‘Says one thing, does another': What's Trump's endgame in Iran?
Washington, DC – Over the past week, United States President Donald Trump has been issuing statements on Iran that appear to be contradictory.
He has called for ending the war and hinted at peace coming 'soon', only to then suggest that assassinating Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei could be an option for the US along with joining Israel's bombing campaign.
In the latest turn, the White House said on Thursday that Trump will make a decision on whether to join the war within two weeks.
These changes in the president's stance has some observers thinking that Trump may not have a clear strategy or endgame; rather he is being dragged to war by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been seeking US attacks on Iran for decades.
Alternatively, could Trump be using his increasingly bellicose rhetoric against Iran to compel Tehran to agree to entirely give up its nuclear programme?
If so, experts warn that brinkmanship could turn into an all-out war between the US and Iran.
Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said Trump could be attempting to build leverage with threats to strongarm Iran into accepting his demands of 'total surrender'.
'I think he's trying to present himself as this madman who is unpredictable, and in so doing, he can then insist on this very hard line that Iran has refused to accept for decades of full dismantlement of its enrichment programme,' Abdi told Al Jazeera.
Another possible explanation of Trump's latest statements, Abdi added, is that he is 'being taken for a ride by Bibi Netanyahu to commit the United States to a full-on war with Iran'.
Iranian American analyst Negar Mortazavi also said that Trump is being 'outmaneuvered' by Netanyahu.
'I don't even know if President Trump knows what he wants,' Mortazavi told Al Jazeera.
'He campaigned as the president of peace … he promised he's going to end conflicts. Russia-Ukraine hasn't ended. Gaza has escalated, and he just let the third big Middle East war – which looks like a regime-change war – start under his watch. So, he says one thing he does another.'
Israel launched its bombing campaign against Iran last week, two days before US and Iranian officials were set to meet for a sixth round of talks in Oman.
Hours before the Israeli assault began, Trump renewed his commitment to diplomacy. And the initial US response to the Israeli strikes was to stress that Washington is not involved in the attacks.
In subsequent days, however, Trump appeared to take credit for the Israeli bombing campaign.
'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' he wrote in a social media post on Tuesday, without elaborating on who the 'we' was.
'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff.' Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.'
Israel's strikes have targeted Iran's air defences, military and nuclear facilities, oil infrastructure and residential buildings, killing hundreds of people, including top military and political officials as well as many civilians. Iran has responded with hundreds of ballistic missiles that have killed at least 24 Israelis and left widespread destruction across the country.
Israeli officials claim they are trying to destroy Iran's nuclear and missile programmes, but also note that their military campaign could lead to the collapse of the Iranian governing system, which they say would be a welcome development.
However, it is widely believed that Israel would need US help to destroy Iran's main uranium enrichment facility, Fordow, which is buried inside a mountain.
Mortazavi said war hawks and Israeli officials appear to be making the case to Trump that bombing Fordow will be an easy task.
'Instead of a regime change war – a devastating, unnecessary war with Iran, which he has been warning everyone and running against in his campaigns, they're just making this look like, 'Oh, you just use your bunker busters once and done.''But Iran has promised to retaliate harshly against any US attack.
Thousands of US troops in the region could come under Iranian missile strikes. If the war escalates, Iran could also disrupt shipping lanes in the Gulf – a major lifeline for global energy.
Iranian lawmakers have already suggested that Iran could close the Strait of Hormuz that connects the Gulf to the Indian Ocean and through which 20 percent of the world's oil flows.
Mortazavi said escalating the conflict will have 'catastrophic' consequences for the region.
'It will look like Iraq and Afghanistan combined, if not worse. Iran is a big country,' she said.
In Iraq, Bush's regime-change war led to years of sectarian bloodshed and the rise of groups like ISIL (ISIS). In Afghanistan, US forces fought for 20 years after deposing the Taliban from the capital Kabul, only to see the group swiftly return to power as US troops withdrew.
Even if Iran's governing system is toppled under US and Israeli blows, experts warn that US war hawks should be careful what they wish for.
Iran is a country of more than 90 million people. The fall of the government could lead to internal conflict, displacement crises and regional – if not global – instability, analysts say.
'This is not a colour revolution. This is going to be war and chaos, potentially civil war, and unrest,' Mortazavi said.
Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of the rights group DAWN, said that even if Trump is trying to gain leverage with his threats and is not seeking war or regime change in Iran, it's a risky strategy.
'The possibilities of the assaults on Iran escalating into not just a broader regional war, but potentially a global war, are extremely high,' Whitson told Al Jazeera.
'And so, continued belligerence and hostile rhetoric from President Trump is only throwing fuel on the fire.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
14 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
LA Dodgers block immigration agents from stadium ground
NewsFeed LA Dodgers block immigration agents from stadium ground Officials at the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball organisation asked federal agents to leave the stadium car park Thursday after dozens of agents wearing face masks converged on the site. Protesters amassed shortly after demanding an end to immigration raids in LA.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The Take: MAGA is split over Israel and Iran. Which way will Trump go?
How did MAGA become Trump's biggest opponent of a US strike on Iran? The Republican base is split over Trump's rhetoric about getting involved in another foreign war. Conservative stalwarts like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon are pushing back. Could a US strike on Iran be a blow against Trump at home? In this episode: Episode credits: This episode was produced by Ashish Malhotra, Sonia Bhagat and Amy Walters with Phillip Lanos, Spencer Cline, Mariana Navarette, Khaled Soltan, Remas AlHawari, Kisaa Zehra, and our host, Manuel Rapalo. It was edited by Noor Wazwaz. Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Our video editor is Hisham Abu Salah. Alexandra Locke is The Take's executive producer. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera's head of audio. Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Instagram, X, Facebook, Threads and YouTube
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump to decide whether US will strike Iran ‘within next two weeks'
United States President Donald Trump will decide on whether his country will join the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks, the White House has said, amid growing speculation of US involvement and fears of wider escalation. On Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump had shared a message: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks. That's a quote directly from President Trump,' she said. 'The president is always interested in a diplomatic solution … he is a peacemaker in chief. He is the peace through strength president. And so if there's a chance for diplomacy, the president's always going to grab it. But he's not afraid to use strength as well,' the press secretary added. The US described its ally Israel's initial June 13 strike on Iran as a 'unilateral action'. But Trump himself has signalled that he knew of the attack in advance and supported Israel's military campaign. At the same time, according to the Reuters news agency, which cited three unnamed diplomats, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff has spoken to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi several times on the phone since Israel began its attacks. Amid the talk of diplomacy, Tel Aviv and Tehran have continued to trade attacks. On Thursday, Israel targeted Iran's Arak heavy water nuclear reactor. Iran, in turn, hit the Soroka Medical Centre, which it claimed was near an Israeli military and intelligence centre. At the same time, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz threatened to eliminate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 'Such a person is forbidden to exist,' he said in a statement cited by the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper. Over the past few days, Trump has hinted at joining Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, but at the same time has proposed a swift diplomatic solution in a confusing message from Washington. Following a report by the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday night that Trump had already signed off on striking Iran but had not decided on when they would do it, the president took to his Truth Social social media account to deny the report. 'The Wall Street Journal has No Idea what my thoughts are concerning Iran!' Trump wrote. But Al Jazeera's senior political analyst Marwan Bishara said that Leavitt's comments could well be a ploy, and if so, Trump would be able to use it as a 'pretext in order to camouflage whatever his intentions are and attack tomorrow'. As Araghchi is expected to meet his British, French and German counterparts in Geneva on Friday, along with the European Union's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, to discuss Tehran's nuclear programme, Bishara said Trump could be waiting to hear the outcome of those talks before making his decision to attack. 'If one has to over-interpret, I would say the following: He's giving the Europeans some time so that everyone could save face,' Bishara said. Al Jazeera's Doha Jabbari, reporting from Doha, said the lack of trust between Tehran and Washington will make it difficult for the Iranians to fully believe Trump is open to diplomacy. 'Assuming that the Israelis have the green light from the Americans to carry out these attacks inside Iran, there is going to be very little trust there,' Jabbari said. 'But really, this is the diplomatic game they have to play,' she added, referring to the upcoming talks in Geneva. 'If they [Iran] don't go, they're going to be accused of basically saying we're not going to talk, we just want war. They're going to have to travel, and the Europeans are acting as a mediator between Iran and the US.' At the same time, Russia and China have repeatedly warned against the US's involvement in the conflict and called for a ceasefire.
