DeepSeek 再被懷疑用 Google Gemini 訓練新版 R1 模型

DeepSeek 以低成本訓練出足夠強效的推理 AI 模型，曾經震驚業界，甚至是政界。DeepSeek 最新推出的 R1-0528 模型主打更強數理和編程表現，不過他們的訓練數據卻未曾公開，AI 業界又再一次懷疑 DeepSeek 是透過蒸餾其他 AI 模型而開發新版本。
其中一個支持這論點的是澳洲開發者 Sam Paech，他在 X 上發文指出R1-0528 模型的語言風格與 Google Gemini 2.5 Pro 極為相似。他認為 DeepSeek 已經從以往基於 OpenAI 的數據切換至 Gemini 的合成數據。另一位開發者 SpeechMap 則發現，R1 模型生成的'推理痕跡'（AI 在得出結論時的思維過程）也與 Gemini 模型極為相似。
If you're wondering why new deepseek r1 sounds a bit different, I think they probably switched from training on synthetic openai to synthetic gemini outputs. pic.twitter.com/Oex9roapNv
— Sam Paech (@sam_paech) May 29, 2025
另一邊廂非牟利 AI 研究機構 AI2 的 AI 專家 Nathan Lambert 更發文指 DeepSeek 在缺乏 GPU 和鉅額資金的支持下，也一定會透過市場最佳的模型 API 來蒸餾數據，這次就是 Gemini。
2024 年時，OpenAI 透過金融時報發聲，指他們獲得證據指 DeepSeek V3 是透過蒸餾 ChatGPT 的數據來訓練而成，後來 Bloomberg 也報道指主要金主 Microsoft 偵測到在 2024 年年底，有大量資料經過 OpenAI 開發者帳戶外洩，他們相信是與 DeepSeek 有關。
為防止競爭對手利用其模型數據，AI 公司正加強安全措施。例如，OpenAI 現在要求用戶完成身份驗證才能訪問高級模型，而 Google 則開始對 Gemini 模型生成的'推理痕跡'進行摘要處理，讓競爭對手更難以利用其數據。
更多內容：
DeepSeek may have used Google's Gemini to train its latest model
DeepSeek 懶人包｜中國AI新創如何影響美國AI巨企？一文整理歷史、最新影響及未來
中國 DeepSeek AI 模型自稱 GPT-4，「AI 天材」是抄襲還是幻想？
DeepSeek 反客為主！連百度搜尋都已確定引入
緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠，追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台！
🎉📱 Tech Facebook：https://www.facebook.com/yahootechhk
🎉📱 Tech Instagram：https://www.instagram.com/yahootechhk/
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群：https://chat.whatsapp.com/Dg3fiiyYf3yG2mgts4Mii8
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道：https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va91dmR545urVCpQwq2D
🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道：https://t.me/yahootechhk

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

How Trump quietly made the historic decision to launch strikes in Iran

By the time President Donald Trump was milling about his golf club in New Jersey on Friday evening, the planes were about to be in the air. To onlookers at the club, Trump showed little anxiety about his decision to authorize airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities that could have profound ramifications both on US national security and his own presidential legacy. The B-2 stealth bombers carrying 30,000-pound bunker busters were preparing to take off at midnight from their base in Missouri, destined for Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Another set of planes was heading west, a deliberate attempt at misdirection as Trump demanded complete secrecy for his momentous decision. As Trump escorted Sam Altman, the chief executive of OpenAI, to an event for new members in a clubhouse dining room, he was loose and — at least in public — in an easygoing mood, people who saw him said. 'I hope he's right about the AI,' Trump joked at one point, gesturing to his guest. Twenty-four hours later, Trump was in the basement Situation Room at the White House, wearing a red 'Make America Great Again' hat as he watched the strikes he had approved days earlier, codenamed 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' play out in real time on the facility's wall of monitors. 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success,' he said a few hours later during late-night remarks from the White House Cross Hall. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.' The decision to go ahead with strikes thrusts the United States directly into the Middle East conflict, raising worries about Iranian reprisals and questions about Trump's endgame. It came after days of public deliberation, as Trump alternated between issuing militaristic threats against Iran on social media and holding private concerns that a military strike could drag the US into prolonged war. Yet by Thursday, the same day he instructed his press secretary to announce he was giving Iran two weeks to return to the negotiating table before deciding on a strike, allies who spoke to him said it was clear that the decision was already made. Speaking on NBC on Sunday, Vice President JD Vance said Trump retained the ability to call off the strikes 'until the very last minute.' But he elected to go ahead. Administration officials went to great lengths to conceal their planning. Deferring the strike decision for a fortnight appeared in keeping with the mission's attempts at diversion — a tactic designed to obscure the attack plans, even though Trump held off giving a final go-ahead until Saturday, according to senior US officials. By the end of the week, US officials had come to believe Iran was not ready to return to the table and strike a satisfactory nuclear deal after Europeans leaders met with their Iranian counterparts on Friday, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN. Trump's two-week public deadline lasted only 48 hours before he took one of the most consequential actions of his presidency. The operation began at midnight ET Friday, with the B-2 bombers launching from Missouri on an 18-hour journey that was the planes' longest mission in more than two decades, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a Sunday morning Pentagon briefing. 'This is a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and preparation so that we could be ready when the president of the United States called,' Hegseth said alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine. 'It took a great deal of precision. It involved misdirection and the highest of operational security.' Discussions about potential options for American strikes on Iran began in earnest between Trump and members of his national security team during a weekend retreat at Camp David in early June, where CIA Director John Ratcliffe briefed Trump on US assessments that Israel was prepared to imminently begin strikes. The options for Trump to join Israel in its campaign had been drawn up in the months beforehand, with the president's advisers having already worked out differences among themselves over what options were on the menu for him to decide from. In the week before he made the final call for US stealth bombers and Navy submarines to target three Iranian nuclear sites, Trump held briefings each day with his national security team in the basement Situation Room to discuss attack plans — and to weigh the potential consequences. Trump came to the secret talks with two principal concerns: that a US attack be decisive in taking out the highly fortified sites, including the underground Fordow enrichment facility; and that any action he took did not pull the US into the type of prolonged, deadly war he promised to avoid as a candidate. On the first point, officials were confident in the US bunker-busting bombs' ability to penetrate the facility, even though such an action hadn't been tested previously. Caine said Sunday that the initial assessment shows 'extremely severe damage and destruction' to Iran's three nuclear sites, though he noted it will take time to determine the ultimate impact to the country's nuclear capabilities. (Iranian officials downplayed the impact of the US strikes to their nuclear facilities on Sunday.) But on the second question of a prolonged war, officials could hardly promise the president that Iran's reprisals — which could include targeting American assets or personnel in the region — wouldn't draw the US into a new quagmire. 'As the president has directed, made clear, this is most certainly not open-ended,' Hegseth said Sunday. 'Doesn't mean it limits our ability to respond. We will respond if necessary.' The uncertainly seemed to give Trump pause, and throughout the week he said in public he hadn't yet made a decision, even if behind the scenes it appeared to the president's advisers that his mind was made up. Trump departed his Bedminster golf club Saturday afternoon and returned to the White House for a scheduled 'national security meeting' — travel that was unusual for the president on a weekend but was previewed on his daily scheduled released the day prior. The US conveyed to Iran through back-channel discussions that the strikes Trump ordered Saturday would be contained and that no further strikes were planned going forward, according to two people familiar with the discussions. But Trump's public message Saturday night after the strikes — warning of 'far greater' future US attacks if Iran retaliates — underscored the unpredictable period he is entering in the Middle East. In April, Trump issued an ultimatum to Iran on a potential nuclear agreement, warning Tehran to strike a deal within 60 days — by mid-June. At the same time, Trump urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on attacking Iran so he could give talks the time and space to show progress. A first round of talks was held in mid-April between the US and Tehran in Oman, led by Trump's foreign envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Despite optimistic notes following the conversations, there was little progress toward an actual nuclear deal. On June 8 — less than a week before Trumps's 60-day deadline was set to expire — he huddled with his advisers at Camp David, where he was presented with potential options on Iran. The next day, Trump and Netanyahu spoke by phone. Several weeks earlier, Netanyahu had told a group of US lawmakers that Israel was going to strike Iran — and he was not seeking permission from the US to do so. Sixty-one days after Trump's ultimatum, Israel launched unprecedented strikes on Iran, targeting its nuclear program and military leaders. 'Iran should have listened to me when I said — you know, I gave them, I don't know if you know but I gave them a 60-day warning and today is day 61,' Trump told CNN's Dana Bash after the Israeli strikes began. But senior Trump officials also initially distanced themselves from the attack, issuing statements that Israel took unilateral action and the US was not involved. As Israel continued its military campaign in Iran, Trump traveled to Alberta, Canada, for a G7 summit, only to return to Washington early 'because of what's going on in the Middle East,' the White House said. Trump spent much of the past week meeting in the Situation Room with his national security team to review attack plans and their potential consequences. On Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt read a statement dictated by Trump: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' But there were signs that diplomacy was not moving forward. Witkoff made attempts at meeting his Iranian interlocutor, Araghchi, with little luck. And Trump had been leaning toward joining Israel's military campaign in private discussions with senior staff even during Witkoff's diplomatic efforts. After European leaders met with Iran's foreign minister on Friday in Geneva, US officials felt it appeared the Iranians would not sit down with the US without Trump asking Netanyahu to stop Israel's attacks — something Trump was not willing to do, sources said. That afternoon, on his way to his New Jersey club, Trump told reporters that his two-week timeframe was the 'maximum' amount of time, and he could make up his mind sooner. Ahead of the Saturday strikes, the US gave Israel a heads-up it was going to attack. Netanyahu held a five-hour meeting with top Israeli officials that lasted through the US strikes, according to a source familiar with the meeting. Trump and Netanyahu spoke by phone again afterward, and the Israeli prime minister praised the US attack in a video message, saying it was carried out 'with complete operational coordination between the IDF and the United States military.' The US had also notified some Gulf partners that it was ready to strike Iran within the coming days, but it did not specify targets and time frame, according to a source familiar with the matter. The message was delivered verbally, the source said, and there was a meeting at the White House where some of these Gulf partners were told. Trump and his team were in contact with top congressional Republicans before Saturday's strikes, but some top Democrats were not told of his plans until after the bombs had dropped, according to multiple people familiar with the plans. Hegseth said Sunday that congressional leaders were notified 'immediately' after planes were out of Iranian airspace. The operation began at midnight Eastern Time Friday into Saturday morning. Caine said that B-2 bombers launched from the US, some headed west as a decoy while the rest 'proceeded quietly to the east with minimal communications throughout the 18-hour flight.' The unprecedented US operation involved seven stealth B-2 bombers. All told, over 125 aircraft were involved, including the B-2s, refueling tankers, reconnaissance planes and fighter jets. At approximately 5 p.m. ET, Caine said, a US submarine 'launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles against key surface infrastructure targets' at the Isfahan nuclear site. And shortly after, at approximately 6:40 p.m. ET, or 2:10 a.m. local time, the lead B-2 bomber plane launched two bunker-buster bombs at Fordow nuclear site, Caine said, and the 'remaining bombers then hit their targets.' Those additional targets were struck, Caine said, 'between 6:40 p.m. ET and 7:05 p.m. ET.' The US military then 'began its return home,' Caine said, noting that no shots were fired by Iran at the US on the way in or out. After US planes had left Iranian airspace, Trump revealed the attack to the world on his social media platform, Truth Social. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Trump wrote, adding that 'a full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow.' CNN's Kylie Atwood, Natasha Bertrand, Haley Britzky, Zachary Cohen, Sarah Ferris, Betsy Klein, Manu Raju, Morgan Rimmer, Jim Sciutto, Alayna Treene and Kaitlan Collins contributed to this report.

Yahoo

3 hours ago

• Yahoo

傳蘋果將捨棄Google合作 將收購AI搜尋黑馬Perplexity

科技中心／李宜樺報導 ▼▲蘋果傳新併購消息！恐捨棄Google，轉密會AI搜尋新星Perplexity。（圖／翻攝自YT@Apple） AI戰升溫，科技巨頭火力全開！繼Meta投資Scale AI後，如今傳出蘋果也悄悄布局，要收購AI搜尋新貴「Perplexity AI」，甚至傳出考慮放棄Google作為預設搜尋引擎。這場看似平靜的搜尋戰場，已悄然掀起風暴！ 根據《彭博》知名科技記者Mark Gurman爆料，蘋果併購部門主管Adrian Perica已在內部討論是否收購Perplexity，雖仍處於早期階段，但若交易成真，將是蘋果史上最大規模併購案──該公司估值高達140億美元，遠超2014年30億美元收購Beats的紀錄。 除了併購，蘋果也考慮另一合作模式，將Perplexity整合至Safari與Siri，作為替代Google搜尋的AI解決方案。畢竟蘋果與Google的搜尋合作協議，正面臨美國反壟斷調查威脅，恐有被迫拆夥的可能。 Perplexity成立僅兩年，卻以AI驅動搜尋技術嶄露頭角，透過自動總結、引文標示等功能挑戰Google霸主地位，甚至已與三星展開深度合作，成為蘋果收購計畫的潛在障礙。 Perplexity對收購傳聞低調回應，稱「目前沒有相關消息」，但該公司近期與多家科技巨頭接觸頻繁，包括Meta也曾試圖收購、並挖角其CEO Aravind Srinivas，顯示AI搜尋市場人才爭奪戰已進入白熱化。 當AI搜尋成為下一代搜尋引擎的競爭主戰場，蘋果此舉無疑是對Google發出重大威脅。科技巨頭的版圖重組已開始，誰能掌握搜尋流量與AI技術，誰就能主宰未來。 更多三立新聞網報導2025報稅必知／報稅倒數9天 你真的報完了嗎？「這一步」沒做＝白報！美軍參戰 介入以伊戰爭！衝突升級 冷靜異常的黃金現補漲行情？全球熱錢瘋搶亞洲 高盛曝對沖基金5年最大買盤新光金、新壽5月再虧破百億 靠準備金撐盤仍難止血？

Yahoo

4 hours ago

• Yahoo

OpenAI scrubs news of Jony Ive deal amid trademark dispute

OpenAI has removed news of its deal with Jony Ive's io from its website. The takedown comes amid a trademark dispute filed by iyO, an AI hardware startup. OpenAI said it doesn't agree with the complaint and is "reviewing our options." Turns out "i" and "o" make for a popular combination of vowels in the tech industry. Sam Altman's OpenAI launched a very public partnership with io, the company owned by famed Apple designer Jony Ive, in May. The announcement included a splashy video and photos of the two of them looking like old friends. On Sunday, however, OpenAI scrubbed any mention of that partnership from its website and social media. That's because iyO, a startup spun out of Google's moonshot factory, X, and which sounds like io, is suing OpenAI, io, Altman, and Ive for trademark infringement. iyO's latest product, iyO ONE, is an "ear-worn device that uses specialized microphones and bone-conducted sound to control audio-based applications with nothing more than the user's voice," according to the suit iyO filed on June 9. The partnership between OpenAI and io, meanwhile, is rumored to be working on a similarly screen-less, voice-activated AI device. According to its deal with OpenAI, Ive's firm will lead creative direction and design at OpenAI, focusing on developing a new slate of consumer devices. When the deal was announced, neither party shared specific details about future products. However, Altman said the partnership would shape the "future of AI." iyO approached OpenAI earlier this year about a potential collaboration and funding. OpenAI declined that offer, however, and says it is now fighting the trademark lawsuit. "We don't agree with the complaint and are reviewing our options," OpenAI told Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider