Smithsonian Director Resigns After Trump Claimed He Fired Her

Two weeks after President Donald Trump claimed he'd fired her because she's a 'highly partisan person,' the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery director, Kim Sajet, announced she was stepping down.
In a memo sent to staff Friday, first obtained by The New York Times, Sajet didn't address Trump's attacks but said she believed this was the right move for the museum.
'This was not an easy decision, but I believe it is the right one,' she said in a memo sent out by Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch. 'From the very beginning, my guiding principle has been to put the museum first. Today, I believe that stepping aside is the best way to serve the institution I hold so deeply in my heart.'
Bunch praised Sajet, saying she 'put the needs of the Institution above her own, and for that we thank her.'
In late May, Trump announced on social media that he was 'terminating' Sajet, who'd held the position for 12 years and was the first female director of the National Portrait Gallery.
'She is a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position,' the president wrote, referring to diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
Trump's authority to fire Sajet from the Smithsonian, which is not part of the executive branch, immediately came into question, and Sajet continued to show up to work through Friday.
The House Administration Committee's top Democrat, Rep. Joseph Morelle (D-N.Y.), and the House Appropriations Committee's top Democrat, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), released a joint statement last week saying Trump had 'no authority' to fire anyone from the Smithsonian.
'The dismissal of Director Sajet is unacceptable and has the same legal weight as the President's prior attempts to undermine the Smithsonian's independence: absolutely none,' the lawmakers said. 'Should the White House require a copy of the Constitution, we would be more than happy to provide one.'
The Smithsonian's Board of Regents backed up that position, saying Monday that all personnel decisions are directed by Bunch, who 'has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian.'
The board includes several lawmakers, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, and Vice President JD Vance.
The White House acknowledged Sajet's departure Friday, with spokesperson Davis Ingle saying in a statement: 'On day one, President Trump made clear that there is no place for dangerous anti-American ideology in our government and institutions. In align[ment] with this objective, he ordered the termination of Kim Sajet. The Trump Administration is committed to restoring American greatness and celebrating our nation's proud history.'
In March, Trump issued an executive order banning federal spending on any Smithsonian exhibits that 'divide Americans based on race.'
Sajet has not issued any public statements about the order.
In a December interview with The Guardian, Sajet ― who was born to Dutch parents in Nigeria and raised in Australia ― spoke about her 'great love' for the U.S. and its cultural influence on the rest of the world, calling it a 'tremendous gift.'
'If anything, I don't think Americans realize how much impact they have across the globe,' she said, adding: 'Sometimes I think Americans look inward so much and they fail to see what an impact they have across the world.'
Trump's Latest Executive Order Is 'Erasing History' In Smithsonian Museums, Governor Says
Suit With A Story: Congressman Donates Clothes From Viral Jan. 6 Photo To Smithsonian
Thousands Of 'No Kings' Protests Against Trump Expected Saturday

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNN

8 minutes ago

• CNN

Hundreds of Americans have fled Iran and others face difficulties leaving as Trump weighs US military action

Hundreds of Americans have fled Iran as the conflict with Israel has escalated, an internal State Department report said. The detail in the Friday situation report underscores that US citizens in Iran are at risk as President Donald Trump weighs US military action. The exact number of Americans in Iran is not known, and the State Department does not require US citizens to register their presence abroad. Unlike in Israel, where the US is working to establish transportation options out of the country for the estimated hundreds of thousands of Americans there, no such options are available for US citizens in Iran. The US does not have a diplomatic presence there. 'We do not anticipate offering direct US government assisted departure from Iran,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce noted at a press briefing Friday. The situation report described some Americans facing difficulties leaving Iran. 'Security alerts also note Americans seeking to depart should be prepared to encounter checkpoints and questioning from authorities,' it states. 'Numerous US citizens have described delays and harassment along their exit route.' It also notes that two Americans were reportedly detained while attempting to depart the country. One source trying to get a US citizen family member out of Iran expressed frustration at the State Department earlier this week, saying the agency seemed to defer everything to seemingly overwhelmed US embassies. This person wanted to see the department apply more pressure to Iran's neighboring countries to approve Americans' entrance. They also suggested dispatching embassy officials closer to the Iranian border to help. More than 25,000 people have sought information from the State Department about the 'situation in Israel, the West Bank and Iran,' Bruce said Friday. Bruce said that the people were seeking 'general information,' and some of them might be inquiring about departure. The department has launched a 'crisis intake form' for Americans in Israel and Iran wanting to know how to get out of those countries as the conflict continues. 'Americans seeking departure should take advantage of existing means to leave,' Bruce noted at the press briefing. Meanwhile, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said Thursday that the US is 'working to get military, commercial, charter flights & cruise ships' for evacuation from Israel. Trump on Thursday opened a two-week negotiating window before deciding whether to strike Iran, setting off an urgent effort to restart talks that had been deadlocked when Israel began its bombing campaign last week.

Axios

14 minutes ago

• Axios

Trump admin shortens ACA enrollment window

The Trump administration on Friday narrowed the period to sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage and imposed other restrictions aimed at rolling back Biden-era flexibilities for the program. Why it matters: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expects the new policies to lower marketplace premiums by about 5% on average, and save taxpayers $12 billion next year. But between 725,000 and 1.8 million people are expected to lose coverage, per CMS's projections. The big picture: Congress is considering codifying many of the same provisions in the massive GOP budget bill that's now in the Senate. That would make them much harder for a future administration to undo. State of play: CMS is shortening the period for enrolling in marketplace insurance by two weeks, starting for plan year 2027. Federal exchanges will then be open for sign-ups from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31 of each year. It's also repealing the monthly opportunity started under the Biden administration for lower-income people to get marketplace coverage. The new rule limits plans' ability to cover gender-affirming care beginning next year. It also excludes Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients from obtaining ACA coverage. CMS said the policies will ensure federal subsidies to offset the cost of ACA coverage only support statutory goals of the law. Yes, but: In response to public comments, CMS is making several of its changes temporary. For plan year 2026 only, CMS will begin charging a $5 monthly premium for consumers who are automatically reenrolled in an ACA plan from one year to the next and would otherwise have fully subsidized coverage. Other changes concerning income verification for enrollees will also end after 2026. Between the lines: Insurance losses from the new policy will be felt hardest in states where "erroneous and improper enrollment is most noticeable," including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah, CMS said.

Boston Globe

25 minutes ago

• Boston Globe

A potential strike on Iran tests Trump's propensity to play to both sides

Since his first campaign for president 10 years ago, Trump has excelled at appearing to favor both sides of the same issue, allowing supporters to hear what they want to hear, whether he's talking about tariffs, TikTok, abortion, tax cuts, or more. But the prospect that the United States might join Israel in bombing Iran is testing his ability to embrace dueling positions with little to no political cost. Some of Trump's most ardent supporters — those who defended him during multiple investigations and ultimately returned him to the White House — are ripping one another to shreds over the idea and at times lashing out at Trump as well. Advertisement The war in Iran is exactly the kind of Middle East entanglement that Trump's anti-interventionist base believed he was bitterly opposed to, because he repeatedly said he was. But he is also the same president who, in his first term, authorized missile strikes in Syria, after its leadership used chemical weapons on citizens, and the assassination of a top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani — two actions he took pride in. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up To Trump, the contradictions are not actually contradictions. 'I think I'm the one that decides that,' he told The Atlantic recently in response to criticism from one of his most vocal anti-interventionist supporters, Tucker Carlson, who said the president's support for Israel's fight in Iran ran against his 'America First' message. Trump was propelled to victory in the Republican primary in 2016 as an outsider, in part because he forcefully condemned the invasion of Iraq, authorized by the last Republican president more than a decade before, and the seemingly endless war that followed. Yet he said the United States should have taken the country's oil, and ran radio ads saying he would 'bomb the hell' out of the Islamic State group. Advertisement He has said he wants to renew the tax cuts he put into effect in his first term, which saved some of the wealthiest earners millions, while also suggesting that congressional Republicans should implement a new tax on the wealthiest. He has said he supports businesses and also wants to deport the immigrant workforce that fuels parts of the economy. He wants to engage in mass deportation and also wants to sell visas for $5 million. He has celebrated the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade as a point of pride while also condemning Republican governors who signed bills banning most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. He has both celebrated and criticized his own criminal justice reform bill of 2018. Despite the contradictions, Republicans for years have been united in support of Trump and what he says he wants, giving him a benefit of the doubt that few, if any, career politicians have ever received. Even when most elected Republicans held Trump at a distance after the deadly attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, 2021, Trump still had a tight grip on Republican primary voters. Trump, a celebrity known to the electorate for decades, has obscured long-standing and unresolved foreign policy divisions within the party dating back to the aftermath of President George W. Bush's push to invade Iraq. Advertisement But as Trump decides whether to plunge the United States into the heart of the Israel-Iran conflict, his core supporters are splintering. Trump's announcement Thursday that he could take up to two weeks to decide did not sit well with some of his most hawkish supporters. On social media, Fox News host Mark Levin began a lengthy post by suggesting that the president was being pulled back from what he actually wants to do. 'LET TRUMP BE TRUMP!' Levin wrote. 'We got our answer. Iran says no unconditional surrender. Again. And again. And again. They cheat and lie and kill. They're TERRORISTS!' His anti-interventionist supporters, meanwhile, have been equally alarmed by what he might decide to do. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, posted on social media over the weekend. Trump's advisers say that on the Israel-Iran conflict in particular, the president is dealing with a fast-moving, complicated situation that does not lend itself to simple, black-and-white solutions, despite the fact that he has consistently campaigned that way. 'President Trump considers the nuances of every issue but ultimately takes decisive action to directly benefit American families,' said Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson. 'The American people trust this president to make the right decisions,' she said, adding that he 'started the Make America Great Again movement because he represents a new leadership that puts Americans first.' But in 2025, Trump is not the only one who can command media attention. Carlson is no longer on Fox News, but he has a show that streams on the social platform X and is a leading voice among foreign policy 'restrainers' who have argued that Trump would be acting against his own movement should he strike Iran. Advertisement Steve Bannon, an adviser who was exiled from the White House in the first year of Trump's first term, has become one of the dominant voices among the MAGA faithful with his 'War Room' podcast, delivering the same message as Carlson. Yet Trump has found that many of his allies will ultimately come back to him, despite unhappiness with some of his decisions.