Who is running in the Rochester City Council primary? Here's what they value.

The Monroe County's primary elections is approaching as it takes place on June 24. And early voting has already begun.
Rochester has a slate of city council candidates running for this year's primary coming out to a total of 15, with three of the candidates being incumbents. Five seats are open on city council.
As part of the Democrat and Chronicle's effort to introduce voters to their City Council candidates, we reached out to each nominee for their input and opinions on the issues most important to them.
The answers of candidates who responded are presented in their entirety and have been lightly edited only where necessary for clarity.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I am an incumbent Councilmember and Chair of the Finance Committee. I have overseen annual budgets that are on-time, balanced and do not raise taxes. I also ensured that our COVID relief funding (ARPA) went towards vital infrastructure, like replacing more than 80% of our lead service lines. In the last year, I spearheaded Roc Vision Zero – a commitment to eliminating traffic fatalities – and increased our ability to produce renewable energy like solar and geothermal. I also serve as a Vice President at Foodlink (the regional food bank) and I teach local government to University students. These two jobs reflect who I am as a Councilmember. My work at Foodlink makes me necessarily collaborative, partnering with organizations across Rochester. And my class demonstrates that I understand the mechanics of government. Finally, my wife and I are raising two young boys and sending them to the Rochester City School District.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
I am committed to making our streets safer for those that walk, bike and drive. Rochester has particularly high rates of crashes and fatalities. It is in our control to fix that and we cannot rely on old strategies and tactics. Last year I spearheaded the creation of Roc Vision Zero, a commitment and plan to eliminate traffic fatalities in our community. Vision Zero is a 10-point plan that focuses on education, engineering and enforcement to make our streets and sidewalks safer for all that use them. Because of our Vision Zero plan, the federal government awarded us nearly $25M for planning, design and buildout of a robust pedestrian safety plan. This is one example of progress, but there is a long way to go still. This will be a primary emphasis for me in a 3rd term.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
The most important function of the upcoming City Council is the adoption of a new zoning code. Most cities only update the zoning code every 3 decades or so and it is time for Rochester's to modernize. The planning for this new code has been underway for a few years and it is time to get it to the finish line. This new code should make it substantially easier, quicker and cheaper to build homes and businesses. It should also allow us to be more creative when thinking about business opportunities. In Rochester right now there are hardly any new ranches, townhouses or coops. The updated zoning code should make these types of buildings easier and cheaper to build. The result will be more building and as the supply of houses go up the costs of rents and ownership will come down.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
With a long-time dedication to community care, I served as a Mental Health Counselor for incarcerated people and led a NY State funded substance use recovery center, providing holistic health and wellness support to people and their loved ones. In response to the 2020 police killings of George Floyd, Daniel Prude and the systemic disinvestment in Black and working-class communities, I co-founded Free The People Rochester—a civil rights organization implementing a care-based vision of safety that prioritizes investments in housing, healthy food, healthcare, education and youth leadership. As a Council Member, I fought alongside residents to change housing laws and expand tenants' rights, ban tear gas and chemical weapons on protestors, and funded life-affirming services including home repairs for seniors, replacing lead pipes and LGBTQIA+ supports. I hold a Master's degree in Community Mental Health Counseling from UR, grounding my leadership in the practice of hope, humility and compassion.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
Over the next four years, I will continue to relentlessly defend and expand the rights of all Rochester residents facing threats from the Trump administration. Just this month, our Progressive Caucus introduced a Sanctuary City Ordinance, codifying and strengthening protections for immigrants and LGBTQIA+ communities. Now, as we face federal cuts to health care and essential services, we must focus on being united and working together to address urgent needs. To that end, I will continue to partner with allies from all levels of government, community stakeholders, and impacted communities to identify issues, and mobilize resources to ensure that our neighborhoods, our schools and our healthcare institutions receive the support necessary to provide essential services to residents.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
We need a change in direction focused on creativity and building the political will to be more responsive to the needs of residents. A 2025 audit of RG&E echoed residents' concerns and highlighted disturbing facts, including significant issues with billing, customer service and tensions between meeting the needs of residents and corporate shareholders. Neighbors have proposed a solution: fund a study to determine whether it's feasible for municipalities to take over RG&E to provide better rates and experiences for residents. Though Council has allocated $500,000 for the study, a majority of Council has decided not to move forward with the study because the County legislature has refused to support the initiative. This is a general theme within City Council—when there are roadblocks, plans are halted and residents suffer the consequences. Over the next four years, I will work with my colleagues to change into a more responsive, innovative body.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I am a leader who listens, I am deliberate and I care deeply about this city. My background in community development, experience in grassroots community organizing and collaborative spirit uniquely position me to create opportunities for our residents in our city. As a Rochester native, husband and father of three, I have deep roots in this community. I am a product of RCSD schools and graduated from St. John Fisher University with my degree in psychology. I started as a part-time grassroots organizer at Ibero and worked my way up to the executive leadership team. As a Councilmember, I was first appointed in September 2020 and elected to my first term in 2022. I became President of the Council in my first term and have worked to lead this city with decency and collaboration. It would be my honor to continue this journey as one of your at-large councilmembers.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
As a Councilmember, I have focused on safer neighborhoods, quality housing and equitable access to opportunities for our residents - core pillars of my record. I have approved significant investments in public safety to include resources to reduce gun violence and improve violence prevention, increasing the PIC team and new funds to start a new ACTION team in the fall. I have invested in your public health by approving over $75M in lead line replacements across our community, with more to come. I increased our investments in affordable housing, utilizing council underruns from the PAB to support gaps in projects that bring more units to our community, to include units for home ownership. I helped develop our workforce development initiatives by bringing employment opportunities directly to residents through the Roc the Block employment fairs. There is so much more to say, I am committed to this work.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
I would like to continue my focus on improving public safety and addressing housing through the zoning alignment project. Creating safer neighborhoods requires partnership. I would work towards enhancing our neighborhood service centers to respond to quality of life requests by investing time and energy into our strategy. With the new Neighbors in Action grants, which I helped develop, we are bringing residents together with small amounts of resources. I would like the NSCs to be developed as hubs for safety, community development, and future planning. The zoning alignment project will set the stage for housing development for decades to come. ZAP will define land uses, housing types, what we do with short-term rentals, and the development of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) among many other strategies. I believe we need people who understand these issues in office to support the growth and development of our city.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I'm an artist, mom, small business owner and community organizer who's spent years bringing people together to solve problems creatively and collectively. I played a key role in organizing against the privatization of downtown, helping stop the proposed BID (for now) and keeping our public spaces in public hands. As a legislative aide for the East District, I've worked behind the scenes researching, supporting policy development and helping residents with everything from housing issues to navigating basic city services. I believe leadership means listening to the people who live here and making decisions that reflect their needs, not just the bottom line. I bring creativity, compassion and a strong grasp of how local government works. I recognize the value of our community beyond dollars and cents and I'm committed to making life better for everyday Rochesterians by putting people at the center of every decision.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
My primary focus will be building community resilience by preparing Rochester for the challenges we face now and those on the horizon. That includes investing in affordable housing, local food systems, public infrastructure, and the care economy. These are the foundations that support working families and help neighborhoods thrive. I will also prioritize making local government more transparent and accessible. That means including residents early in the decision-making process, not as an afterthought. Whether it's pushing for public power, protecting tenants or ensuring city services reach those who need them most, I will work to make sure Rochester serves the people who live here.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
I want to shift decision-making away from top-down planning and toward community-led solutions. Too often, policies are shaped by developers or outside consultants instead of the people who actually live here. I would work to create real, ongoing opportunities for residents to shape city policy, especially those who are most impacted. When we trust our communities and invest in their leadership, we make better, more lasting decisions.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I've worked for Monroe County for 30 years, I am the past president of the 19th Ward Community Association, and I have been involved in a variety of community initiatives like the Rochester Food Policy Council and the Pharmacy Access Coalition. I currently serve as Chief Community Engagement Officer, touching every corner of this city and county. I've built relationships and collaborated with many community-based organizations-I understand the challenges our city faces. With all I've learned in these roles and the insight I have in the community, I believe that I am the most qualified candidate for City Council to be able to bridge the gap between city and county to work together on making positive changes for the community.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
My primary focus area will be access to resources and public safety. I want to expand our outreach to underserved communities and bring county and city resources to the community in the forms of events, workshops and public forums (HUBS). The city and county have different strengths and collaboration between these two municipalities is how we can help as many people as possible. I also want to expand on mentorship and youth employment programs, focus on health and food access in neighborhoods and address the systemic issues around education. If we can find a way to take care of those in need by working towards employment, addressing health concerns and keeping them in stable environments, we will see less crime and violence. Law enforcement is important but it can't be our only focus. I believe if we heal together, we can thrive together.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
Something I want to do on City Council is put an emphasis on funding Trade Schools. While a University education is wonderful, there are other ways that our residents can achieve success, we should be investing in these programs as well. We can get youth and adults signed up for trade schools so they can develop skilled trades like carpentry, electrical, masonry, plumbing and machinery. From there, our unions can enlist them making them accessible to big contracted jobs. This will address the shortage in trades workers and provide for young people entering the working world who know that University just isn't for them.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I believe a City Council member should have a balance of qualifications and experience. A council member should be an advocate for the community. I have been an advocate since coming out at the age of 16, starting with advocating for equal rights for the LGBTQ+ community. My advocacy has only expanded over the years; I have worked and advocated for policy focused on housing, healthcare access, safer streets, and environmental justice, among several other social justice initiatives. Advocating isn't enough if you can't pull other members together and work within the system to get policy approved. A City Council member also needs to be able to govern and understand governance in this role. I have served on several boards, including the city's Preservation Board. This has helped me understand the role of a governing body and how to work collectively with others to move forward policies and strategic plans for the betterment of the organization.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
I believe that all our challenges are interconnected; the overarching challenge is the poverty in the community. There isn't a single solution to solve this problem, but we can take steps to tackle it. We can work on expanding jobs and creating opportunities through job training and apprenticeship programs. One of the challenges with employment or meeting basic needs is access and transportation. We need to improve our transportation system and work on ensuring that work opportunities are in the city and not going to the outskirts of the county, so that everyone can get to them. We should also look at increasing the wages of city workers and increasing the minimum wage. The other main challenge is our public safety challenges. We need to invest in intervention programs and address the root causes of the crime, especially focusing on our youth.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
Shortage of safe and affordable housing. The city is taking some steps to address this through improving the zoning code, which will help create more housing options in broader parts of the city. The affordability will continue to be a challenge if not addressed correctly. However, the city needs to create an intentional and comprehensive housing plan. We need to create a plan that can help bring someone from homelessness to home ownership. I believe that supporting community-controlled models/community land trusts is a way of creating sustainable, affordable housing.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I am a qualified candidate because I bring lived experience, proven results and a deep commitment to equity. As a Program Manager for New York State's SNUG program, I achieved a homicide-free year in one of Rochester's most violent neighborhoods through grassroots partnerships and innovative prevention strategies. I founded the 14621 Food Stands during the pandemic to provide essential resources, expanding into the underserved 14605 community. Currently, I serve as a Program Officer at a local foundation, where I co-designed its Racial Health Equity strategy. I hold a master's degree from the University of Oklahoma (summa cum laude) and a Diversity & Inclusion certificate from Cornell. I come from a rich legacy of advocates, organizers, and activists, and I pay honor to those who came before me—my great-great uncle Rocky Simmons and my great aunt Audrey Smith. I am committed to carrying forth our legacy of service to empower all Rochesterians to thrive.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
My primary area of emphasis in office would be community safety rooted in prevention, mental health and housing stability. As someone who has led successful community violence prevention efforts, I know firsthand the power of the credible messenger model—employing trusted community leaders who share lived experience to mediate conflicts and build relationships that break cycles of violence. For mental health, I will prioritize barrier-free, culturally competent services that recognize trauma and provide accessible care, ensuring no one is left behind. In housing, I will champion affordable, safe and stable options that allow families to thrive without the constant fear of eviction or displacement. Together, these pillars form a comprehensive approach to addressing the root causes of violence and poverty, ensuring every Rochesterian has a fair shot at a safer, healthier future.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
One major change in direction I would work towards is transforming how we approach violence prevention in Rochester. Too often, our city has relied on crisis response rather than investing in the root causes of violence. I would champion a comprehensive approach that centers credible messengers—community leaders with lived experience—who mediate conflicts, build trust and connect individuals to essential supports. At the same time, I would work to expand safe, affordable housing options so families have the stability they need to build healthy lives. Finally, I would prioritize accessible, trauma-informed mental health services that meet people where they are, without stigma or barriers. This holistic approach recognizes that violence prevention, housing, and mental health are interconnected—and that real safety means investing in our communities before crises happen.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I'm a lifelong Rochester resident, licensed clinical social worker and Executive Director of Connected Communities, where I've led efforts that brought over $75 million in housing and economic investment to city neighborhoods. I've spent my career tackling poverty, advocating for equitable policies and empowering residents to lead change from within. I understand how city systems work—and where they fall short for families. I bring both lived experience and proven leadership, having grown from a teen mom to a CEO and now a City Council candidate. I'm ready to bring my deep community ties, policy knowledge and results-driven approach to City Hall to ensure every Rochester resident has the opportunity to thrive.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
My primary focus will be economic justice and neighborhood investment—ensuring that every Rochester resident, regardless of zip code, has access to good jobs, stable housing and strong community infrastructure. I will champion policies that support small businesses, increase access to affordable housing, and invest in youth and workforce development. As a licensed social worker and nonprofit leader, I know that poverty is policy-driven—and I'm committed to shifting how resources are distributed, especially in historically underinvested neighborhoods. I'll also prioritize community voice in decision-making, working alongside residents to co-create solutions that are both practical and equitable.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
I would work toward a shift to person-centered policymaking—an approach that puts people, not just systems or numbers, at the heart of city decisions. Too often, policies are created without understanding how they impact everyday lives, especially for those navigating poverty, housing insecurity or systemic barriers. As a licensed clinical social worker, I've spent my career listening to and advocating for those most impacted by policy gaps. In office, I'll push for community-informed solutions that prioritize dignity, access and equity—whether it's in housing, public safety or economic development. Government should work with people, not just for them.
What makes you a qualified candidate?
I am a third generation Christmas tree farmer with a triple bachelor's degree from the University of Buffalo and have been advocating for community needs for fifteen years. As a founding board member of 490 Farmers and a leader in the urban agriculture community I have grown and donated more than 10,000lbs of fresh, organic produce to local pantries and have supported over 40 gardens across every neighborhood of the city. For the last several years, while working as a Legislative Aide for Councilmember Martin, I helped to advocate for progressive legislation and a budget that aligns with our city's needs, until October '24 when I accepted a position at the PAB. I believe that my community focused work ethic, combined with my technical knowledge and experience make me uniquely qualified to represent our community as a City Councilmember.
What would be your primary area of emphasis in office?
My primary focus is creating strong local food systems and a green city that ensures not a single person goes hungry in the city of Rochester. We currently have an eight ZIP code area where a third of the people are struggling to put food on their table. This is especially unacceptable since our region grows 45% of the fruits and vegetables for the entire state of NY. By working with local growers and distributors, returning local grocers to our neighborhoods and building urban farms throughout Rochester's 3,000 vacant lots we can solve hunger in our community. I believe my experience as a farmer, as a food security program manager and as a leader in the urban agriculture community will allow me to address this basic need in our city.
What's a change in direction you would work toward in office?
Rochester's budget this year (not including RCSD) is $680 million. Despite being in the midst of a housing crisis and seeing homelessness double in the last few years, we are spending less than $1 million on housing. Despite having some of the highest child poverty in the country, we are cutting funding to Youth Services, Community Library services and Rec Centers. If elected to City Council, I will ensure that we invest in our young people by giving families safe spaces to exist and that our housing crisis is addressed with the resources and urgency it deserves. Lastly, I am committed to funding a feasibility study that explores our options for a public utility. RG&E has been forcing our community to choose between keeping their lights on or keeping a roof over their head, and I believe it's time for City Council to take action.
— Kerria Weaver works as the Government and You reporter for the Democrat and Chronicle, with a focus on how government actions affect communities and neighborhoods in Rochester and in Monroe County. Get in touch at kweaver@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Rochester Democrat and Chronicle: Rochester City Council primary 2025: What the candidates stand for

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNN

26 minutes ago

• CNN

Suspect in Minnesota lawmaker attacks was a ‘prepper' who had drafted a ‘bailout plan' for wife, according to court filing

The man charged in the killings of a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband one week ago was a 'prepper' and had at some point given his wife a 'bailout plan' in case of 'exigent circumstances,' according to an FBI agent investigating the case. The term 'prepper' refers generally to someone who stockpiles materials and makes plans to survive some future disaster or doomsday event. In a newly unsealed affidavit obtained by CNN affiliate WCCO, FBI agent Terry Getsch wrote that Boelter and his wife were preppers and that Boelter's established 'bailout plan' instructed his wife to go to her mother's home in Wisconsin. The affidavit does not imply that Boelter's wife knew about her husband's alleged plans to attack the lawmakers, and she has not been charged with any crime. After last Saturday's shootings, Boelter's wife was pulled over by law enforcement 'while traveling with her four children to visit friends northwest of the metro area,' Getsch wrote. She consented to a search of their car, in which investigators found two handguns, passports for Boelter's wife and their children and about $10,000 in cash. During an interview, Boelter's wife said that she received a group text message from Boelter in a thread with their kids. 'Dad went to war last night … I don't wanna say more because I don't wanna implicate anybody,' one text from Boelter to members of his family read, according to a federal complaint unsealed earlier this week. The affidavit also revealed that at roughly 9 a.m. on Saturday, Boelter visited a bank in Robbinsdale, Minnesota, and withdrew all $2,200 he had in a bank account in his name. A third party whose name is redacted in the affidavit drove Boelter from the bank. Boelter was driven to the bank by a person listed as 'Witness 1' in a previously unsealed court document, the same person who authorities say sold Boelter an electric bike and Buick sedan, which was found during the 43-hour manhunt last weekend. Authorities said earlier this week Boelter is believed to have carried out the attacks on lawmakers alone, but noted investigators would 'fully explore' to ensure that was the case. CNN reached out to the Brooklyn Park Police Department for an update on the investigation. Boelter, 57, faces both federal and state charges. Investigators found 'voluminous writings' in Boelter's home and car, but no clear manifesto has been uncovered, according to Acting US attorney Joseph Thompson. The notebooks contained the names of more than 45 Minnesota state and federal public officials, 'mostly or all Democrats,' according to the complaint. Some listed had ties to Planned Parenthood and the abortion rights movement. Boelter made his first appearance in federal court on Monday. He faces six federal charges, including murder, stalking and firearms offenses. He has not yet entered a plea and CNN has reached out to the federal public defender representing him for comment. Boelter is scheduled to appear in federal court in St. Paul, Minnesota, for a preliminary detention hearing on Friday.

CNN

26 minutes ago

• CNN

The kings of Queens: Andrew Cuomo seeks restoration months after Donald Trump's

They are two men from the outer boroughs of New York – both with the Queens accent to prove it, each with his own distinctive rhythm – born of domineering fathers who chose their careers for them and made them righthand men. They revered their fathers but also saw them as not quite ready to do what it took to truly get ahead. One brought his father's real estate empire into Manhattan and turned it into a global brand. The other took his father's political mantle and built a career in both Washington and New York, winning three governor's elections of his own. Both revel in finding weakness and needling those they don't respect. Both can be abrasive, then charming a moment later. Both present themselves as forever underestimated. Both have faced a litany of scandals and been accused of sexual misconduct by multiple women in allegations they both deny and dismiss as politically motivated. Both have small circles of ultra-loyalists and much longer lists of enemies who want them to fail. Now, seven months after Donald Trump won a second White House term that he presented as part vindication, part retribution, Andrew Cuomo is seeking his own restoration. Ahead of Tuesday's Democratic primary for New York mayor, Cuomo has centered his bid on the idea that he alone has the stature and experience to fight Trump. Their lives have intersected and crashed into each other for 40 years – over politics and policy, literal questions of life and death during the Covid-19 pandemic, but also personality and self-assurance that each knows better what their parties, and Americans, want. That worries some who have clashed with both. 'Seeing what I see from Washington, DC, which is only focused on retribution and revenge, there are a lot of similarities in certain people running for the mayor of the city of New York, and I don't need those same characteristics to be revealed in the office of the mayor or the city,' said New York Attorney General Tish James, a longtime Cuomo and Trump critic. For decades, they were competing Macy's Thanksgiving Parade balloon-sized personalities who made the motions of friendship to get what they really wanted. Trump recorded a video played at Cuomo's bachelor party warning him not to cheat. Nineteen years later, Cuomo was one of the guests watching Trump walk his daughter Ivanka down the aisle at her wedding to Jared Kushner. Over that time, Trump donated a total of $64,000 to Cuomo's campaigns. A few days after Cuomo won his third term as governor in 2018, he flew to Washington to have lunch with Trump, where the president greeted him like an old friend. Before walking out of the Oval Office grabbed Cuomo's arm and said, 'Hey Andrew, can you believe this?' The year that defined them both was 2020. As they faced off over immigration, Covid-19, racial justice protests and federal funding for the state of New York, Cuomo would return to the Oval Office for what would be the first of three in-person meetings, along with dozens of phone calls and quite a few tweets. A dozen aides to Trump and Cuomo revealed new details about those run-ins to CNN. They spoke on condition to anonymity to discuss private meetings. Those details may be the guide for what may be ahead if Cuomo becomes mayor and they inevitably meet again. The meeting started with a warm handshake, with the White House photographer right up close to get the smiles. 'You should sit here,' Trump said, pointing Cuomo to one of the chairs in front of the Resolute Desk, according to one person in the room. That morning before heading to the White House, Cuomo had accused Trump of 'extortion': The president was threatening to revoke 'trusted traveler' status for New York, which allowed for Global Entry speeding travelers through customs, if the governor didn't give the administration access to the state's driver's license database. Immigrants without legal authorization can get licenses in New York. Cuomo didn't want the database to be used for immigration raids, but he also didn't want to lose all the international travel business. In the meeting, Trump held up a sheet with three columns of states, arranged by color. All green were giving Trump all the information he wanted. Green and red were mixed. New York, Trump pointed out, was all red. He shoved the chart across the desk at Cuomo. Trump name-checked a few rich New Yorkers who didn't want to have their access to Global Entry shut down. 'It's good leverage,' he pointed out to Cuomo, according to the person in the room. 'You can do this, but we will sue you,' Cuomo told him. By the end, neither the president nor the governor had conceded anything, and aides to both thought they'd outmaneuvered and cornered the other. Trump slid a small stack of red MAGA hats toward Cuomo at the end, talking about his poll numbers and how great his re-election campaign was going to be. Cuomo glanced at them and did not pick them up. Eventually, the administration produced a memorandum of understanding that did not admit doing anything wrong but did back off the threats. A court reinstated 'trusted traveler' later that year. But within weeks, no one was traveling much at all. Trump was on the phone quickly after the first confirmed coronavirus cases hit New York. He had been yelling at rallies that the virus was a Democratic hoax, but to Cuomo, he was asking what the state needed, what he could do to help. Within days, their daily dueling briefings began. Cuomo liked the attention, the sudden nationalization that made him both a social media hero for locked-down liberals, driving Democratic speculation that he could sub in as the Democratic presidential nominee for a man already showing his age, then-former Vice President Joe Biden. Cuomo and Trump watched each other on TV. They went in front of cameras to respond to mock and undermine each other. Then they got on the phone and blew past whatever had been part of the show to talk about what they were going to do. Trump was giving Cuomo's team access to statisticians and academics trying to figure out what was happening. Cuomo was grateful, often telling aides who were running into problems that he'd walk into his office and call the president directly to get them cleared, enjoying being able to bypass what he'd felt was too many steps in dealing with the previous administration of Democratic President Barack Obama. When Trump toyed with blockading New York City, Cuomo wrote a New York Times op-ed with one reader in mind. Trump called him as soon as he saw it and talk of a blockade stopped. Cuomo felt like he was in the catbird's seat, his aides say, of being in a crisis needing something out of a president he was convinced he knew how to work. 'They both understood why each of them was taking the public approach and it didn't really bother them why the other one was saying what they were saying publicly,' a former state official told CNN. Cuomo and a few aides were back in the Oval Office two weeks later to ask for more help. Each state was being allocated 20,000 tests per day, and Cuomo felt the severity in New York should get their allocation boosted to 40,000. Going in, Cuomo had been amused that he and his aides had to test multiple times before seeing the president themselves. Trump was behind the desk again, Cuomo and aides in chairs in front. According to three people in the room, the president kept the conversation loose, armed again with charts and a marker to make points. Trump asked Cuomo if he'd seen the 'Bikers for Trump' rally that had just happened. He asked how Cuomo's mother was doing. Cuomo sat back, letting him go on before interjecting to bring him back to a specific ask. He even brought the president a bottle of New York-branded hand sanitizer. 'They always did that charm dance with each other because they were Queens brawlers,' one Cuomo aide at the time told CNN. Trump asked Cuomo how 'our hospitals' back in Queens were doing. Eventually he agreed to the extra tests, but not extra disaster aid Cuomo wanted too. Trump offered to put Cuomo on the phone with the doctor who'd treated then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who had just recovered from coronavirus. On the way out, Cuomo and his retinue ran into Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, according to two people who saw the interaction. Cuomo asked about the disaster relief money, and when he heard it wasn't resolved, brought them back into the Oval Office. Trump, already back in his private dining room watching TV, came back in and agreed to the request. As they left, he gave Cuomo a few extra rapid testing machines they had in the White House for his own use. Cuomo aides convinced themselves that they were being strung along so that Trump would cajole Cuomo to join his own briefing that evening. Trump aides say that was never a possibility. They each did their own briefings after, Cuomo when he returned to New York. Two days after George Floyd was killed, Cuomo was back in the Oval Office. He wanted to get Trump thinking that more federal money for infrastructure projects could 'supercharge' the projects while giving Trump potential accomplishments for an ongoing re-election campaign that appealed to him personally and politically. The meeting did not go well – Trump came in incensed that the New York attorney general had subpoenaed his children and was convinced that Cuomo had orchestrated it, according to top Cuomo aide Melissa DeRosa, who detailed the encounter in her book, 'What's Left Unsaid: My Life at the Center of Power, Politics & Crisis.' But afterward, Cuomo went a few blocks over to the National Press Club in Washington and said it was a 'good conversation.' 'The president is from New York, so he has a context for all these things we're talking about,' Cuomo said. The money never arrived. They talked more when the summer of protests sparked by Floyd's murder began to grow violent in New York. Though things were never as intense there as in other parts of the country, Cuomo responded with a stronger hand than his rival, then-Mayor Bill de Blasio, pushing de Blasio to establish a curfew, moving to send in state police and openly considering sending in the National Guard himself. A few weeks later, Trump was dangling the threat to send troops into more cities. Cuomo called him and told him not to. Trump told him to stop criticizing him publicly. Cuomo backed off. The troops never came. The relationship dissolved again later that summer, when Trump was furious about Cuomo's recorded speech to the Democratic National Convention. Far from the famous rallying keynote Mario Cuomo delivered against Ronald Reagan in 1984, it was still a call to action, and a call to kick out 'a dysfunctional and incompetent' Trump. The president spent the night tweeting furiously about 'the horrible governor.' Since Trump moved troops into Los Angeles two weeks ago to quell protests over immigration enforcement, Cuomo has repeatedly said that Trump didn't do that when he was governor and wouldn't do it if he were mayor. Trump aides question both claims, but Cuomo does have the 2020 parallel to point to. Trump has made clear he wants the operations in Los Angeles to be the first in a series of moves into blue cities. Cuomo has spent the closing weeks of his campaign leaning heavily into anti-Trump talk and warning about repeats of Los Angeles in TV ads, in mailed materials and in comments on the trail. Last month, when word leaked that the Department of Justice was stepping up its investigation into him for possible perjury in congressional testimony over his handling of Covid-19, he linked himself to other Democratic politicians the president has targeted. 'We know Mr. Trump, because this is Trump II. I was there for Trump I,' Cuomo boasted on Thursday at a stop. 'Don't ever forget that we beat Trump once. We're gonna beat him again.' Cuomo's opponents, meanwhile, have said he wouldn't stand up enough, and 'I think New Yorkers are hungry for a different kind of politics,' progressive challenger Zohran Mamdani began one campaign video standing outside of Trump Tower, drawing comparisons between the two of them. Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is seeking reelection as an independent, and others say Cuomo is only running for to line himself up for Trump's current job in 2028. Cuomo, in turns, says his rivals aren't tough enough and recently suggested Trump would cut through Mamdani, a 33-year-old state assemblyman, 'like a hot knife through butter.' He argues repeatedly that his experience is a main reason to elect him. The president was asked in April about Cuomo. Aboard Air Force One, Trump claimed credit for helping New York during the pandemic before offering an apt summary of their relationship. 'I've always gotten along with him,' Trump said. 'We've had our ins and outs a little bit.'

Yahoo

31 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Arellano: Welcome to the deportation resistance, Dodgers. What's next?

For Dodgers fan, it's all about the moments on the field. Kirk Gibson's Game 1-winning World Series home run in 1988. Freddie Freeman doing the same last year. Koufax's four no-hitters. Fernandomania. Shohei Ohtani anytime he's at the plate or on the mound. Advertisement It's outside the baseball diamond where the team has usually stumbled. And right now, the team finds itself in the middle of an unforced error that they're trying to recover from. That's the best way to describe how the Boys in Blue have acted as the city emblazoned on their hats and road jerseys battles Donald Trump's toxic alphabet soup of federal agencies that have conducted immigration sweeps across Los Angeles over the past two weeks. Read more: Federal agents denied entry to Dodger Stadium parking lot: Here is what really happened They stayed quiet as rumors circulated that la migra was using the Dodger Stadium parking lot as a staging and processing area for their raids. They ignored calls for days by some fans and community leaders to issue a statement, any statement, in defense of immigrants. Advertisement After offering my my fellow Times columnist Dylan Hernández a "no comment," the team finally told our colleague Jack Harris on Wednesday that they planned to assist 'immigrant communities impacted by the recent events in Los Angeles' without offering details. Then they paused in light of Thursday's dramatic events, which saw the Dodgers dragged into a fight with the Trump administration over what actually happened when federal agents were spotted near the stadium that morning. The team posted on social media that they denied a request by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to 'access the parking lots.' 'False,' ICE blared on social media. The Department of Homeland Security chimed in to claim Customs and Border Protection agents just happened to be near the stadium gates 'unrelated to any operation or enforcement' — this, even as local television news footage showed a U.S. citizen caught earlier that morning at a Home Depot just up the 101 freeway being transferred from one unmarked vehicle to another. 'We'll get back to you soon with the timing' about how the Dodgers will help immigrants, president Stan Kasten told Harris Thursday. No, Stan. The moment is now. Federal agents stage outside Gate E of Dodger Stadium on Thursday. (Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times) For decades, the Dodgers have gotten away with being the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of Major League Baseball – a corporate entity with an undue, even unhealthy following by too many Latinos. Each brand does little more than offer quick thrills to fans while taking their money, yet both have turned into markers of latinidad in Southern California à la lowriders and guayaberas. Advertisement The Dodgers have pulled this off even as they're the same franchise that refuses to put up any marker acknowledging that their home stands on the site where L.A. officials razed three barrios in the 1950s for a housing project that never materialized, then sold the land to the Dodgers for basically nothing. That didn't retire Fernando Valenzuela's number until the last years of his life. That will sell bland, overpriced tacos and micheladas at the stadium and not blink — hey, at least Flamin' Hot Cheetos are still cheap. They've put one arm around Latino fans while picking their pockets with the other for so long because they have been able to get away with it. Talks of boycotts over the years never worried executives because they knew other fans would quickly fill in any new seats. Fans booed while stadium security recently booted out attendees who brought signs to games decrying ICE, but Kasten and his crew knew no one would walk out in solidarity. All the Dodgers have to do is keep winning, stage an occasional giveaway night — wow, look! Another Valenzuela bobblehead on July 19! — or have organist Dieter Ruehle play a few bars of 'La Chona' and all is forgiven by too many too often. Sports teams have no obligation to take stances on the issues of the day and probably shouldn't. They're capitalist endeavors, not charity cases, whose stated mission is to provide bread and circuses to the masses while making as much profit as possible in the process. Social justice-minded followers too often willfully forget this. But they and the rest of us deserve to hold the Dodgers to a higher standard because that's how they have always marketed themselves. Advertisement They're the organization that broke baseball's color barrier with Jackie Robinson. That expanded the game's international reach with Valenzuela, Hideo Nomo and Chan Ho Park. That established baseball academies across Latin America and fostered a Latino fan base unlike any other in U.S. professional sports. Read more: Granderson: For Dodgers, the fight against racial injustice is driven by the past and present Besides, the Dodgers have waded into political morasses before. They played Robinson as Jim Crow still ruled the United States. They rightfully proclaimed 'Black Lives Matter' in the wake of George Floyd's murder in 2020. The team in 2023 bestowed a Community Hero award to a drag troupe in the face of protests from conservative Catholics, although the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence were relegated a ceremony held hours before the start of a game when the stands were nearly empty. Other immediate members of the Dodgers family heard the call to stand with L.A. early on. Valenzuela's daughter, Maria Valenzuela, told Fox 11 that her father 'would be really disappointed' with what's going on, adding, 'He pitched for every immigrant who believed they belonged.' Broadcasting Hall of Famer Jaime Jarrín decried on his Instagram account the 'injustices and heartbreak we've witnessed' and blessed all the peaceful protests that have sprung up in response, telling those who are taking to the streets: 'Do not be afraid. Stay strong. Keep showing up. Let your voice be heard.' Advertisement But the only current player who has said anything about Trump's raids — this, in a squad whose roster is chockablock with visa holders — is Kiké Hernández. The Puerto Rican-born journeyman posted on Instagram that he 'cannot stand to see our community being violated, profiled, abused and ripped apart." Guess his teammates are still too thrilled to have met Trump at the White House earlier this year to muster up the energy to say anything? On Friday afternoon, the Dodgers finally announced something: They would coordinate with the city of Los Angeles to commit $1 million in financial assistance to families impacted by Trump's raids, and promised aid to trusted L.A. institutions like the California Community Foundation to help in the matter. "We have heard the calls for us to take a leading role on behalf of those affected," Kasten said in a statement. That's a good start — but I hope the team sees it as just a start. Trump has already promised that the same rage he's inflicting on L.A. will soon come to Chicago and New York, cities with large immigrant populations and their own historic baseball teams. That's why the Dodgers need to summon the moral courage of their past even more and once again set an example others want to follow. Advertisement The moment is now. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.