Ugandan military accuses EU diplomats of engaging in subversive activities
KAMPALA, Uganda (AP) — Ugandan military authorities on Friday accused diplomats from Europe of engaging in subversive activities, in an escalation of tensions over European criticism of human rights violations by Uganda's security forces.
Some European diplomats are mobilizing on behalf 'the negative and traitorous groups opposed' to the government of President Yoweri Museveni, the military said in a statement.
The statement singled out the German ambassador, Matthias Schauer, charging that 'the intelligence services are aware about his clearly undiplomatic practices that have been taking place in different parts of the country for some time now.'
That statement was issued by Col. Chris Magezi, a close associate of Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba, the president's son who also serves as Uganda's top military commander.
Kainerugaba's military rise has been a source of concern among Ugandans who believe he is poised to take over from Museveni in a chaotic political transition. Kainerugaba frequently asserts his wish to succeed his father as president of the east African country, alarming Ugandans who don't want to see hereditary rule.
Kainerugaba has gained notoriety most recently for his unpredictable posts on the social platform X. He has threatened to behead Bobi Wine, a prominent opposition figure, and he drew widespread criticism earlier this month for reporting the apparent torture in his 'basement' of Wine's bodyguard, who was missing at the time.
Schauer, the German ambassador, is among a group of European diplomats who complained about Kainerugaba in a meeting on Thursday with Gen. Salim Saleh, a retired army officer who is Kainerugaba's uncle and an influential member of Uganda's security apparatus. Saleh apologized for Kainerugaba's provocative posts on X, according to reports in the local press.
The strong response from Kainerugaba's press office on Friday marks an escalation in relations between the Ugandan government and diplomats it accuses of meddling.
It was not immediately possible to get a comment from Schauer or Jan Sadek, the top EU diplomat in Uganda.
The EU has repeatedly urged Ugandan authorities to protect civil liberties ahead of presidential elections next year.
Sadek has expressed concern over serious rights violations that include arbitrary detentions and the degrading treatment of political opponents. He spoke of 'an alarming militarization of the political sphere' in a speech earlier in May.
'The use of military force against civilians, with apparent impunity, contradicts the principles of the rule of law,' he said.
Museveni, who first took power by force in 1986, is serving his sixth term. He will seek re-election in polls set for January 2026.
Many Ugandans expect an unpredictable political transition because the 80-year-old Museveni has no obvious successor within the ranks of the ruling National Resistance Movement party, with real power concentrated in a strong military and powerful intelligence system. Some observers fear that Museveni may step aside in favor of Kainerugaba in a bloodless coup.
A long-time opposition leader, Kizza Besigye, has been jailed since November over alleged treason charges his lawyers say are politically motivated. Besigye, a qualified physician who retired from Uganda's military at the rank of colonel, is a former president of the Forum for Democratic Change party, for many years Uganda's most prominent opposition group.
Uganda has never witnessed a peaceful transfer of political power since independence from the British in 1962.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
an hour ago
- News24
‘Let Israel have a taste of devastation it has perpetrated in Gaza,' says Malema
EFF leader Julius Malema condemned Israel's actions in Gaza, expressing solidarity with Iran and Palestine during a funeral in KwaZulu-Natal. Malema was speaking at the funeral service of EFF supporters who died in a bus accident in KwaZulu-Natal last week. South Africa has urged de-escalation and adherence to international law amid worsening Israel-Iran hostilities. EFF leader Julius Malema has strongly condemned Israel's actions, asserting that the country should continue to experience the same destruction and devastation it has inflicted on Gaza. Malema used Sunday's funeral service of seven of the 10 EFF supporters who died in a bus accident in KwaZulu-Natal to reaffirm his party's unwavering support for both Iran and the people of Palestine. He said: 'We stand in full solidarity with Iran, a country under siege from Western imperialism for choosing independence. We reject the bullying of this nation by the United States, Israel, and its allies, and we stand by their right to defend themselves by any means necessary. 'Let Israel finally have a taste of the devastation and violence it has perpetrated in Gaza.' Malema's comments come after US President Donald Trump confirmed on Saturday night that 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated'. Reuters reported that during a late-night address to the nation, Trump said US forces struck Iran's three main nuclear sites and warned Tehran it would face more attacks if it did not agree to peace. According to the report, after days of consideration and well ahead of his self-imposed two-week deadline, Trump's choice to support Israel's military campaign against its key adversary, Iran, signifies a significant intensification of the conflict. Last week, the South African government expressed deep concern regarding the escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran. Pretoria called for the urgent de-escalation, restraint, and full compliance with international law by all parties to prevent further human suffering. Malema told mourners that the pain of South African children was connected to the pain of children in Palestine, where bombs are dropped on homes, hospitals, and schools. He said: The screams of mothers in Gaza echo the cries we hear here. We say to the Israeli apartheid regime, the world is watching, and history will judge you harshly. He added the EFF stood firmly with the people of Palestine and will never be neutral in the face of genocide. 'We are anti-imperialists because we understand that our struggle for freedom is bound to the struggle of all oppressed people across the world.'
News24
2 hours ago
- News24
China's new trade offer looks generous. But SA must learn from the past
Chinese authorities may lower import tariffs for various goods from African countries. But SA needs to draw appropriate lessons from experience, says Wandile Sihlobo. South Africa's agricultural export focus means the country must always keep an open eye for any potential new market expansion. One country that has consistently been on our radar is China. The country's dominance in global agricultural imports, stable economy, large population, and current low penetration by South Africa's agriculture make it an ideal area for expansion. However, the nonexistence of a preferential trade agreement in agricultural products has disadvantaged South Africa relative to its competitors, such as Australia, Peru, and Chile, among others, which access the Chinese market at a tariff-free rate or with low tariffs. It is against this backdrop that we found the official announcement by the Chinese authorities that they would consider lowering import tariffs for various goods from African countries encouraging. While no official details have been released yet, we view the message as consistent with what the official representatives of the People's Republic of China have been communicating, particularly regarding agriculture. For example, in April, Wu Peng, current Chinese Ambassador to South Africa, stated that '…China and South Africa need to strengthen our bilateral trade and economic cooperation. Chinese government welcomes more South African agricultural and industrial products to enter the huge Chinese market.' China's signalling the willingness to absorb more South African agricultural products is only the first step in what will likely be a long journey, as trade matters generally take time. Ideally, the following steps should be a clear and pragmatic plan for reducing import tariffs and removing phytosanitary barriers that certain agricultural products continue to encounter in the Chinese market. Indeed, the work must be led by South Africa's Department of Trade, Industry, and Competition, as well as the Department of Agriculture, and at specific points, also the Department of International Relations and Cooperation. This will help ensure that China proceeds beyond statements to actual business collaboration. South Africa remains a small share in the Chinese list of agricultural suppliers, at about 0.4%. However, this current access in China is vital for the wool and red meat industry. China accounts for roughly 70% of South Africa's wool exports. There is a progressive increase in red meat exports, even though animal diseases currently cause glitches. The focus should be on expanding this access by lowering duties and other non-tariff barriers to encourage more fruit, grain, and other product exports to China. Still, it is essential to emphasise that the focus on China is not at the expense of existing agricultural export markets and relationships. Instead, China offers an opportunity to continue with export diversification. As we stated recently, the Trade Map data show that China is among the world's leading agricultural importers, accounting for 9% of global agricultural imports in 2024 (before 2024, China had been a leading importer for many years). The US was the world's leading agricultural importer in the same year, accounting for 10% of global imports. Germany accounted for 7%, followed by the UK (4%), the Netherlands (4%), France (4%), Italy (3%), Japan (3%), Belgium (3%) and Canada (2%). It is this diversity of agricultural demand in global markets that convinces us that South Africa's agricultural trade interests cannot be limited to one country but should be spread across all major agricultural importers. Importantly, the approach of promoting diversity and maintaining access to various regions has been a key component of South Africa's agricultural trade policy since the dawn of democracy. For example, in 2024, South Africa exported a record $13.7 billion of agricultural products, up 3% from the previous year. These exports were spread across the diverse regions. The African continent accounted for the lion's share of South Africa's agricultural exports, with a 44% share of the total value. As a collective, Asia and the Middle East were the second-largest agricultural markets, accounting for 21% of the share of overall farm exports. The EU was South Africa's third-largest agricultural market, accounting for a 19% share of the market. The Americas region accounted for 6% of South Africa's agricultural exports in 2024. The rest of the world, including the United Kingdom, accounted for 10% of the exports. In a nutshell, China's signalling the willingness to lower import tariffs is a welcome development. However, it will only become more substantial once more information becomes available. From a South African side, the relevant government departments should consider, through the local Embassy, sending an enquiry about unlocking this process. Ultimately, China is one of the focus areas in South Africa's long-term agricultural export diversification strategy, and any opportunity to further this plan should be pursued vigorously. Importantly, while China's offer looks generous, a country like South Africa needs to draw appropriate lessons from experience. Unilateral duty-free, quota-free market access is a double-edged sword: in the short to medium term, they can help a country increase the share of its exports in a significant market, but since these are not anchored in reciprocity, the largesse can disappear if there are frictions between the two parties, for example, over geopolitics. In short, non-reciprocal arrangements can lead to dependence and can easily be exploited by the benefactor as a means of political leverage to achieve strategic ends. While South Africa—and indeed African countries—should take advantage of this opportunity, we must aim to conclude a bilateral trade agreement with China that guarantees predictability and certainty and is durable. Wandile Sihlobo is chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).
News24
2 hours ago
- News24
Person of interest: Apartheid assassin Eugene de Kock to testify at Cradock Four inquest
During a case management meeting for the Cradock Four inquest in May, several interested parties allegedly told the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) that they considered apartheid assassin Eugene de Kock to be a person of interest. Claims were made that De Kock assisted by providing advice to disguise the murder weapon used in the Cradock Four murders and that he allegedly said the 1989 Motherwell bombing was, in part, to terminate people who could shed light on the murders. This information is contained in an affidavit by De Kock's attorney, filed in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria as part of his litigation against police to secure legal funding as he is due to testify at the Cradock Four inquest. In May, the court ordered that the police fund his legal representation for the inquest, after they had dismissed his request twice. The inquest will investigate who should be held responsible for the deaths of anti-apartheid activists Matthew Goniwe, Fort Calata, Sparrow Mkonto and Sicelo Mhlauli, who were abducted and murdered by security police in June 1985 in the Eastern Cape. According to the confirmatory affidavit, De Kock's attorney said the case management meeting in which parties said they considered De Kock to be an 'implied person' was held on 7 May. 'Specific reference was made that after the murders of the Cradock Four, Col de Kock assisted by providing advice to disguise a murder weapon and that further reference was made to the Motherwell bombing, in that Col de Kock declared that part of the reason of the Motherwell bombing was to terminate persons that could shed light on the Cradock Four murders,' the affidavit reads. The Motherwell bombing refers to the murders of three police officers and a police informant in Motherwell, Eastern Cape, on 14 December 1989. The South African Press Association reported that De Kock was forced to take part in the bombing to ensure that he could not testify against his superiors. The affidavit further stated that the Cradock Four's families' legal representatives requested that De Kock be put on the list of persons of interest. In De Kock's affidavits that formed part of the litigation against the police's decisions to refuse him legal funding for the inquest, there were arguments about whether he was considered a witness or suspect at the inquest. When police refused De Kock's first application for funding, they said it was because he exceeded his powers as they laboured under the averment that he was a suspect. This was also after he was told he was a suspect by a state attorney. Police said this was a factual inaccuracy. In an email giving feedback on the case management meeting, a prosecutor stated that the NPA considered De Kock an essential witness because he had received amnesty for his role in the matter. 'Although he can, therefore, not be prosecuted on the offence for which he had been granted amnesty, [he] could still be considered a person of interest for the role he played in covering up the matter,' the email reads. 'History and infamy' De Kock – who was dubbed 'Prime Evil' for his role as the commander of a notorious Vlakplaas death squad that carried out the torture and executions of people fighting against the apartheid regime – said he was not involved in the murder or planning of the murder of the Cradock Four, which he documented in his amnesty application before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). In 1999, De Kock was granted amnesty in respect of defeating the ends of justice related to the Cradock Four murders. While De Kock reportedly knew about the killings, he was not personally responsible for them, according to the Foundation for Human Rights. Despite this, De Kock, in an affidavit, said it was 'possible and highly probable that individuals can fabricate versions to implicate me, in order to 'save themselves''. 'It is also possible and probable that individuals can fabricate versions to implicate me as a result of my history and infamy,' De Kock added. There have been two previous inquests into the murders of the Cradock Four, both of which made no findings against De Kock. He had also not been called to give evidence in the previous inquests. De Kock was paroled in 2015 after spending two decades in prison for his crimes, including murder, which he did not receive amnesty for at the TRC.
