8.1 pounds of reported delivered meth gets man arrested
HENDERSON, Ky (WEHT) – A successful controlled delivery of over eight pounds of suspected meth helped lead to the arrest of a Henderson man.
According to an affidavit, on June 12, the Evansville DEA office was contacted by an outside law enforcement agency regarding a suspicious parcel found to contain 8.1 pounds of a crystalline substance that had a presumptive field test for meth.
Officials found out that the parcel was intended to be delivered to an address in Evansville.
The affidavit says the Evansville-Vanderburgh County Drug Task Force conducted a controlled delivery the next day. Detectives doing surveillance reportedly saw Davont Marquez Terry driving around the area allegedly doing counter-surveillance for more than an hour before leaving and returning about 30 minutes later driving a pickup truck.
Terry allegedly took the parcel and left. A traffic stop was conducted, and Terry was taken into custody without incident. He allegedly denied knowing he was transporting illegal narcotics despite earlier surveillance and returning in a different vehicle.
He was booked into the Vanderburgh County Jail.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sophie Cunningham Assigns Blame For The Caitlin Clark Incident
Sophie Cunningham Assigns Blame For The Caitlin Clark Incident originally appeared on The Spun. Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham has broken her silence on coming to Caitlin Clark's defense. Cunningham, who was traded from the Phoenix Mercury to the Indiana Fever this offseason, came to Clark's defense during a recent Indiana Fever vs. Connecticut Sun game earlier this week. The Fever topped the Sun, 88-71, but in the third quarter, all hell broke loose. Advertisement Clark was poked in the eye by Sun guard Jacy Sheldon. Clark and Sheldon then got into it, before the Indiana Fever guard was knocked to the ground by another Sun player. Multiple technical fouls were awarded. Later in the game, Cunningham took Sheldon to the ground on a fastbreak layup attempt. She ended up getting ejected from the game for the foul. Over the weekend, Cunningham, who starred collegiately at Missouri, broke her silence on the incident. She made it clear that she believes that's her role with the team. 'I think the refs had a lot to do with that. It was a build up for a couple years now of them just not, not protecting the star player in the WNBA. And so at the end of the day, I'm going to protect my teammates, that's what I do," she said. Sophie Cunningham spoke Cunningham believes that it was the referees' fault for letting things escalate to that point. She believes that other teams have gotten away with too much when it comes to defending Clark. It clearly doesn't sound like Cunningham is planning on changing anything moving forward. Advertisement Sophie Cunningham Assigns Blame For The Caitlin Clark Incident first appeared on The Spun on Jun 22, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jun 22, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
"Trash F***ing White Girl": Brittney Griner Allegedly Unleashes Racial Slur Toward Caitlin Clark After Fouling Out
The WNBA's early-season spotlight turned white-hot on Thursday night, not because of a game-winner or a breakout performance, but due to a controversial moment involving two of the league's most high-profile figures. Following a physical and intense matchup between the Indiana Fever and Atlanta Dream, Brittney Griner is under fire after being caught on camera allegedly hurling a racially charged insult at star Caitlin Clark. Advertisement In what was already a chippy contest, Griner fouled out in the fourth quarter of Indiana's 81-76 win. Cameras appeared to catch her yelling 'trash f***ing white girl' in the direction of Clark as she exited the court. Though no microphone officially captured the audio, the video quickly circulated on social media and triggered a firestorm of commentary. The moment was already tense. Clark and Rhyne Howard had exchanged words in the first quarter, and Clark was involved in multiple physical plays throughout the game. This wasn't the first heated incident involving Clark either, she had a highly publicized run-in with Angel Reese earlier in the season, further fueling the national spotlight on the Fever star. Advertisement But the Griner comment took the discourse in a new direction. While some fans dismissed it as typical trash talk in the heat of battle, others pointed to a double standard and called for accountability. Former NCAA swimmer and activist Riley Gaines led the charge, reposting the clip on social media and referencing Griner's controversial return from Russian detention in 2022. Many echoed that sentiment, arguing that if Clark had been the one using racially charged language, the outrage and media coverage would be explosive. Some fans even called for a suspension or fine, citing that no form of racial language should be tolerated, regardless of the player or context. Advertisement Conversely, some attempted to defend Griner, saying the comment might have been directed at a white referee who made the foul call. The ambiguity has fueled speculation, though no official clarification has come from the Dream, the Fever, or the WNBA. At present, neither Griner nor Clark has publicly commented on the clip. The WNBA has yet to release a formal statement or confirm any disciplinary action, though insiders report the league is aware and reviewing the footage. The incident occurred during what was meant to be a celebratory period for the WNBA, with increased national attention thanks to rookie stars like Clark. However, the growing divide between established veterans and high-profile newcomers like Clark has highlighted deeper issues in the league, issues that touch on race, favoritism, and how the spotlight is shared. If nothing else, this moment reminds the sports world that words matter and when spoken in the national spotlight, they can spark far more than just a postgame debate.
Associated Press
a day ago
- Associated Press
DEA Judge Mulrooney's MMJ Marijuana Ruling May Be DEA's Last Stand Before the Constitution Strikes Back
Judge Mulrooney's decision may have handed MMJ BioPharma Cultivation a defeat inside the DEA's walls, but in doing so, he may have handed MMJ a powerful victory in federal court. The record of constitutional violations and DEA violations is now preserved - the 'Axon-Jarkesy defense' is primed - and the very administrative law judge system the DEA clings to may not survive scrutiny. WASHINGTON, D.C. / ACCESS Newswire / June 22, 2025 / In a move that now appears both unconstitutional and strategically reckless, the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) Chief Administrative Law Judge John J. Mulrooney II has ruled against MMJ BioPharma Cultivation - not by adjudicating evidence, but by canceling the hearing altogether, shutting the courtroom door before any facts could be presented. This denial of due process is not just procedural misconduct. It stands in direct violation of recent Supreme Court precedent - namely, Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC (2023) and Jarkesy v. SEC (2024) - which fundamentally altered the authority of federal agencies to conduct internal administrative hearings shielded from constitutional scrutiny. Why DEA's ALJ System is Constitutionally Cracked In Axon v. FTC, the Supreme Court held that constitutional challenges to federal administrative adjudication systems need not wait until after the agency's internal process is complete. The ruling opened the door for early judicial review - precisely to prevent agencies like the DEA from causing irreparable harm to regulated parties before a federal court can weigh in. Justice Gorsuch put it plainly: 'A proceeding that has already happened cannot be undone.' But that is exactly what happened to MMJ BioPharma Cultivation. Despite spending seven years pursuing a legally sound registration to grow marijuana for FDA-sanctioned clinical trials, MMJ was denied the chance to be heard. Judge Mulrooney ruled - without trial - that the case could be decided on the papers, ignoring contested facts, ignoring ex parte communications concerns, and ignoring the constitutional structure of justice itself. Jarkesy and the Death Knell for DEA's Shadow Court The Supreme Court's decision in Jarkesy v. SEC went even further. The Court ruled that administrative adjudications violate the Constitution on multiple fronts: The DEA's administrative system which allowed Judge Mulrooney to operate unchecked, issue rulings without testimony, and sabotage a life sciences company without judicial oversight - now sits squarely in the crosshairs of both Axon and Jarkesy. MMJ BioPharma Cultivation: The Victim of an Unconstitutional Machine MMJ BioPharma Cultivation is not a fringe operation. It is the only DEA applicant actively pursuing pharmaceutical-grade cannabinoid therapies under FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) protocols, including a manufactured softgel formulation for Huntington's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis. Despite this, Judge Mulrooney's June 2025 ruling canceled a long-scheduled hearing without any opportunity for MMJ to introduce its DEA-compliant facility documentation, binding supply agreements, or evidence of DEA ex parte interference. Even worse, the company was never formally noticed of the pretrial decision - a basic requirement of any fair proceeding. Instead of adjudicating facts, Mulrooney rubber-stamped DEA's bureaucratic inertia. What's Next? The Courts Must Clean Up the DEA's Mess The Supreme Court has been crystal clear: agencies like the DEA do not have unreviewable authority over people's rights, livelihoods, or innovations. Congress did not create 'mini-courts' within executive agencies to bypass the Constitution. Judge Mulrooney's decision may have handed MMJ a defeat inside the DEA's walls, but in doing so, he may have handed MMJ a powerful victory in federal court. The record of constitutional violations is now preserved - the 'Axon Side-Step' is primed - and the very administrative law judge system the DEA clings to may not survive scrutiny. If MMJ's case advances to the D.C. Circuit or even the Supreme Court, it may well be the case that dismantles the DEA's internal adjudication regime once and for all. In the end, the question is no longer whether MMJ BioPharma has been mistreated. The question is whether the DEA's system can survive the Constitution. MMJ is represented by attorney Megan Sheehan. CONTACT: Madison Hisey [email protected] 203-231-8583 SOURCE: MMJ International Holdings press release
