Freed HK Democracy Activist Says Needs To Figure Out 'Red Lines'

A leading face of Hong Kong's quashed democracy movement told reporters he would have to figure out "where the red lines are" following his release from prison on Friday, after more than four years behind bars.
Jimmy Sham was one of 45 opposition figures jailed for subversion after holding an informal election primary in 2020, in what was the city's largest national security case.
The 37-year-old was one of four people released on Friday after serving their sentences -- the second batch from the 45 to be freed in recent months.
"It's the first day, so I'm still trying to figure out what I can and should do in the future, and where the red lines are," Sham told local media reporters.
Civil and political rights in the city have been curtailed since Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law on Hong Kong in 2020, after enormous and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests the year before.
Sham was the convenor of the now-defunct Civil Human Rights Front, one of the marches' largest organising groups.
A well-known LGBTQ activist, Sham wore a locally designed T-shirt featuring a parade of cartoon creatures waving a rainbow flag as he was released.
While he was in jail, judges ruled on a case he had brought asking the city's top court to strike down Hong Kong's same-sex marriage ban.
"(The case) was a blessing to me. I was in a mild depression... It made me feel as if something could change, and it made me feel empowered," he said Friday.
Judges rejected same-sex marriage but ordered the government to set up an "alternative legal framework" to protect same-sex couples' rights.
"It's a shame that the case was lost, but having a framework that can be established (in the future) has been a big change," Sham said.
But after four years and three months in jail, he said he had a lot to catch up on and learn from others.
"I think I am out of touch with society," he said, adding he wanted to spend time with his family before anything else.
He walked free along with three former district councillors, Roy Tam, Henry Wong, and Kinda Li.
Their release follows that of ex-legislators Claudia Mo, Jeremy Tam, Kwok Ka-ki and Gary Fan, also part of the 45, in late April.
Sham said he had "mixed feelings" about his freedom.
"I've experienced a lot of unhappiness and powerlessness, so I hope we can all pull ourselves together, and try to get on with our lives anyway," he said.
"I won't leave Hong Kong at this moment, as many who are meaningful to me are still staying here," he added.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Int'l Business Times

a day ago

• Int'l Business Times

Budapest Mayor Defies Police Ban On Pride March

Hungarian police on Thursday banned the country's main Pride march from taking place in Budapest on June 28 but the capital's mayor defied them, vowing it would still go ahead. Since Prime Minister Viktor Orban returned to power in 2010, Hungary has passed a series of laws which have been criticised at home and across the European Union for curtailing the rights of the country's sexual and gender minorities in the name of "child protection". "The police, acting within their authority over public assemblies, prohibit the holding of the assembly at the aforementioned location and time," the police said on their website. Police said the ban was necessary under recent legislation that bans the promotion of same-sex relationships to under-18s. They said any appeal against the decision must be lodged with the central European country's supreme court within three days. Budapest's liberal Mayor Gergely Karacsony vowed to hold the gathering despite the ban. He said the police decision had "no value" because the march did not require official authorisation anyway, as it was an event organised by the city council. "Budapest city hall will organise the Budapest Pride march on June 28 as a city event. Period," he wrote on Facebook. On Monday he had announced that Budapest city hall would organise the march in an attempt to sidestep the recently adopted law. One senior government figure on Wednesday accused the mayor of "trying to cheat". "All events of this type have to be announced, and the police have the right to ban them," said Gergely Gulyas, head of Orban's office. "No serious legal expert would try to dispute that." In mid-March, the Hungarian parliament passed a bill aimed at banning any gathering that violates an anti-LGBTQ law adopted in 2021. The 2021 law prohibits the "display or promotion of homosexuality" to under-18s. In its decision published Thursday, police said that the march "by its very nature cannot be held without the representation" of people belonging to the LGBTQ community and that under-18s could be present along the route. "If it cannot be stated with absolute certainty that the display is not taking place in the presence of persons under 18 years of age, the assembly would be in breach of the ban," the police said. Hungarian lawmakers in April overwhelmingly backed constitutional changes that strengthened the legal foundations for banning the Pride march. The government said the annual event could be held at an enclosed location like a stadium, out of sight of children. The conflict over the Pride march has already sparked protests in Hungary. Thousands of people blocked bridges in the capital, demanding the ban be repealed. Several members of the European Parliament have said they will attend the parade. European equalities commissioner Hadja Lahbib is also due to attend the march, as are ministers from several European Union countries, the organisers said. Attendees risk a fine of up to 500 euros ($570), which the Hungarian authorities say will be channelled into "child protection" projects. Police may use facial recognition technology to identify them. Under Orban, Hungary has passed several laws targeting the LGBT community that have been criticised abroad AFP The conflict over the Pride march has already sparked protests in Hungary AFP

Int'l Business Times

2 days ago

• Int'l Business Times

Fundraising Shift At NY Pride As Trump Scares Off Corporate Donors

New York's pride parade, the highest-profile annual US LGBTQ gathering, is ramping up efforts to raise funds from individual community members with corporate donations on the wane as Washington demonizes diversity. Following President Donald Trump's attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion policies in both government and the private sector, several companies have cancelled or curtailed their sponsorships of pride parades this year. NYC Pride's spokesman Kevin Kilbride said "just about 80 percent of the fundraising goal" for the city's largest pride parade group had been met. The parade itself will be held on June 29, and according to organizers could draw as many as two million attendees. "That gap we're trying to fill with a community fundraising campaign. So in the middle of May, we launched a peer-to-peer campaign so folks can start their own fundraiser online, share it with their friends, and then have folks donate to that," he said. The group was "wanting to lean a little bit more into individual giving and support from the community," he said. The organization behind the annual parade as well as several other community projects said it raised "nearly $25,000 from almost 200 donors" in a matter of days. In years past, flamboyant floats sponsored by large corporations have paraded down Manhattan's Fifth Avenue alongside those organized by community groups. And while many will still participate, some have quietly cut back their commitments. Muneer Panjwani, who runs Engage for Good, said "there's been a massive pullback over the last year, specifically in corporations that have long supported pride events that have decided not to support anyone." Panjwani's organization connects companies to non-profits, and reports on the sums raised from "checkout giving" -- where consumers are given the option of donating while paying for goods in a store. "While companies are pulling away their philanthropic dollars at the top level, from the bottom up, consumers are saying, 'we still care about this issue,'" he said. One of the most prominent brands that reportedly stepped back from its previously high-profile involvement with pride was discount department store Target. For a time, Target was reportedly asking to forego publicity and donate to New York Pride silently, but has now reinstated its float at the parade, according to Kilbride. The retailer has come under fire and seen its share price dip after a boycott was organized online in response to it curtailing diversity programs, citing "the evolving external landscape." "We will continue to mark Pride Month... (by) sponsoring local events in neighborhoods across the country," a Target spokesman told AFP. At Brooklyn's annual pride parade, progressive Democratic city councilman Chi Osse told AFP that "pride started grassroots through community, and corporations bowing the knee at a president who thinks he's a king just shows us who they are to us." Brooklyn's pride event is a smaller affair and has long been seen as a more radical gathering than its Manhattan sibling -- albeit with a handful of its own corporate participants. One of those leading the twilight parade's Sirens Women's Motorcycle Club contingent, Anya Glowa-Kollisch, said "it's great when companies are willing to say that they support equal rights." "But I think at the end of the day, it's a movement that's driven by people demanding their rights, and a lot of corporations just kind of do this because they think they should," they said. "So it's really valuable to have people in the community coming out and showing that this is who we are."

DW

11-06-2025

• DW

Just good neighbors? What nations helping Syria really want – DW – 06/11/2025

Aid, money, political cover — Syria's neighbors are providing a lot to the war-torn country. But the likes of Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the US are obviously not just helping Syria because they're benevolent and kind. With strings attached — that is how almost all the recent foreign aid and assistance into Syria should be seen. After the December 2024 rebel offensive that toppled the country's decades-long Assad family dictatorship, various neighboring states have stepped in to help Syria recover from 14 years of brutal civil war. There is a lot of vaunted talk of humanitarian assistance, Arab unity, international development and regional security. But as in any other diplomatic sphere, most of the countries involved are also acting in their own self-interest. So, what are they doing in Syria and why? Turkey: Biggest winner Turkey has often been described as the "biggest winner" after the ousting of the Assad regime in a lightning offensive led by the rebel group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS. "The [HTS] group had long cultivated a close working relationship with Ankara because the rebels controlled Idlib, a province on the Turkish border in northern Syria," Asli Aydintasbas, a senior policy fellow and expert on Turkey at the European Council on Foreign Relations, or ECFR, explained recently . HTS has gone on to form an interim government, keeping some of the most powerful ministries — such as defense, foreign affairs and interior — for its own members or close associates. This puts the Turkish government, with existing ties to HTS, in a powerful position. "Turkey, first and foremost, in the mid- and long term, is interested in the stabilization of Syria," Sinem Adar, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies . "It doesn't want a failed state at its border." Earlier this month, Turkish defense minister Yasar Guler (pictured) said Turkish soldiers will stay in Syria for the time being Image: SIMON WOHLFAHRT/AFP There are currently around 20,000 Turkish troops in northern Syria, there has been talk of a Turkish-Syrian defense pact, as well as plans to set up Turkish air and naval bases inside Syria. Earlier this month, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler told journalists his country will help train the new Syrian military. In the shorter term, one of Turkey's primary objectives was to counter Syrian Kurdish forces, who controlled large parts of Syria's northeast during the war. Turkey considers these to be allied with the militant Kurdish Worker's Party, or PKK. For decades, the latter was engaged in a violent, armed struggle against Turkey, for Kurdish rights, but announced the end of their insurgency earlier this year. This is why Turkey has backed the formation of a centralized government in Syria, rather than a federation of semi-autonomous areas run by different Syrian communities, including the Kurds. For now, Turkey appears to have got its way: Syria's Kurds have agreed to be part of the central, HTS-led interim government and say their troops will join the new Syrian army. There are also economic opportunities for Turkey in Syria. The neighboring country was already providing a lot of consumer goods in HTS-controlled areas and also has a large construction sector that would benefit from rebuilding in Syria. In fact, stock prices for Turkish construction sector businesses rose around 3% after the ouster of the Assad regime. A more prosperous Syria would also mean Syrian refugees in Turkey, who have become a tricky political issue, would be more likely to return home Image: Ahmed Deeb/dpa/picture alliance The Gulf states: Money and power Various Gulf states have come to Syria's financial and reputational rescue over the past few months. Saudi Arabia and Qatar paid off its $15.5 million (€13.6 million) debt to the World Bank, Qatar will pay around $87 million in salaries for Syrian public servants and some of Syria's first major development deals have been with United Arab Emirates, Qatari and Turkish companies. Saudi Arabian leaders also successfully pushed for the lifting of sanctions on Syria and, although it was never officially confirmed, the UAE allegedly helped defuse tensions between Syria and neighboring Israel. "The [Gulf] states are exerting their leverage on Syria's need of financial resources to entrench economic and political alliances with the new leadership in Damascus," Eleonora Ardemagni, a senior research fellow at the Italian Institute for International Political Studies, explained in a June analysis . "[Gulf] states' interest lies in strengthening their political, security and economic ties with Damascus and using this to address questions that matter to them, such as trafficking of the Captagon drug and counterterrorism," Emily Tasinato, an ECFR fellow researching the Gulf region, also wrote recently. For Gulf leaders, there is also emphasis on filling the geopolitical power vacuum that arose after the end of the Assad regime. Previously Iran and Russia were Assad's biggest supporters and Gulf states, with mostly Sunni Muslim leaderships, were happy to see Iran, a Shiite Muslim theocracy and perennial foe, pushed out. Saudi Arabia is also concerned about Turkey's influence, Ardemagni suggested. After meeting with Syrian leader Ahmad al-Sharaa (right) in Saudi Arabia, President Trump (center) said he would lift sanctions on Syria partially because Saudi prince Mohammed bin Salman (left) asked him to Image: IMAGO US: A brand new alliance? US President Donald Trump previously called for American troops to get out of Syria. "This is not our fight," he wrote on social media last December. But that attitude seems to have changed following talks with the leaders of Saudi Arabia and Turkey, both of whom Trump professes to like personally. During the civil war, around 2,000 US soldiers were stationed alongside Syrian Kurds, in the ongoing fight against the extremist "Islamic State," or "IS," group. Currently a drawdown is underway, with 500 having already left as Syrian-Kurdish fighters integrate into the general Syrian army. However, this month, there have also been reports that a US military delegation will soon come to Damascus to make a deal to transition the previously unauthorized American presence into an authorized one. In an interview with Syria TV last month, US State Department spokesperson Michael Mitchell said it was too early for the US to withdraw completely because of ongoing concerns about the "IS" group. The US was ready to begin a "new era" in its relationship with Syria, Mitchell added. Observers have speculated the US could actually take on an even bigger role in Syria in the future. This would, they argue, counter Russian influence and potentially even lead to some kind of Syrian-Israeli detente. Iran, Russia: The biggest losers Both countries are often described as having lost the most after the ousting of the Assad regime. Both previously had a significant presence in Syria, and this has been significantly reduced. But that does not mean either is gone for good. Russian diplomats retain a presence in Syria, Russia has controversially positioned itself as a "protector" of Syria's minorities and also has close economic ties to Syrian allies like Turkey and the UAE. As for Iran, its "influence in Syria is no longer contingent on the Assad regime's survival," Egyptian security analyst Mohamed ELDoh wrote for specialist US outlet, Global Security Review , this month. "It is embedded in paramilitary networks, ideological infrastructure and narco-trafficking cartels."