Democrats' wary response to transgender ruling shows party's retreat

Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Even Democrats who condemned the ruling tried to turn the focus to other issues. Schumer suggested on the social platform X that Republicans were using the topic 'to divert attention from ripping health care away from millions of Americans.'
Advertisement
The careful calculus reflected how the fraught topic of transgender issues has tormented Democrats for months, with Republicans putting them firmly on the back foot. Many party leaders now believe that liberal politicians took positions in recent years that deviated too far from the beliefs of the average voter.
Last year, Donald Trump painted Vice President Kamala Harris as too far to the left by pointing to her past positions on transgender care, including support for taxpayer-funded transition operations for prisoners and migrants, which she expressed on a questionnaire in 2019. (Trump elided the fact that appointees in his first administration provided gender-affirming care for a small group of inmates.)
Advertisement
'Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you,' declared a widely circulated Trump ad. The line of attack was considered by some Democrats to be one of the most effective against Harris.
Since her loss, they have made some efforts to pivot, conscious of polling like a New York Times survey in February that found that nearly 80 percent of Americans — including 67 percent of Democrats — believed that transgender female athletes should not be allowed to participate in women's sports. A survey from SCOTUSPoll in April found that 64 percent of Americans, including 38 percent of Democrats, supported states' being able to ban certain treatments for transgender minors.
But many elected Democrats still see themselves as important defenders of transgender Americans, and plenty of rank-and-file lawmakers had full-throated condemnations of the ruling Wednesday.
'Trans youth and their health care are under attack — and now our highest court has joined in on the assault,' Representative Summer Lee of Pennsylvania wrote on social media.
Representative Brittany Pettersen of Colorado added: 'As a mom, I can't imagine the pain these families navigate as they're denied the care their children need. Trans kids, like all kids, deserve the freedom to reach their greatest potential.'
Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois, who has a transgender cousin, appeared to be the most forthcoming of the party's potential 2028 contenders, writing on X that 'Illinois has enshrined protections to meet this very moment.'
Advertisement
'In a time of increasing overreach and hateful rhetoric, it's more important than ever to reaffirm our commitment to the rights and dignity of the LGBTQ+ community,' he added. 'You have a home here always.'
In recent months, other ambitious Democrats have sounded a different tune, with Newsom making headlines in March when he suggested that transgender athletes' participation in women's sports was 'deeply unfair.'
Pete Buttigieg, who ran for president in 2020 and later served as transportation secretary, offered a nuanced answer at a town hall in Iowa last month when asked about transgender rights.
'While I think we do need to revisit some of the things that we have had to say policy-wise that haven't kept up with the times as a party, that doesn't mean, ever, throwing vulnerable people under the bus,' said Buttigieg, who is gay.
Asked whether Buttigieg had spoken about the ruling or would issue a statement, a spokesperson for him replied, 'He has not.'
Even Democrats without evident presidential aspirations have shifted on transgender issues this year. As Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada voted against a bill barring transgender women and girls from participating on girls' sports teams, she said she supported 'fair play and safety' but not 'transgender athletes competing in girls' and women's sports when it compromises those principles.'
And Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, one of the first to break with his party on transgender athletes, faced a backlash in November when he said in an interview: 'I have two little girls. I don't want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete.'
Representative Sarah McBride of Delaware, the first openly transgender member of Congress, has focused less on her identity and more on issues like paid family leave and the minimum wage. In a statement Wednesday, she said that the Supreme Court ruling 'undermines doctors' and that 'politicians and judges are inserting themselves in exam rooms.'
Advertisement
In a podcast interview this week with Ezra Klein, a New York Times opinion columnist, McBride suggested that activists took their feet off the gas after gay marriage was legalized and public perception shifted in favor of LGBTQ+ rights. That has allowed, she added, 'for the misinformation, the disinformation — that well-coordinated, well-funded campaign — to really take advantage of that lack of understanding.'
A member of the Supreme Court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, was perhaps the most prominent voice defending transgender people on Wednesday.
In her dissent, Sotomayor wrote that 'the court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time​ Magazine

30 minutes ago

• Time​ Magazine

We Need to Invest in the Heartland

For too long, the national conversation about innovation, the future of higher education, and economic growth has been dominated by a handful of colleges and universities largely based in coastal power centers. In doing so, we've overlooked the rest of the country and have weakened the broader foundation of American capitalism and democracy. There is another path forward—and it runs through the heartland of America. Across the country, families, and employers are rethinking the value of a college degree. Meanwhile, the pace of technological change is accelerating—AI is transforming industries, new sectors are emerging, and the demand for skilled talent is shifting rapidly. This comes at a time when public trust in institutions is eroding, and millions of Americans are asking whether our systems still work for them. Whether America leads or lags in this new window of opportunity depends on how we respond. With bold leadership and deep partnerships between universities and the private sector, the heartland can become the driving force behind America's next wave of innovation, economic competitiveness, and shared prosperity. Businesses and philanthropists are uniquely positioned to scale this pivotal moment: one that calls for a new, more inclusive era of American innovation and entrepreneurial growth. In the Midwest, universities are working hand-in-hand with businesses—and proving that the innovation and growth of the future will not be confined to any one part of the country. This region is uniquely suited to lead the next wave of American renewal. It has what the moment demands: grit, talent, urgency, and values that anchor capitalism in real lives and impact. As a nation, we often overlook where some of the most consequential innovation is happening. While innovation breakthroughs are happening at an exciting pace in the heartland, venture capital dollars continue to concentrate in California, New York, and coastal cities. Moreover, research centers are partnering with hospitals and farms, and in classrooms from coast to coast students are working with local employers to move forward in areas like AI, energy, bioscience, and robotics. This is where innovation reaches scale and serves everyday people, and not just markets or valuations. The future of American prosperity will be shaped by whether states, the federal government, and individual donors continue to invest in public universities embedded in their communities—institutions that serve as launchpads for discovery, entrepreneurship, and upward mobility for millions of people. For more than 80 years, universities have partnered with government and industry to drive innovation, advance research, and develop a skilled workforce. For the United States to maintain its global leadership, it is important for these three sectors to renew and strengthen their collaboration in the face of emerging challenges and opportunities. Public institutions, in fact, enroll three-quarters of the roughly 19 million college students in the United States, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. More specifically, America's land-grant institutions, created by and for the people, are uniquely positioned to rewrite the value proposition for higher education for the next generation. Access and opportunity are at the core of our mission, calling us to do work that directly benefits the people we serve. We exist to make life better in the communities of which we are a part. At The Ohio State University, demand is soaring for affordable academic programs, deep partnerships with industry, and innovation-based education and research. It's why we launched the Center for Software Innovation and joined the NextGenAI consortium from OpenAI—bringing additional research grants, funding, and API access to AI-related campus work. But for partnerships like these to grow, we need a mindset shift—within universities and across business and philanthropy. Investors and employers must see the Midwest as a wellspring of ideas, talent, and leadership. More broadly, we must ensure research dollars and economic incentives reach every corner of America. These investments make the United States more resilient and competitive globally while unlocking a wider pool of ideas, perspectives, and solutions. When America invests in our universities, we invest in well-rounded citizens, building social mobility and stability, and research that literally saves lives. We know this from experience. One of us is a Navy airman turned university president. The other, a software entrepreneur turned university benefactor and investor. We've seen how cross-sector leadership can create durable, inclusive growth. But this work can't be piecemeal. We need a national rallying cry to drive how, where, and why we invest in America's future. That future can start in the heartland, if we recognize its potential and act accordingly. The heartland doesn't just hold the key to America's economic future—it holds the promise of a robust economy rooted in community, powered by purpose, and capable of restoring trust in systems meant to serve us all.

Yahoo

37 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Senate parliamentarian knocks pieces out of Trump's megabill

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has ruled that several key pieces of the massive bill to implement President Trump's agenda run afoul of the Byrd Rule and must be taken out of the package to allow it to pass with a simple majority vote on a special procedural fast track. The parliamentarian ruled against several provisions under the jurisdictions of the Senate committees on Banking, Environment and Public Works, and Armed Services. These included a provision that would have placed a funding cap on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which would have cut $6.4 billion from the agency by reducing its maximum funding to zero percent of the Federal Reserve's operating expenses. The funding cut would have eliminated the agency. The creation of the CFPB was one of the central reforms of the Dodd-Frank Act that Democrats passed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. She also ruled against language cutting $1.4 billion in costs by reducing the pay of Federal Reserve staff, cutting $293 million by reducing the Office of Financial Research funding and cutting $771 million by eliminating the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Sen. Jeff Merkley (Ore.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, touted the parliamentary rulings. 'The Senate Parliamentarian advised that certain provisions in the Republicans' One Big, Beautiful Betrayal will be subject to the Byrd Rule – ultimately meaning they will need to be stripped from the bill to ensure it complies with the rules of reconciliation,' Merkley said. 'As much as Senate Republicans would prefer to throw out the rule book and advance their families lose and billionaires win agenda, there are rules that must be followed and Democrats are making sure those rules are enforced,' he added. Senate Republicans will need to remove the provisions from the bill or otherwise would have to muster 60 voters to overcome a point of order against the bill. Senate Republicans hold a 53-47 seat majority. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) could opt to override the parliamentarian's ruling with a simple majority vote on the floor, establishing a new Senate precedent, but he has indicated he does not plan to do that. The parliamentarian ruled several sections of the bill under the jurisdiction of the Environment and Public Works Committee also violated the Byrd Rule. She ruled against the repeal of funding authorizations in the Inflation Reduction Act and the repeal of the Environmental Protection Agency's multipollutant emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles for model years 2027 and later. She also ruled against a provision under the Armed Services panel's jurisdiction that would reduce appropriations to the Department of Defense if spending plans are not submitted on time. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the ranking member on the Senate Banking Committee, applauded the parliamentarian's rulings on the issues under her committee's jurisdiction. 'These proposals are a reckless, dangerous attack on consumers and would lead to more Americans being tricked and trapped by giant financial institutions and put the stability of our entire financial system at risk,' she said. 'Democrats fought back, and we will keep fighting back against this ugly bill,' she said. Warren's Banking staff submitted in-depth written briefs to the parliamentarian in advance of her ruling. Warren's staff and Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott's (R-S.C.) staff also presented oral arguments to the parliamentarian during a June 16 meeting that lasted for 90 minutes. Updated at 12:55 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Chicago Tribune

an hour ago

• Chicago Tribune

The Tribune's Quotes of the Week quiz for June 21

Summer temperatures are officially here, Chicago. A heat wave is moving across the region this weekend, with potentially record-breaking temperatures and dangerously high humidity. Luckily, the city's pools reopened just in time. For the first time since the pandemic, Chicago's outdoor public pools will be open seven days a week this summer. What else happened this week? Let's jump in. President Donald Trump left the the Group of Seven summit in Canada early as the war between Israel and Iran intensified. The president said he will decide the level of U.S. involvement in the conflict within two weeks. The Federal Reserve also kept its key rate unchanged this week, waiting to see how new tariffs will impact the economy. On Sunday, the man suspected of shooting two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses was taken into custody following a two-day manhunt. Several prominent Illinois politicians were among the names listed in the alleged shooter's notebooks. Tensions over immigration continued to flare this week. Following news that President Trump was directing federal immigration officials to ramp up deportations in Democratic-run cities and possibly targeting Chicago with a military response similar to Los Angeles, Mayor Brandon Johnson warned that such a move would be challenged in the courts, saying the president should respect the Constitution. And several Illinois Democratic congressmen were denied entry at an ICE facility in suburban Broadview, despite demands to check on the conditions of the detainees held there. In state financing news, Gov. JB Pritzker signed the Illinois budget Monday, while Cook County projected a $211 million shortfall for 2026. Funding for Chicago-area transit also remains unresolved in Springfield — as does the question of who will lead the Chicago Transit Authority. The Tribune discovered this week that the mayor didn't conduct a national search for a replacement for Dorval Carter, who left the CTA earlier this year, despite claiming otherwise. As the school year comes to a close, Pedro Martinez's tenure as Chicago Public Schools CEO is over. In his final week as schools chief, Martinez delivered remarks at the City Club about his time leading the district. Summer break often means more large gatherings of young people downtown. In an effort to curb these sometimes violent and chaotic 'teen takeovers,' Chicago City Council narrowly passed an ordinance that would give the police superintendent the power to declare a 'snap curfew' anytime, anywhere. On Wednesday, Mayor Johnson said he would veto the measure and on Friday, followed through on that promise, issuing the first mayoral veto in nearly two decades. Preparations for this year's NASCAR street race have begun, but will the race be held in Chicago again next year? The Tribune reported this week that a tourism commission in Southern California is currently in negotiations to move the race to San Diego. In other news from the world of sports and entertainment, the Chicago Fire offered a detailed look this week at their stadium plans, Cubs legend Sammy Sosa returned to Wrigley Field and the James Beard Awards were announced. Plus, a popular gay bar in Chicago's Northalsted neighborhood could soon have another location at O'Hare International Airport. If the proposal is approved, Sidetrack would be the first LGBTQ+ bar in a U.S. airport. That's all for this week! Here's the Tribune's Quotes of the Week quiz from June 15 to 21. Missed last week? You can find it here or check out our past editions of Quotes of the Week. Until next time, stay cool, stay hydrated and be safe out there, Chicago!