Ohio Democrats propose bill to gradually increase minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2030
Stock photo from Getty Images.
Ohio lawmakers are once again trying to increase the state's minimum wage to $15 per hour.
State Reps. Dontavius Jarrells, D-Columbus, and Ismail Mohamed, D-Columbus, recently introduced House Bill 34, which would increase the minimum wage by a dollar per hour each year for workers until reaching $15 per hour in 2030. The bill is in the Ohio House Labor and Commerce Committee.
Ohio's minimum wage went up to $10.70 per hour for non-tipped employees on Jan. 1. The federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour.
'At $10.45 per hour, Ohio's minimum wage is not enough for working families to stay afloat,' Jarrells said in a statement. 'No one should have to work multiple jobs just to survive. Raising wages means strengthening families, stabilizing communities, and growing our economy.'
Under H.B. 34, the state's minimum wage would increase to $11 per hour on Jan. 1, 2026, $12 per hour in 2027, $13 per hour in 2028, $14 per hour in 2029 and $15 per hour in 2030. The bill also raises the tipped minimum wage by $0.50 per year for five years.
The director of Commerce would then adjust the state's wage on Sept. 30 of every year, starting in 2030, and the new wage would take effect on Jan. 1, according to the bill.
Ohioans passed a constitutional amendment in 2006 that has increased the state minimum wage every year based on the consumer price index.
One Fair Wage, a national organization, tried unsuccessfully to get minimum wage on the Ohio ballot last fall. The organization failed to submit the necessary signatures to the Ohio Secretary of State to get their initiative on the ballot, which would have increased minimum wage up to $15 per hour in 2026.
Increasing Ohio's minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2026 would have aided nearly 1 million Ohioans — about a fifth of Ohio's workforce, according to Policy Matters Ohio.
Upping Ohio's minimum wage to $15 an hour in 2025 would have saved 4,000 lives and created a $25 billion benefit to the state economy by 2036, according to the Scioto Analysis.
One Fair Wage said they plan on trying to get on Ohio's ballot again, but 'can't disclose more at this point,' the organization said in an email.
One Fair Wage encountered lots of opposition from the Ohio Restaurant & Hospitality Alliance who said restaurant operators would have to raise their menu prices by about 20-30% if the minimum wage jumped to $15 per hour.
There were a couple of bills related to increasing Ohio's minimum wage during the last General Assembly, but neither of them made it out of committee.
Two democrat state senators — Kent Smith and Hearcel Craig — introduced a bill that would have gradually raised the state's minimum wage one dollar each year until it was up to $15 an hour in 2027.
In an effort to stop the constitutional amendment, Republican state Sen. Bill Blessing put forth a bill that would have increased the wage to $15 by 2028.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Jewish New Yorkers rip Gov. Hochul for failing to help evacuate those stranded in Israel amid conflict with Iran
Gov. Hochul has done 'nothing' to evacuate New Yorkers stranded in Israel as missiles from Iran rain down on the country — while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has helped get hundreds of people to safety, angry families told The Post. Frantic calls to Hochul's office this week went unanswered, according to those trying to get their relatives home. 'It wouldn't even occur to Hochul to help constituents stranded in a war zone,' fumed one Long Islander with a teen relative studying in Israel. 'She's doing nothing.' Meanwhile, DeSantis contracted with the nonprofit Grey Bull Rescue to help about 1,500 Americans from multiple states get home. 4 Hochul was accused of 'deafening silence' on the issue of Americans who have been stranded in Israel. Gabriella Bass With Israel's airspace almost completely shut down, about 5,000 Americans have sought help, with the number of requests 'skyrocketing,' according to the rescue group. Desperate, they're taking ships from Israel to Lanarca in Cyprus, or traveling by land to Amman, Jordan and flying to Cyprus in a bid to get to America — all with the help of DeSantis' operation, which arranged for four wide-bodied chartered planes to collect them. So far DeSantis has welcomed two flights. 4 Gov. DeSantis had his state contract with a rescue group to help get Americans home. Getty Images 'She should be doing what DeSantis did — partner with private contractors to get your citizens out,' the frantic relative, who did not want to be named for fear of retaliation, said of Hochul. 'She should have organized this already,' the relative added. 'There's no excuse to sit on her hands as she heads the state with the most Jews in the country.' Erika Reichelscheimer said she felt 'completely abandoned' after calling the governor every day to no avail about her elderly parents, who were on a week's vacation in Israel when the conflict erupted June 13. 4 About 1,500 Americans have fled Israel thanks to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, he said. Erez Uzir, courtesy of Birthright Israel 'We cannot even get a call back,' said Reichelscheimer. 'Disappointed is an understatement.' 'I haven't even seen Hochul say anything,' said Reichelscheimer, 34, Her dad is running out of his heart medication. Meanwhile her brother, in Israel separately, was able to flee because of DeSantis' efforts, she said. Asked what message she would give to Hochul, a distraught Reichelscheimer begged: 'Please use your vast resources and platform as the governor of New York to help your constituents that are literally in a life or death situation abroad. The silence from your office on this has been deafening.' 'DeSantis is doing what he is supposed to do,' said a Long Island couple whose 18-year-old is stranded and who also requested anonymity. 'We wish Hochul was doing the same.' 4 Elise Stefanik slammed Hochul as a 'disgrace' for failing to get New Yorkers home from Israel. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Rep. Elise Stefanik, who is believed to be challenging Hochul in the next election, slammed the governor. 'No answers from the Governor. No action. Not even the dignity of a call back. It's an utter disgrace. Kathy Hochul continues to prove she is the worst governor in America,' said Stefanik. 'Just last week, she proudly handed $50 million in New Yorkers' hard-earned taxpayer money to illegal migrants — and now, when actual New Yorkers are trapped in a war zone, she's doing absolutely nothing.' 'It's an absolute farce what's going on and Hochul should be ashamed of herself,' railed former veteran state assemblyman Dov Hikind, who said he's fielded countless phone calls from those looking for help. Hochul is a 'steadfast ally to Israel and to New York's Jewish community,' her spokesman, Avi Small said, adding the administration is 'in active conversations with Governors from other states with large Jewish populations to determine how to coordinate travel for constituents if commercial flights do not resume.' Roughly 1.4 million Jews live in New York state.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Pelosi added millions to net worth last year: report
She might be the She-Wolf of Wall Street. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-California) raked in between $7.8 and $42.5 million in 2024 — meaning her estimated net worth with venture capitalist hubby Paul Pelosi could now top out at $413 million, new financial disclosures showed. The staggering sum is an eye-popping jump from 2023, when financial disclosures showed the couple's net worth topping out at a possible $370 million. Advertisement 4 The Pelosi's added between $7.8 and $42.5 million to their net worth in 2024. Getty Images Pelosi's exact net worth is not known because lawmakers are only required to disclose ranges. Market research firm Quiver Quantitative, which estimates a single figure based on daily stock values it tracks, placed the pair's 2024 worth at $257 million — up $26 million from a year earlier. Advertisement But the value of their various other ventures — which include but are not limited to a Napa Valley winery, ownership in a political data and consulting firm and a stake in a Bay area Italian restaurant — mean Pelosi's worth could be far higher in the estimated range. A large chunk of the couple's fortune has come from a sizable stock portfolio and timely trades, all done in Paul Pelosi's name. The former House Speaker, who's so infamous for trading Missouri Rep. Josh Hawley named a bill after her, and her husband dumped 5,000 shares of Microsoft stock worth an estimated $2.2 million in July — one of their largest sales in three years — a few short months before the FTC announced an antitrust investigation into the tech giant. They also sold 2,000 shares — worth an estimated $525,000 — of Visa stock, less than three months before the credit card company was hit with a DOJ monopoly lawsuit. Advertisement 4 Some have nicknamed Pelosi the 'Queen of Stocks.' Getty Images for The Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA) Their best trade though might have been exercising a call option in December they bought in late 2023 at an estimated premium of $1.8 million, allowing them to nab 50,000 shares of hot AI chip stock NVIDIA for $12 a pop — less than one tenth of its market price. In total the couple paid an estimated $2.4 million for the investment, which on paper is now worth more than $7.2 million. NVIDIA wasn't their only AI play of 2024. Advertisement The couple also paid between $600,000 and $1.25 million for a call option on California cybersecurity company Palo Alto Networks in February, the same week it was revealed the White House briefed lawmakers on a serious national security threat related to Russia. The shares rose close to 20% in the days after the move. 4 A bill aiming to ban lawmakers and their spouses from trading individual stocks was named 'The PELOSI Act.' Jack Forbes / NY Post Design The option allowed the pair to scoop up 14,000 shares of Palo Alto in December at a $100 strike price — half its trading value. The company has been crushing earnings over the past year and the investment is now worth around $2.8 million. But the Queen of Stocks did suffer one setback — when she and Paul Pelosi ditched 2,500 shares of former Department of Government Efficiency boss Elon Musk's Tesla in June, losing somewhere between $100,000 and $1 million on the trade. In all, their investment portfolio pulled in an estimated 54% return in 2024, more than double the S&P 500's 25% gain — and beating every large hedge fund, according to numbers in Bloomberg's end-of-year tally of hedge funds' returns. 4 Pelosi and her good fortune have been at the center of arguments about why Congress shouldn't be allowed to trade stocks. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post The formidable profits come amid growing calls to ban Congress from trading individual stocks, arguing lawmakers have access to market-moving information ahead of the public. Advertisement Pelosi in the past rejected calls for a ban, stating 'we're a free‑market economy.' She has since softened her stance in the face of growing criticism. When asked in May whether Congress should pass a trading ban, she replied, 'If they do, they do.' 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks, and she has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' a spokesperson told The Post. The couple is already off to a rocking 2025. Advertisement In January, they bought call options for then-little-known artificial intelligence health firm, Tempus AI, which has since inked a $200 million deal with AstraZeneca and doubled its stock price. The couple also took out call options for energy company Vistra — whose stock climbed last month after it unveiled a massive $1.9 billion deal to acquire natural gas facilities across the country from a private equity firm, citing rising US power demand.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Why Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' is failing the migrant crisis
The violent anti-ICE riots that erupted in Los Angeles last week were the inevitable result of years of Washington's failure to enforce immigration law. As masked mobs torched government property and assaulted officers tasked with upholding the rule of law, one thing became clear: the border crisis isn't just at the border. 4 The US needs upwards of 1,000 additional immigration judges to tackle the migrant crisis effectively. But the funding is currently lacking. Bloomberg via Getty Images President Trump vowed to restore order through mass deportations — and he can, but only if Congress does its part. That means recognizing the core problem that's too often ignored: without a functioning immigration court system, no one can actually be deported. Right now, more than 4 million migrant cases are languishing in limbo, inviting new waves of illegal immigration. The message this sends is to cross the border and work freely for up to 10 years while waiting for a hearing until it is inhumane to be deported. Advertisement Congress is starting to notice. Buried in the House's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is $1.25 billion in funding to hire 250 immigration judges and their staff. Extra judges is welcome news, but the appropriation is insufficient. According to my estimates, we need 1,000 more immigration judges to eliminate the court backlog by the end of President Trump's term. Although the bill allocates over $100 billion for border security, it almost entirely ignores the greatest obstacle to deportations: the underfunded immigration court system. 4 President Trump has allocated $1.25 billion for new judges, but that number will barely dent the problem ALLISON DINNER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock What would it really cost to get the immigration court system back on track? Hiring 250 judges annually carries a price tag of $4.7 billion over five years, about three dollars per American. This would give every immigrant due process and help send home the millions who are legally deportable. That is scarcely a rounding error in the federal budget, yet it is the difference between enforcing the law and surrendering to chaos. The OBBB as it stands offers only a quarter of what is required. Yet immigration courts are only half the story. US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is sitting on 1.4 million affirmative asylum applications — cases filed by people who arrive in the US on a visa. Because asylum-seekers pay no filing fee, the backlog is funded almost entirely by jacking up costs on high-skilled immigrants, who now shoulder a $600 surcharge every time their employers file paperwork. This is unfair and insufficient. Advertisement 4 The Department of Homeland Security has offered illegal migrants $1,000 to help them 'self-deport.' Ron Sachs – CNP On this issue, Congress is doing exactly what it should and is proposing a $1,000 asylum filing fee. Under current conditions, such a fee would raise $400 million in annual revenue — enough to hire hundreds of asylum officers. Legitimate asylees already spend thousands on legal assistance, so costs are not a new barrier. Rather, the costs ensure that those who benefit from asylum bear the burden of processing applications, instead of other legal immigrants. The Republican-proposed fee also ensures that fraudulent asylum applications are a less attractive path for illegal immigrants. To further dissuade fraudulent asylum, Trump's USCIS and Executive Office for Immigration Review should revive the last-in, first-out rule they implemented in his first term. This rule would process the most recent asylum filings before older ones. The policy proved effective since would-be border crossers and visa overstayers learned that bogus asylum claims would be denied quickly, thus shrinking the inflow. Reinstated alongside a surge of judges and asylum officers, last-in-first-out would end future illegal immigration while working through the backlog of current illegal immigrants. 4 Until sufficient resources are provided to adequately process both new and backlogged migrant cases, protests such as the anti-ICE riots will continue. Advertisement Critics scoff that nearly $5 billion is too much and argue for scrapping the deportation court process in favor of broader executive authority. Yet one court ruling after another proves that any rewrite of asylum law still needs 60 votes in the Senate. The quickest and most practical solution is to hire more immigration judges and deport those ordered to leave. The president and the Department of Homeland Security also wisely help migrants self-deport by paying for their flight home and giving them $1,000, saving the much larger cost of deportation. President Trump has promised mass deportations; his allies in Congress say they want that. The irony is that the price tag for making good on that pledge is shockingly small, but only if lawmakers write a bigger number into the bill currently on the floor. If Republicans are serious about restoring order at the border and in the cities the radical left is rioting, they should prove it by signing the check and hiring immigration judges. Daniel Di Martino is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a PhD candidate in Economics at Columbia University.
