HECS debts holding millions of first home buyers back
Jill Radge, a 26-year-old teacher, has revealed how after sacrificing for six years to save for a deposit, her HECS debt nearly killed her dream of buying a home.
HECS debts have become one of the biggest hurdles for young hopeful buyers getting into the property market and approximately 2.9 million Aussies have one.
First home buyers in Australia have faced significant challenges in recent years, with rising rents, living costs and property prices making it harder than ever to enter the housing market.
Despite a degree being a necessity to secure a job in many professional fields and HECS often placed in the 'good debt' category – many buyers don't realise when it comes to getting a loan, it significantly effects borrowing power.
Research from Finder.com.au revealed 2.9 million Aussies have a HECS-HELP debt and the average amount was around $27,640 in the 2023–2024 financial year, up from $26,494 in 2022–23.
The number of people with HECS debts above $40K is now almost one quarter of all debtors, according to Finder.
Canstar estimates showed that, for someone on the average wage (about $103,000 a year), excluding HECS debt repayments could potentially boost their borrowing capacity by up to $64,000.
For someone earning a lower income of $80,000 per year, this could potentially boost their borrowing capacity by $33,000.
Canstar director of research Sally Tindall said Australians who have invested in their education should not be unfairly disadvantaged when it comes to securing a home loan.
'Excluding HELP debt repayments from banks' borrowing capacity assessments where the borrower is expected to pay off the debt in the 'near term' is a step in the right direction, and one that could help level the playing field for those trying to get a foot on the property ladder with student debt hanging over them,' she said.
'That said, first home buyers should carefully consider how much debt they're truly comfortable taking on, rather than simply relying on the bank's assessment of how much they can borrow,' Ms Tindall added.
Jill Radge had saved for nearly six years, living with her parents, investing in shares and putting every spare dollar into saving for a deposit.
'I was really diligent with my money, I stopped spending money on clothes and only splurged when I needed to,' she said.
When she spoke to a broker to get her pre-approval, she was told her HECS debt was hindering her borrowing power.
'It took me by surprise,' she said. 'A lot of young people are wanting to buy in Sydney and it's really difficult when they've been at uni for several years and worked really hard to get into a professional career and it's a huge hurdle to getting into property,' she said.
'It's such a big debt, I personally don't think it should be a consideration for first home buyers,' she said.
Her broker advised her that for her circumstances, every $10,000 of HECS it would reduce her borrowing power by around $27,000.
Ms Radge had to make the decision of whether to pay off the rest of her HECS debt with her deposit and put her dream on hold, or have a tighter budget.
'I didn't want to go past my budget, I didn't want to burn myself,' she said.
She almost gave up the search to save towards a bigger deposit until she found a one-bedroom unit under her $730,000 budget on the Northern Beaches, which she said was always her dream.
'I decided to keep paying off my HECS debt, and I was able to pay it off while I have this home loan,' she said.
'Young people are working really hard and they work to buy into the Sydney market … from my experience the first homebuyer benefits have really helped me and helped me to support, I think it's really important to help first home buyers get into the market.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Three reform scenarios shaping Treasurer Jim Chalmers' tax agenda at upcoming productivity roundtable
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has foreshadowed significant tax reform, but there are three possible scenarios likely to arise from his upcoming productivity roundtable. The Albanese government's productivity summit in August 2025 will bring together businesses, unions and leaders to discuss potential economic reforms. Mr Chalmers opened the door to major tax changes for the first time in years at the National Press Club on Wednesday, outlining 'progressive and patriotic' reform. According to sources, there are three possible scenarios likely to emerge from the reform push - and each one could shape the future of the tax system. The first scenario sees the best-case outcome for Mr Chalmers - business and other stakeholders unite behind a shared reform agenda. This would give the Albanese government the political cover to act decisively and push ahead with meaningful changes. The second scenario is less rosy, and would result if consensus breaks down and scare campaigns erupt. In such a case, the government would decide to shelve major changes and instead focus on implementing the modest agenda it took to the last election. The third scenario would be the boldest, and it would be that, even in the face of criticism, Mr Chalmers proceeds with tax reform proposals anyway. He would either put these to voters at the next election in 2028 or design a phased system that would not come into effect until after it. Emboldened by Labor's strong electoral mandate, there have been loud calls to lift the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in exchange for income tax cuts. However, Mr Chalmers poured cold water on such a possibility, dampening the hopes of economists who have requested the change for decades. 'Historically I've had a view about the GST. I think it's hard to adequately compensate people,' he told reporters at the National Press Club. 'I think often an increase in the GST is spent three or four times over by the time people are finished with all of the things that they want to do with it. 'But what I'm going to try to do… I'm going to try not to dismiss every idea that I know that people will bring to the roundtable.' Despite this, AMP's chief economist Shane Oliver has since urged Labor to hike the GST and apply it across the board to minimise income tax. 'In an ideal world you would have less reliance on income tax and reduce the disincentive effects associated with it and have more reliance on GST,' he said 'It's seen as a fairly efficient tax because if you're taxing all goods and services at the same rate it doesn't distort people's economic decisions. 'The GST is a good tax. Economists like it because it's neutral.' CPA Australia's chief executive Chris Freeland also urged reform as the tax system remains 'overly reliant on personal and company income tax'. 'We welcome that the Treasurer was careful not to rule in or rule out any changes at this stage,' Mr Freeland said. 'Australians deserve a mature and honest conversation about the trade-offs required to fund the services and resources they expect. 'That must also include examining and fixing the GST and federal-state arrangements.' CreditorWatch's chief economist Ivan Calhoun said the Treasurer expressing a more open attitude towards GST than he, or his predecessors, had in the past was positive. 'He actually used that three letter GST acronym which has just been off the agenda for any political party,' Mr Calhoun said.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Future focus as inflation blare dims but change needed
The man who writes the cheques for Australia's largest state budget can finally focus on the future. Inflation was "blaring" in NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey's ears when he was compiling his first two budgets after Labor returned to government in 2023 for the first time in 12 years. "But the challenge in front of the state and the nation is making sure that we are growing our economy fast enough to support a rise in living standards," he tells AAP as he prepares to hand down his third. Mr Mookhey says Tuesday's state budget is about the future of the state's essential services and economic growth. "There's a lot of opportunity and a lot of ambition in NSW and the changes we're making are designed to hold on to what we love ... but also ensure that our kids and our grandkids have the same level of opportunity that we had," he says. While receding inflation and distance from the COVID-19 pandemic's associated spending have allowed the treasurer to cast an eye to the future, issues from the past remain. Framed in Mr Mookhey's parliament office is a newspaper headline relating to the underpayments scandal in the state's workers' compensation scheme he played a role in exposing in opposition. The page is yellowing with age as Mr Mookhey pushes to reform a scheme he is now in charge of, and which he argues is becoming unsustainable due to the rising cost and prevalence of psychological injuries. "It's been a hard case to argue," he says. "This system is failing everybody. It's a system that is fundamentally broken." Changes are simmering on the back burner after a parliamentary inquiry prevented action before the budget. Mr Mookhey hopes reform can create a "prevention culture" that limits psychological injuries from occurring. Outside of the workplace, he has promised some reassurance to people dealing with mental health issues and their loved ones. "They will see more investment in mental health resources in our health system and they will see more investment when it comes to our social interventions," he says. However, public psychiatrists at the pointy end of mental health crises should not expect the budget to deliver a pay rise at the level they have been calling for amid resignations in protest and arbitration in the state's Industrial Relations Commission. The federal distribution of GST to the states also continues to frustrate Mr Mookhey after dashing his hopes of a surplus in 2024. NSW now receives its lowest share of GST since it was introduced - about 85 cents for every dollar raised. "What frustrates me is not so much that we support the other states, it's just the missed opportunities," he says. The distribution needs to change but the tax's bigger proportional hit on the spending power of lower-income Australians means Mr Mookhey does not support raising the rate. "We can do better," he says. "What we need to focus on is just making sure the system is simple, the distribution is fair, the distribution is predictable, but also the distribution is understandable." Another federal issue with implications for state budgets is the rise of the black market for illicit tobacco fuelled by rising excise on dinky-di durries. The market shift is robbing the Commonwealth of expected revenue and creating criminal complications for states. It has already led to increased funding for enforcement within the health budget, but Premier Chris Minns indicated earlier in June a decision would have to be made about the resources devoted to combating illicit tobacco sales. While smoke clouds what the budget might do to address the issue, Mr Mookhey notes it is a source of public anxiety. "It's right and fair that we respond to community concerns about it ... we're going to have to work through what is the right solution." The tax issues are part of what economic researchers at the e61 Institute call a "vertical fiscal imbalance" that characterises the nation. "The states carry many of the spending responsibilities but lack equivalent revenue-raising capacity," chief executive Michael Brennan says, warning state finances are drifting onto an unsustainable path. But NSW will at least bank a cash surplus in Tuesday's budget for the first time since 2021. "Which means we're no longer borrowing money to pay our day-to-day bills as a government," Mr Mookhey says. "That gives us a platform for further progress." Australian Public Policy Institute chief executive Libby Hackett expects the budget will be a step forward, building on previous years. "This will be a structural reform budget: supporting better service delivery, infrastructure alignment and long-term productivity, even in a tight fiscal environment," Professor Hackett tells AAP. "Moreover, this budget presents a real opportunity to advance whole-of-government objectives in cross-cutting areas." Opposition Leader Mark Speakman sees it differently, warning the state is heading for "yet another low-vision, low-value, low-energy budget". "We have had not one visionary pre-budget announcement."
Daily Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
NSW suburbs that outperform top super fund
NSW homeowners in over 200 suburbs could be building retirement wealth faster than their super fund, new research reveals. Comparison site Finder has revealed how Australia's super funds compared to that of property price growth over the past ten years. The research found that a shocking 23 per cent – equivalent to around 4.6 million people – said they didn't have enough money in their super fund or other investments to get by in retirement. Australian Retirement Trust's super savings high growth fund had the highest returns, with a 8.79 per cent annual 10 year return, yet there were over 200 suburbs in NSW that out performed that. Houses in Millfield, Lockhart, Brunswick Heads and Clareville were among the top performers, growing by an average of 11-16 per cent annually over the past 10 years. MORE: 'They're off': $962m king's look into real estate woes Retired publican lists $12m apartment How you can save this end of financial year The average 10-year performance across all super funds is 5.7 per cent a year, according to Finder, while Sydney's 10 year annual compound property growth rate was 6.4 per cent. Finders money expert Richard Whitten said the more attention you give your superannuation now, the better off you'll be. 'It's truly a shame to reach retirement age only to find you have 'too little too late.' You can avoid this by taking proactive steps to engage with your super as soon as possible,' he said. He added that to have a comfortable retirement, a single person might need around $595,000 in their super by 67. 'Many Australians are still well below the amounts suggested for a comfortable retirement, making proactive engagement even more critical.' Ben Kingsley, managing director of Empower Wealth Advisory and co-author of 'How to retire on $3,000 a week,' said your return on investment could be higher with property, but warned there were always risks involved. 'If you're going to invest in property you don't want to be speculating, you want to be investing for the decades, not the short period of time,' he said. MORE: Singles face impossible property reality 'One of the advantages of investing in property is it isn't locked away until you're in your 60s. It gives you the ability to leverage from those returns, to accelerate some growth in further returns – use the proceeds or equity to add to your initial property portfolio, which is something to consider.' '(Super) is a sort of set and forget for most Australians, with property when you do have ownership you have control, you can tinker with the property itself you can add value to the property,' he added. He noted it was important to diversify when it came to setting up for retirement. 'You can't save your way to retirement, you need to put your money to work, whether that's additional contributions to super, or investing in shares or property, you're better off starting to think about it in your 30s,' he said. Canstar's director of data insights, Sally Tindall, said Aussie's shouldn't be choosing between a healthy super amount and a property, but should aim to invest in both. 'It comes down to personal preference, but open your mind to achieving both. Don't put all your eggs in one basket,' she said. 'It's not a simple comparison and there's a multitude of factors, there's tax implications on both sides, and whether you're purchasing as an investor or an owner-occupier,' she said. Recent Labor government tax changes, which apply an additional 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances exceeding $3 million, would affect an estimated 80,000 Australians (0.5% of super account holders). MORE: Rare backyard find that can kill you 'It will be interesting to see how that plays out over time, as the government has said that $3m won't be indexed, which could then start to impact many more people in many years to come as the number of people with that sum starts to increase, so that's another factor in the equation.' With the super guarantee increasing to 12 per cent on July 1, Ms Tindall said this may encourage some people to take the property route, knowing their employee is contributing more to their super. 'It's also not just the super vs. mortgage, there are plenty of other things like shares people could be putting their money into. It's important to understand what the mix is and understand the pros and cons and the sacrifice you might have to make, as well as the benefits you can get from each one.' MORE: New builds vanish amid loan slump TOP 20 NSW GROWTH SUBURBS OVER 10 YEAR AVERAGE
