Cancer patients risk dying because of ‘RUBBISH they read on social media', top doctors warn
CANCER patients are refusing medical treatment because of rubbish they read online, top doctors warn.
People are becoming incurable and even dying as a result of misinformation on social media.
A study led by the University of Bologna found that almost all cancer -related videos on YouTube and TikTok – between 88 and 100 per cent – contain incorrect information.
The NHS, top UK charities and global experts warn the problem is out of control, killing patients who have cancer and terrifying those trying to stay healthy.
Professor Richard Simcock, NHS doctor and chief medical officer at Macmillan Cancer Support, said: 'I recently saw two young women who have declined all proven medical treatments for cancer and are instead pursuing unproven and radical diets, promoted on social media.
'As a doctor, I want to be able to use the best available therapies to help people with cancer.
'A person is perfectly entitled to decline but when they do that on the basis of information which is frankly untrue or badly interpreted it makes me very sad.'
Polling by Macmillan has found that 59 per cent of Brits – more than 30million people – believe myths or misconceptions about the disease.
For example experts say patients are being sucked in by influencers' claims that low-carb diets can battle cancer, recommendations for unproven drugs, and a belief that negative thoughts can cause relapse.
Internet users have also been convinced of false or unproven cancer risks such as from deodorants, mobile phones, underwired bras and dairy, they added.
They also accuse search engines and artificial intelligence of regurgitating false information.
Professor Stephen Powis, NHS England's medical director, said: 'Social media can provide a supportive community but we're also seeing an alarmingly high level of misinformation on some of these platforms.
'I would urge people to be sceptical of any 'miracle cures' and to use trusted, credible sources like the NHS website.
'These fairy tales aren't just misleading, they can be harmful.'
Dr Julie Gralow, president of the American Society for Clinical Oncology, said: 'Several patients of mine wanted an all-natural treatment approach and found clinics online.
'In some cases they died within nine months.
'It's tragic and we wonder what we could have done differently but in the end we can't force anybody to do anything.'
About 400,000 people develop cancer in the UK each year and 50 per cent survive for 10 years or more after diagnosis.
Matthew Hobbs, of Prostate Cancer UK, added: 'Sadly there are a lot of poor sources of information out there.
'Sometimes they are deliberately pushing unproven treatments or ideas, other times it is well meant advice but lacking expertise and full understanding of all the facts.'
Retired breast surgeon Dr Liz O'Riordan said: 'We need to get more doctors talking to patients on social media and explaining things to them.'
1
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
20 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Streeting launches investigation into maternity services after families ‘gaslit'
Wes Streeting said that 'up and down' the country 'maternity units are failing, hospitals are failing, trusts are failing, regulators are failing' and there was 'too much passing the buck'. Mr Streeting, who has been meeting families who have lost babies to poor maternity care, told the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) conference in London: 'Over the last year, I've been wrestling with how we tackle problems in maternity and neonatal units, and I've come to the realisation that while there is action we can take now, we have to acknowledge that this has become systemic. 'It's not just a few bad units. Up and down the country, maternity units are failing, hospitals are failing, trusts are failing, regulators are failing. 'There's too much obfuscation, too much passing the buck and giving lip service.' Mr Streeting apologised on behalf of the NHS, having met families in Nottingham and around the country whose children have died or been injured. Senior midwife Donna Ockenden is currently examining how hundreds of babies died or were injured in the care of Nottingham University Hospitals Trust. Mr Streeting said: 'All of them have had to fight for truth and justice, they describe being ignored, gaslit, lied to, manipulated and damaged further by the inability for a trust to simply be honest with them that something has gone wrong. 'I want to say publicly how sorry I am, sorry for what the NHS has put them through, sorry for the way they've been treated since by the state and sorry that we haven't put this right yet, because these families are owed more than an apology. They're owed change, they're owed accountability and they're owed the truth.' The Health Secretary said risk is 'considerably higher' than it should be for women and babies because of a 'crisis' in maternity and neo-natal services. He added: 'Within the past 15 years, we've seen appalling scandals that blew the lid on issues ranging from care, safety, culture and oversight: Shrewsbury, Telford, East Kent, Nottingham. 'The last government responded with initiatives like Better Births in 2016 and the maternity transformation programme. 'But, despite improvements on some metrics, inequalities in maternal and neo-natal outcomes have become more visible, not less. The rate of late maternal deaths has been consistently rising. 'Babies of black ethnicity are twice as likely to be stillborn than babies of white ethnicity, and black women are still two to three times more likely to die during pregnancy or shortly after birth than white women. 'Tragically, that gap is closing slightly, but partly because more white women are dying in childbirth.' Other high-profile scandals had deepened the public's mistrust in the state, Mr Streeting continued. 'From the Horizon Post Office scandal to the infected blood scandal, the degradation of responsibility and trust in our institutions is compounding a cynicism and malaise at the ability of British politics to deliver for people. 'This is a dangerous place for a country to be. 'If we do not admit the scale of the failure in maternity services, we're condemning ourselves to etching that mistrust deeper. 'If we cannot admit openly that we as institutions and as a state got this wrong, we'll never be able to fix it or rebuild that trust. 'Too many children have died because of state failure and I will not allow it to continue under my watch.' The new investigation will consist of two parts. The first will investigate trusts of greatest concern at the moment, including Leeds, Gloucester, Mid and South Essex and Sussex, 'to hold them to account for improvement', Mr Streeting said. He added: 'I'm currently discussing with Leeds families the best way to grip the challenges brought to light in that trust by their campaigning, reports in the media and the latest Care Quality Commission (CQC) report, and I'll be ordering an investigation into nine specific cases identified by families in Sussex …' The second part of the investigation will be a 'system-wide' look at maternity and neonatal care, uniting lessons from past maternity inquiries to create one 'clear set of actions' designed to improve national NHS care. A National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, chaired by Mr Streeting, has also been set up, made up of experts and bereaved families. The investigation will begin this summer and report back by December. A new digital system will be rolled out to all maternity services by November to flag potential safety concerns in trusts, while an anti-discrimination programme to tackle inequalities is being launched. Asked about the cost of the review, Mr Streeting said: 'I suspect it will be somewhat less than the enormous costs we pay in clinical negligence claims. 'Probably the most shocking statistic in this area is that we are paying out more in clinical negligence for maternity failures than we are spending on maternity services. That's how bad things are. 'So, putting together a review team, undertaking the level of analytical work required to produce a really good, high-quality evidence-based report is a drop in the ocean compared to the price of failure.' Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, said: 'Despite the hard work of staff, too many women are experiencing unacceptable maternity care and families continue to be let down by the NHS when they need us most. 'This rapid national investigation must mark a line in the sand for maternity care – setting out one set of clear actions for NHS leaders to ensure high quality care for all. 'Transparency will be key to understanding variation and fixing poor care – by shining a spotlight on the areas of greatest failure we can hold failing trusts to account. 'Each year, over half a million babies are born under our care and maternity safety rightly impacts public trust in the NHS – so we must act immediately to improve outcomes for the benefit of mothers, babies, families and staff.' The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) said maternity services are 'at, or even beyond, breaking point'. RCM chief executive Gill Walton said: 'Every woman and family should leave maternity and neonatal services whole, happy and healthy. 'Yet we know that, for far too many, that isn't their experience. 'Systemic failings and a lack of attention to the warning signs have let those families down and let down the hardworking staff who are trying so hard to provide the care they deserve. 'Everyone involved in maternity services: the midwifery community, obstetricians, anaesthetists, sonographers and, of course, the women and families in their care; knows that maternity services are at, or even beyond, breaking point. 'This renewed focus and commitment by the Health Secretary to deliver change is welcome, and we will do everything we can to support him in doing so.' Professor Ranee Thakar, president of the RCOG, said: 'The maternity workforce is on its knees, with many now leaving the profession.' She said that 'for years, maternity units have had too few staff, too little time for training and lacked modern equipment and facilities, resulting in women and babies being harmed.' She urged the Government to 'not to lose sight of funding and workforce shortages within this'.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Living apart: is this the secret to a happy, lusty sex life with your partner?
Name: Living apart together. Age: At least since Victorian times. Appearance: Separate beds, busy loins. Living apart together? Is that where you share a home with your partner, but you've become so emotionally estranged that you can feel your connection eroding on a daily basis? No. Why? No reason. Carry on! It's the opposite. Couples who live apart together remain a couple, but each has their own home. That doesn't sound very romantic. Or maybe it's the most romantic thing ever. How's that? They're constantly having it off, for one. Are they? Absolutely. A recent study in the journal Andrology tracked 5,000 men to see how often they had sex. It found that men who lived with a partner managed it once or twice a month on average. Those living apart? Three to seven times a month. And why is this? It might have something to do with the data. The study included several young men in relationships who hadn't moved in with their partners yet. Ah, so before the deadening familiarity of their partners destroyed their libido for good. Listen, is everything OK? Perfectly fine! Carry on! Anyway, it isn't just that. Researchers suggested that it might be down to cohabiting men letting themselves go a bit physically. They get comfortable and sedentary, which negatively affects their sexual activity. So living apart will make me have more sex and look better? I'm not sure that's the exact message, but living apart together is more common than you'd think. It's estimated that one in 10 long-term couples do it. Well, it seems to work. But ask yourself this: does the possibility of having sex a few extra times a month justify the financial burden of owning and keeping two households instead of one? Yes, yes it does. I suppose it does keep the mystery alive. It takes work to remain sexually invested in someone who you have seen pick their toenails. There's nothing sexier than not being told you're loading the dishwasher wrong. Exactly. Maintain separate residences and you only get to see your partner when you want to see them. There are fewer compromises to make, so your love will remain more pure. Sounds like a no-brainer to me. Well, you'll probably die young. Wait, what? The researchers noted that men who live together apart are at higher risk of heart attack and stroke, the reason being that they don't have a woman around to remind them to take their pills every day and eat healthily. Do you ever get the sense that men might be their own worst enemies? Honestly, every single day. Do say: 'Darling, let's sell the house and buy two studio flats.' Don't say: 'He died doing what he loved: forgetting to take his blood thinners.'
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fifth large snake found in Lincolnshire woodland near Scunthorpe
A fifth snake has been found abandoned in North 16ft (5m) long reticulated python was discovered by a passing motorist on a road in Twigmoor Woods, near Scunthorpe, on Saturday discovery comes after Humberside Police said its rural task force was investigating offences under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 after four snakes had been found in the same area on June Harry Eynon, who was driving home when he spotted the snake and called police, said: "We were shocked to say the least, but also a little scared because it's not something you see every day in this country." The animal was recovered by RSG Reptiles and taken to their specialist reptile rescue centre near Alford, where the four other snakes are being looked Rob Stokes said the snake was underweight and was "quite poorly" with a respiratory infection that would require treatment by a vet."It's been out in the British weather for more than 10 days," he previous four pythons were discovered in the Twigmoor and Cleatham areas of North snakes are non-venomous and are native to South East Asia and can grow up to 18ft (5.5m) in Stokes said he thought all five had been "dumped by the same people"."Apart from being illegal, it's just cruel," he said."They're pets, so they are unlikely to attack people, although they could present a danger to wildlife."He appealed to anybody struggling to keep exotic animals to get in touch rather than abandoning them in the wild. The snake, named Dave by one of the people who found it, will live at the rescue centre with the other Reptiles has set up an online fundraising appeal to pay the costs of building enclosures for the snakes and vet said the fifth snake had been "taken away safely" and added that they had also received a report of another one found dead in the same a statement, police said: "Inquiries are continuing to establish the circumstances surrounding the reports and identify those involved, and we would appeal to anyone who has information to contact us."Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
