An arrest was made after a 'credible threat' to Texas lawmakers, an official said.
A person was taken into custody on Saturday afternoon in connection with what the Texas Department of Public Safety said was a 'credible threat' to the safety of state lawmakers attending an anti-Trump protest in Austin, according to a law enforcement official.
The threat had prompted the temporary closure of the Texas State Capitol grounds, and the law enforcement official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe an ongoing investigation, said the person taken into custody was found in the town of La Grange, Texas, between Austin and Houston.
The threat came after shootings that killed a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband and wounded another Minnesota lawmaker and his wife early on Saturday.
The Texas Department of Public Safety sent a warning to Texas lawmakers early Saturday afternoon and said it was concerned about people who could be inspired by the Minnesota killings.
The message to lawmakers, sent around 1 p.m. Central time, said the Minnesota attack 'seems to be an isolated incident.'
'However, we're always concerned about copycats and those who this attack might inspire,' it read.
'I received it and I was like whoa, it could easily have been one of us, easily,' said State Representative Ron Reynolds, a Houston-area Democrat who was in Houston on Saturday and spoke at a protest that attracted roughly 15,000 people.
'You have to take it seriously,' Mr. Reynolds said, adding that what happened in Minnesota was 'awful.'
'It's a threat to democracy. But it's real. We can't let them silence us, but we have to be vigilant,' he said.
Around 4:45 p.m., lawmakers received another update from the state police saying they had 'addressed the earlier reported threat' and that the Capitol grounds had been reopened.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texas woman, 81, awarded $60K after 5-year fight against ‘sovereign immunity' — what it could mean for others
A federal judge has ordered the city of McKinney to pay almost $60,000 plus interest to 81-year-old Vicki Baker. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) Why the big payday? Baker's home was torn apart by a SWAT team during a 2020 police standoff. Baker took the city to court after her house became the battleground for a high-stakes manhunt, reported WFAA. McKinney police unleashed tear gas, explosives, and tactical vehicles on the property while chasing a fugitive who had barricaded himself inside. Insurance plans do not cover 'acts of the government' and the city refused to pay for the damage, so Vicki joined forces with the Institute for Justice (IJ) to file a lawsuit in March 2021. 'I've just learned that my battle with the city of McKinney is coming to an end,' Baker said in a statement on June 5. 'Judge Mazzant has, once again, ruled that I am due just compensation under the Texas Constitution.' According to the WFAA report, it all started on July 25, 2020, when Wesley Little, a man Baker had hired for repairs, broke into her home and held a teenager hostage. Baker was in Montana, but her daughter, who was living at the property, escaped and called 911. After Little released the teen but refused to surrender, a SWAT team fired roughly 30 tear gas canisters shattering windows, smashed doors, and tore down a fence with an armored vehicle. Once inside they found Little had died by suicide. The incident left more than $50,000 in damage to the house, according to Baker, with her insurance covering only the destruction caused by Little, not the police's tactical incursion. The city of McKinney initially refused to pay, citing sovereign immunity, a legal shield that often protects cities from liability unless waived or overturned by a judge. Baker, a cancer survivor who had recently invested $25,000 to ready her home for sale, didn't back down. 'It was more devastating because of everything that was happening to me at the time,' she said. 'I felt like this was a case that would help not just me, but a lot of people. That's why I wanted to fight.' With legal help from the Institute for Justice, Baker argued that the government's destruction amounted to an uncompensated taking of her property under both the U.S. and Texas Constitutions. 'It took five years, but Vicki is finally going to be made whole,' said Jeffrey Redfern, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice. 'She's fortunate that Texas has strong protections for private property rights, but people in much of the rest of the country aren't so lucky.' Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it There were many setbacks, including losing at the Fifth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court declining to hear the case, but a favorable ruling grounded in the Texas Constitution was ultimately handed down by U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant this month. WFAA has covered similar cases in Texas since 2020, highlighting the ongoing legal battle over police damage during raids, with cities repeatedly invoking sovereign immunity. Michael Lamson, a Houston trial lawyer, said to WFAA, "If you're taking their property and you're not paying them for it, you're doing a very good job as a government." Redfern reportedly pointed in court to a 1980 Texas Supreme Court ruling in Steele v. City of Houston, where the city was held liable after police allowed a home to burn following tear gas explosions, as a crucial precedent. McKinney officials stated they are 'evaluating options for appealing' the ruling. As for Baker, now living in Montana, she says the city's legal fees ended up being more than what it owed her. 'They have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees,' she said. 'And they could have gotten off with paying me $60,000.' In Texas and other states, sovereign immunity protects state agencies, counties, and cities. Sovereign immunity is meant to shield public agencies from endless lawsuits that could drain taxpayer dollars and gum up government operations. Unfortunately, this means when a homeowner sues a city for damage caused during police raids or other government actions, city governments can pull out the sovereign immunity card. The may ways this can hurt homeowners include: Limited legal recourse: Most can't sue cities for property damage unless there's a rare exception. Financial strain: Repairs from police or government damage can run tens of thousands of dollars. Legal fights: Challenging sovereign immunity is complex and expensive, and can be lengthy. Unfair burden: Citizens pay the price, while cities walk away free and clear. The Institute for Justice is taking on similar cases in California, Indiana and North Carolina awaits a U.S. Supreme Court decision in Martin v. United States, involving an FBI SWAT raid that damaged another family's home. For now, Baker's victory could become a powerful blueprint for others fighting back against government damage. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texas may soon enact restrictions on when and how students can protest
The state of Texas could be set to pass a law putting major limits on protests at its public universities, including banning demonstrations at certain times of day and barring all protests during the final two weeks of the semester. The law, whose Republican backers describe as an explicit response to the state's pro-Palestine campus protests, would impact more than one million students at one of the nation's largest public university systems and has drawn criticism from free speech advocates and students. 'While the world watched Columbia, Harvard and other campuses across the country taken hostage by pro-terrorist mobs last year, Texas stood firm. UT allowed protest, not anarchy,' State Senator Brandon Creighton told The Washington Post about his bill. 'No First Amendment rights were infringed — and they never will be. This is how we protect student safety, defend our institutions, and safeguard freedom for generations to come.' The bill, Senate Bill 2972, would prohibit protests between 10pm and 8am, ban students from erecting tents and wearing disguises like masks, bar the use of drums and microphones, and halt 'expressive activities' during the final two weeks of class. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has until the end of the week to decide on the law, which will go into effect if he declines to act. His office has not indicated how he will proceed. Civil rights advocates argue the bill's provisions contradict the spirit of a 2019 Texas law, passed when Republicans largely argued campuses overly restricted conservative speech, that mandated universities ensure all outdoor common areas were considered traditional public forums where anyone could protest as long as they weren't breaking the law or disrupting university functions. 'S.B. 2972 threatens the free expression of all Texans, regardless of political beliefs,' Caro Achar of the Texas branch of the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a statement. 'This bill imposes broad restrictions that allow school officials to restrict how, when, and where Texans can speak on campus — undermining the First Amendment rights of students, faculty, staff, and the general public.' 'I don't know that we've seen a law regulating campus expression that's this restrictive,' Tyler Coward, a lawyer with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, told The New York Times of the bill. The 'expressive activity' limited in the bill could range from a conversation to a t-shirt with a slogan, others warned. In 2024, Texas saw large-scale campus pro-Palestine protests, and state officials responded by sending in over 100 state troopers to clear out a protest encampment at the University of Texas at Austin. All told, over 150 were arrested at state universities last April. In the wake of widespread pro-Palestine encampments on campus last year, universities across the country reiterated existing restrictions and imposed new rules on protest, including mask bans and time-place-and-manner limits. During the recent Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, Donald Trump unilaterally claimed masks were no longer allowed at protests, despite having no legal authority to make such a demand. Protest restrictions have also been a key sticking point in the administration's negotiations with top universities like Harvard and Columbia, which the White House has alleged aren't doing enough to stop campus antisemitism that flared during the protests. The administration has sought to pause funding to these Ivy League schools unless they submit to wide-ranging reforms. Harvard has challenged the administration, while Columbia has largely acceded to the Trump demands, including partially banning face masks.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Teens on dirt bikes vandalize Florida golf course, spark safety concerns
The Brief Teens riding electric dirt bikes have been caught on camera damaging a Brevard County golf course. Residents say the bikes are also endangering pedestrians along sidewalks and pathways. Deputies are increasing enforcement, and officials warn the behavior could lead to felony charges. VIERA, Fla. - A group of teens riding high-powered dirt bikes has drawn the attention of law enforcement and frustrated residents after being caught on camera tearing up the turf at Duran Golf Club in Brevard County. What we know Teens riding high-speed electric dirt bikes have been caught on video damaging the turf at Duran Golf Club in Brevard County, prompting public safety and property damage concerns. The Brevard County Sheriff's Office confirmed the riders were seen recklessly operating the vehicles, some capable of reaching 50 mph, across the greens and nearby pedestrian areas. Officials say the issue has grown throughout the summer. What we don't know Authorities have not identified any of the teens involved or whether charges have been filed. It's also unclear if the bikes are registered or if any riders have been cited for violations so far. The backstory Electric dirt bikes have surged in popularity, but their powerful engines and off-road capabilities have clashed with residential safety norms. In Viera, residents say the bikes are frequently spotted on sidewalks and walking paths, endangering pedestrians and damaging community property. Big picture view Neighborhoods in central Brevard County are seeing a shift in public space use, raising questions about enforcement, youth supervision, and e-vehicle regulation. Community leaders and residents alike are expressing growing frustration as safety risks mount. What they're saying Surveillance video shared by the Brevard County Sheriff's Office shows teens recklessly riding across the greens at full speed — a problem that authorities and neighbors say has been escalating throughout the summer. Some electric dirt bikes, like the ones seen in the footage, can reach speeds up to 50 mph. Residents of the Viera area say the teens aren't just confined to the golf course — they're also riding on sidewalks and neighborhood pathways used daily by pedestrians. "There's a safety concern — number one, that they could have an accident," said sheriff's office spokesman Tod Goodyear. "But there's also the issue of criminal mischief." Mary Lewis, a local resident, said the young riders have nearly run her off the sidewalk. "They're just not obeying any rules," she said. "They think they can do whatever they want. And when people confront them, they swear and give you grief. It's really a problem." What's next Though tracking down the bikers has proven difficult in the past, the Brevard County Sheriff's Office says it is now stepping up enforcement. STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO: Download the FOX Local app for breaking news alerts, the latest news headlines Download the FOX 35 Storm Team Weather app for weather alerts & radar Sign up for FOX 35's daily newsletter for the latest morning headlines FOX Local:Stream FOX 35 newscasts, FOX 35 News+, Central Florida Eats on your smart TV The Source This story was written based on information shared by the Brevard County Sheriff's Office, and Viera resident Mary Lewis.
