Picuris Pueblo uses genetic testing and finds ties to Chaco Canyon
TAOS COUNTY, N.M. (KRQE) – A New Mexico pueblo is going against the norm and using genetic testing, looking to answer questions about their history. The results show they have ties to Chaco Canyon going back hundreds of years.
'It's what we always talked about, what was passed on through generations – through our fore-fathers and our elders, that we had that connection,' said Picuris Pueblo Governor Wayne Yazza Jr.
Governor Yazza Jr. of the Picuris Pueblo says they always knew they had ties to Chaco Canyon, but didn't have the hard evidence to prove it. When non-Pueblo parties started conversations such as drilling in the area, Picuris leaders say they felt left out.
All Pueblo Council of Governors voice support for legislation to permanently protect Chaco Canyon
'Chaco Canyon was being mined, drilled, being basically in a position where we could lose it,' said Picuris Pueblo Lt. Governor Craig Quanchello.
That's when leaders decided they could use genetic testing to trace their DNA back to the site. Hoping to get a say on the land, they partnered with a scientist in Denmark and a professor at Southern Methodist University.
'There are controversial aspects to this. Not everybody agrees with doing ancient DNA. But Picuris knows its identity, they know they've been there for over 1,100 years. They know they would like to know more,' said Professor Mike Adler, Southern Methodist University.
The Picuris Pueblo has a population of about 300 people. The lieutenant governor says having this genetic data would also open opportunities for them to learn about their medical history and tailor medicine to their genetic makeup.
Governor signs bill protecting students' right to wear Native American regalia
'Looking at the world legally, there's all these disputes, whether it land, sacred sites, monuments, it all ties together at the end of the day. Having this DNA, it's a game-changer. It's a tool that we can use to our advantage,' said Yazza Jr.
Picuris leaders say they hope this will open the door for future productive conversations surrounding Chaco. 'At the end of the day, it's protecting Chaco. That was the big thing of tracing it. Letting them know that that's a sacred place to all tribes,' said Yazza Jr.
The data collected is also completely controlled by the Pueblo. Meaning if any researchers wanted access in the future, they would need to get their permission.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Calls for facial recognition alternatives are unsustainable
Despite being penned by House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-Tenn.), Friday's opinion piece urging 'an alternative' to facial recognition technology offers a bizarre string of statements that do not make the case. Each biometric modality (fingerprint, iris, face, etc.) offers advantages that could make it the most effective for a specific purpose. But there are data-backed reasons facial recognition technology is widely adopted — including the ability to use existing hardware (cameras) and photos, rather than requiring specialized equipment and data collection processes. With rapid improvement through machine learning and neural networks, the leading technologies are now over 99 percent accurate across demographics according to National Institute of Standards and Technology data. Customs and Border Protection selected face recognition for its programs and has since verified more than 697 million travelers of all nationalities and ethnicities. More than 2 million U.S. air travelers use facial recognition technology every day to verify IDs at Transportation Security Administration checkpoints. Much is made about the risk of fraudsters getting the software to falsely match, but the figures cited are from research limited to unlocking personal phones, and conducted before Face ID was introduced on iPhones in 2017. Since then, presentation attack detection capabilities have been integrated into iPhones as well as higher security biometric applications. Fake videos, printed photos and masks are not a concern in an in-person setting where human detection of spoofing efforts would be immediate. The potential for fraud is with remote, online verification, where presentation attack detection measures are commonly combined with matching software. Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate is testing these technologies, showing so far, the leading presentation attack detection technologies detect spoofing attempts 100 percent of the time. Across the nation, facial recognition technology is successfully leveraged in law enforcement to find missing children, fight human trafficking and stop dangerous criminals. It's unclear how facial recognition technology alternatives would work, when the only evidence from a crime scene may be security video, recordings from by-standers or online media. We agree, China's use of technology 'to control its citizenry' is unacceptable. But this shouldn't deter U.S. agencies from leading the way in responsible use of (non-Chinese) technology under established privacy rules, bounded by the Constitution and subject to congressional oversight. Jake Parker is senior director of government relations for the Security Industry Association (SIA). He came to SIA with more than 12 years of experience on Capitol Hill, most recently as legislative director for Rep. Tom Latham (R-Iowa), a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Sandia Labs help complete new gravity bomb a year ahead of schedule
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) — Sandia National Labs is marking a major milestone for the US nuclear security enterprise, and they're doing so earlier than expected. The first production unit of the B61-13 is officially complete about a year ahead of schedule. Story continues below New Mexico News Insiders: The Crew Behind Swift Water & Arroyo Rescues Film: These productions were filmed at Rail Yards. Have you seen them? Trending: New video shows fight before teen was shot and killed in Albuquerque News: VIDEO: Canoeing accident in northern NM leads to dramatic rescue operation Sandia says they served as the lead system integrator and the design agency for the unit's non-nuclear components. Scientists say the newly completed bomb that relies on gravity to reach its target comes with increased yield compared to its previous version. In May, Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright 'diamond stamped' the B61-13, signifying the unit's readiness for deployment to the US nuclear stockpile. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
GMOs Made With New Techniques Face Low Adoption Rates and Market Failure
New international report examines the efficacy of 'New GMOs' despite billions in investment in CRISPR and similar technology Brussels / Bellingham, Wash., June 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As political pressure mounts to deregulate gene-edited crops, a new report by the European Non-GMO Industry Association (ENGA) and the Non-GMO Project reveals a stark reality: New GMO crops created with newer genetic engineering techniques, such as CRISPR, ODM, TALEN, ZFN and RNAi, are failing to find growers and markets. Despite billions of dollars in investment and widespread deregulation, only three new gene-edited GMOs are currently in cultivation, and none of them meaningfully advance climate or sustainability goals. The report indicates that 49 more crops are in development. The findings dismantle the narrative that New GMOs are essential to feeding a growing population or combating the climate crisis. In fact, the evidence suggests that their real-world impact remains negligible, and two early new crops have already been withdrawn from the market due to commercial failure. 'Despite the hype, the evidence from our report is overwhelming: New GMOs are only a promise and are far from a reality on the market,' said ENGA Secretary General, Heike Moldenhauer. 'Furthermore, despite widespread claims, not a single New GMO currently on the market delivers on sustainability promises, one of the main reasons their proponents are pushing to deregulate them.' The report reveals: Only three New GMO crops are being cultivated globally: two in the US and one in Japan. Many of the 49 crops in development have been cleared for market access, especially in the US, but are not actually grown. None of the New GMO crops in development meaningfully address climate resilience or biodiversity loss, with just two showing potential for drought or salt tolerance. At the same time, the Non-GMO Project points out that continued monitoring is critical. GMO crops continue to be developed for cultivation using older transgenic engineering techniques to produce new crops like herbicide-resistant wheat and pest-resistant sugar cane. Additionally, many new GMOs are being created using synthetic biology and precision fermentation to create lab-grown foods like 'animal-free dairy' and seedless seed oils. 'To be sure, old GMOs are still an overwhelming presence in the food supply web, especially here in the United States, and more are on the way,' said Hans Eisenbeis, Director of Mission and Messaging at the Non-GMO Project. 'However, efforts to launch the next generation of GMO plants using gene-editing technologies like CRISPR just aren't getting off the ground, despite increasingly permissive regulations, exaggerated sustainability claims, and billions of dollars in public and private investment.' The report highlights shifts in the development of New GMOs compared to their old counterparts. The application of old genetic engineering largely focused on five commodity crops: soy, corn, canola, sugar beets and cotton. These are used as animal feed, processed food ingredients, fuel or clothing. Today, the application of genetic engineering is far broader. With new technologies, companies are working on a variety of plants that are intended for direct human consumption, such as tomatoes and salad greens. The report also shows that developers of New GMOs have become more diverse. Whereas old GMOs were mainly produced and marketed by the four engineering giants Corteva, Bayer, BASF and Syngenta, many start-up companies are involved in the development of New GMOs, as are state institutes. The new report lays out the regulatory hotspots around the world. ENGA and the Non-GMO Project strongly recommend that companies in the food industry: Explicitly exclude New GMOs in their supplier requirements. Rely on independent certification systems that ensure products are free from New GMOs. New GMOs are frequently "non-testable" meaning there are no commercially-available tests, so vigilance from the non-GMO community is critical. New GMOs differ from traditional GMOs in that they may not rely on transgenic technologies or leave foreign DNA in the organism. In many countries, New GMOs face a simplified regulatory process and do not require safety testing. Find the full report 'New GMOs' here. ### Media Contacts:ENGA: Sarah Farndale, farnisarah@ +32 (0)490 390665Non-GMO Project : Alex Tursi, alex@ +1 802.777.6737 About the reportThe report's editors are: Hans Eisenbeis, The Non-GMO Project (USA), Eva Gelinsky, Researcher (CH) and Heike Moldenhauer, ENGA (BE). About ENGAThe European Non-GMO Industry Association (ENGA) is the voice of the Non-GMO food and feed sector at the EU level. ENGA, founded in 2020, secures and supports the expansion of non-GMO production and advocates for the strict regulation of old and New GMOs in order to keep untested and unlabelled GMOs from entering the EU food and feed chains. About The Non-GMO Project The Non-GMO Project is a mission-driven nonprofit organization based in the US. Since 2007, the Non-GMO Project Verified seal has remained North America's most trusted third-party verification for GMO avoidance. Through its Food Integrity Collective, Non-UPF Verified program, and Non-GMO Project Verified mark, the organization promotes transparency and health in food systems. Learn more at and CONTACT: Alex Tursi Non-GMO Project 802-777-6737 alex@ in to access your portfolio
