US-Pakistan bonhomie: Why India should not be surprised

It's no surprise that Pakistan may once again become a frontline state in US strategy for the South and West Asian region — and America's ties with India could suffer collateral damage read more
Should India be surprised by the latest turn in US-Pakistan relations under the Trump 2.0 administration? Analysts of Indo-US relations have often characterised this relationship as the one with 'ups and downs' or 'peaks and valleys', particularly during four decades of the Cold War.
But US-Pakistan relations have witnessed more extensive fluctuations in history, and that pattern continues until today. Pakistan is yet to learn lessons from the extreme oscillations of its ties with the United States, and currently Islamabad seems excessively jubilant over the latest turn in its ties with the Trump White House.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
President Donald Trump, who had accused Pakistan of offering nothing but 'lies and deceits', is all praise for the Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir. He truly honoured a terror-sponsoring field marshal by hosting lunch for him in the White House—a rare gesture in US history—and thanked him for ending Pakistan's war against India that could have gone nuclear.
There is recorded evidence that it was the Pakistani Army's DGMO who called India's DGMO requesting 'ceasefire'. Field Marshal Munir has openly expressed President Trump's intervention in ending the armed conflict and even suggested that Trump should be awarded the coveted Nobel Peace Prize. What he has not revealed is Pakistan's SOS call to Washington to push for a ceasefire with India after the Indian military not only destroyed several terror camps in Pakistan but also severely damaged Pakistani military bases. When advised by Washington to speak to the Indian side and ask for a ceasefire, Pakistan's DGMO did that.
President Trump is right that he played a role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire, but that role was confined to giving sane advice to Islamabad to seek a ceasefire agreement. India thus is right as well in repeatedly asserting that the ceasefire agreement was the outcome of conversations between the DGMOs of the two countries and it was not because of any mediation by Washington.
The whole irony of the Trump-Munir luncheon meeting lies in the fact that it took place so soon after the Pahalgam attacks by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists that forced India to punish the terrorists and their sponsors. It was wise on the part of President Trump to advise Pakistan to seek a ceasefire agreement with India, but it was ill-advised on his part to sing praise of Pakistan's contribution to counterterrorism efforts. First, the CENTCOM head General Michael Kurilla described Pakistan as a 'phenomenal' counterterrorism partner in his Congressional testimony. Now the president of the US bestows all praise on the Pakistani field marshal.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Washington is well aware of Pakistani duplicity in counterterrorism operations undertaken by the US in Afghanistan. How Pakistan under General Pervez Musharraf was taking billions of dollars of economic and military assistance from the United States and diverting some of the wealth to strengthen the anti-Western Haqqani network in Afghanistan is not unknown to the policy community in the US.
How a Pakistani nuclear scientist once visited Al Qaeda supremo Osama bin Laden in the caves of Afghanistan is also not a secret. Nor is the place where Osama bin Laden was hiding, and the Obama administration captured him without informing Islamabad and by violating Pakistani sovereignty, also known to the world. That even a few American citizens were killed in the Pakistan-sponsored terrorist attack on the Taj Hotel in Mumbai could not have been an unfamiliar event to the Trump advisors.
Why is there then this renewed praise for Pakistan's contribution to counterterrorism so soon after the Pakistani hand in the brutal and inhuman terror attacks in Pahalgam? It is because the Trump administration may need Pakistan's endorsement for probable US military intervention in Iran. Pakistan's memory of its engagements with the US is too short. It willingly joined the US-backed regional collective security groupings, such as CENTO and SEATO, and soon found that these two alliances were of no use in its anti-India misadventures in 1965 or 1971. Pakistan played the key role of being a conduit for America in its anti-Soviet proxy war for 10 years in Afghanistan, from 1979 to 1989, only to be abandoned after the Soviet withdrawal of troops in 1989.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Pakistan expected the US to quietly look the other way at its clandestine nuclear activities for serving so well the US interests in Afghanistan in the 1980s. But Washington imposed the Pressler Amendment and cut off all assistance to Pakistan after the end of Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan. Pakistan went to the extent of offering its troops for US operations during the Kuwaiti crisis of 1990-1991 with the hope that Washington would show leniency on nuclear issues. But it failed in its attempt.
The US used Pakistan as a frontline state as long as its troops remained in Afghanistan until their full withdrawal by the Biden administration. But after the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan, Pakistan's strategic relevance ended, and it was almost abandoned by the US. President Joe Biden described Pakistan as the 'most dangerous' country in the world. Pakistan has learnt no lesson, and yet again it seems to be offering its help for any probable military operations in Iran by the Trump administration.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It is clear that the Iran-Israel war figured prominently in the conversation between Pakistan's strongman and President Trump. In Trump's views, Pakistan knows a lot about Iran. Pakistan's knowledge about Iran could be useful to any future American intervention in Iran. After all, Pakistan shares about 900 km of border with Iran. Pakistan would prefer to have a monopoly over the 'Islamic Bomb', and that would be possible if Iran's ability to go nuclear is erased.
In the game of periodic mutual love and hate, friend and foe, and embrace and divorce equations between Pakistan and the United States, India faces the collateral damage, and it should take timely steps to safeguard its national security. There is thus no surprise that Pakistan may yet again become a frontline state for the US strategy in the South and West Asian region.
The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Economic Times

31 minutes ago

• Economic Times

Iran Israel war: When will Tehran-Tel Aviv conflict end?

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Iran-Israel war has entered the second week but both countries continue relentless strikes sending shockwaves across the middle-east and the world. People on social media are urging for the solution and are asking when will this Israel Iran war end? While Iran has already rejected US President Donald Trump's 'surrender' proposal, Israel has said they were targeting the nuclear facilities and also hinted that the regime change would be the optimum military emphasized it was preparing for the possibility that the war could turn into a lengthy campaign, AP reported. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Israel's military operation in Iran would continue 'for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of Iran's nuclear program and arsenal of ballistic Netanyahu's goal could be out of reach without US help. Barring a commando raid or even a nuclear strike, Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility is considered to be out of reach to all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. Trump said he would put off deciding whether to join Israel's air campaign against Iran for up to two President Tayyip Erdogan on Saturday told Iran's foreign minister that resuming Iranian-U.S. talks on Tehran 's nuclear programme was the only way to achieve a solution to their dispute and the conflict with Israel, the Turkish Presidency said. Erdogan met Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi on the sidelines of an Organisation of Islamic Cooperation meeting in Istanbul. In a statement, his office noted that Erdogan said Israel had to be stopped immediately, Reuters war between Israel and Iran erupted on June 13, with Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, top generals and nuclear scientists. At least 722 people, including 285 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,500 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights has retaliated by firing more than 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. Most have been shot down by Israel's multi-tiered air defences, but at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded.A1. Turkish President is Tayyip Erdogan.A2. The war between Israel and Iran erupted on June 13.

Indian Express

34 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Bike taxi riders rally at Vidhana Soudha, urge Karnataka govt to lift ban and frame policy

Several bike taxi riders from across Karnataka took out a bike rally to Vidhana Soudha in Bengaluru on Saturday, urging the state government to lift the ban on bike taxis and introduce a regulatory framework to govern their operations. Riders from cities including Mysuru, Mandya, Hassan, Davangere, Tumakuru, Ramanagara, Shivamogga, and Kanakapura participated in the rally. The protest comes in the wake of the Karnataka High Court's order directing bike taxi operators to suspend operations pending the formation of rules under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act by the government. Bike taxi operators claimed that the ban has impacted the livelihoods of more than six lakh people across the state. Many participants claimed the ban has pushed them into financial distress, with no alternative source of income and increasing pressure to meet basic household needs such as groceries, rent, and school fees. 'Before the ban, I could earn enough to keep my family going. Now there's no money coming in,' said Ramesh, a rider from Tumakuru. Ravi, a rider from Mysuru, added, 'This ban hasn't just taken away our jobs – it's taken away our dignity.' Apart from riders, regular commuters have also been affected by the absence of bike taxis, with concerns raised over increased fares and limited transport options. Protesters highlighted that bike taxis had provided a quick and affordable last-mile connectivity option in urban and semi-urban areas. Riders have requested the state government to formulate a bike taxi policy that 'addresses safety, registration, and operational guidelines – similar to what is already in place in 19 other Indian states.' Meanwhile, Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy has emphasised that the state government is not inclined towards drafting a bike taxi policy and that whiteboard two-wheelers cannot be used for commercial purposes. Officials of the road transport offices across Bengaluru also seized 103 bike taxis earlier this week for operating despite the Karnataka High Court's directive to suspend operations in the state. The transport department officials have booked the riders of the 103 bike taxis across RTO divisions in the central, west, south, north, east, Electronic City, and KR Puram, among others.

Business Standard

41 minutes ago

• Business Standard

US urges citizens to avoid Iraq travel amid rising Iran-Israel conflict

The United States has issued an alert to its citizens against travelling to Iraq under any circumstances, citing the threat of terrorism, kidnapping, armed conflict, and civil unrest amid escalating regional tensions linked to the Iran-Israel conflict. The advisory comes after the US Department of State on June 11 ordered the departure of non-emergency government personnel from Iraq, underscoring the deteriorating security conditions in the country. 'Do not travel to Iraq for any reason,' the US Embassy and Consulate in Iraq said in an alert, pointing to the 'US government's limited ability to provide emergency services to US citizens in Iraq.' According to the updated travel advisory, American citizens in Iraq face a range of serious threats including violence by terrorist and insurgent groups, anti-US militia activity, and frequent attacks involving improvised explosive devices (IEDs), indirect fire, and drones. These attacks have occurred even in major urban centres. 'US government personnel in Iraq are required to live and work under strict security due to serious threats,' the Embassy said, adding that Baghdad-based staff are prohibited from using the Baghdad International Airport due to ongoing risks. The US has also cautioned against travel to areas near Iraq's northern borders, warning of aerial bombardments, armed clashes, and heightened militant activity. American nationals are particularly discouraged from attempting to cross into Syria through Iraq. 'US citizens should not travel through Iraq to engage in armed conflict in Syria,' the advisory noted. 'They would face extreme personal risks — kidnapping, injury, or death — and legal risks including arrest, fines, and expulsion.' 10-years jail for illegal border crossing The Kurdistan Regional Government has announced that those caught illegally crossing the Iraq-Syria border could face prison terms of up to ten years. Adding to the dangers, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has also issued flight advisories for civil aviation operating in and around Iraqi airspace. Travellers have been urged to check FAA regulations before making any travel decisions. Apart from security threats, regular demonstrations, protests, and labour strikes across Iraq further complicate travel and movement within the country. The Embassy warned that such events could erupt without notice and potentially turn violent. 'Don't rely on US govt assistance' For those who still choose to remain in or travel to Iraq despite the warnings, the US government strongly advises preparation of a comprehensive personal security plan, arranging legal documents such as wills and powers of attorney, and ensuring that loved ones have access to essential records in case of emergencies. 'Have departure plans that do not rely on US government assistance,' the advisory said.