English not a shame, but power: Opposition

Several opposition leaders on Friday hit out at the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its ideological fount, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), for discouraging the learning of English to deny India's poor the tools to question authority and access opportunity and called the language a 'link' across the country. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi.(HT Photo)
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said that English plays a crucial role in instilling confidence and enhancing employment prospects, just like one's mother tongue.
'English is not a dam, but a bridge. English is not a shame, but power. English is not a chain, but a tool to break the chains. The BJP and RSS do not want poor kids of India to learn English because they do not want you to ask questions, move ahead and become equal,' the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha wrote on X as he shared a video criticising the RSS for opposing the widespread use of English.
'[RSS chief] Mohan Bhagwat says every day to not speak in English but in Hindi. But, if you look at the kids of those in the RSS and the BJP, everyone goes to England for studies… What is the thought behind it? Because they do not want you to enter the board rooms, or for you to get high-paying jobs. They want to go to English schools, carry on with their contracts… They want to keep the doors closed for you,' he could be heard saying in the video from a public event.
In his post, which he wrote in Hindi, Gandhi underlined the role of English and native languages as a means of empowerment. 'Every language of India has soul, culture, and knowledge. We have to cherish them, and at the same time, teach English to every child. This is the path to an India that competes with the world and gives every child an equal opportunity,' he said.
The comments came a day after Union home minister Amit Shah said that India's culture and history could not be fully understood through 'foreign languages', calling for a return to Indian languages to preserve cultural integrity.
Speaking at a book launch on Thursday, Shah said 'those who speak English will soon feel ashamed'.
His comments invoked criticism from Kerala ministers R Bindu and V Sivankutty, who said that the remarks indicate a 'restrictive and narrow-minded' political view and are 'condemnable'.
Bindu, the state higher education minister, said that English is the most widely used language across the world to communicate with each other and also on the internet. 'The view that children should not learn English or that it will be embarrassing would only lead to their world becoming more restrictive. Moreover, India is not an isolated island in the world. So, learning English is becoming a necessity,' she said.
State general education minister V Sivankutty termed Shah's remarks as 'condemnable' and said that 'no language was higher or lower than another'.
Communist Party of India (CPI) MP Sandosh Kumar said that Shah's statement 'is a deliberate attempt to stigmatise India's linguistic diversity and push the RSS-BJP's cultural majoritarianism'.
'English functions as India's link language, bridging regions and enabling access to education, employment, and global opportunity. To attack it is to attack the aspirations of the people, especially the youth and marginalised,' the MP said.
Trinamool Congress MP Sagarika Ghose called the comments 'preposterous'. '. English is a link language across India, its aspirational, confers a global advantage and knowledge of English is demanded by millions. Indians should not be 'ashamed' of ANY language,' she said in a post on X.
TMC's Derek O'Brien said India has 22 constitutionally recognised languages and 19,500 languages and dialects and this is the 'unity in diversity' of the country.
In a video statement, the TMC parliamentary party leader in Rajya Sabha said 97% people use one of the recognised languages as their mother tongue as he accused the Centre of not understanding this.
'In India, 97% people use one of the 22 constitutionally recognised languages as their mother tongue. 19,500 languages and dialects are used as mother tongues. This is the 'unity in diversity' of our great nation. Amit Shah, PM Narendra Modi and gang will never understand this,' O'Brien said.
HT reached out to BJP leaders for a comment, but did not receive any at the time of going to print.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New Indian Express

40 minutes ago

• New Indian Express

Replace India's national flag with a saffron flag: Veteran BJP leader N Sivarajan

PALAKKAD: Inviting widespread outrage, likely to escalate political debate in days to come, veteran BJP leader and former National Council member N Sivarajan made a controversial call to replace India's national flag with a saffron flag. The incident occurred during a public protest organised by the BJP at the Anchuvilakku Junction in Palakkad, where the party accused both the LDF and UDF of insulting 'Bharat Mata'. During the protest, Sivarajan, who is the BJP sitting councillor in Palakkad municipality, stated that political parties should be prohibited from using flags resembling the national tricolour. Targeting the Congress and NCP, he further said they should adopt distinct flags -- suggesting that the Congress would use a green flag. Sivarajan went on to say that Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, who he alleged were ignorant of Indian history, could instead fly the Italian flag.

New Indian Express

40 minutes ago

• New Indian Express

'Power over principles will backfire,' warns ex-Gujarat minister Nanubhai as he slams BJP's changing culture

AHMEDABAD: Former Education Minister Nanubhai Vanani has launched a sharp attack on the BJP's internal culture, warning that 'gaining power by sidelining principles' could backfire. Despite the BJP's record-breaking win in the 2022 Gujarat Assembly elections with 156 seats and its grip over all 8 municipal corporations, Vanani has raised alarm. In a strongly worded letter, he questioned the means by which the party is securing power, saying people should not feel cheated after three decades of loyalty. His statement strikes at the heart of BJP's current political strategy in Gujarat. In a scathing seven-page letter titled 'The Very Formula That Led to Congress's Downfall Now Threatens the BJP Too,' Nanubhai Vanani delivers a blistering critique of his own party, warning that the BJP is treading the same self-destructive path once taken by the Congress. Senior BJP leader and former Education Minister Nanubhai Vanani has accused his own party of abandoning its ideological core in blind pursuit of power. 'The entire culture of the Bharatiya Janata Party has changed,' Vanani wrote, warning that the party is now driven by a ruthless mantra: "Jo Jeeta Wahi Sikandar." But, he asks, 'Where have these Sikandars come from? What's their ideology, what's their morality—does anyone even care anymore?' Vanani claims that the BJP is recruiting leaders with no connection to its values, thereby eroding its foundational ideology. 'This reckless induction is not just weakening us—it's destroying the very spirit that built this party,' he warned. He added that the BJP's growing tilt toward power-centric ideology is not only dangerous but suicidal. 'Power means nothing if it's gained by dumping principles. True power lies in winning with principles at the core,' he emphasized.

First Post

an hour ago

• First Post

US-Pakistan bonhomie: Why India should not be surprised

It's no surprise that Pakistan may once again become a frontline state in US strategy for the South and West Asian region — and America's ties with India could suffer collateral damage read more Should India be surprised by the latest turn in US-Pakistan relations under the Trump 2.0 administration? Analysts of Indo-US relations have often characterised this relationship as the one with 'ups and downs' or 'peaks and valleys', particularly during four decades of the Cold War. But US-Pakistan relations have witnessed more extensive fluctuations in history, and that pattern continues until today. Pakistan is yet to learn lessons from the extreme oscillations of its ties with the United States, and currently Islamabad seems excessively jubilant over the latest turn in its ties with the Trump White House. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Donald Trump, who had accused Pakistan of offering nothing but 'lies and deceits', is all praise for the Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir. He truly honoured a terror-sponsoring field marshal by hosting lunch for him in the White House—a rare gesture in US history—and thanked him for ending Pakistan's war against India that could have gone nuclear. There is recorded evidence that it was the Pakistani Army's DGMO who called India's DGMO requesting 'ceasefire'. Field Marshal Munir has openly expressed President Trump's intervention in ending the armed conflict and even suggested that Trump should be awarded the coveted Nobel Peace Prize. What he has not revealed is Pakistan's SOS call to Washington to push for a ceasefire with India after the Indian military not only destroyed several terror camps in Pakistan but also severely damaged Pakistani military bases. When advised by Washington to speak to the Indian side and ask for a ceasefire, Pakistan's DGMO did that. President Trump is right that he played a role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire, but that role was confined to giving sane advice to Islamabad to seek a ceasefire agreement. India thus is right as well in repeatedly asserting that the ceasefire agreement was the outcome of conversations between the DGMOs of the two countries and it was not because of any mediation by Washington. The whole irony of the Trump-Munir luncheon meeting lies in the fact that it took place so soon after the Pahalgam attacks by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists that forced India to punish the terrorists and their sponsors. It was wise on the part of President Trump to advise Pakistan to seek a ceasefire agreement with India, but it was ill-advised on his part to sing praise of Pakistan's contribution to counterterrorism efforts. First, the CENTCOM head General Michael Kurilla described Pakistan as a 'phenomenal' counterterrorism partner in his Congressional testimony. Now the president of the US bestows all praise on the Pakistani field marshal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Washington is well aware of Pakistani duplicity in counterterrorism operations undertaken by the US in Afghanistan. How Pakistan under General Pervez Musharraf was taking billions of dollars of economic and military assistance from the United States and diverting some of the wealth to strengthen the anti-Western Haqqani network in Afghanistan is not unknown to the policy community in the US. How a Pakistani nuclear scientist once visited Al Qaeda supremo Osama bin Laden in the caves of Afghanistan is also not a secret. Nor is the place where Osama bin Laden was hiding, and the Obama administration captured him without informing Islamabad and by violating Pakistani sovereignty, also known to the world. That even a few American citizens were killed in the Pakistan-sponsored terrorist attack on the Taj Hotel in Mumbai could not have been an unfamiliar event to the Trump advisors. Why is there then this renewed praise for Pakistan's contribution to counterterrorism so soon after the Pakistani hand in the brutal and inhuman terror attacks in Pahalgam? It is because the Trump administration may need Pakistan's endorsement for probable US military intervention in Iran. Pakistan's memory of its engagements with the US is too short. It willingly joined the US-backed regional collective security groupings, such as CENTO and SEATO, and soon found that these two alliances were of no use in its anti-India misadventures in 1965 or 1971. Pakistan played the key role of being a conduit for America in its anti-Soviet proxy war for 10 years in Afghanistan, from 1979 to 1989, only to be abandoned after the Soviet withdrawal of troops in 1989. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan expected the US to quietly look the other way at its clandestine nuclear activities for serving so well the US interests in Afghanistan in the 1980s. But Washington imposed the Pressler Amendment and cut off all assistance to Pakistan after the end of Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan. Pakistan went to the extent of offering its troops for US operations during the Kuwaiti crisis of 1990-1991 with the hope that Washington would show leniency on nuclear issues. But it failed in its attempt. The US used Pakistan as a frontline state as long as its troops remained in Afghanistan until their full withdrawal by the Biden administration. But after the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan, Pakistan's strategic relevance ended, and it was almost abandoned by the US. President Joe Biden described Pakistan as the 'most dangerous' country in the world. Pakistan has learnt no lesson, and yet again it seems to be offering its help for any probable military operations in Iran by the Trump administration. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is clear that the Iran-Israel war figured prominently in the conversation between Pakistan's strongman and President Trump. In Trump's views, Pakistan knows a lot about Iran. Pakistan's knowledge about Iran could be useful to any future American intervention in Iran. After all, Pakistan shares about 900 km of border with Iran. Pakistan would prefer to have a monopoly over the 'Islamic Bomb', and that would be possible if Iran's ability to go nuclear is erased. In the game of periodic mutual love and hate, friend and foe, and embrace and divorce equations between Pakistan and the United States, India faces the collateral damage, and it should take timely steps to safeguard its national security. There is thus no surprise that Pakistan may yet again become a frontline state for the US strategy in the South and West Asian region. The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD