Singapore's election 2025: Continuity, change, and democratic limits
With the 2025 general election, the city-State's political trajectory reached a critical point under Lawrence Wong's premiership. Even as the People's Action Party (PAP) retained power, the election reflected changing voter expectations, opposition resilience, and the challenges of greater political liberalisation in a controlled democracy. A comparison of the 2025 election with the previous ones in 2015 and 2020 provides insight into both the continuity and subtle shifts within Singapore's political landscape.
The use of Group Representation Constituencies (GRC), restrictions on media, and limited campaign periods raise concerns about fairness. These institutional mechanisms, unchanged in 2025, contribute to the PAP's dominance. The Electoral Boundaries Review Committee, appointed by the Prime Minister (PM)'s Office, has frequently redrawn constituencies in ways that critics argue disadvantage opposition strongholds—an issue consistent across all three elections.
A significant difference between 2025 and earlier elections lies in leadership. PM Lawrence Wong, who took office in 2022, led the PAP into a general election for the first time. In contrast, Lee Hsien Loong had led the party during the 2006, 2011, 2015, and 2020 elections. Wong's leadership was a test of whether the PAP's fourth-generation (4G) team could command the same level of trust and legitimacy among the voters.
While the PAP's slight vote recovery in 2025 indicates some voter confidence in Wong's leadership, it is equally plausible that the electorate was motivated by fears of instability amidst global economic headwinds. The Covid-19 pandemic, political corruption scandals, and rising geopolitical tensions between the US and China all formed the backdrop for 2025. Wong campaigned on issues of continuity and stability, but his popularity is yet to match Lee Kuan Yew or even Lee Hsien Loong. This suggests a future vulnerability for the PAP if governance challenges mount.
The Workers' Party (WP), widely seen as the most credible opposition force, retained 10 elected seats in 2025. Including two Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) seats, its total parliamentary representation stood at 12—identical to 2020. This marked a plateau in opposition gains, despite a more professional campaign, growing youth support, and targeted messaging on the cost of living, housing, and transparency.
Smaller opposition parties, such as the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), which made headlines in 2020 with the entry of former PAP MP Tan Cheng Bock, struggled to gain traction in 2025. This reflects a consolidation of opposition support around the WP, but also public scepticism about lesser-known challengers lacking parliamentary experience.
Many of the concerns in 2025 mirrored those of the 2020 election—cost of living, income inequality, job security, and housing affordability. However, these issues were framed more sharply due to inflationary pressures and a volatile global economy. The PAP attempted to assure voters of its economic stewardship, while the opposition capitalised on growing discontent, especially among younger voters facing stagnant wages and high home prices.
Another critical theme for 2025 was governance and integrity. The PAP's long-standing image of incorruptibility has come under stress through a series of scandals. Notably, former transport minister S Iswaran was charged with corruption in 2024—the first such case in decades. Additionally, public backlash erupted over ministers' interactions with a convicted money launderer, further eroding public trust. These events echoed concerns raised in 2011 about ministerial salaries and the arrogance of the elite, but they struck harder in 2025 because they contradicted the PAP's post-2020 reformist image.
While the party took swift action to discipline members involved, opposition parties framed these incidents as signs of systemic opacity. The WP's call for more robust institutional checks and balances resonated in this context but fell short of tipping the electoral scale.
The 2025 election also highlighted demographic shifts in political attitudes. Young voters, particularly those aged 21–35, expressed growing frustration with the status quo. While many still supported the PAP for pragmatic reasons, surveys indicated increasing openness to diverse political voices. The WP's messaging on sustainability, education reforms, and political diversity aligned well with the youth.
However, overall, voter behaviour still remained cautious. Unlike in western democracies, where political polarisation can lead to major power shifts, Singaporean voters tend to favour incremental change within a secure political framework. This dynamic, seen clearly in the cautious expansion of opposition seats in both 2020 and 2025, reveals a political culture that values competence over ideology—a double-edged sword for reform.
Voter turnout in 2025 stood at 93.1%, comparable to 95.6% in 2020 and 93.6% in 2015, reflecting continued high civic engagement. However, voter sentiment appeared more subdued. The 2015 election was energised by the passing of founding father Lee Kuan Yew, while 2020 was marked by pandemic-related uncertainty and a digital-heavy campaign. In contrast, 2025 saw a more technocratic and policy-driven campaign, with fewer emotional appeals and a greater focus on technocratic competence. Innovative use of social media platforms is another defining feature of the 2025 general election in the country.
Singapore's political system has long been characterised by stability, centralised power, limited opposition, and a cautious electorate. Yet, when compared to 2015 and 2020, it also revealed signs of political maturity. The electorate is becoming more discerning, less deferential, and more concerned about accountability. The PAP's dominance, while still overwhelming, is now contingent on its ability to maintain transparency and manage socioeconomic tensions while also maintaining high economic growth.
Whether Singapore moves toward a more pluralistic political model or maintains the status quo will depend on how both the ruling party and opposition respond to transforming public expectations. The 2025 election may not have radically altered the political map, but it sets the stage for deeper questions about governance, legitimacy, and the future of democracy in one of Asia's most successful yet tightly managed States.
This article is authored by Rahul Mishra, associate professor, Centre for Indo-Pacific Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, and senior research fellow, Thammasat University, Thailand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
BJP MP Eatala Rajender accuses Revanth Reddy of undermining self-respect, sacrifices of Telangana people; praises PM Narendra Modi's leadership
BJP MP Eatala Rajender HYDERABAD: At the same meeting, BJP MP Eatala Rajender accused chief minister Revanth Reddy of "undermining the self-respect of Telangana people" and failing to uphold the sacrifices made during the statehood movement. He slammed the Congress govt for pushing the state into debt and weakening probes into BRS-era scams. He praised PM Modi for "ensuring India's safety during the Covid-19 pandemic" and for encouraging indigenous vaccine production. "Schemes like PM-Kisan and Ujjwala Yojana are transforming lives of the poor, farmers, and women. We are moving with a vision to make India a developed country by 2047," he said.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
'Bullseye': Trump claims 'monumental damage' inflicted on Iranian nuclear sites
President Donald Trump asserted on his Truth Social platform that Iran's nuclear sites sustained "monumental damage" in the American attack, though a US assessment on the strikes is still underway. "The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" he wrote. US defence officials have said they are working to determine about just how much damage the strikes did. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like LG, KT, SK 모든 통신사 개통당일 현금 100만원 당일 지급! 똑똑하게 돌려받자! 인싸통 더 알아보기 Undo Iran as well has not said how much damage was done in the attack, though Tehran has not offered any details so far on the strikes it has faced from Israel in its war with that country. Iran likely filled in tunnels at nuclear sites ahead of US strikes Live Events An analysis of satellite photos by a nuclear nonproliferation group based in Washington shows Iran likely filled in tunnels at its nuclear site at Isfahan ahead of US strikes early Sunday. The Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security published satellite images taken by Airbus it assessed showed trucks dumping soil into tunnels at the site on Friday. The US attack likely targeted the tunnel entries, the group said. "At least three of the four tunnel entrances are collapsed," it said. "The status of the fourth one is unclear." Iran also is believed to have filled in tunnels at its underground Fordo enrichment facility before the American strike. That may have been to protect the sites from the strikes. Meanwhile, the US cruise missile strike at the Isfahan site likely destroyed its uranium conversion facility, the Institute for Science and International Security said. That facility takes natural uranium and turns it into uranium hexafluoride, which is what Iran spins in centrifuges to enrich. Australia endorses US strikes, FM says Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said her government endorsed the US strikes. "We support action to prevent Iran getting a nuclear weapon and that is what this is," she said. Her remarks to Channel Nine news Monday were firmer than an official statement supplied Sunday by her government immediately after the strikes that stopped short of backing President Trump's measures. "Ultimately we want to see de-escalation and diplomacy," Wong said Monday. She would not say whether Australian satellite communications or signals intelligence were employed by the United States. Both countries are members of the Five Eyes intelligence sharing partnership. But Wong said the US had been clear that "this was a unilateral strike."
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
APMC recognition soon for foreign medical graduates
Vijayawada: In a major relief for foreign medical graduates (FMGs), the Andhra Pradesh Medical Council (APMC) has decided to issue recognition letters in line with the National Medical Commission (NMC) guidelines. Registrations had been on hold for over a year due to the absence of a governing council, leaving around 1,300 graduates in limbo. State govt recently constituted the council, which resolved the long-pending issue of registration. The 1,300 students, who pursued MBBS/BDS courses in foreign universities, were struggling to get registration with the APMC for the past 2-3 years since completing their internships. The foreign medical graduates, who returned abruptly from colleges during the Covid-19 pandemic and completed their courses through offline mode, were required to complete 1-3 years of mandatory internship in local medical colleges allocated by the medical council. They would be eligible to get registration and start practice only with valid registration from the medical council. "The issue was pending for the past year as there was no governing council. We took the issue as a priority soon after assuming charge and resolved to grant registrations to the FMGs," AP Medical Council chairman Dr Daggumati Srihari Rao told TOI. He added that the NMC has been issuing guidelines from time to time to handle the grievances of the FMGs. Sources said several FMGs from AP moved to neighbouring states and applied for registrations with the medical councils in those states. Since the medical graduates could approach any state medical council for getting registrations, the students reportedly completed their internships and also started working in some of the neighbouring states. However, a good number of students stayed back in AP with the hope that the state govt would resolve the issue. After a year-long tussle between the coalition partners, state govt allocated the APMC chairman post to Dr Srihari R of BJP. "The NMC clarified last June that compensation certificates submitted by FMGs, who sufficiently compensated their online study with offline mode, shall be accepted. Accordingly, the internship period of one year may be considered for FMGs who submitted the compensation certificates issued by the respective universities," said Dr Srihari Rao. Students who completed the course in a foreign university but failed to finish the internship (one year due to Covid) were allowed to complete a one-year internship in the local college.
