US Embassy in Tel Aviv suffers damage after Iran missile strikes

A United States Embassy branch in Israel's Tel Aviv suffered minor damage due to nearby Iranian strikes as the conflict between the latter two countries continues to escalate. However, no US personnel has been injured.
US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said that the US Embassy and Consulate will remain closed on Monday.
Track updates of Israel-Iran conflict here.
'Our @usembassyjlm US Embassy in Israel & Consulate will officially remain closed today as shelter in place still in effect. Some minor damage from concussions of Iranian missile hits near Embassy Branch in @TelAviv but no injuries to US personnel,' said Huckabee in a post on X.
'Thanks for those checking on your team working @usembassyjlm For any of the 700,000 Americans living is Israel, check Embassy website for updates re: travel advisories, airport re-opening, or official @usembassyjlm operations,' he said in a follow-up post.
Also read: India relocates its citizens, students in Iran as Israel strikes rock Tehran
Videos of the damage the US Embassy branch in Tel Aviv has suffered are going viral on social media. One such video shows glass window panes shattered inside the building.
HT.com could not independently verify the authenticity of the videos.
The damage to the US Embassy branch comes after Iran launched a barrage of missiles at Israel in retaliation to their attacks over the weekend. The two countries have been engaged in active military confrontation which has entered its fourth day now, with no signs of de-escalation in sight.
Also read: 'Pakistan will nuke Israel if...': Iran general's big claim as conflict escalates
The current military conflict between Israel and Iran was triggered by overnight strikes by the former under 'Operation Rising Lion', attacking several military and nuclear sites across Iran. Many key commanders and nuclear scientists were killed in Iran in the strikes. Iran has retaliated by launching air strikes across Israel.
Air raid sirens rang across Israel early Monday morning after Iran launched a new wave of missiles at Israel, killing at least five people and injuring dozens others, reported AP.
Iran fired a new wave of missile attacks on Israel early Monday, triggering air raid sirens across the country as emergency services reported at least five killed and dozens more wounded in the fourth day of open warfare between the regional foes that showed no sign of slowing.
According to Iran, it launched some 100 missiles and even vowed further retaliation against Israel for its actions against the country's military and nuclear infrastructure.
At least 224 people in Iran have died in Israeli strikes since last Friday, the report added. In Israel, the death toll has touched 19.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

10 minutes ago

• First Post

US issues 'worldwide caution' for its citizens after joining Israeli campaign on Iran

The US has issued a global security alert, warning its citizens to be extra cautious amid rising tensions in the Middle East. The alert follows recent US airstrikes on Iran and growing threats of retaliation. read more This handout picture released by the Iranian Red Crescent on June 14, 2025, show Iranian Red Crescent volunteers working in a Tehran neighbourhood hit by a reported Israeli strike. AFP The US State Department issued a 'worldwide caution' alert on Sunday, warning Americans that the conflict in the Middle East could increase security risks for those living or travelling abroad. 'The conflict between Israel and Iran has disrupted travel and led to airspace closures across the region. There is also a risk of protests targeting US citizens and interests overseas,' the alert said. It advised all Americans to be extra cautious worldwide. The alert did not mention the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites the night before, which Iran warned would have 'irreparable consequences.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In response to the strikes, Iran threatened US bases in the region. An advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Akbar Velayati, said any country hosting American forces involved in attacks on Iran would be considered a legitimate target. Meanwhile, the US began evacuation flights from Israel for American citizens and permanent residents. It also ordered staff to leave US embassies in Iraq and Lebanon.

Time of India

11 minutes ago

• Time of India

Trump is open to regime change in Iran, after his admin said that wasn't goal

The Trump administration on Sunday sent a series of conflicting messages to Iran - with US officials initially indicating a willingness to resume negotiations after a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites and President Donald Trump talking up the possibility of regime change. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change', but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump posted on social media. "MIGA!!!" The posting on Truth Social marked something of a reversal from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth said. The Trump administration has made a series of intimidating statements even as it has simultaneously called to restart negotiations, making it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran. Live Events Up until the US president's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging by Trump's vice president, Pentagon chief, top military adviser and secretary of state suggested a confidence that any fallout would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table. Hegseth had said that America "does not seek war" with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. But the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings that could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack US bases in the region, engage in cyber attacks or double down on a nuclear programme that might seem like more of a necessity after the US strike. All of that raises the question of whether the strikes will open up a far more brutal phase of fighting or revive negotiations out of an abundance of caution. Inside the US, the attack quickly spilled over into domestic politics with Trump choosing to spend part of his Sunday going after his critics in Congress. Trump, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, returned to social media on Sunday to lambaste Rep Thomas Massie, who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval. "We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the bomb right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)" Trump said as part of the post on Truth Social. At their joint Pentagon briefing, Hegseth and Air Force Gen Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that "Operation Midnight Hammer" involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance. Caine indicated that the goal of the operation - destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan - had been achieved. "Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Caine said. Vance said in a television interview that while he would not discuss "sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground," he felt "very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon." Pressed further, he told NBC's "Meet the Press" that "I think that we have really pushed their program back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon." The vice president said the US had "negotiated aggressively' with Iran to try to find a peaceful settlement and that Trump made his decision after assessing the Iranians were not acting "in good faith." "I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship, reset these negotiations and get us in a place where Iran can decide not to be a threat to its neighbours, not to be a threat to the United States, and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears," Vance said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on CBS's "Face the Nation" that "there are no planned military operations right now against Iran, unless, unless they mess around and they attack" US interests. Trump has previously threatened other countries, but often backed down or failed to follow through, given his promises to his coalition of voters not to entangle the United States in an extended war. It was not immediately clear whether Iran saw the avoidance of a wider conflict as in its best interests. Much of the world is absorbing the consequences of the strikes and the risk that they could lead to more fighting across the Middle East after the US inserted itself into the war between Israel and Iran. Israeli airstrikes that began on June 13 local time targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and generals, prompting retaliation from Iran and creating a series of events that contributed to the US attack. While US officials urged caution and stressed that only nuclear sites were targeted by Washington, Iran criticised the actions as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Washington was "fully responsible" for whatever actions Tehran may take in response. "They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities," he said at a news conference in Turkey. "I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy." China and Russia, where Araghchi was heading for talks with President Vladimir Putin, condemned the US military action. The attacks were "a gross violation of international law," said Russia's Foreign Ministry, which also advocated "returning the situation to a political and diplomatic course." A Turkish Foreign Ministry statement warned about the risk of the conflict spreading to "a global level". British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom was moving military equipment into the area to protect its interests, people and allies. His office said he talked on Sunday with Trump about the need for Tehran to resume negotiations, but Trump would have posted his remarks about regime change after their conversation. The leaders of Italy, Canada, Germany and France agreed on the need for "a rapid resumption of negotiations." France's Emmanuel Macron held talks with the Saudi crown prince and sultan of Oman. Iran could try to stop oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz, which could create the same kind of inflationary shocks that the world felt after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Oil prices increased in the financial markets as the war between Israel and Iran had intensified, climbing by 21% over the past month. The Pentagon briefing did not provide any new details about Iran's nuclear capabilities. Hegseth said the timeline for the strikes was the result of a schedule set by Trump for talks with Iran about its nuclear ambitions. "Iran found out" that when Trump "says 60 days that he seeks peace and negotiation, he means 60 days of peace and negotiation," Hegseth said. "Otherwise, that nuclear programme, that new nuclear capability will not exist. He meant it." That statement was complicated as the White House had suggested last Thursday that Trump could take as much as two weeks to determine whether to strike Iran or continue to pursue negotiations. But the US benefited from Iran's weakened air defences and was able to conduct the attacks without resistance from Iran. "Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface to air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission," Caine said. Hegseth said that a choice to move a number of B-2 bombers from their base in Missouri earlier Saturday was meant to be a decoy to throw off Iranians. Caine added that the US used other methods of deception as well, deploying fighters to protect the B-2 bombers that dropped a total of 14 bunker-buster bombs on Iran's sites at Fordo and Natanz. The strikes occurred Saturday between 6:40 pm and 7:05 pm in Washington, or roughly 2:10 am on Sunday in Iran.

Indian Express

11 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Trump's gamble in Iran: Implications for the US, its allies, and a weakened Tehran

In a bold political gamble, US President Donald Trump has now entered the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, after initially distancing himself from Tel Aviv's strikes on Tehran's nuclear infrastructure earlier this month. Whether or not this was his original intent, Trump's intervention carries far-reaching implications—not just for US domestic politics and foreign policy, but also for the geopolitics of the Middle East and broader Asia. Trump's principal political challenge may not come from international criticism labelling his actions as illegal—a view echoed by the opposition Democratic Party—but rather from within his own support base, the 'Make America Great Again' coalition. A key element that propelled Trump back into the White House has been the solid support of the populist right-wing that has been vocal in its opposition to America's 'endless wars' in the Middle East. Throughout his campaign, Trump promised to be a 'peace president,' pledging to avoid military entanglements abroad. His calculation appears to be that the strike on Iran would be swift and decisive and that Tehran would comply with his demands. But recent American history suggests it is far easier to start a war than to end one. The enemy, after all, has a say in when—and whether—it ends. Trump is betting that Iran is too weak to mount a significant response or that American military power can suppress any escalation. Yet if he is dragged into a drawn-out conflict, the resulting backlash could erode his domestic support and jeopardise his presidency. Iran, for its part, has shown little interest in capitulating. It has launched missile attacks against Israel, though the frequency and intensity of these strikes are tapering off. Israel, enjoying complete air superiority, continues to target Iranian military infrastructure with impunity. Still, Tehran retains the option to widen the war—by targeting US forces in the region, attacking American allies, or disrupting vital oil shipping lanes in the Gulf. Such actions would provoke massive retaliation from the US, particularly against Iran's oil sector. Yet with the Islamic Republic's political credibility on the line, passivity is not an option. Over the past year and a half, Iran has lost considerable ground in the Middle East. A resurgent Israel has dealt major blows to Tehran's regional proxies, including Hamas and Hezbollah. Iran has also lost a key ally in Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Meanwhile, its principal international backers—Russia and China—have criticised US actions but offered little tangible support in the face of coordinated Israeli-American military pressure. Whether Moscow and Beijing will now step in to provide political or diplomatic cover for Tehran remains uncertain. Iran's Arab neighbors, who have no reason to love the Islamic Republic of Iran, have provided passive support to Israel's offensive. Many in the Gulf may quietly welcome the dismantling of Iran's nuclear capabilities, but they also fear the consequences of a prolonged war that could destabilise the region and threaten their own security. For Israel, US military involvement represents a major strategic victory. Tel Aviv's goals go beyond halting Iran's nuclear programme—it seeks regime change in Tehran. Whether the nuclear infrastructure has been permanently destroyed or merely set back remains unclear. Tehran insists the US strikes had minimal impact, and many observers suspect Iran may have secured its enriched uranium stockpiles before the bombing began. While Israel continues to pursue the elusive goal of regime change, the outcome remains far from certain. Beyond the Middle East, America's Asian allies are watching with concern. They worry that Washington's oft-repeated 'pivot to Asia' could once again be sidelined by military entanglements in the Middle East. Beijing, however, is unlikely to object. A distracted United States, preoccupied with the Middle Eastern wars, makes it easier for China to pursue strategic primacy across the Indo-Pacific. (C Raja Mohan is a distinguished fellow at the Council on Strategic and Defence Research, Delhi, and a contributing editor on international affairs for The Indian Express)