What are the risks of health tourism? Why MEPs are calling for better protection of patients abroad
ADVERTISEMENT
Lower costs, a more comfortable experience, and the lack of availability of certain treatments closer to home are some of the reasons Europeans seek healthcare abroad. However, this so-called 'health tourism' comes with unpredictable risks.
'More and more European citizens are traveling abroad to receive medical treatment, attracted by lower costs and shorter waiting times, but often without proper awareness of the associated risks,' MEP Michele Picaro (Italy/ECR) told Euronews.
He wants a European-level discussion on the need for minimum safety and quality standards even in non-EU healthcare facilities, to protect citizens by giving them more information about what's at stake.
Countries such as Turkey, Thailand, and South Korea have become popular destinations, offering low prices and experiences that resemble five-star hotel services.
'Healthcare is getting more and more expensive and getting difficult to access in some countries across Europe. So, it's only reasonable to expect that some of our citizens will travel to wherever they can to get the best value and a timely service for their money,' said MEP Billy Kelleher (Ireland/Renew Europe) during a recent debate in the European Parliament.
However, despite the initial appeal of seeking treatment abroad, there are significant risks linked to aftercare and potential side effects that pose problems once patients are back in Europe.
High price to pay
There have been several reports in the EU of patients returning from treatment abroad with complications.
In March 2023, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) linked 87 cases of botulism - an illness caused by a toxin that attacks the body's nerves causing breathing difficulty, muscle paralysis, and even death in some cases - to intragastric injections of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), commonly known as Botox, carried out in Turkey.
Private clinics in Turkey advertise the local affordability of such procedures compared to elsewhere, with prices often around half of equivalent costs in Europe.
'In the beginning, patients come back feeling quite pleased because they think that their problems have been solved at half the price. But six months later there are often relapses, serious infections, and sometimes then the treatment is even more complex and more costly,' said Valentina Palmisano (Italy/The Left).
Another concern raised is the lack of access to up-to-date medical records for treatments conducted abroad, which makes aftercare in Europe more difficult.
Health Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi also warned of the risks of relying on clinics in third countries that may not uphold the same standards as those in the EU.
"In many cases, there is little or no legal recourse if something goes wrong. and patients may be exposed to unregulated medical practices", he told MEPs in Strasbourg.
He added that while EU medical facilities must comply with strict health and safety regulations, ensuring treatments meet high standards, regulations in non-EU countries vary significantly.
European cross-border healthcare
The EU has already tools in place for citizens who need to seek medical treatment outside of their country, but within European borders: the cross-border healthcare directive.
ADVERTISEMENT
However, MEPs warned that its implementation remains inconsistent.
"Cross-border medical care enables patients in the EU to seek medical treatment in other member states, but the rules are still too complex and not used enough,' said Tomislav Sokol (Croatia/EPP).
He added that, although these rules are in place, many patients are unaware of their rights or how to benefit from them, and called on the Commission to simplify the rules and ensure easier access to cross-border care.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
EU ministers propose international limits on sperm 'super donors'
A coalition of EU health ministers wants to set international limits on the number of children a single sperm or egg donor can produce, putting an end to the "super sperm donor" phenomenon. The proposal, in the form of an information note, was introduced in Luxembourg on Friday by Sweden and Belgium during a meeting of EU health ministers, and it is backed by four other countries: France, Hungary, the Netherlands, and Spain. While many European countries, including Sweden – one of the lead proponents – have national laws that cap the number of children per donor, no international regulations currently exist. Some commercial sperm and egg banks have set voluntary limits, such as 75 families per donor. However, others have no such restrictions. As a result, it's not uncommon for donor-conceived individuals to discover they have more than 100 genetic half-siblings, in stories that frequently attract public attention. A Dutch sperm donor suspected of fathering over 550 children worldwide and Telegram CEO Paul Durov, rumoured to be the biological father of more than 100 children through years of sperm donation, are some of the better-known examples. These and other similar cases raise "new concerns about the potential psychosocial impact on donor-conceived children and donors,' Swedish Health Minister Acko Ankarberg Johansson said. More recently, further calls were made to limit the number of donations after another Dutch donor whose sperm carried a rare cancer-related genetic variant was used to conceive at least 52 children, some of whom have been diagnosed with cancer. Call for a cross-border donor register Explaining their proposal, the ministers have argued that international action is needed not only due to ethical concerns but also because of demographic trends, including declining fertility rates and delayed family planning. These trends have compelled many EU countries to increasingly rely on commercial gamete banks that operate internationally, making it harder to enforce donor limits. Belgian Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke said that international limits would only be practical if supported by a comprehensive cross-border donor register. 'We badly need a Europe-wide quota supported by an EU register to ensure proper implementation,' he said. 'It is unacceptable that children or parents have to discover through genetic testing that they could have 70 or more half-siblings across Europe or even globally. That is unethical and a risk factor,' he continued. While several member states support the initiative, the European Commission is, for now, proceeding cautiously. Proponents have called for an update to the EU regulation on substances of human origin. However, this legislation was revised only recently, in June 2024. Speaking at the meeting, the European Commission's top health official, Director-General for Health and Food Safety Sandra Gallina, called the issue a recurrent concern for member states and patients. She pointed out, however, that regulating donor offspring numbers falls mainly under national jurisdiction, as the EU's mandate in this area is limited to safety and quality standards. 'The EU can help raise awareness among in-vitro fecundation professionals about national donor limits,' Gallina explained. She also announced that the Commission would respond to Sweden and Belgium's request by organising a discussion involving national authorities and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the continent's main professional body in the field.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Summer swimming: Most of Europe's waters safe to bathe in, report says
From the Atlantic to the Mediterranean, Europeans can swim safely in most of Europe's waters, according to the latest EU bathing water assessment released on Friday. Over 85 per cent of the sites tested met the EU's strictest 'excellent' bathing water quality standards according to data last year, while 96 per cent of all officially recognised bathing waters in the EU met the minimum quality standards. The assessment and interactive map, produced by the European Environment Agency (EEA) in partnership with the European Commission, highlights where swimmers can find well-managed bathing sites in Europe. The assessment tests the suitability of waters for bathing, focusing on monitoring bacteria that can cause potentially serious illness. In total, over 22,000 bathing water sites were assessed in all 27 EU Member States, as well as in Albania and Switzerland. In five countries - Greece, Cyprus, Bulgaria, Austria, and Croatia - 95 per cent or more of the bathing waters were marked as being excellent quality bathing waters. Only 1.5 per cent of EU bathing waters were found to be of poor quality. The quality of coastal bathing waters is generally better than that of rivers and lakes. In 2024, around 89 per cent of EU coastal bathing waters were classified as excellent, compared to 78 per cent of inland bathing waters. From the Atlantic to the Mediterranean, most of Europe's bathing waters are of excellent bathing quality when assessed against the parameters (Escherichia coli [E. coli] and enterococci) required by the Water and Waste Water Directive (BWD). Bathing water quality in Europe has improved significantly over the last decades. This is due to a drastic reduction of organic pollutants and pathogens previously released in untreated or partially treated municipal wastewater. These improvements have occurred as a result of the combined effects: - The systematic monitoring and management introduced under the Water and Waste Water Directive. - The major investments in urban waste water treatment plants; - the large investments in urban waste water treatment plants. - Improvements in wastewater networks. Thanks to these ongoing efforts, swimming is now possible in urban and once very polluted waters. BWD focuses on monitoring E. coli and enterococci, important indicators of faecal contamination, which poses a risk to human health due to the potential presence of pathogens. In addition, toxic cyanobacterial blooms, although not subject to the quantitative monitoring prescribed by the BWD, often lead to anti-bathing advisories. However, chemicals are also present in the water. Water quality is monitored and assessed under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) (EU, 2000). The report found there is still significant pollution of surface and groundwater, which are not captured by bathing water monitoring, even when they exceed legal limits set to prevent harm to the environment. As the conflict between Israel and Iran intensifies, air strikes on Iran's nuclear sites could have serious health consequences across the region. Monitoring groups have not yet documented any such impact. On Monday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, said it had not identified radiation leaks as a result of Israeli strikes that began Friday and have killed hundreds of people in Iran. But that could change quickly as the attacks continue. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, chief of the World Health Organization (WHO) said Tuesday that he is worried about 'the targeting of nuclear sites, which may have immediate and long-term impacts on the environment and health of people in Iran and across the region'. Not all strikes on nuclear facilities would be the same, and an Israeli military official has said their forces plan to minimise the risk of a nuclear disaster and the consequences for civilians. 'There are gradients of risk,' Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in the UK and wrote a book on wartime risks to nuclear facilities, told Euronews Health. A successful attack on a live nuclear reactor would be the most devastating to human health, spreading radioactive materials that could endanger people hundreds of kilometres away. But Iran's only commercial nuclear power plant, the Bushehr plant, has not been targeted or affected by the recent attacks, according to the IAEA. Israel has targeted three key nuclear facilities: Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordo. The sites use centrifuges to enrich uranium gas, which produces the fuel that powers civilian nuclear reactors. These centrifuges would also be central to an Iranian effort to develop nuclear weapons, which European Union officials have said must not happen. Israeli strikes fully destroyed the above-ground plant at the Natanz facility, which is more than 100 miles from Tehran. The attacks also severely damaged the site's below-ground operations, which contain its centrifuges. According to the IAEA's director general Rafael Mariano Grossi, there is both 'radiological and chemical contamination' inside the Natanz facility. During an emergency meeting on Monday, Grossi said uranium isotopes may have spread within the facility. Such a leak would consist primarily of alpha particles and would pose a 'significant danger if uranium is inhaled or ingested'. Those dangers include a higher risk of cancer and damage to the kidneys, lungs, and bones. 'However, this risk can be effectively managed with appropriate protective measures, such as using respiratory protection devices while inside the affected facilities,' Grossi added. The level of radioactivity surrounding the site, meanwhile, 'has remained unchanged and at normal levels, indicating no external radiological impact to the population or the environment from this event,' Grossi said. Israel also hit a nuclear research facility in Isfahan on Friday, the IAEA said, damaging four buildings, including a uranium conversion plant. But there has been no sign of increased radiation there. Israel has been eyeing an attack on the secretive Fordo fuel enrichment site, which is where many analysts believe Iran has been working on its nuclear weapons capabilities. The site, built clandestinely, was first publicly acknowledged in 2009. Fordo is buried deep in the mountains of northern Iran, and US President Donald Trump is reportedly considering dropping a bunker-busting bomb to destroy the heavily fortified facility. The site's location deep below ground means that in the immediate aftermath, 'the likelihood of significant contamination [in the surrounding region] is significantly reduced, if not zero,' Bennett said. Over time, though, radioactive isotopes would be 'leaching into the groundwater,' he added. That means it will be critical that Iran allows the IAEA into the country to help manage any leaks – similarly to how the agency assists at the Chernobyl site in Ukraine, decommissioning and managing radioactive waste, Bennett said. It's not yet clear whether Iran will do so. One week into the conflict, it is still escalating. 'At this point, given the fog of war… everything is conjecture,' Bennett said.
Euronews
4 days ago
- Euronews
Bill Gates in Brussels next week for vaccine push with the EU
Bill Gates will visit Brussels next week to participate in a Gavi vaccine alliance summit together with EU leaders to pledge provision of vaccine purchases for developing countries in an event co-hosted by The Gates Foundation and the European Union. The goal of the event is to collect €9 billion between 2026 and 2030. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the president of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, will likely represent the EU at the event. Gavi is a global vaccine alliance bringing together public and private actors that help vaccinate more than half the world's children against some of the deadliest diseases. The Gates Foundation, alongside the European Union, is its biggest sponsor. Gavi intends to immunise at least 500 million children in the next five years. This, according to their press release, would save 8-9 million lives. It is not immediately clear how much the EU will contribute to this plan financially. The EU has provided €3.2 billion in financing to Gavi since 2003. There was enhanced cooperation between the two during the coronavirus pandemic in the COVAX programme. EU institutions together with individual member states have also contributed €2.55 billion to Gavi's programmes, amounting to one third of the budget of the campaign. 'When the Gates Foundation made its first investment in Gavi 25 years ago, I couldn't have predicted the extraordinary impact it would have on combatting infectious diseases, lifting up economies and saving lives,' said Bill Gates in a press release announcing the summit in Brussels. "Together with Gavi, we have the goal to vaccinate 500 million children by 2030. That is why the European Union is proud to co-host Gavi's High-Level Pledging Summit in Brussels. Our support will remain steadfast,' von der Leyen is cited in the release as saying. Besides the Gavi's pledging summit, Bill Gates will also have other agenda items in Brussels, participating on Tuesday in a debate with MEPs on the European Parliament's Development Committee. The discussion will focus on assistance and innovation as drivers for improving health and living standards in the Global South. The press release of the Parliament adds that several international donors, like the United States and several EU countries, are cutting their aid budgets. The European Parliament has backed the mandatory microchipping of all cats and dogs across the EU, in a bid to reduce fraud and improve the enforcement of animal welfare standards. This brings the EU a step closer to setting minimum common standards for the breeding and keeping of cats and dogs, after the vote on amendments to the European Commission's original proposal. This vote paves the way for negotiations with EU ministers, who had already adopted their position last year. Currently, pet registration is mandatory in 24 EU member states, but the systems are fragmented. Only a private initiative, Europetnet, links national and regional databases in 17 countries. MEPs also proposed that dogs and cats imported from non-EU countries for sale must be microchipped before entry and registered in a national database. "This marks a clear move against illegal breeding and the irresponsible importation of animals from outside the EU," said Veronika Vrecionová, the Czech conservative MEP who acted as rapporteur on the file. Animal welfare organisations hailed the vote as a major breakthrough, noting that the law would ensure basic standards - including proper feeding, veterinary care and protection from abuse - helping eliminate unregulated backyard breeding and abusive puppy and kitten mills. Some earlier amendments by MEPs had sparked concerns for potentially facilitating illegal trade. However, animal welfare NGOs confirmed these issues were resolved in the final plenary vote. Crucially, the Parliament went beyond the Commission's original proposal by calling for full identification and registration of all kept cats and dogs, not just those placed on the market. "MEPs have finally taken a step today that we've been waiting for for years, one that could end the illegal pet trade once and for all in Europe," said Joe Moran, European office director for FOUR PAWS International. To prevent the exploitation of animals, MEPs also want to limit the number of litters a female animal can have during her lifetime. The rules would apply universally to all breeders, regardless of their size. In particular, the European Parliament took a positive step by including small breeders in the scope of the proposal, according to Iwona Mertin, companion animals programme leader at Eurogroup for Animals. "This is significant, especially in countries where 80% of breeders produce fewer than four litters per year. Without this, a major loophole would remain," she said. There are currently 127 million cats and 104 million dogs in the EU, with about 44% of households owning a pet. The sector's annual value is estimated at €1.3 billion, according to EU Commission data. MEPs also left the door open to extending the law's protections to other companion animals in the future, by supporting the creation of a so-called "Positive List," namely a list that would allow only species deemed suitable to be kept and sold as pets. Final negotiations between the Parliament and EU ministers are expected to begin soon, marking the last phase before the law can be adopted.
