No Laptops, No Problem: why one Cape Town café is reclaiming the space

When was the last time you went into a coffee shop and just, you know, drank coffee?
Maybe chatted with a friend, or watched the world go by the window. When you weren't on your phone, or catching up on emails. When there wasn't someone at the table opposite tapping feverishly into their MacBook. Chances are that was me, and for that I apologise. At least I'm not (and never will be) that guy in the corner talking loudly on a Zoom call.
I'm not sure when we all decided that restaurants and coffee shops were also de facto offices. That by virtue of buying a R38 coffee, we had now paid rent for two hours (maybe more) of remote work using someone else's water and Wi-Fi to do business or hold meetings. But, somehow, imperceptibly, it happened. And I'm not altogether sure I like it.
Should cafés be quiet corners for remote work and Zoom calls, or buzzing hubs for conversation and connection? So when a friend told me about a polite little note at Our Local in Sea Point, I had to head down for a look.
'We are a small community space and are about people connecting, so unforch no laptops allowed. Like not even for a cheeky email :)'
For Michael Carter, Creative Director/Owner of Our Local, the decision to limit laptop use wasn't about being anti-tech or making things difficult for patrons; it was about preserving the essence of the café.
'At our Sea Point store, which is much smaller [ than the original Our Local in Kloof Street ], we have a no-laptops-at-all policy,' says Carter. 'The size of the space was really the deciding factor: we simply can't create the kind of warm, relaxed environment we're known for if it turns into a mini co-working hub.'
So instead of leaving it to the (always friendly) waiters and baristas to police, Walker went with the polite notice on the tables and menu.
'Our Local is about switching off, connecting, and taking a proper break,' he adds. 'When half the room feels like a call centre or gaming room, it's hard to feel like you're getting that escape. The vibe shifts – and not in a good way. People also will take calls on Teams and spread out files – it really can become quite comical.'
At the original Our Local in Kloof Street, the larger space has allowed Carter to be a little more flexible, with designated 'laptop zones' in the backroom and bar as a compromise that caters to remote workers without disrupting the café experience.
It's a fair compromise, but still the policy has sparked mixed reactions.
'Some people totally get it and even thank us for keeping the space human,' says Carter. 'Others don't love it, and our staff do sometimes bear the brunt of that. But we've found it's something worth standing behind.'
Besides chattering Zoom calls and extended meetings ruining the vibe of the space, cafés transforming into remote work hubs – just without, y'know, that rent payable each month – also hits owners where it hurts: the bottom line.
'Guests sitting with laptops for hours can affect table turnover, and that directly impacts our team, especially waiters who rely on tips to earn a living,' adds Carter. 'Our business supports real people with families, so this matters to us.'
While some remote workers may bristle at the idea of a 'no devices' zone, Carter certainly isn't suggesting a citywide crackdown.
'We're not saying every café or restaurant should follow suit — each space is different. But we do think more places should feel confident drawing the line where it makes sense for them. A restaurant isn't automatically a co-working space, and it's okay to say so.'
In a world where digital burnout is real and meaningful connection is rarer than a flat white, perhaps introducing a few limits on laptops is no bad thing. After all, sometimes the very best ideas are sparked over coffee and conversations, not spreadsheets.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The National

7 days ago

• The National

Leeds & Southampton 'interested' in Celtic's Carter-Vickers

The US international has been the main man in the Hoops defence for a number of years now, including impressing on the European stage. Clubs will have taken notice of that and the Herald reports Leeds and Southampton are both taking a look. Leeds, owned by 49ers Enterprises who are also now involved at Rangers, have just been promoted to the Premier League and are looking to strengthen their defence. While Southampton will be hoping to return to that level at the first time of asking after relegation to the Championship. Carter-Vickers is one of the most important and influential players at the Scottish champions and would not be allowed to go for anything less than a substantial figure. Read more: Meanwhile, Celtic are lining up a swoop for Japanese defender Hayato Inamura, who plays for Albirex Niigata in the J-League. The 23-year-old is a left-sided centre half who can also operate at full-back. Swedish international winger Benjamin Nygren is close to a £2million move from Danish side Nordsjaelland while Kieran Tierney has been confirmed on a five-year deal. Teenage Fulham striker Callum Osmand is also omn the verge of joining the Hoops. Ross Doohan is expected to sign on a free transfer after his Aberdeen departure, replacing Scott Bain in the goalkeeping ranks. As well as interest in Carter-Vickers, there could also be suitors for Reo Hatate, while Daizen Maeda is yet to sign a new deal. Greg Taylor is expected to finalise a free transfer to Greek side PAOK, although Danish giants Copenhagen could look to hijack that deal.

Daily Mail​

12-06-2025

• Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE I was excited to come to Australia on a working holiday visa - but here's what they DON'T tell you

A British traveller has shared one of the biggest struggles she's been faced with since moving to Australia that 'no one talks about'. Alice Carter moved Down Under four months ago, swapping London for Sydney, but has been left fearing she'll be forced to return to the UK after struggling to find a job. Despite plenty of experience, the former social editor has been unable to land a role in her chosen field due to the restrictions on her Working Holiday visa. 'It's been such a struggle and no one talks about it,' she told Daily Mail Australia. UK passport holders between the ages of 18 and 35 qualify for Working Holiday visas, which allow Brits to live and work Down Under for up to three years. As of July 2024, Brits no longer have to complete three months of farm work to apply for a second or third visa - but they cannot work for the same employer for more than six months. Ms Carter said she believed her most recent role as social editor at UK publication The Independent made her an ideal candidate for social marketing and strategy roles in Australia. But she has found herself in the same position time and time again where prospective employers have 'really liked her', but can't offer her a job because the visa limitations mean they will have to fill the position again in just a few months. While the rule is explained to applicants in the fine print, what isn't explained, according to Ms Carter, is how reluctant companies are to hiring anyone on a working holiday visa. Ms Carter said employer after employer has been wary of hiring her as she is unable to commit to a contract of longer than six months. 'I've just got off another interview and she said she really loves me and then she finds out I have my working holiday visa and then she tells me no,' she recalled in a video shared to TikTok. 'That's probably the 12th time that's happened where I've gone through a whole interview or started an interview and they've really liked me and I've really liked them. 'Then they say they can't offer the job due to my visa.' Ms Carter said she always makes it clear on any job application that she is a Working Holiday applicant The former social editor, who has worked with brands including Marie Claire UK, Depop and clothing brand TM Lewin, admitted she is considering returning home because she can't find work. Ms Carter's video was flooded with comments from other Brits who had found themselves in the same situation. One viewer said the same thing 'is constantly happening to me... starting to think Aus is no longer the dream'. Ms Carter replied: 'Sorry to hear! I've been here four months and I can't even get hospitality, thinking to have to go home too.' Another commented: 'Who the hell came up with the name of it like why's it called WORKING holiday if none of us can get any damn work, like???' 'It's a nightmare, I've managed 12 months at a place through a recruitment company and then working for the company itself but I'm now in the job hunting part again, job ends in two weeks and I'm dreading it,' another wrote. 'Just keep applying stay persistent I was the same you'll eventually get one that one employer who will give you a chance,' a third said. According the the Department of Home Affairs, the rule is intended to 'provide a temporary opportunity to work while exploring and enjoying the country'. It argues that 'tourism and travel should remain the primary focus of the visa holder's stay' and that work should only be for a 'temporary and secondary income source during a holiday'. However, as many visitors like Ms Carter are finding out, rather than limiting work to six months, the rule is preventing any work at all. Brits on Working Holiday visas are not subject to the six month work limitation if they work in plant and animal cultivation, natural disaster recovery, and critical sectors, including agriculture, food processing, health, aged and disability care and childcare, tourism and hospitality, anywhere in Australia. Certain industries in Northern Australia, including fishing and pearling, tree farming and felling, construction and mining, are also exempt. In certain situations Working Holiday visa holders can ask the government for permission to extend the limitation. You do not need to ask permission to work with the same employer for more than six months if you work in different locations, including working from home, but work in any one location must not exceed six months.

Scotsman

10-06-2025

• Scotsman

The costs of this little-known credit card mistake

Many Brits don't realise that this simple credit card mistake can lead to hidden fees and hurt their credit scoresc 💳 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Millions of Brits risk damaging their credit scores by using credit cards like debit cards Withdrawing cash on credit cards can incur hefty fees of up to 5% per transaction Frequent cash withdrawals may lead to loss of perks, such as payment plan options from providers like Amex Lenders see cash withdrawals as a warning sign of financial trouble, harming loan or mortgage chances Experts advise using credit cards only for large purchases, not everyday spending or cash withdrawals Millions of Brits could be unknowingly damaging their credit scores and racking up steep fees simply by using their credit cards like debit cards, a top payments expert has warned. Richard Carter, founder of Lopay – the UK's highest-rated, lowest-cost payment app – says withdrawing cash on a credit card is one of the most damaging mistakes people make with their finances. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Every cash withdrawal makes the next payment that little bit harder,' he said. 'There's a time and place to use a credit card – and a cash machine is not one of them.' His 'rule for life'? Simple: 'Never use a credit card for cash. End of.' With more than 58 million credit cards in circulation across the UK, that's more than one for every adult – and Carter believes too many people are putting their financial future at risk by using them carelessly. (Photo: DANIEL LEAL/AFP via Getty Images) | AFP via Getty Images Here's why swiping for cash is such a costly mistake Hefty fees: Withdrawing cash on a credit card often comes with charges of up to 5%, meaning a quick £200 ATM withdrawal could cost you an extra £10. Withdrawing cash on a credit card often comes with charges of up to 5%, meaning a quick £200 ATM withdrawal could cost you an extra £10. Damaged credit scores: Lenders view cash withdrawals as a red flag, suggesting you may be struggling financially – and this can harm your chances of getting a mortgage or loan. Lenders view cash withdrawals as a red flag, suggesting you may be struggling financially – and this can harm your chances of getting a mortgage or loan. Loss of perks: Some providers, like American Express, may cut off benefits such as their 'PlanIt' payment plans if they detect frequent cash withdrawals. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Instead, Carter recommends using credit cards only for large purchases on goods or services, and avoiding day-to-day spending where possible. 'A credit card can be a brilliant tool – there are perks, rewards, and protections,' he said. 'But treat it with care. Used wrong, it can bring chaos to your finances.' Are you struggling to make ends meet as costs continue to rise? You can now send your stories to us online via YourWorld at It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.