logo
PHOTOS: Possible World War I weapons found at Vancouver airfield

PHOTOS: Possible World War I weapons found at Vancouver airfield

Yahoo27-02-2025

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Multiple weapons that could be over 100 years old were discovered at a Vancouver airport on Tuesday.
Vancouver police that an archaeologist found what appeared to be a UXO (Unexploded Ordnance) during construction at . According to authorities, the weapon could be a Stokes mortar from World War I.
'U.S. Air Force Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) personnel were called in to assist, and came up with a plan to safely detonate the item on site. They dug a hole in the ground and the device was safely detonated,' Vancouver police said.
Authorities also said that several other mortars were located and detonated on Wednesday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Vintage Watches Were Smaller — And Why That Still Matters
Why Vintage Watches Were Smaller — And Why That Still Matters

Time Business News

time2 days ago

  • Time Business News

Why Vintage Watches Were Smaller — And Why That Still Matters

In today's world of oversized divers, hulking chronographs, and statement pieces that stretch past 45 mm, picking up a vintage men's watch from the mid-20th century can feel… surprising. A 33 mm case? For many, that might seem closer to a child's watch than a man's. And yet, from the 1930s to the 1960s, this size wasn't unusual. It was the standard . So what happened? Why were watches smaller for so long, and what does that say about design, culture, and our evolving expectations? Let's rewind. Before the 20th century, men didn't wear wristwatches. Timekeeping was handled by pocket watches — thick, hefty, and often ornately engraved. Wrists were considered a feminine domain. A man pulled his time from his vest pocket. That changed during World War I. Soldiers needed a way to check the time quickly without fumbling with a chain. The solution? Strapping pocket watch movements to leather bands and wearing them on the wrist. These field-expedient 'trench watches' became standard issue. From this wartime necessity came a new norm: the wristwatch. For the first time, men embraced timepieces worn visibly — but early designs had to remain compact, both for practicality and engineering reasons. From the 1920s through the 1960s, a typical men's watch measured between 31 and 36 mm. Today that may seem small, but back then, it was all about proportional design. Think about wrist anatomy. The average male wrist measures around 18.5 cm in circumference. The flat top of the wrist — where the watch sits — is approximately 30 mm wide. So a 34 mm watch? Perfectly centered, sleek, and unobtrusive. At the time, a wristwatch wasn't designed to dominate your outfit. It was a complement — a subtle detail, like a pocket square or cufflinks. The goal wasn't to stand out, but to complete the look. And in this, vintage watches excelled. Consider the Patek Philippe Calatrava Ref. 96, released in 1932 at just 31 mm. Or the Rolex Datejust, which launched in 1945 at what was then a bold 36 mm. These were not small watches — they were proportionate watches. Even utilitarian pieces stuck to the formula. The U.S. Army A-11 was just 32 mm. The original Blancpain Fifty Fathoms, considered one of the first true dive watches, came in at 37 mm. And when Yuri Gagarin made history as the first man in space in 1961, he was wearing a 33 mm Sturmanskie. There was a practical reason behind all this modesty. Watchmaking in the early 20th century was still perfecting miniaturization. Taking a pocket watch movement and adapting it for the wrist meant downsizing components without compromising performance. A smaller case forced movement makers to be efficient — and that efficiency became a badge of honor. Self-winding mechanisms and complications like chronographs did push cases slightly larger — into the 36 to 38 mm range — but anything over 40 mm was almost unheard of. One notable exception, the IWC Portuguese from 1939, measured 43 mm. But that was only because it used a full pocket-watch movement. It was the outlier, not the trend. Flash forward to the late 1990s and early 2000s. Suddenly, the fashion world embraced big . Watches exploded in size: 42 mm, 45 mm, even 48 mm cases became not just acceptable, but desirable. A combination of things. Fashion became more maximalist. Marketing campaigns celebrated bold, statement-making pieces. And celebrity culture took over: Stallone wore Panerai, Schwarzenegger partnered with Audemars Piguet, Jay-Z championed Hublot. Bigger was bolder. And bolder sold. Watch brands responded. Panerai's 44 mm Luminor became an icon. The Royal Oak Offshore hit 42 mm and kept growing. Rolex released the Deepsea Sea-Dweller — 44 mm wide and nearly 18 mm thick. For a while, bigger meant better. And yes, some technical watches needed more space — for helium escape valves, multi-day power reserves, or flyback chronographs. But often, the extra size was mostly empty. Tiny quartz movements floated inside oversized steel. Still, the appeal was obvious: oversized watches demanded attention. They didn't whisper sophistication. They shouted wealth, power, and presence. But over time, the novelty wore off. Oversized watches began to feel impractical. Heavy. Top-heavy. Impossible to wear under a shirt cuff. And more importantly, they didn't fit. Collectors started to rediscover vintage watches. Not just for their history or patina — but for how they wore . A 34 mm Seamaster sat perfectly on the wrist. A 36 mm Datejust slid under a cuff effortlessly. People realized: small watches weren't outdated. They were refined . In 2017, Paul Newman's personal Rolex Daytona sold for $17.8 million. It was just 37 mm. In a world obsessed with massive chronographs, that was a reminder: size isn't everything. Fashion followed. Men's style leaned retro — looser tailoring, vintage influence, elegant silhouettes. Suddenly, a massive diver didn't quite match your tweed sport coat. The industry responded. Tudor launched the Black Bay Fifty-Eight at 39 mm. Omega reissued its 1957 trilogy — Speedmaster, Seamaster, Railmaster — in vintage proportions. Even Cartier, Longines, and Breitling embraced smaller cases. And on the red carpet, actors like Paul Mescal, Jacob Elordi, and Timothée Chalamet began wearing vintage watches under 36 mm. In 2025, Chalamet famously wore two 33 mm Cartier Tanks on the same wrist — and made it look fresh. Today, the stigma around small watches is gone. You can wear a 36 mm Explorer I, a 33 mm Omega De Ville, or a 34 mm Poljot and still be the most stylish person in the room. Size no longer defines masculinity or fashion sense. Vintage watches are proof: elegance doesn't have to be loud. Sometimes the most powerful presence is the quietest one. At Dumarko, we've always believed in balance. Proportion. Wearability. Our collection celebrates the 31–36 mm range because we know that a truly great watch isn't about dominating the wrist. It's about belonging on it. And once you wear one, you might just realize — small isn't a compromise. It's the legacy of timeless design. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Theodore Roosevelt Jr.: The Apple Doesn't Fall Far From the Tree
Theodore Roosevelt Jr.: The Apple Doesn't Fall Far From the Tree

Epoch Times

time15-06-2025

  • Epoch Times

Theodore Roosevelt Jr.: The Apple Doesn't Fall Far From the Tree

June 6, 1944: D-Day: Utah Beach. Many of the GIs fighting on the beach that day witnessed something extraordinary, a solitary figure walking upright across the sand, cane in one hand and pistol in the other, directing men forward, leading them over the seawall and inland, all while under fire from the Germans. The cane was not for show, for this soldier had been wounded in combat over 25 years earlier in World War I, an injury which had contributed to his arthritis. Those who came closest to this man would also have noted signs of his age: the wrinkled cheeks and the creased eyes.

30 Mass. National Guard troops with historic ties to Revolution marching in DC Army parade
30 Mass. National Guard troops with historic ties to Revolution marching in DC Army parade

Yahoo

time13-06-2025

  • Yahoo

30 Mass. National Guard troops with historic ties to Revolution marching in DC Army parade

WASHINGTON — Thirty National Guard soldiers from Massachusetts are in Washington this week, marching in Saturday's controversial — and costly — Army parade. They are members of the 1st Battalion, 182nd Infantry Regiment, headquartered at the Melrose Armory. They are part of the 27th Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the 42nd Infantry Division, headquartered in Syracuse, N.Y. 'As one of the four oldest units in the U.S. military, soldiers from the 1-182 Infantry were among the Massachusetts militia who first formed the ranks of the Continental Army on Cambridge Common in 1775,' said Lt. Col. Landon Mavrelis, commander, 1st Battalion, 182nd Infantry Regiment, in a statement. The 42nd 'Rainbow' Division is one of the eight Army National Guard divisions in the parade, said Eric Durr, spokesman for the New York Division of Military and Naval Affairs. Eleven of the Army's 19 divisions are participating. The 42nd was created during World War I by taking National Guard units from 26 states and creating a special division that could go quickly to France in the fall of 1917. The division was organized in Garden City, Long Island, and was nicknamed 'The Rainbow Division.' The division's first chief of staff, Douglas MacArthur — who later commanded American forces in World War II — said the division would 'stretch across the country like a rainbow.' 'The legacy forged by Rainbow Division soldiers on battlefields across France marked the 42d ID as one of the premier divisions of the American Expeditionary Force. We are honored to represent our predecessors, and all brave Americans who fought in that conflict 100 years ago,' said Major Gen. Jack James, the commander of the 42nd Infantry Division. James will lead the contingent along with a color guard. Another 30 soldiers from the 42nd Infantry Division Band, headquartered at the Camp Smith Training Site near Peekskill, New York, also will march. The parade officially commemorates the 250th anniversary of the Army's founding in 1775. But the date Saturday also coincides with President Donald Trump's birthday, raising questions about the appropriateness of soldiers participating in what could be a political event. The parade is expected to cost $45 million. The Massachusetts soldiers left for Washington, D.C., on Wednesday and will return Sunday, according to the New York Guard. According to a statement from New York State, soldiers will be housed in an empty Department of Agriculture office building and an unused General Services Administration warehouse, just as they were for the inauguration. The soldiers will receive meals ready-to-eat, or MREs, for breakfast and lunch, and a hot meal for dinner along with per-diem of about $69. The cost is being picked up by the Army. Getting the construction industry 'Sublime ready' with or without the federal government With a makeover, Uncle Sam rises again for East Longmeadow's 4th of July Bankruptcy protection ends for ESG Clean Energy, Holyoke generating plant linked to Scuderi engine Read the original article on MassLive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store