Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II Completes $230,000,000 Initial Public Offering
NEW YORK, June 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II (the 'Company') announced today the completion of its initial public offering of 23,000,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit, resulting in gross proceeds of $230,000,000.
Sizzle
The units began trading on the Nasdaq Global Market on April 2, 2025, under the ticker symbol 'SZZLU.' Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one right to receive one-tenth (1/10) of a share of common stock upon the consummation of an initial business combination. The common stock and Share Rights are expected to trade separately under the symbols 'SZZL' and 'SZZLR' once eligible.
Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II is a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting a business combination with one or more businesses across sectors including hospitality, restaurant, food and beverage, retail, consumer, real estate (including proptech), food-related technology, professional sports, and airlines. The Company is focused on identifying established, scalable businesses operating within or adjacent to these sectors in the United States and other developed markets.
The Company is led by Steve Salis (Chief Executive Officer and Chairman), Jamie Karson (Non-Executive Vice Chairman), and Daniel Lee (Chief Financial Officer and Head of Business and Corporate Development). The Board of Directors includes Neil Leibman, Warren Thompson, and David Perlin.
This is the second SPAC sponsored by Salis Holdings. The team's previous vehicle, Sizzle Acquisition Corp., completed a merger with European Lithium to form Critical Metals Corp. in early 2024.
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. acted as sole book-running manager for the offering.
Media Contact:
Sheena Lajoie
sl@sizzlespac.com
Disclaimer: This press release is provided by the Sizzle Acquisition Corp. II. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.
Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an "as-is" basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
RDDT Investor Alert: A Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) - Contact Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP
RADNOR, PA - June 20, 2025 (NEWMEDIAWIRE) - The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP ( informs investors that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Reddit, Inc. ('Reddit') (NYSE: RDDT) on behalf of those who purchased or otherwise acquired Reddit securities between October 29, 2024, and May 20, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). The lead plaintiff deadline is August 18, 2025. You can also contact attorney Jonathan Naji, Esq. by calling (484) 270-1453 or by email at info@ DEFENDANTS' ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google Search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) Defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner the company was unable to overcome in the short term; (5) Defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for their outlook on user rates and advertising revenues; and (6) as a result, the company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: Redditinvestors may, no later than August 18, 2025, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP or other counsel, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff is usually the investor or small group of investors who have the largest financial interest and who are also adequate and typical of the proposed class of investors. The lead plaintiff selects counsel to represent the lead plaintiff and the class and these attorneys, if approved by the court, are lead or class counsel. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision of whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP encourages Reddit investors who have suffered significant losses to contact the firm directly to acquire more information. ABOUT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP: Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP prosecutes class actions in state and federal courts throughout the country and around the world. The firm has developed a global reputation for excellence and has recovered billions of dollars for victims of fraud and other corporate misconduct. All of our work is driven by a common goal: to protect investors, consumers, employees and others from fraud, abuse, misconduct and negligence by businesses and fiduciaries. The complaint in this action was not filed by Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP. For more information about Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP please visit May be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
CRTC upholds decision allowing large telecoms to resell internet services on each other's networks
Canada's telecom regulator has upheld its decision allowing large telecoms to resell internet services by piggybacking on competitors' networks, siding with arguments made by Telus Corp. versus most of its competitors in the latest development of a multi-year, industry-wide policy debate. Under the fibre wholesale framework, designed to improve internet affordability and competition, the government previously required three carriers - BCE Inc.'s Bell Canada, Telus and SaskTel - to give competitors access to their fibre networks at regulator-set rates. Given the steep cost of building infrastructure, the framework was designed to give new market entrants an opportunity to enter the market and offer competitive internet services and prices. From 2024: Ottawa orders CRTC review of Rogers, Bell and Telus reselling services on each other's networks The latest question under review was whether, in addition to smaller regional companies, the country's three largest carriers would be allowed to take advantage of the mandated rates as well. In its decision, issued Friday morning, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission held firm on its previous decision that Telus, Bell and Rogers are allowed to expand into each others' fibre networks where they don't already have their own infrastructure. In order to overturn the CRTC's decision, those not in favour of incumbent access had to prove there was 'substantial doubt' as to whether the CRTC had made errors in its original policy allowing the sharing. But the regulator said that they had not done so. 'While the Commission appreciates the significance of the applicants' claims, the balance of the evidence does not establish a substantial doubt as to the correctness of the Commission's decision. Therefore, the Commission declines to vary the Final Decision,' the CRTC said in its decision. Opinion: The CRTC has failed to protect the Canadian broadcasting industry This means that Telus, whose network is primarily in the west, can expand over Bell's networks in the east, and vice versa. Rogers has infrastructure spanning the country, so it is excluded from accessing the mandated rates near-nationally. The company has some fibre, but it is not yet being required to grant competitors access to it. The CRTC said that several thousand Canadian households have already purchased new internet plans offered by dozens of providers using the access enabled by the framework. 'Changing course now would reverse the benefits of this increased competition and would prevent more Canadians from having new choices of ISPs in the future,' the CRTC said. The decision may not yet be final. Cabinet has the power to make changes to the regulator's decision itself, or require that the CRTC review its policies again, until August 13. Their involvement is considered a last hope by those in favour of blocking incumbent access. CRTC considers standardized labels in hearing on home internet plans The country's biggest telecoms have been facing increasing pressure in recent years, given an overall market slowdown, reduced immigration meaning fewer new customers, and high debt loads. The country's biggest telecoms have been facing pressure due to high debt loads and the mature market's overall slowdown. The policy debate created a rare industry split that saw nearly every one of the country's largest telecoms in agreement and only one major carrier, Telus, split from the rest. Telus argued it should be allowed to resell on SaskTel and Bell's network, saying that where an incumbent operates out-of-territory, it is acting as a new competitor with the potential to disrupt the status quo, to the benefit of consumers. Bell, Rogers, Cogeco Inc., Quebecor Inc., Bragg Communications Inc.'s Eastlink, Teksavvy and the Competitive Network Operators of Canada - representing independent companies - all argued that the regulator should bar the three incumbents from mandated access, disagreeing that Telus would be a 'new entrant.' Bell and Rogers said allowing the incumbents to resell internet would put a chill on network investment, and Rogers added that none of the large incumbent players need to be enabled by mandated wholesale access to compete. Others argued that because of their scale and ability to bundle internet with other services, incumbents like Telus operating in their networks could swallow up smaller competition and lead to more market consolidation in the long term. Telus called this view an attempt to stifle competition. The Competition Bureau, for its part, supported incumbent sharing out-of-network, noting the risks of increased market coordination and possible negative impacts on small competitors but saying the benefits outweighed the risks. But the CRTC found that industry projections suggested allowing the incumbents to share networks would only have a 'modest near-term impact' on regional competitors, despite applicants' claims that the sharing would severely harm those providers. It also found that internet providers would be encouraged to continue investing in their networks, given continued pressure to compete, the cost savings of operating fibre compared to copper networks, and other protections included in the decision. It said it will monitor the use of the framework and will make adjustments if necessary. The federal government has yet to finalize the access rates.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
VOO ETF News, 6/16/2025
How is VOO stock faring? The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is down 1.03% in the past five days and 9.11% over the past year. Confident Investing Starts Here: According to TipRanks' unique ETF analyst consensus, determined based on a weighted average of its holdings' analyst ratings, VOO is a Moderate Buy. The Street's average price target of $611.49 implies an upside of 11.43%. Currently, VOO's five holdings with the highest upside potential are Caesars Entertainment (CZR), Interpublic Group of Companies (IPG), Moderna (MRNA), LKQ Corp. (LKQ), and PG&E Corp. (PCG). Meanwhile, its five holdings with the greatest downside potential are Palantir Technologies (PLTR), Franklin Resources (BEN), Cf Industries Holdings (CF), Tesla (TSLA), and Garmin (GRMN). Revealingly, VOO ETF's Smart Score is a seven, implying that this ETF will likely perform in line with the market. Power up your ETF investing with TipRanks. Discover the Top Equity ETFs with High Upside Potential, carefully curated based on TipRanks' analysis.
