L.A. City Council backs huge trash fee hikes for residents
The Los Angeles City Council moved Friday to dramatically increase trash fees in a bid to raise money and close a billion-dollar budget deficit.
On a 10-1 vote, the council ordered city attorneys to draft an ordinance raising the fees on roughly 740,000 customers, with council members arguing that the city has subsidized the cost of trash pickup for too many years.
Owners of single-family homes and duplexes will see their trash fees more than double in the coming budget year, reaching $55.95, up from $36.32.
Fees for smaller apartment buildings — those with three or four units — will be increased to $55.95, up from $24.33, with each unit paying the full fee.
The trash fees will rise each year through 2029, hitting $65.93 for all categories.
For single-family homes and duplexes, that would represent an 81% increase over this year. For buildings with three or four units, the fee for each unit would nearly triple.
On residents' bimonthly bills from the Department of Water and Power, the increases will show up under the line item 'Solid Resource Fee.'
Read more: Huge trash fee hike looms for L.A. residents
Larger apartment buildings would not be covered by the planned trash fee hikes.
Residents can seek to overturn the fees. Proposition 218, passed by California voters in 1996, requires that property owners be mailed information about the proposed fees and that a hearing be held at least 45 days after the mailing.
The fee fails if a majority of owners send in written protests.
Larry Gross, executive director of the Coalition for Economic Survival, said landlords will likely pass the fee increase on to tenants who renew a lease or sign a new lease. He expressed concern about the regressive nature of the fee, which will disproportionately hurt low-income residents, since they will pay the same amount as wealthier residents.
Councilmember Adrin Nazarian, who represents the eastern San Fernando Valley, expressed a similar concern at Friday's City Council meeting as he cast the lone "no" vote.
He pointed out the dramatic increase that residents of a four-unit building will see in the first year. "That unit is going to pay as much as a home in the wealthiest parts of the city," he said.
Councilmembers John Lee, Traci Park, Monica Rodriguez and Imelda Padilla were absent from Friday's vote.
City leaders said that a program to help low-income residents afford the fees will be expanded, also pointing out that the last trash fee increase was 17 years ago.
Without the fee hike, the general fund would lose about $200 million in the next budget year, since the city has been partly subsidizing trash pickup, according to city officials.
The fee increase is planned as the city faces a nearly $1-billion budget shortfall and the potential elimination of thousands of city jobs. Mayor Karen Bass is scheduled to release her proposed budget, and her plan for closing the financial gap, later this month.
Part of the shortfall is due to labor costs and recent pay increases for some workers, including for police officers and firefighters, that were approved by Bass and the council.
Read more: L.A. city budget shortfall grows to nearly $1 billion, with layoffs 'nearly inevitable'
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. on Friday blasted the trash fee hike and accused Bass and the City Council of mismanagement through overspending, "unaffordable" labor contracts and "policies that have driven businesses out of the city, resulting in lower business tax and sales tax revenue."
'The mayor and City Council may want taxpayers to bail out Los Angeles, but it's more likely that taxpayers will bail out of Los Angeles,' the association said.
Several Bureau of Sanitation employees spoke in support of the fee at Friday's City Council meeting.
Charles Leone, a coordinator with Service Employees International Union 721, which represents sanitation workers, told the council that the fee should have gone up "decades ago" and described the hard work that goes into picking up the trash.
"They took on the homeless crisis — head on, they take out the trash every single day, they lift up the mattresses every single day, they address the couches every single day, the list goes on and on," he said.
The council last year raised sewer fees for all property owners. Landlords who own units that are rent-stabilized — the vast majority of units in the city — typically can't pass on water costs, which are linked to sewer costs, to their tenants, according to city officials.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
20 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. city leaders look to file lawsuit over ‘unconstitutional' immigration enforcement
Faced with a wave of immigration arrests, the Los Angeles City Council is looking to sue the Trump administration to secure a court order prohibiting federal agents from carrying out any unconstitutional stops or arrests of city residents. Seven council members signed a proposal asking City Atty. Hydee Feldstein Soto to prioritize 'immediate legal action' to protect the civil rights of Angelenos, arguing that such a step is needed to keep their constituents from being racially profiled or unlawfully detained. A lawsuit would almost certainly intensify the tensions between the city's elected officials and the federal government over the ongoing raids, which have been carried out in Hollywood, Pacoima, Cypress Park and many other locations. Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, who co-authored the proposal, said she and her colleagues have received reports of residents who were stopped, questioned and detained by individuals claiming to be federal immigration agents but did not display an official badge or government identification. Yaroslavsky said she was personally informed about a Latina who was recently walking on Westwood Boulevard and was approached by several men in masks who demanded that she show a valid ID. 'She produced identification and they let her go,' said Yaroslavsky, who represents part of the Westside. '[But] you can't do that under the 4th Amendment. It's not reasonable suspicion that they're noncitizens just because they're brown.' The proposal, which was co-authored by Yaroslavsky and Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, now heads to three council committees for consideration. Asked about the city's efforts, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers act 'with the utmost integrity and professionalism.' She also pushed back on the assertions made by Yaroslavsky and her council colleagues — and chided The Times for reporting on their claims. 'Attacks against ICE officers have increased 500% because of this unhinged, extremist rhetoric from Democrat politicians — that the LA Times is apparently happy to amplify,' Jackson said. 'The LA Times should do some real reporting, instead of just regurgitating Democrat propaganda.' The city's preparations for legal action represent the latest in a series of confrontations between the Trump administration and the city of Los Angeles. On Friday, during an appearance in Los Angeles, Vice President JD Vance ripped into Gov. Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, accusing them of endangering the lives of federal law enforcement officers by speaking out against the immigration sweeps. 'What happened here was a tragedy,' Vance said. 'You had people who were doing the simple job of enforcing the law, and you had rioters, egged on by the governor and the mayor, making it harder for them to do their job.' Bass shot back hours later, saying Vance was 'spewing lies and utter nonsense' and attempting to justify the waste of taxpayer dollars on the deployment of the National Guard and the U.S. Marines to Southern California. L.A. neighborhoods are indeed experiencing fear and terror, but the kind caused by men in masks carrying guns and rifles who are pulling people off the street, she said. 'They refuse to give ID. They're driving regular cars with tinted windows and in some cases out-of-state license plates,' she said. 'Who are these people ... are they bounty hunters? Are they vigilantes? If they're federal officials, why is it that they do not identify themselves?' A decision by the city to go to court would offer only the latest example of California elected officials taking on the Trump administration. Newsom is locked in a legal battle with the federal government over the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta has filed more than a dozen other federal cases dealing with tariffs, federal employee layoffs, LGBTQ+ rights and other topics. On Friday, the council voted 9-1 to provide Feldstein Soto up to $250,000 to bring on an outside legal team to respond to any actions taken by the federal government over the next month, when the council is on its summer recess. Yaroslavsky said that council action is not connected to her proposal, which could receive a vote from the full council by the end of next week. The city's potential legal filing could be modeled after a federal lawsuit filed by United Farm Workers in the state's Central Valley earlier this year, Yaroslavsky said. In that case, United Farm Workers alleged that border patrol agents stopped, detained and arrested dozens of people of color who appeared to be farm workers or day laborers, 'regardless of their actual immigration status or individual circumstances.' ' 'Operation Return to Sender' tore families apart and terrorized the community,' the lawsuit states. 'It also violated the law. The Fourth Amendment prohibits Border Patrol agents from detaining a person, whether in a private vehicle or on foot, without reasonable suspicion that the person is in the country unlawfully.' In April, a federal judge ordered federal authorities to halt illegal stops and warrantless arrests in the Central Valley. In an 88-page order, U.S. Dist. Judge Jennifer Thurston said the evidence presented so far by the American Civil Liberties Union, whose lawyers represent the farm workers, showed that Border Patrol agents had engaged in a 'pattern and practice' of detaining people without reasonable suspicion and executing warrantless arrests without determining flight risk. 'The evidence before the Court is that Border Patrol agents under DHS authority engaged in conduct that violated well-established constitutional rights,' Thurston wrote. Lawyers for the federal government said the allegations cited by the plaintiff were 'disparate examples' and did not constitute systemic behavior. They also argued that the court lacks jurisdiction to take up the case, which was filed as a class action lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and officials with U.S. Border Patrol. Yaroslavsky said she wants the city to seek the same type of order that was issued by Thurston in the Central Valley. The city, she said, needs to help residents who may be too frightened of retaliation by federal law enforcement to file a challenge directly. 'Even if they're here legally, they're afraid,' she said. 'Because the Trump administration has shown it's willing to detain and deport people who are here legally. So if ever there were an instance where it made sense for local government to step in on behalf of our people, now is the time.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
FilmLA 5-Year Contract Approved Amid Worker Complaints
The Los Angeles Board of Public Works approved a new five-year contract with FilmLA on Friday, despite calls from industry groups for changes to the city's film permitting system. The Los Angeles Board of Public Works voted 4-0 to extend FilmLA's contract through June 2030, just days before the current deal was set to expire. Adrin Nazarian, who represents a district that includes North Hollywood, where many IATSE West Coast locals are headquartered, previously spoke about the rapid decline in Los Angeles production as studios have moved shoots to other states and countries amidst pressure to reduce production spending and make their streaming services profitable. 'We've been regressing and losing so much ground,' he stated. 'Now we're losing commercials and platforms and miniseries. We can't have this happen.' While a handful of high-profile productions have moved to California, including NBC's 'Suits L.A.' and the second season of Prime Video's popular 'Fallout,' TV production in Los Angeles has fallen 58% from its all-time high in 2021, according to the latest quarterly report from FilmLA. In response to this, Hollywood unions and studios, who two years ago were in conflict amid an industry-paralyzing double strike, have joined forces to lobby local and state officials to make changes that would allow California to become a more competitive production hub. In Sacramento, a pair of bills that would expand the types of productions eligible for the California Film and Television Tax Credit have been slowly advancing through various committees. The bills have the support of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who last fall called for the program's cap to be raised from $330 million to $750 million. Among the fees required of L.A. shoots that are reduced or nonexistent in other cities include county and city fees for fire review and notification, hourly fees for public safety and fire workers and additional fees for shoots that take place on roads, including for permit applications, road inspections and closures. The post FilmLA 5-Year Contract Approved Amid Worker Complaints appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
05-06-2025
- Yahoo
Predicting the unpredictable for intermodal
Intermodal analyst Larry Gross says that normally he'd be able to draw on his 45 years of transportation experience to make predictions about freight volume in the months ahead. 'Theoretically, it would mean that I would be bringing some long-term insight to the situation that we find ourselves in today: You know, a sense that, well, the last time that this happened, here's how it went,' Gross said Tuesday during an Intermodal Association of North America webcast. But the past does not offer a road map for how intermodal traffic might perform while a trade war is raging. 'There is no 'last time' for some of what we're seeing right now,' Gross said. 'It's really a unique situation.' Shippers pulled forward their imports, particularly from China, in an attempt to beat tariff deadlines, which sent international container volume higher beginning late last year. Then when the Trump administration imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese goods in April, trade all but dried up, creating an air pocket of container volume bound for the says he was surprised it took as long as five to six weeks for the air pocket decline to hit U.S. railroads. 'We've only really seen it now for the past two or three weeks,' he said of BNSF and Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP) intermodal volumes. Now, with tariffs on Chinese goods reduced to 30% from May 12 through the middle of August, Gross is expecting a mini-surge in volume to begin in the middle of this month. 'It's not going to be … a huge volume, because even though 30% is a lot lower than 145%, it's still pretty significant,' Gross said of tariffs on Chinese goods. The hold on reciprocal tariffs, which vary by country and will remain in effect until at least July 9, means importers of goods made elsewhere also may try to rush containers to the U.S., he says. What happens to volume after these summer tariff-related deadlines depends on the next steps in trade talks. But it's trade with China, Gross says, that will have the biggest impact on U.S. intermodal makes up roughly half of all U.S. rail traffic. And North American volumes this year are running well ahead of 2024 levels as well as the 10-year average. U.S. intermodal volume is up 7% this year through May 24, while North American volume is up 5.8%, according to Association of American Railroads data. Overall, 41.3% of U.S. containerized imports come from China, Gross says, citing S&P Global PIERS data for 2024. Chinese imports make up 57.5% of containers handled by U.S. West Coast ports but just 25.6% of boxes that land at U.S. East Coast ports and 34.7% at Gulf Coast ports. 'To the extent that we have a trade war with China, the West Coast is going to feel it much more acutely than the East Coast,' Gross said. Making matters worse for the West Coast: Asian trade is flowing back to normal routings involving East Coast ports for two reasons. First, shipments were diverted to the West Coast last year amid labor uncertainty and a brief strike at East and Gulf Coast ports. Second, some shipments shifted to the West Coast to avoid danger on their normal route via the Red Sea, which was under threat by Houthi rebels in Yemen. This means that both international and domestic intermodal volume from Southern California will face headwinds after the mini-surge, Gross says. Some 15% of domestic container shipments out of Southern California carry goods that were transloaded from international containers, he estimates. This is bad news for BNSF and UP, which originate intermodal loads from West Coast ports. But it's not necessarily good news for Eastern carriers CSX (NASDAQ: CSX) or Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC) because the intermodal share of imports is much lower at the East Coast ports they serve. It's unclear when trade disputes will be ironed out, Gross says, but he doesn't expect agreements to fall into place quickly. And that, he says, will mean lingering uncertainty for businesses and consumers alike. 'Uncertainty is the enemy of growth,' Gross said. Slowing growth, plus the potential for tariff-fueled inflation, could ultimately produce stagflation that will reduce consumer demand, he says. 'It certainly wouldn't surprise me to see a downturn in the second quarter and third quarter of this year,' Gross he expects domestic intermodal to eke out slight year-over-year gains for 2025 – if intermodal can continue to slowly regain market share from trucking. International volume, Gross says, likely will be flat to down this year. 'I certainly view more downside risk in that forecast than upside potential,' he said. The post Predicting the unpredictable for intermodal appeared first on FreightWaves. Sign in to access your portfolio
