Ayatollah is planning to FLEE Iran, exiled prince claims as he warns of more bloodshed if regime is allowed to survive
Katie Davis, in Paris
Published: Invalid Date,
IRAN'S exiled crown prince today warned the bloodthirsty Ayatollah is plotting to flee as his terror-stoking reign is "collapsing".
Reza Pahlavi also urged the West not to "throw Iran 's corrupt regime" a lifeline - or face more bloodshed.
10
10
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been in hiding since war broke out between Israel and Iran - and is understood to be holed up in a bunker.
But Pahlavi, the son of Iran's final shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, today said the barbaric leader and senior regime generals are plotting to escape the country.
He also urged Western countries not to allow the regime "to survive" - describing it as Iran's " Berlin wall moment".
Speaking in Paris, the prince said: "But like all moments of great change, it comes with danger.
"We stand at a crossroads. One road leads to bloodshed and chaos. The other to a peaceful and democratic transition.
"The difference in these two roads depends on one factor and one factor alone.
"If the West throws the regime a lifeline, there will be more bloodshed and chaos because the regime will not stop or surrender after it has been humiliated."
Pahlavi warned nowhere in the world will be safe as long as the Ayatollah's regime remains in power.
He added: "No country, no people are safe whether its on the streets of Washington, Paris, Jerusalem, Riyadh or Tehran."
Pahlavi today announced he has offered to "help our great nation navigate through this critical hour towards stability" - but insisted he does not seek political power.
It comes as Donald Trump last night hinted at regime change in Iran after unleashing US military might on nuclear sites on Sunday.
The US president said: "If the current Iranian regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be regime change? MIGA!".
Pahlavi, 64, left Iran in 1979 after the Islamic Revolution saw his father toppled from power.
He has spent most of his time living in the US with his wife and three daughters - and is a leading voice in the call for regime change in Iran.
10
10
10
10
10
It comes as Iran has vowed revenge after Trump blitzed critical nuclear sites after a week of trading blows with Israel.
Trump hailed Operation Midnight Hammer as a "bullseye" that caused "monumental damage" to Iran's doomsday plot.
Conflict in the Middle East now sits on a knife edge as it threatens to spiral and draw in other countries.
The bloodthirsty Iranian regime has today deployed a fresh barrage of missiles against Israel as Ayatollah Ali Khamenei continues to cower in hiding.
Who was the Shah?
By Annabel Bate, Foreign News Reporter
THE last Shah of Iran was Mohammad Reza Pahlav i.
He ruled from 1941 to 1979, having succeeded his dad Reza Shah.
Mohammad Reza had a pro-Western foreign policy and encouraged economic development in the nation.
What led to his downfall initially however was 1963 The White Revolution - a series of social, political and economic reforms that Mohammad Reza initiated.
This looked to both modernise and westernise Iran.
But the reforms were perceived as controversial and led to some resistance from various religious and political factions.
On February 11, 1979, Iran's army declared its neutrality, paving the way for the fall of US-backed Shah Mohammad Reza.
He died in exile in Egypt in 1980.
Israel launched a fresh round of missile strikes on Iran's Fordow nuclear site - blowing up access roads to the uranium plant.
Significant damage has likely been caused to the plant and the sensitive machinery it houses by the US' bombing, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said.
Iran claimed to have moved much of the nuclear material away from the site before the strikes.
In bombing access routes, Israel could have made it more difficult to return anything that was removed.
Iran is now desperately trying to recruit its allies and the supreme leader has sent his foreign minister to Moscow.
In a televised meeting, Vlad slammed Trump's airstrikes as "unprovoked aggression" and said he was helping Iran.
The Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi was also set to deliver a letter from the supreme leader, sources said.
It comes as Vlad's man at the UN has warned that America has opened "Pandora's box" and that "no one knows what new catastrophes and suffering it will bring".
And elsewhere, the IDF targeted Iran's "Destruction of Israel" clock in this morning's strikes, according to Defence Minister Israel Katz.
The clock was erected in Palestine Square in Tehran in 2017, and supposedly counts down to the elimination of Israel - one of the regime's official goals - by 2040.
Katz listed the clock amongst various other targets responsible for "maintaining the regime's stability" as momentum towards regime change picks up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
Explosions heard in Qatar as Iranian missiles shot towards US airbase after Tehran vowed revenge for Trump nuke strikes
IRAN launched a salvo of ballistic missiles at Qatar targeting the biggest US military base in the Middle East. Loud explosions were heard in central Doha as air defence systems worked to intercept the missiles launched at Al Udeid air base - home to some 10,000 US army personnel. 3 3 All the Iranian missiles were shot down, it is understood. Footage shared by OSINT accounts appeared to show interceptions by air defence systems. It comes after the US said it expects that Iran could carry out retaliatory attacks targeting American forces in the next 24 to 48 hours. The Qataris have now closed their airspace. They said they reserve the right to respond directly and in accordance with international law. It has also been said that there are no casualties at the US Al Udeid military base in Doha, following Iran's attack on the facility. Tehran repeatedly threatened to strike US military bases in the Middle East following Donald Trump's bombing of its nuclear sites. Qatar is home to the largest US military base in the Middle East – Al Udeid Air Base. The base in the desert outside of Doha serves as the forward HQ for US Central Command. It houses about 10,000 troops and hosts some 40 military aircraft. In total, the US has about 50,000 troops stationed in the Middle East. British military personnel also serve there on rotation. Earlier today, The Sun reported that US and UK embassies in Qatar warned American and British citizens to 'shelter in place until further notice'. Meanwhile, the Israelis carried out their most intense bombing raids in Iran - pounding the Islamic Republic's intelligence HQ, a prison full of dissidents and the Fordow nuke plant for the second time. The IDF blew the gates off the notorious Evin Prison - a pit of torture and executions - hoping to bust out the regime's fierce critics languishing behind the walls. Also targeted were the Basij Headquarters of the Revolutionary Guard, Iran's "Destruction of Israel" countdown clock and various other security hubs, the IDF said. The Fordow mountain-fortress nuclear site was bombed - barely a day after the Americans pulverised it - with IDF rockets going after the "access routes". Significant damage has likely been caused to the plant and the sensitive machinery it houses by the US's bombing, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said. Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
header
Fifa is facing new questions over the increasingly fraught World Cup next year, with the issue of how to treat Iran while the country is involved in a conflict with the co-host the US. There are no provisions within Fifa's regulations to prevent Iran from playing their group matches in the US, despite the country being subject to military action by the Trump administration and Iranian citizens being under a travel ban that prevents them from entering the country. The ban contains an exemption that could apply to players, staff or associated families with teams at the 2026 Fifa World Cup. Iran, who faced USA in the group stage of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, qualified in March for their fourth consecutive World Cup. Although 2026 is also being hosted by Canada and Mexico, only by being given a specific slot in group A could Iran avoid playing in the US, with their matches then taking place in Mexico. If Iran won that group they would stay in Mexico for their last-32 game and any last-16 match. Should they go further – and they have never reached a World Cup knockout game – they would then play in the US. Fifa did not respond on Monday to a request for comment from the Guardian and will likely be considering its options before the World Cup draw, which is due to take place in December. The decision will be a difficult one for its president, Gianni Infantino, who has associated himself closely with President Donald Trump, who authorised the use of US bombs on Iranian nuclear sites last weekend. Infantino and the Fifa Council will have the final say on inclusion in the competition and the makeup of the draw, but the organising committee for Fifa competitions will be expected to have input. The committee has members from Canada, Mexico and Iran, and its chair is Uefa's president, Aleksander Ceferin. In 2022, his organisation announced that Ukraine and Belarus would be kept apart in Uefa competition draws, after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and his action may provide an example for Fifa to follow. Before the World Cup draw in Qatar, the agreed draw constraints included limitations on where teams could be selected but this related only to a 'general principle' that no more than one team from each confederation (excluding Europe) should appear in a given group.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Iran's closure of strait of Hormuz would be monumental act of self-harm, says Lammy
Any Iranian move to close the strait of Hormuz waterway would be an act of monumental self-harm, David Lammy, the UK's foreign secretary, said, as he continued to refuse to endorse the Israeli and American strikes on Iran, or lay out the UK view of their lawfulness. Lammy said there was no need for the British government to say if the strikes were legal since the UK was not involved in the action and had not been asked by the US to take part, or to allow the US to use the UK's Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean to target Iran. The US used B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles to hit Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday night. Lammy denied that the US was involved in regime change, saying the attacks were very targeted. No assessment had yet been completed on the effectiveness of the US attacks, he admitted, raising questions over whether Iran has moved its enriched uranium to a new site. Lammy, in an hour-long statement to the Commons, also disclosed the first RAF plane had evacuated 63 British nationals and their dependents to Cyprus from Israel. He said negotiations were under way to help the 4,000 British nationals in Israel that had registered with the Foreign Office. Referring to the Iranian parliament's decision to vote for the closure of the strait of Hormuz, he said contingency plans were in place. He told MPs: 'Be in no doubt we are prepared to defend our personnel, our assets and those of our allies and partners. We are closely monitoring how energy markets are responding to the conflict. We have been extremely clear to the Iranians. Any action to blockade their Straits of Hormuz would be a monumental act of self-harm, making a diplomatic solution even harder.' Lammy also repeated his plea for Iran to return to the negotiating table. He said: 'My message for Tehran was clear, take the off-ramp, dial this thing down, and negotiate with the United States seriously and immediately. 'The alternative is an even more destructive and far-reaching conflict, which could have unpredictable consequences.' For the first time since the crisis broke party political splits started to emerge with Liberal Democrats, Scottish Nationalists and Labour backbenchers, including the chair of the foreign affairs select committee, Emily Thornberry, challenging the trustworthiness of the US and the legality of its action. Lammy was also repeatedly asked if the UK's reputation as an upholder of rule-based order was not damaged if it could not admit the acts of its allies were unlawful. By contrast the Conservative frontbench and Reform MPs congratulated the US's actions, with some MPs backing regime change. Lammy said: 'It's not our belief that it is for us to change the regime of any country – that is for the people of that country.' He added 'I am confident that this is not about regime change and the Israelis have been clear they are not attacking the civilian population.' Asked about the Israeli bombing of the gates of Evin prison in Tehran, he said he had been reassured in phone call by the Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar that 'nuclear targets remained their objective and focus at this time'. The UK has long taken the view that any public criticism of the US only reduces the UK's private influence, but it has been rare for the government to be so circumspect in setting out its views on such a major crisis. Lammy did implicitly question the wisdom of a US strategy based heavily on air power, pointing out that 'strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon'. Thornberry expressed her concern over whether diplomatic negotiations favoured by Lammy would occur since that required a modicum of trust. She said given that Trump tore up the previous nuclear deal in 2018, Israel had ended the previous US-Israel talks by striking Iran and an emboldened Benjamin Netanyahu was talking about regime change, it is difficult to see how negotiations based on trust can take place. Lammy also broke new ground by saying for the first time that the UK's focus in any future diplomatic negotiations would be a requirement for Iran to accept zero enrichment of uranium, saying we have 'moved on' from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal that allowed Iran to enrich to 3.75%. Lammy insisted that Iran was in breach of its obligations by enriching uranium at levels of purity as high as 60% and said the country was engaging in deception and obfuscation. Speaking to the BBC, he also refused to say if he agreed with the latest US intelligence assessment that Iran was close to securing a nuclear weapon, saying instead that he relied on the report from the International Atomic Energy Agency , the UN's nuclear inspectorate, which said in its latest report it had no evidence that Iran was seeking to make a nuclear bomb.
