‘Is this the end?': Asian students bound for US anxious about visa freeze
BENGALURU/BEIJING: Devraj was until recently stressed about securing part-funding for a humanities master's programme at Columbia University, New York. But though the Delhi-based 26-year-old has secured a scholarship that will cover 85 per cent of his tuition, he is unsure if he will get to go to the US at all.
Millions of students across the globe are in a similar bind, now that a new US policy has effectively frozen new student visa applications.
A US State Department directive on May 27 ordered embassies to suspend scheduling appointments for student and foreign visitor visas as it prepares to expand social media vetting of such applicants to enhance national security.
Issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the memo directed US embassies to remove any unfilled appointments from their calendars for students seeking visas but said those with appointments already scheduled could go ahead.
Rubio said the pause would last 'until further guidance is issued'.
The move escalates a series of restrictions on international students, amid the US government's wider pressure campaign against top American universities.
Last week, the Department of Homeland Security told Harvard University that it can no longer enrol international students.
This was purportedly to hold the Ivy League school accountable 'for fostering violence, anti-Semitism and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus'. A judge has temporarily blocked the ban.
In a twist of the knife for international students, the latest policy change could delay visa processing and disrupt enrolment timelines at US universities.
Several student applicants in Asia declined The Straits Times' request for comment, citing a 'fear of any consequences' impacting their visa eligibility.
'A suspension could mean weeks or months, and things may not be resolved before my classes start in August,' said Devraj, whose name has been changed to protect his identity.
He was unsure if he should confirm his enrolment by May 31, by paying the university a non-refundable US$1,000, which is around 83,000 rupees – not a small amount for the middle-class young Indian. Only then would the university issue him an I-20 certificate, which is a prerequisite for student visa application.
India is the largest source of international students in the US, with 331,602 studying there in the academic year 2023-24. China comes a close second, with 277,398.
These Asian giants together account for a third of foreign students in the US.
They are followed by South Korea with 43,149 students, Canada with 28,998, Taiwan with 23,157, and Vietnam with 22,066.
In China, students and officials alike were confused and disappointed.
Chinese state broadcaster CCTV inquired with the US Embassy in Beijing on May 28, but a staff member said that it had 'yet to receive relevant information', and visa processing was proceeding as usual.
Others reported on Chinese social media that slots for student visa interviewees were not available for June and July, although it is unclear whether this was due to the latest development.
A higher education career counsellor in an international school in Beijing, who declined to be named, told ST: 'Since early this morning, students have barged into my office and exclaimed: 'Teacher, is this the end for us? What does this policy mean?''
She has students who paid deposits of a few hundred US dollars in May to secure their places in American universities before they can apply for visas.
If they do not get their visas, they would have to squabble with the universities on whether the deposits can be refunded, she said.
While most Chinese students still prefer to pursue their higher education in the US, some of them have already chosen to go to Canada or Britain instead, she said.
'Those who have shortlisted only American universities can only wait for further information,' she added.
China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said on May 28: 'China has always believed that normal educational cooperation and academic exchanges should not be disrupted.
'We urge the US side to earnestly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of students from all countries, including Chinese students.'
The introduction of stringent social media checks has raised concerns among prospective students and their families.
Rubio had foreshadowed social media monitoring in March after the police arrested Tufts University doctoral student Rumeysa Ozturk over an op-ed she wrote on Gazans. She was later freed on bail as she fights possible deportation.
At the time, Rubio had said: 'If you apply for a visa to enter the United States and be a student, and you tell us that the reason you are coming to the United States is not just because you want to write op-eds, but because you want to participate in movements that are involved in doing things like vandalising universities, harassing students, taking over buildings, creating a ruckus – we're not going to give you a visa.'
A leaked US State Department diplomatic cable dated March 25 describes a new standard for visa denials based on a broad definition of what constitutes support for 'terrorist activity'.
It mandated comprehensive reviews of the social media profiles of all applicants seeking F (academic students), M (vocational students) and J (exchange visitors) visas.
Officers must take screenshots of any 'potentially derogatory' content found during these reviews, even if such content is later deleted or altered. These records will be stored in the applicant's case file and may serve as grounds for visa denial.
Many like Devraj are hurrying to make their social media accounts private.
'I have no other option. The US government could apply its whims and fancies under vague and broad parameters to deem any of my posts a threat to national security,' said Devraj, adding that he might look to Europe if 'things remain this bad in the US'.
China-based consultancies who provide overseas educational application services have also advised Chinese students to remove 'sensitive content' on their social media, including phrases such as 'Gulf of Mexico', 'LGBTQ', 'gender diversity' and 'anti-Semitism'.
A prospective Taiwanese student to the US, who declined to be named, told ST that she has yet to secure a visa appointment slot and is now 'very worried' that her application would be affected.
The 28-year-old had been looking forward to starting a master's programme in law this August in Texas, where her boyfriend is already studying engineering.
However, she is not concerned about the vetting of her social media accounts as she said she is rarely active online. 'If I post anything, which is rare, they're just pictures of food – nothing politically sensitive,' she said.
On a Korean internet community group of more than 40,000 called Jaws Mom, set up to dispense free advice for parents looking to send their children to the US, group administrator Kim Seong-jun called the suspension of visa interviews 'shocking news'.
He advised the group members to stay calm and wait to see what happens, as the start of the fall semester in US schools is still more than two months away.
He also urged members to refrain from criticising the US government on its policies on social media platforms and to delete such comments if already made.
A parent member, in response to Kim's post, shared that her child was supposed to start school in autumn, and had already received the I-20 certificate. She had not seen the urgency in scheduling a visa appointment with the embassy and now regrets her decision.
'I have no choice but to wait and see how things progress, but I'm anxious,' she wrote.
The South Korean Embassy in the US created an emergency contact network for international students and held several meetings to share the current situation.
Earlier, on May 22, the embassy posted a notice regarding the strengthening of US immigration policies and entry screening. In particular, it warned international students residing on student visas that 'if caught engaging in illegal employment or labour activities, it can be considered a serious violation of immigration law'.
The Indonesian embassy on May 27 conveyed to the US its 'deep concern over the negative effect' the policy has on Indonesian and other foreign students.
The US Embassy in Jakarta reported 8,348 Indonesian students in the US for 2023-2024.
Rolliansyah Soemirat, spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said in a statement on the sidelines of the Asean Summit on May 27 that 'Indonesian missions in the US are prepared to provide consular assistance to affected Indonesian students'.
Dr Sidrotun Naim, a member of the Jakarta-based alumni association Harvard Club of Indonesia, told ST on last week's ban: 'Indonesian students in Harvard face two options in dealing with this situation: They can transfer to another campus in order to retain their legal status in the US or return to Indonesia. But the situation remains fluid.'
Since the ban on Harvard enrolment of new international students, some territories are moving swiftly to attract the run-off of top students from the US.
The Hong Kong Education Bureau called on all universities in Hong Kong 'to introduce facilitation measures for those eligible with a view to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of students and scholars', and to attract top talent in accordance with each institution's diverse admissions and recruitment policies.
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) has invited affected students from any foreign university to make use of its 'robust transfer policies and admission protocols', streamlined credit transfers and seamless transitions into its programmes, including accommodation arrangements and scholarships.
'On the day the foreign student ban was announced, we were approached by graduating students, alumni, and prospective students currently bound for Harvard – many from Hong Kong and mainland China – who are grappling with profound anxiety about the disruption of their academic journeys,' a HKUST spokesman told ST.
Japan has also indicated its willingness to support visa applications for those who may find themselves stranded by US policy directives. Tokyo on May 27 called on its domestic institutions of higher learning to open their doors to students who plan to or have enrolled in the US.
The top three public universities – University of Tokyo, Kyoto University and Osaka University – have said they are considering the acceptance of students and young researchers of US universities who may be displaced.
One hitch is that the Japanese academic year begins in April, making it out of step with the US.
University of Tokyo president Teruo Fujii told the Nikkei newspaper that the stagnation of higher learning in the US marked a 'crisis for the global academic community'.
He added: 'We will work towards expanding, within the year, our acceptance of international students who have difficulty studying or researching overseas due to political interference.'
Meanwhile, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi declined comment at a regular news briefing on May 28, saying Tokyo would respond after it gains a 'full understanding' of the matter, including how long appointments for student visa screenings would be paused.
Japan is not a top source of foreign students to the US. The weak yen and sluggish economy make costs prohibitive. Still, 13,959 Japanese students and researchers enrolled in US universities for the 2023-24 academic year, including 260 at Harvard.
Yusuke Matsuda, the Japan representative of prep school Crimson Education and an adviser to the Education Ministry, urged students who have secured appointments with the US embassy not to cancel or reschedule their interviews and to carefully review their public profiles.
'If your interview isn't scheduled, this suspension may cause anxiety, but it is recommended that you wait a few days to a week and see how things go,' he wrote on the online portal Newspicks.
Matsuda said it was likely for US universities to eventually band together and seek a class action lawsuit to halt policies that would hurt their enrolment of foreign students, citing precedent in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Trump, in his first term in office, sought to implement a policy that would have forced international students to leave the US if their classes were held entirely online. The authorities rescinded the policy after Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology sued the Trump administration.
Andrew Siow, 19, a student enrolled in an American Degree Transfer Programme at Sunway University in Malaysia, had planned to finish his third and fourth years in science engineering at Western Michigan University in the US.
'If this continues, I guess I will have to finish my studies in Malaysia. I really wanted to go there and see the US, maybe visit parts of the country during my semester break. I've always wanted to visit California. I just hope the American government will stop this soon,' said Siow.
Some have given up on the US.
Indonesian Niwa R Dwitama, 33, told ST that he is considering pursuing his doctoral studies in Britain.
Niwa, who holds a master's degree in international affairs from Columbia University, was accepted into Johns Hopkins University in Washington for his doctoral studies in March.
'With the current US immigration policy and economic uncertainties, being a foreign student in the US poses greater risks and hardships. After all, I will be bringing my family with me during my studies,' he said.
In Malaysia, the new directive was the final nail in the coffin for Liyana Ariff, whose 19-year-old daughter is planning to study data analytics in the US.
The 48-year-old engineer told ST that she may send her daughter, a computer science student, to study elsewhere, though 'I know my daughter will be disappointed'.
Liyana had already been 'quite concerned and wary of how the US has been deporting people out of the country'.
'I've read about that lady from Wales who was detained for three weeks even though she was flying out to Canada from Seattle. And she's white. They're also arresting their own citizens. If that can happen to these people, they could do a lot worse to my daughter.' - The Straits Times/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
41 minutes ago
- The Star
India says it will never restore Indus water treaty with Pakistan
FILE PHOTO: People walk next to a cultivated land on the dry riverbed of the Indus River in Hyderabad, Pakistan April 25, 2025. REUTERS/Yasir Rajput/File Photo NEW DELHI (Reuters) -India will never restore the Indus Waters Treaty with Islamabad, and the water flowing to Pakistan will be diverted for internal use, Home Minister Amit Shah said in an interview with Times of India on Saturday. India put into "abeyance" its participation in the 1960 treaty, which governs the usage of the Indus river system, after 26 civilians in Indian Kashmir were killed in what Delhi described as an act of terror. The treaty had guaranteed water access for 80% of Pakistan's farms through three rivers originating in India. Pakistan has denied involvement in the incident, but the accord remains dormant despite a ceasefire agreed upon by the two nuclear-armed neighbours last month following their worst fighting in decades. "No, it will never be restored," Shah told the daily. "We will take water that was flowing to Pakistan to Rajasthan by constructing a canal. Pakistan will be starved of water that it has been getting unjustifiably," Shah said, referring to the northwestern Indian state. The latest comments from Shah, the most powerful cabinet minister in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's cabinet, have dimmed Islamabad's hopes for negotiations on the treaty in the near term. Last month, Reuters reported that India plans to dramatically increase the water it draws from a major river that feeds Pakistani farms downstream, as part of retaliatory action. Pakistan's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comments. But it has said in the past that the treaty has no provision for one side to unilaterally pull back and that any blocking of river water flowing to Pakistan will be considered "an act of war". Islamabad is also exploring a legal challenge to India's decision to hold the treaty in abeyance under international law. ($1 = 86.5600 Indian rupees) (Reporting by Aftab Ahmed; Editing by Jacqueline Wong)
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
After tight-lipped talks in London, the US-China silence speaks volumes
With global economic ramifications on the line, those with a vested interest in supply chains and geopolitical stability watched closely and waited as high-ranking officials from the United States and China emerged from last week's trade talks in London. Then, the public was told little. In the absence of an official readout from both sides, hope for a bit more clarity has given way to a fog of questions and buzzy speculation about what happened behind those doors. Was leverage being applied? By whom and in what manner? And what does this perceived stand-off mean, not just for the two economic giants, but for a world desperate for direction? The silence, some say, hints at tensions, recalibrated power and the fragile balance of global trade, deepening uncertainty about the world's most consequential economic relationship. 'This round of negotiations could mark a turning point in the US-China trade war,' said Tao Dong, president and chief economist at Springs Capital (Hong Kong), in an op-ed published on Sunday by the New Economist think tank. China's hardball tactics around export controls on rare earth elements – the main focus of the closed-door London talks – perhaps caught the US delegation off guard and added a new layer of tension and complication to already fragile discussions, Tao said. 'The dynamic has shifted from unilateral US pressure to a more evenly matched contest – China is no longer on the defensive and is now negotiating from a position of strength. Second, the focus has moved from tariff levels to export controls – tariffs themselves are now secondary; both sides are targeting choke points in each other's supply chains, which is why commerce ministers, rather than just trade officials, are now at the table,' Tao wrote. The current state is one of fragile equilibrium Washington has likely come away with a clearer view of China's leverage – its dominance in key supply chains and its strategic advantage in rare earths, analysts said. And while some deals may be disclosed, any Chinese concessions on rare earth exports could be narrow and conditional, with reciprocal US promises still pending presidential approval. 'The current state is one of fragile equilibrium,' Tao explained, calling it more constructive than past episodes of maximum pressure. 'But at the core, structural and strategic divergences remain – these are unlikely to be resolved within the current negotiation framework.' One week ago, US President Donald Trump said on social media that a deal with China was 'done', pending final approval by himself and President Xi Jinping. Trump said China would supply full magnets and any necessary rare earths 'up front', and that the US agreed to 'Chinese students using our colleges and universities'. And on Thursday, he said he would set unilateral tariff rates with trading partners in the next week or two, and that letters would be sent to them outlining terms of the new deals before July's deadline. All of this unfolds against a broader climate of rising global uncertainty, not just in trade, but across politics and society, deepening divisions that continue to weigh on investor confidence. In the US, domestic tensions are also running high – an estimated 5 million people took to the streets in thousands of cities and towns, protesting what organisers of the No Kings march described as 'authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarisation of our democracy'. Israel's bombardments of Iran since Friday, amid accusations that Tehran is nearing nuclear capability, have raised the spectre of a full-scale regional war, with potential ripple effects on oil prices, supply chains and US foreign policy calculations in an already fragile global economy. As of Tuesday, no official announcements had been made regarding the June 9-10 talks in London; the two negotiating teams only said that they had agreed 'in principle' to a 'framework' that each side would bring home for review by their respective leaders. Some analysts say signs indicate the London talks did not go as smoothly as the ones that took place a month prior in Switzerland and were immediately followed by joint announcements, including details of the result. The world's most consequential economic relationship hit a turbulent patch ahead of the London talks, as mutual accusations of breaching the Geneva truce deepened mistrust between Washington and Beijing. Then, an impromptu call between Xi and Trump on June 5 offered a symbolic olive branch but did little to alter the underlying power dynamics that were subsequently at play in London. Future negotiations are expected to continue, and this round signalled a willingness on both sides to make tactical concessions – trading short-term interests to de-escalate tensions, avoid mutual damage, and prevent market panic, Tao said. Still, the strategic rivalry between the US and China may extend into other domains, including technology and finance, as other industries may eventually be drawn into the crossfire, he warned. Both countries probably haven't played many of their cards – let alone their trump cards, said Xu Tianchen, senior China economist with the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), adding that China could still cut off rare earths to the US, and that the US is not letting its best chips go to China. 'If I'm to make a rough guess, I'd say that the US wanted many things from China for nothing, and that didn't impress China,' Xu said. 'Negotiations will 100 per cent continue, taking place every several months. But based on the limited evidence from the London talks, they will be tug-of-wars that are lengthy but struggle to produce meaningful results.' And while the London talks appear to have yielded little progress, some analyses suggest that they have laid bare the West's deep reliance on, and vulnerability to, China's tightening grip on rare earths. The materials, critical in hi-tech industries, from EV batteries to missile systems, are at the heart of the current stand-off and remain a weakness that the US and Europe are only now scrambling to reduce and will take years to rectify. Regarding the pressing question of how much China will ease its rare earth exports, Arthur Kroeber, founding partner of China-focused economic research consultancy Gavekal Dragonomics, said in a report last week that this is the best bet: 'China will reopen to commercial buyers enough for them to satisfy their ongoing need, but not so much that they can stockpile. And [China] may be even stingier with buyers that feed into the US defence supply chain.' I think those tariffs will be 'frozen' permanently – put back into Pandora's box Despite the narrow space in which a deal can be made, Washington is now more likely to give up ground on some firmly held positions, even those concerning national security, to get a trade agreement, he added. 'The jousting of recent weeks suggests that China has set its sights on eroding US export controls. This makes sense: China has more to gain from reopening the flows of US technology than it does from expanding the US market opportunities for its hi-tech firms,' he pointed out. According to a Reuters report quoting people familiar with the matter, the recent US-China trade talks in London failed to resolve key national security-related export restrictions. Beijing has yet to commit to approving exports of certain rare earth magnets critical to US defence systems, while Washington continues to block China's access to advanced AI chips over military-use concerns. China and the US are likely withholding specifics to preserve negotiating leverage and manage domestic perceptions, some say. Washington may be avoiding any appearance of concession, given Trump's hardline stance on trade, while Beijing may prefer to frame any potential deal as a strategic win that buys time, said Zhuang Bo, global macro strategist at Loomis Sayles Investments Asia. Economic incentives remain strong for both sides to avoid renewed escalation, he pointed out, as 'the US is grappling with inflationary pressures and persistent supply-chain vulnerabilities, while China is contending with a sharp decline in exports to the US and domestic economic headwinds, including deflation'. In this context, there is 'a high likelihood of an extension [beyond the August 10 deadline of paused tariffs] if no agreement is finalised', Zhuang added. Xu with the EIU also said an extension seems likely because 'if they don't do so, tariffs will immediately go back to levels the US can't afford'. 'I think those tariffs will be 'frozen' permanently – put back into Pandora's box,' Xu said. 'But, of course, that won't be the end of the tariff story; the US will find other tools contained in decades-old legislation.' Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily said in a commentary on Thursday that the London talks were a step toward solving trade disputes through equal dialogue. The newspaper called for the US to honour its words with actions. China is positioned to handle the headwinds. The US is not so well-positioned Vice-Premier He Lifeng, who led China's delegation in London, said Beijing was 'sincere but also principled'. He urged the two to safeguard the hard-won outcomes of their dialogue and maintain ongoing communication, the state's Xinhua reported. Alberto Vettoretti, managing partner of the business consultancy Dezan Shira & Associates, said US officials could extend the tariff pause if the two sides have made genuine progress on key issues, including lifting reciprocal export restrictions, but more time is needed to agree on other areas. 'If trade talks stall entirely, and little to no progress is made, then it's possible Trump would try to pressure China by raising tariffs again,' he said. 'How Trump acts on July 8, when the 90-day pause on the Liberation Day tariffs is up, and whether the US raises tariffs on countries that haven't concluded deals with the US, could be a good indicator of how he will act with China in August.' China's global export curbs could backfire – preferential treatment for the US risks alienating other partners, he added. 'Third countries will likely push their own agenda and adopt a multipronged approach. Companies from China will continue to expand overseas to curb related risks, so neighbouring countries shall benefit from the current instability,' Vettoretti said. In terms of dealing with China, Trump's urgency depends on whether he realises he misplayed his hand – or was misled, said Victor Gao, vice-president of the Centre for China and Globalisation, a Beijing-based think tank, as a prolonged deadlock risks backlash from consumers and US firms long reliant on profitable China ties. 'China is positioned to handle the headwinds. The US is not so well-positioned,' Gao said. 'China is willing to wind down its positions to zero.' So far, Trump has claimed that Chinese imports into the US receive a sum of '55 per cent' tariffs. Gavekel's Kroeber said a deal on fentanyl would be low-hanging fruit, but Trump's trade negotiators may be reluctant to surrender much of their tariff leverage for a side-agreement on drugs. If Trump truly wants a deal, Kroeber added, he could easily ease chip-export controls via the Bureau of Industry and Security, a single-agency decision. But flashy wins like Chinese factories creating US jobs are more politically rewarding – and require complex reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, which includes nine departments, including Defence and Homeland Security. Either path demands Trump break from years of national-security orthodoxy, and Trump 'is still far from making that move', Kroeber said. Dan Murphy, executive director at the Mossavar-Rahmani Centre for Business and Government of Harvard Kennedy School, said last week during the Caixin Summer Summit in Hong Kong that the US and China might be missing or not factoring in potential risks and complications while failing to grasp the big picture. 'My concern, and I think it is going to be a core concern that extends to the economy of China and Asia, is that China and the United States are looking [at each other] from farther away, and we are seeing a less nuanced and less complicated picture, and this can lead to miscalculations.' - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Japan-US-Philippines coast guards simulate crisis amid China threat
The United States Coast Guard ship Cutter Stratton (left) sails past a smaller Japan Coast Guard vessel during exercises this week. - Photo: AFP TOKYO: Helicopters buzzed in the shadow of a smouldering volcano and boats rescued dummies from the sea this week in a show of maritime unity by Japan, the United States and the Philippines. The joint coast guard exercises held off Japan's southwest shore follow a warning from the three countries about Chinese activity in disputed regional waters. Tensions between China and other claimants to parts of the East and South China Seas have pushed Japan to deepen ties with the Philippines and the United States. This week marked the second time the countries' coast guards have held training drills together, and the first in Japan. They took place over five days off the coast of Kagoshima, where Sakurajima volcano dominates the skyline, quietly puffing out smoke and ash. Dozens of personnel took part, with Friday's (June 20) final exercises featuring one vessel from each of the three countries' coast guards. They included the BRP Teresa Magbanua, which was provided to the Philippines by Japan through a loan agreement. The 2,265-ton vessel, named after a schoolteacher and revolutionary, usually monitors Chinese boats in the South China Sea. China and the Philippines have engaged in months of confrontations in the contested waters, which Beijing claims almost entirely, despite an international ruling that the assertion has no legal basis. Chinese and Japanese patrol vessels in the East China Sea also routinely face off around disputed islands. On Friday, Manila accused China of using a water cannon on two of its fisheries department boats as they attempted to resupply Philippine fishermen near the disputed Scarborough Shoal. - Man overboard! - The US Coast Guard was represented in the exercises by the cutter Stratton, which can carry up to 170 personnel, and Japan by the 6,000-ton Asanagi. Friday's drills began with a simulation of a person falling overboard. Once the dummy, wearing a bright red lifejacket, was in the water, a US drone was launched from the Stratton, circling high above as it scanned the area. A small Philippine rescue boat then emerged from the Teresa Magbanua, zipping across the water before coast guard personnel fished the dummy out of the water. Other rescue scenarios enacted included a Japanese helicopter racing from shore to pull a human subject from the sea. The helicopter's rotor blades whipped up the calm blue waters, where the occasional small hammerhead shark could be seen idly swimming alongside the Asanagi. The exercises concluded with a simulated collision and fire, with all three coast guards blasting the stricken vessel with their water cannons. - Trust-building - Japan Coast Guard official Naofumi Tsumura said the joint exercises had "built mutual understanding and trust". "More than anything, we have strengthened coordination and cooperation between us," he said. In 2024, the three countries issued a joint statement that included strong language aimed at Beijing. "We express our serious concerns about the People's Republic of China's (PRC) dangerous and aggressive behavior in the South China Sea," it said, describing "dangerous and coercive use of Coast Guard and maritime militia vessels". They also expressed "strong opposition to any attempts by the PRC to unilaterally change the status quo by force or coercion in the East China Sea". This week's joint exercises were the first since the statement was released. Tsumura said there were small details that could have worked better and vowed to improve in future collaborations. He said the three countries' coast guards had "come to understand each other better, or as the Japanese often say, to know each other by face". "I believe we are now able to conduct maritime rescue operations more effectively," he said. - AFP
