Consumer Commission orders Millstock Cars to refund R269,000 for Ferrari repairs
Millstock Cars, a dealership in Cape Town, is challenging a National Consumer Commission (NCC) ruling that mandates them to refund more than R269,000 to a customer for repairs made to a faulty Ferrari.
The issue started when Mychajlo Jevon Gambale purchased a used Ferrari for over R3.6 million in April 2021.
However, just five months after the purchase, the car displayed a warning light and was diagnosed at Ferrari Cape Town with a faulty temperature sensor, requiring replacement at a cost exceeding R53 000.
The dealership initially argued that the car was sold "voetstoots" (as is), thus denying liability for the sensor replacement.
However, after negotiations, Millstock agreed to cover 50% of the repair costs and paid a deposit to Ferrari Cape Town.
According to Gambale, after Millstock confirmed it would pay for the replacement of the sensor, the manufacturer, Ferrari Italy, identified an underlying issue with the Clutch Control Plane (CCP) and recommended that the entire CCP be replaced.
Gambale demanded that Millstock pay for the replacement of the CCP, which was quoted at over R269 000.
However, the dealership refused this request, prompting Gambale to escalate the matter to the NCC.
Upon reviewing the case, the NCC sided with Gambale, issuing a notice demanding that Millstock refund the repair expenses for the CCP.
In response, Millstock appointed consulting engineer and tribologist, Patric Swan, who found no evidence of mechanical damage or wear, asserting that the original diagnosis of a faulty sensor was accurate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Watch: Ferrari F80 dubbed ‘fastest road car' they've ever been in by Hamilton, Leclerc
Both Ferrari drivers, Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton hare the sentiment that the Ferrari F80 is the quickest road car they have ever been in. Lewis Hamilton's Ferrari journey is off to a flying start — quite literally. The seven-time Formula 1 world champion, who recently joined the Scuderia, has already had his hands on the steering wheel of the company's most powerful road car to date: the Ferrari F80. Not long after his first day at Maranello — where he posed beside the iconic F40, Enzo Ferrari's final signed-off creation — Hamilton made headlines again by expressing a desire to one day bring a modern homage to life, rumoured to be called the 'F44'. But while that project brews in the background, Hamilton is clearly wasting no time enjoying what's already on offer. Invited by Ferrari to drive the F80 around the Fiorano test circuit, Hamilton joined current teammate Charles Leclerc for a high-speed session in the hybrid hypercar. And the verdict? As expected, glowing. 'Fastest road car I've ever been in,' the Brit enthused — quite the statement from someone who's piloted the Mercedes-AMG One, a car built with Formula 1 tech and a Nürburgring lap record under its belt. Clearly impressed, Hamilton even hinted at adding the F80 to his personal garage: 'Okay, I've got to order me some of these one day.' With only 799 examples planned and reportedly already spoken for, one would imagine Ferrari might still make a plan for its newest star signing. 'This is another level,' he added, calling it 'the fastest road car Ferrari has done.' Leclerc, meanwhile, is no stranger to the F80. The Monégasque driver was part of the hypercar's launch campaign, having previously driven it at Fiorano shortly after its official reveal. Before his departure from the team, Carlos Sainz Jr. also sampled a camouflaged prototype and gave it his stamp of approval. Now racing for Williams, the Spaniard was one of the first to get a taste of the electrified machine. As for Hamilton, despite owning a Pagani Zonda (which he once described as 'terrible to drive' but praised for its soundtrack), the V6-powered F80 appears to have left a far greater impression — both in performance and refinement. Whether or not the F44 concept sees the light of day, the F80 is already proving a fitting welcome gift for Hamilton in red. Watch the video here:

TimesLIVE
18 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
FAIS ombud upholds complaint against Luvuyo Burial and Consulting
The office of the ombud for financial services providers has issued a determination in favour of Pumelele Mantingani after financial services provider Luvuyo Burial and Consulting failed to honour a funeral policy claim. Luvuyo Burial's failure to honour the claim has also resulted in its licence as a financial services provider being suspended by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA). Mantingani, who took out a funeral policy with the company in September 2020, lodged a complaint with the ombud's office on October 28 last year after Luvuyo Burial and Consulting failed to honour a valid claim after the death of her uncle, Mbuyeni Katshi, on July 17 2024. Mantingani submitted her claim on July 27 2024. Luvuyo Burial and Consulting, based in Khayelitsha, Cape Town, acknowledged the claim and committed to payment, but only partially honoured the obligation, paying R5,000 of the R10,000 due. Despite further assurances, the balance remains unpaid. Numerous attempts were made by the ombud to resolve the matter amicably. Though Luvuto Burial undertook on more than one occasion to settle the outstanding balance, it failed to do so. During the investigation, it also came to light that Luvuyo Burial was operating without an underwriter, raising serious concerns regarding its compliance with regulatory requirements. In assessing the evidence, the office found that the policy was valid and that the deceased was listed as an insured life. However, Luvuyo failed to act in accordance with the policyholder protection rules, which require that: 'An insurer must, within two business days after all required documents in respect of a claim under a microinsurance policy or a funeral policy have been received, assess and make a decision whether the claim submitted is valid, and authorise payment of the claim, repudiate the claim or dispute the claim and notify the claimant of the dispute.' The ombud said the company's failure to process the claim appropriately reflected noncompliance with treating customers fairly outcome 6, which states that 'customers do not face unreasonable post-sale barriers when they want to change a product, switch providers, submit a claim or make a complaint'. As a result, the ombud upheld the complaint and ordered that Luvuyo Burial and Consulting pay the complainant the outstanding balance of R5,000 with interest at a rate of 11.25% per annum from the date of the determination until the date of final payment. 'Given the respondent's failure to comply with regulatory requirements, a copy of this determination was referred to the FSCA for its attention and possible enforcement action. 'As a result, the respondent's licence as a financial services provider was suspended by the FSCA on April 14,' the ombud said.


Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
Godongwana thinks political parties should be wholly funded from national fiscus
CAPE TOWN - Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana is of the view that political parties should be wholly funded from the national fiscus and not have to accept private donations. Speaking to the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC)'s political funding conference in Durban on Thursday, Godongwana said it's unacceptable that some political parties don't submit annual audited financial statements. Godongwana's own political party, the African National Congress (ANC), was among those fined by the Electoral Court last year for falling foul of the law in this regard. The finance minister questioned whether the IEC was the appropriate body to keep political parties in check over their finances, saying it puts the institution at risk of accusations of bias and a lack of independence. "I'm from the ANC. When they do it to us, we say they've been captured. When they do it to another party, they say Ramaphosa has sent them." With a court challenge still pending over plans to double the annual private funding limit to R30 million, while also raising the threshold for declaring donations to R200,000, Godongwana said he hoped the matter was settled before next year's local government elections. He said that the conference should consider the implications of political parties purely being funded by the state. "That raises the question: What is the optimal level of funding and what is the criteria for that? We complain that departments are inefficient. Should we fund political parties for inefficiencies as well?" Godongwana also hinted that if the revenue allowed, more money could be set aside to fund next year's local government election, in addition to the R1.4 billion already allocated in this year's budget.