Scientists raise alarm over sudden deaths among professional body builders
Male bodybuilders are facing a high risk of sudden death from heart problems, scientists warn in a new study.
The research, published on Wednesday in the European Heart Journal, highlights the health risks associated with professional bodybuilding and calls for greater awareness and preventive strategies within this community.
Sudden cardiac death is when someone dies unexpectedly due to a heart problem and is generally rare among young individuals.
However, the new study found that the condition kills an unusually high proportion of male bodybuilders, including young ones, with professional ones at the highest risk.
In the study, an international team of researchers looked for reports of deaths among 20,286 male bodybuilders who had competed in at least one bodybuilding event between 2005 and 2020, and had these reports verified by doctors.
They particularly looked for reports of deaths of any of these named competitors in five different languages across different web sources, including official media reports, social media, bodybuilding forums and blogs.
Reported deaths were then cross-referenced using multiple sources and verified and analysed by doctors to establish the cause of death.
Overall, researchers found 121 deaths among the over 20,000 professional bodybuilders, with the average age at death of 45 years.
Cardiac death accounted for nearly 40 per cent of these 121 mortalities, according to the study.
Professional bodybuilders experienced a fivefold greater risk of cardiac death compared to amateurs, scientists found.
Autopsy reports of some of the deceased bodybuilders that were available showed signs of thickening or enlargement of the heart and coronary artery disease.
Some also seemed to have abused anabolic substances, researchers found.
'Bodybuilding involves several practices that could have an impact on health, such as extreme strength training, rapid weight loss strategies including severe dietary restrictions and dehydration, as well as the widespread use of different performance-enhancing substances,' study co-author Marco Vecchiato said.
These practices place significant strain on the heart and may lead to structural changes over time, researchers warned.
'Professional athletes had a markedly higher incidence of sudden cardiac death, suggesting that the level of competition might contribute to this increased risk,' Dr Vecchiato said.
'The risk may be greater for professional bodybuilders because they are more likely to engage intensively in these practices over prolonged periods and may experience higher competitive pressure to achieve extreme physiques,' he explained.
Scientists call for proactive heart screening and counselling among bodybuilders, 'even in young and apparently healthy athletes'.
'For bodybuilders, the message is clear: while striving for physical excellence is admirable, the pursuit of extreme body transformation at any cost can carry significant health risks, particularly for the heart,' Dr Vecchiato said.
'Awareness of these risks should encourage safer training practices, improved medical supervision, and a different cultural approach that firmly rejects the use of performance-enhancing substances,' he said.
The findings highlight the need for a cultural shift in bodybuilding, including stronger anti-doping measures and education campaigns about the risks of drug abuse.
About 15 per cent of the 121 deaths assessed in the study were categorised as 'sudden traumatic deaths', including car crashes, suicides, murders and overdoses.
'These findings underline the need to address the psychological impact of bodybuilding culture,' scientists concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
All babies in England to get DNA test to assess risk of diseases within 10 years
Every baby in England is to have a DNA screening to avoid fatal diseases and receive personalised healthcare as part of the government's £650m investment in DNA technology, it has been reported. Within a decade, every newborn will undergo whole genome sequencing, which assesses the risk of hundreds of diseases and is expected to form part of the government's 10-year plan for the health service. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, told the Telegraph the advances in genomics would allow people to 'leapfrog' killer illnesses and receive 'personalised' health care. He said: 'The revolution in medical science means that we can transform the NHS over the coming decade, from a service which diagnoses and treats ill health to one that predicts and prevents it. 'Genomics presents us with the opportunity to leapfrog disease, so we're in front of it rather than reacting to it.' Streeting added: 'With the power of this new technology, patients will be able to receive personalised healthcare to prevent ill health before symptoms begin, reducing the pressure on NHS services and helping people live longer, healthier lives.' All new parents are now offered a blood spot test for their babies, normally when the child is five days old, to check whether they have any of nine rare but serious conditions. The newborn's heel is pricked to collect a few drops of blood on a card that is sent away to be tested. Along with a greater focus on prevention, the 10-year plan is expected to include Streeting's other 'shifts' in the NHS, from hospitals towards more community-focused care and from analogue to digital services. Last week the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announced that the government would increase NHS funding by £29bn a year in real terms over the next three years. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Our 10-year health plan will be published soon and will set out details for a range of initiatives to advance the NHS and make it fit for the future.' In October, the NHS in England announced it was to screen 100,000 newborn babies for more than 200 genetic conditions in a world-first scheme aimed at bolstering early diagnosis and treatment.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
ChatGPT use linked to cognitive decline, research reveals
Relying on the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT to help you write an essay could be linked to cognitive decline, a new study reveals. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab studied the impact of ChatGPT on the brain by asking three groups of people to write an essay. One group relied on ChatGPT, one group relied on search engines, and one group had no outside resources at all. The researchers then monitored their brains using electroencephalography, a method which measures electrical activity. The team discovered that those who relied on ChatGPT — also known as a large language model — had the 'weakest' brain connectivity and remembered the least about their essays, highlighting potential concerns about cognitive decline in frequent users. 'Over four months, [large language model] users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels,' the study reads. 'These results raise concerns about the long-term educational implications of [large language model] reliance and underscore the need for deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning.' The study also found that those who didn't use outside resources to write the essays had the 'strongest, most distributed networks.' While ChatGPT is 'efficient and convenient,' those who use it to write essays aren't 'integrat[ing] any of it' into their memory networks, lead author Nataliya Kosmyna told Time Magazine. Kosmyna said she's especially concerned about the impacts of ChatGPT on children whose brains are still developing. 'What really motivated me to put it out now before waiting for a full peer review is that I am afraid in 6-8 months, there will be some policymaker who decides, 'let's do GPT kindergarten,'' Kosmyna said. 'I think that would be absolutely bad and detrimental. Developing brains are at the highest risk.' But others, including President Donald Trump and members of his administration, aren't so worried about the impacts of ChatGPT on developing brains. Trump signed an executive order in April promoting the integration of AI into American schools. 'To ensure the United States remains a global leader in this technological revolution, we must provide our Nation's youth with opportunities to cultivate the skills and understanding necessary to use and create the next generation of AI technology,' the order reads. 'By fostering AI competency, we will equip our students with the foundational knowledge and skills necessary to adapt to and thrive in an increasingly digital society.' Kosmyna said her team is now working on another study comparing the brain activity of software engineers and programmers who use AI with those who don't. 'The results are even worse,' she told Time Magazine.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Streeting should stand firm in face of doctors' risible demands
No country can claim to be in the forefront of democracy and development unless it can ensure the health of its citizens. Whatever its woes — and they are many — the National Health Service does keep most Britons in better health than many people on other continents. Partly that is thanks to pioneering excellence in medical research. And partly it is the result of a long tradition of top surgeons and physicians whose skills underpin specialist units attracting doctors from overseas. The consultants know it. They are proud of it. And, to their discredit, they are ready nowadays to exploit it. NHS consultants earn, on average, £145,000 a year. It may not be the salary of an investment banker. But it is considerably more than most people are paid. And there is ample opportunity to supplement this salary with private practice and filling in as a locum at the going rate of £200 an hour. Consultants have been awarded a pay increase of 4 per cent for the coming year, a figure above inflation. The British Medical Association, the doctors' union, has described this as an 'insult'. It insists that a pay rise of 35 per cent over the next three years is needed to restore consultant pay to 2008 levels in real terms. Otherwise, the BMA says, it will support a strike if an 'indicative ballot' shows that this is what senior doctors want. The consultants' claim is risible. It is not only unaffordable in today's straitened times and given the parlous state of NHS finances; it is based on the threat of holding the health, and sometimes the lives, of thousands of patients to ransom. It is a maximalist demand, backed by possible strike action, similar to the bullying approach of the rail unions. Consultants ought to be able to see that their claim has far less validity or public support than the claims by nurses and resident — once known as junior — doctors. They, too, insist that their pay needs to catch up with what they once enjoyed. They, too, risk losing public sympathy, following earlier strike action. But millions of Britons have seen their take-home pay fall in recent years. Comparisons do not help consultants. Famously, Aneurin Bevan, the architect of the NHS, bought off consultants opposed to his proposals for a state scheme, saying that he had 'stuffed their mouths with gold'. And since 1948 they have enjoyed this well-funded quasi-independence from state control, with generous state pensions. They have also enjoyed the fruits of expensive training, provided largely by the state in Britain's medical schools. Doctors, like everyone nowadays, are obliged to pay back their tuition fees — but many will not do so for years. An alarming number will never do so; on qualification they look for more lucrative contracts abroad, often in Australia. As a result Britain has partly depended on an inflow of doctors trained overseas, largely in India, a situation benefiting neither country. In the long term, the tight restriction on the numbers enrolling in medical schools should be eased; a developed country should never risk a doctor shortage. Also in the long term, doctors, especially consultants, should be compelled, by legislation if necessary, to devote a defined period of their careers to the NHS and serve in areas of greatest need. Other countries make provision for nationwide coverage. The immediate challenge, however, is pay. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is holding talks with the BMA. He must stand firm in resisting its absurd new demands.
