Sharpest View of the Sun Reveals Magnetic Stripes the Size of Manhattan
Scientists used the world's largest solar telescope to capture incredibly detailed images of the Sun's surface, revealing ultra-fine magnetic stripes rippling across the star and magnetic fields that resemble fluttering curtains, which modify light.
The Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope stands tall at 13 feet (4 meters) atop a volcano in Maui, Hawaii, staring at our host star with great intensity. Using the telescope's unique capabilities, a team led by scientists from the National Science Foundation (NSF) observed ultra-narrow bright and dark stripes on the solar photosphere at an unprecedented level of detail. The recent observations, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, offer new insight into how the Sun's magnetic fields shape the dynamics at its surface and affects space weather.
The stripes, called striations, ripple across the walls of solar granules—convection cells in the Sun's photosphere where hot gas rises from inside the star to reach the surface. They're around 12 miles wide (20 kilometers), roughly the length of Manhattan, which is tiny compared to the monstrous size of the Sun.
The striations are the result of curtain-like sheets of magnetic fields that ripple and shift across the surface of the Sun. As light from the granule walls passes through these fields, it appears to flutter and alternate between brightness and darkness. This variation is an indication of the underlying magnetic field, which appears dark when it's weaker and bright when it's relatively stronger. 'These striations are the fingerprints of fine-scale magnetic field variations,' David Kuridze, a scientist at the National Solar Observatory and the study's lead author, said in a statement.
The team behind the study used the Inouye telescope's Visible Broadband Imager instrument, which operates in a specific range of visible light, called the G-band, that highlights areas with strong magnetic activity. Scientists then compared the telescope's images with simulations that recreate the physics of the Sun's surface, finding them to be in agreement.
'Magnetism is a fundamental phenomenon in the universe, and similar magnetically induced stripes have also been observed in more distant astrophysical objects, such as molecular clouds,' Han Uitenbroek, NSO scientist and co-author of the study, said in a statement. 'Inouye's high resolution, in combination with simulations, allows us to better characterize the behavior of magnetic fields in a broad astrophysical context.'
Located approximately 93 million miles (149 million kilometers) from Earth, the Sun has been holding our solar system together with its gravity for nearly five billion years, and yet there is still so much we don't know about our host star. By studying the magnetic architecture of the solar surface, scientists are hoping to understand the physics behind solar eruptions, flares, and coronal mass ejections so that they can better predict space weather.
The Sun is currently at solar maximum, a period of heightened activity in its 11-year cycle which is marked by intense flareups that can sometimes be directed toward Earth. On May 10, 2024, a G5 magnetic storm—classified as extreme—hit Earth as a result of large expulsions of plasma from the Sun's corona. The G5 storm, the largest in more than 20 years, caused some deleterious effects on Earth's power grid and some spectacular auroras seen across much of the globe. The storm also increased atmospheric density in low Earth orbit by up to an order of magnitude, which in turn caused atmospheric drag that affected satellites.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks the Trump administration's National Science Foundation research funding cuts
BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump 's administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields. Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. An email Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned. At issue are 'indirect' costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren't linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient's indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses. The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as 'overhead' and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs. The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year. Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health.
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Trump administration's National Science Foundation research funding cuts blocked by judge
A federal judge has blocked President Trump's administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields. Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. An email by the Associated Press on Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned. At issue are "indirect" costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren't linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient's indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses. The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as "overhead" and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs. The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year. Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health. In a recent interview on "CBS Mornings Plus," Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors — whose organization sued the Trump administration over federal funding cuts to Columbia University — said examples of research that has been cut includes a research project that looks at discerning when AI is making fake videos or a project that examines when people start to believe lies that are repeatedly told. "We are losing all the critical research that helps us understand truth and fiction in our social media platforms, whether it's Facebook or X or any other platform," he said.
Washington Post
a day ago
- Washington Post
Judge blocks the Trump administration's National Science Foundation research funding cuts
BOSTON — A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump 's administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields. Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. An email Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned. At issue are 'indirect' costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren't linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient's indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses. The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as 'overhead' and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs. The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year. Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health.
