle on his suit lapel. Democrats are fighting to stop the provision, which was unveiled days after two Minnesota state legislators were shot in their homes, as the bill speeds through the Senate. They argue that loosening regulations on silencers could make it easier for criminals and active shooters to conceal their weapons. 'Parents don't want silencers on their streets, police don't want silencers on their streets,' said Senate Democratic leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y. The gun language has broad support among Republicans and has received little attention as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., work to settle differences within the party on cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits, among other issues. But it is just one of hundreds of policy and spending items included to entice members to vote for the legislation that could have broad implications if the bill is enacted within weeks, as Trump wants. Inclusion of the provision is also a sharp turn from the climate in Washington just three years ago when Democrats, like Republicans now, controlled Congress and the White House and pushed through bipartisan gun legislation. The bill increased background checks for some buyers under the age of 21, made it easier to take firearms from potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools. Passed in the summer of 2022, just weeks after the shooting of 19 children and two adults at a school in Uvalde, Texas, it was the most significant legislative response to gun violence in decades. Three years later, as they try to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, Republicans are packing as many of their longtime priorities as possible, including the gun legislation, into the massive, wide-ranging bill that Trump has called 'beautiful.' 'I'm glad the Senate is joining the House to stand up for the Second Amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities as the Senate works to pass President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who was one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan gun bill in 2022 but is now facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for reelection next year. If the gun provisions remain in the larger legislation and it is passed, silencers and the short-barrel rifles and shotguns would lose an extra layer of regulation that they are subject to under the National Firearms Act, passed in the 1930s in response to concerns about mafia violence. They would still be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other guns — and that includes possible loopholes that allow some gun buyers to avoid background checks when guns are sold privately or online. Larry Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, who supports the legislation, says changes are aimed at helping target shooters and hunters protect their hearing. He argues that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. 'All it's ever intended to do is to reduce the report of the firearm to hearing safe levels,' Keane says. Speaking on the floor before the bill passed the House, Rep. Clyde said the bill restores Second Amendment rights from 'over 90 years of draconian taxes.' Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the larger bill 'with the purest of motive.' 'Who asked for it? I asked,' said Clyde, who ultimately voted for the bill after the gun silencer provision was added. Clyde was responding to Rep. Maxwell Frost, a 28-year-old Florida Democrat, who went to the floor and demanded to know who was responsible for the gun provision. Frost, who was a gun-control activist before being elected to Congress, called himself a member of the 'mass shooting generation' and said the bill would help 'gun manufacturers make more money off the death of children and our people.' Among other concerns, control advocates say less regulation for silencers could make it harder for law enforcement to stop an active shooter. 'There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots,' said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. Schumer and other Democrats are trying to convince the Senate parliamentarian to drop the language as she reviews the bill for policy provisions that aren't budget-related. 'Senate Democrats will fight this provision at the parliamentary level and every other level with everything we've got,' Schumer said earlier this month. Jalonick writes for the Associated Press.

What does TACO mean in reference to Trump? Why the phrase is resurfacing
What does TACO mean in reference to Trump? Why the phrase is resurfacing

USA Today

time30 minutes ago

  • USA Today

What does TACO mean in reference to Trump? Why the phrase is resurfacing

A four-letter acronym that started as a way to describe President Donald Trump's tariff policies has morphed into a viral social media phrase, much to his ire. Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined the term "TACO trade" in May to describe how many investors responded to Trump's whiplash tariff policies. "TACO," an acronym that stands for "Trump always chickens out," has since become a sweeping term criticizing Trump. Social media users have taken to creating memes and artificial intelligence-generated images depicting the phrase. Trump himself hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, calling it "a nasty question." Here's what to know about the phrase and how it has been reignited in political discourse after the U.S. carried out strikes in Iran. Live updates: What is Iran's next move? World awaits response to U.S. bombing What does TACO mean? Where the phrase comes from TACO stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong coined the term after the Trump administration issued tariffs on imports from worldwide trade partners in early April before reversing course on the policies a week later. "The US administration does not have a very high tolerance for market and economic pressure, and will be quick to back off when tariffs cause pain," Armstrong said in a May 2 article. "This is the Taco theory: Trump Always Chickens Out." In an interview with NPR, Armstrong said he came up with the phrase as a shorthand "so I didn't have to reexplain it every time that it came up." "I just tried to think of a catchy acronym, and TACO happened to be the most kind of amusing one that I could think of," he said. What does Trump think of the TACO acronym? Trump fired back at a reporter asking about the TACO phrase in a White House press conference on May 28. "Oh, I chicken out. Isn't that nice? I've never heard that," Trump said during the exchange, before defending his decisions on tariffs. "Six months ago, this country was stone cold dead. We had a dead country. We had a country that people didn't think it was going survive," Trump said. "And you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." TACO chatter reignites amid US strikes on Iran After the U.S. military bombed three Iranian nuclear sites on June 21, some supporters have taken to social media to assert that the attack is evidence against the "TACO" theory. Some Trump backers say his follow-through on the attack, which came after he issued warnings to the country, disproves the belief that he "always chickens out." Others have suggested the bombings were in spite of the "TACO" nickname. "Have to wonder, did we bomb Iran because someone called Trump TACO?" one person wrote on X. Actor John Cusack opined on social media that the Iran attack "was a bombing for ego − to get back at people calling him weak." Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store