Families in limbo over 'lifeline' adoption support fund
Hundreds of families with adopted children in Surrey are waiting to hear whether funding for their government-provided therapy services will continue. The Department for Education (DfE) has yet to say whether funding for the Adoption and Special Guardianship Support Fund will continue after 31 March.Karen Garner from the Sensory Smart Child Therapies clinic in Walton-on-Thames said: "Our concern is for the hundreds of children that we support who have been adopted after experiencing trauma, loss and neglect."The DfE said it was "committed to ensuring all children are able to achieve and thrive" and that adoptive parents "will be at the heart" of its plans.
Ms Garner said the children they support "are making great progress with therapeutic relationships and specialist interventions".But she said only 18 families "out of hundreds" have had their funding confirmed and there are 400 families across all clinics "in limbo".
'It will have a huge impact'
Families say the services are a lifeline and the uncertainty is causing them anxiety.A mother who visits the clinic in Walton-on-Thames, we are calling Sarah said: "It helps with my daughter's emotions and anxiety."Not to have it will have a huge impact on her, she looks forward to it every week and thrives when she leaves." Another parent we are calling Kate said: "If my family can't access the funding after March it will affect my daughter's confidence."Another parent said the fund provided a vital lifeline for her family and without the professional help they receive they would be lost."We are more aware of what our child needs, which means we can also advocate for them at school," she said.
Every child is entitled to apply for a fund of up to £5,000 per year for specialist intervention under the scheme.In a statement, the DfE said its planer were "to rebalance the system to provide earlier support and greater stability for children".The government has promised to set out more details on the fund as soon as possible.
Alison Woodhead from Adoption UK told the BBC that at least 82% of families they surveyed said the fund had a significant impact on their children and the wider family.She said it "changes lives for hundreds of complicated children who have been removed from their birth families and it is an essential part of their development". "We are receiving an increasing numbers of families calling our helpline asking for clarity, and sadly we can't offer it to them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
18 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I'm a pet expert, these are the common garden essentials that could be KILLING your dog, you must act now
Our expert reveals when to seek help from a vet URGENT WARNING I'm a pet expert, these are the common garden essentials that could be KILLING your dog, you must act now WITH the UK enjoying hot weather this weekend, plenty of us will be spending more time outside in our garden. And as much as we want our furry friends to join us, dog owners are being warned of the potentially fatal things lurking on your plot. 1 Experts have revealed the common garden essentials that could be poisoning your dog Credit: Getty Many people spend more time gardening in the summer, using fertiliser to help their gardens bloom. But as Ross Hallifax, from pet insurance specialist Purely Pets, explains: 'Not only can dogs experience skin and foot irritation if they walk on fertiliser, but it can cause stomach upset if ingested due to its toxic ingredients like nitrogen and phosphorus.' But it's not just fertiliser that can cause a problem for our pooches. Used to help control unwanted garden visitors, both dry and wet pesticides can also be dangerous to your dog and irritate their skin and digestive system if consumed. Read More on Pets DOG DAYS Dog owners urged to avoid 'hidden danger' this week - check breeds most at risk Snail and slug bait can also be highly toxic and if consumed, can cause severe tremors. And for those refreshing their garden shed or outdoor space this summer, be careful of paint. Both the fumes released during painting, and the product itself, can be toxic to our pets due to its high-chemical content. If you suspect your dog has ingested something they shouldn't have, look out for signs of vomiting, diarrhoea, hyperactivity or restlessness, tremors, seizures, or fits, or blood in the stool. Ross adds: 'If you suspect your dog has been exposed to any of these toxins, try to call your vet immediately and explain what's happened so they can help identify the best course of treatment.' Vet Dr Sarah-Jane Molier previously warned dog owners over fake grass as it can absorb heat, making it more likely a pup could be hurt. How to keep pets safe during a heatwave Dr Sarah-Jane Molier told Pets Radar: "Tarmac, asphalt and fake grass are the most common culprits. "They absorb heat throughout the day and retain it well, meaning they stay hot for quite some time." It may not always easy to tell when your dog has injured itself. Owners should look out for any limping or resting of one leg that switches between the two. Vet Dr. Rachel Siu reveals the 5 dogs she'd never own By Marsha O'Mahony HUSKY Beautiful, intelligent, and super-active, like a Border Collie, a Husky is a working dog and likes to keep busy. If you lead a sedentary life, then this guy is not for you, and you are not for him. It should be no surprise that Huskies love the cold - look at that coat of fur. So, living in 110 degrees in Texas is pretty grim for these dogs. DACHSHUND Adorable, cute, funny, and they can be very expensive. The basic physiology of these sausage dogs does them no favours. "Because of their long backs, they're really prone to intervertebral disc disease," said Dr. Rachel. You would be wise to keep a pot of money aside just in case because back surgery is likely to be expensive. GREAT DANE These lolloping, loving, and gregarious dogs are "goofballs." But they have short lifespans, developing health issues early on in life. Prepare yourself for heartbreak. DOODLE These are the current "it" dog, they are everywhere. They can be mixed with pretty much any other breed. Their popularity has soared in recent years, with pet owners attracted to their low maintenance and hypoallergenic qualities. But this couldn't be further from the truth, said our vet. "These dogs are often mixed with shedding dogs so they do shed and they also need grooming very frequently," she wrote. Their temperament is unpredictable and she has seen some that are wonderful to work with and others who have serious behavioral problems. BULLDOGS These guys are adorable but they have serious respiratory problems. Genetics are not on the side of any brachycephalic dog. "I just would not own them," she said. "They're just not a healthy breed. They struggle to breathe with their smooshed faces." Like the Dachshund, they also suffer from intervertebral disc disease. If your canine companion doesn't get excited for going on a walk, it could also be a sign. They will often lick or chew their wounded paws, and be hesitant to let you touch them. Some more obvious signs include patchy discolouration on the pads as well as blisters and peeling. If you think your dog has burned paws, take them to the vet.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
NHS survey overstates mental health crisis in children, say experts
A leading consultant has criticised official data that claims that more than one in five school children has mental health problems as 'nuts' and 'pernicious'. A new report by the Department for Education on the rise in pupils not attending school links it to increased levels of mental illness among young people. It cites NHS data showing that 21 per cent of children aged eight to 16 have a 'probable mental health problem'. The figure has been widely publicised and is part of the justification for the government's policy to put councillors in every secondary school. But experts warn that the calculation is based on 'subjective' questionnaire data and could be exaggerating the prevalence of mental health issues among young people. The Strengths and Difficulties survey used in the NHS data gives children multiple choice questions on their emotional state, concentration levels, conduct and relationships to assess their mental wellbeing. Pupils are asked questions such as: 'Have you recently felt capable of making decisions about things?'; 'Have you recently felt that you are playing a useful part in things?' and 'Do you sometimes feel anxious in certain situations?'. Response options are 'not true', 'somewhat true', or 'certainly true'. Children who score 17 or above out of 40 are recorded as having 'probable mental health problems'. However, Professor Dr Joanna Moncrieff, an academic at University College London and a practising psychiatrist for the NHS, has questioned the method and the labelling of children as mentally ill. 'Anyone scoring above the average in this survey is deemed to have a probable mental health problem – I mean that's nuts,' she told The Telegraph. 'It is a really good illustration of how misleading this whole mental health debate can be. Saying that the reason children are not going to school is because of mental health problems is oversimplifying to the extent that you are not saying anything. By saying it is a mental health problem, you think you've explained it, but you really haven't.' Dennis Hayes, a professor of education at Derby University and co-author of The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education, described the data method as 'shoddy' and 'crude'. 'It is as bad as the little questionnaires in OKAY magazine,' he said. 'I went through some of those questions. One is 'do you sometimes feel anxious in certain situations?' Yes, all the time! So, I don't think this is the way to proceed.' Prof Hayes said children and adults are being taught to see normal anxieties as ' mental health problems '. 'Multiple choice surveys merely confirm a cultural belief that we are all unwell,' he said. 'It's a terrible and destructive thing. It creates introverted children and young people who can't cope.' Prof Moncrieff said labelling children can limit them: 'People think they've found an explanation, but they haven't; they have just acquired a label and labels can be really pernicious because they limit you,' she said. 'You think 'I have this thing, therefore I can't possibly do this and I can't possibly do that'. It is really worrying.' Another academic, Frank Furedi, emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Kent, argued that children who registered concern about their lives, or the state of the world, were not necessarily exhibiting signs of mental illness. 'What used to be called problems of life, problems of existence, are now framed in the language of psychology, and we tend to medicalise our personal problems,' he said. 'So, we no longer have shy people; we have people with social phobia. We no longer have kids who are just very energetic; we have ADHD. We are inciting young people to feel unwell. To me, the mental health industry is actually complicit in creating a mental health problem.' Long waiting lists Concerns have also been raised that the data method, and others like it, could be leading to a crisis in the already overstretched Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), leaving referrals with the most serious mental health conditions stuck on long waiting lists. Almost one million children and young people had active referrals for CAMHS in England, figures from 2022-23 show. A third were on waiting lists, while 40 per cent had their referral closed before accessing support. Nearly 40,000 children experienced waits of at least two years. The most common reason for a referral for mental health treatment was cited as anxiety. 'I don't work with children, but we have quite a lot of young people coming through from CAMHS and we are absolutely overwhelmed with referrals,' said Prof Moncrieff. 'I would say anecdotally that there are people coming through who are less unwell (than in the past). Then we have the whole question of how we help; is it really helpful or might it be harmful? I don't think it is a good thing for lots of people to be on antidepressants or other forms of drug treatment.' Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has pledged to provide school counsellors in all secondary schools in England. Campaigners say this does not go far enough and want mental health professionals at primary level too. But Prof Moncrieff said the move could have unintended negative consequences. 'The worry is that they could end up identifying and labelling more kids and sending them off to CAMHS,' she said. 'The best case scenario is counsellors reduce the need because pupils have someone to talk to and that helps. But I do worry that we have such a mental health-obsessed culture now that most people think they are doing the right thing by labelling children and referring them.'
ITV News
4 days ago
- ITV News
'Why didn't they tell us?' Mothers who took epilepsy drug that led to birth defects feel 'abandoned'
In the first of several reports, ITV Meridian's Social Affairs correspondent Christine Alsford has been speaking to Carole McNeil about her experience. Three women who say they weren't warned that their epilepsy medication risked causing birth defects in their children say they feel 'abandoned and forgotten' by the government. Carole McNeil, Penny Johnson and Jo Gamblin all had babies with a variety of problems including mobility difficulties, learning disabilities, speech problems and autism. They gave birth to their now grown up children over a sixteen year time span - but they all say they weren't told about the dangers of sodium valproate. They say they weren't given the chance to change their medication and their concerns were dismissed by doctors and other medical experts. None of them have told their stories before - but they say they can now no longer stay silent amid institutional failures and unacceptable delays in their fight for justice. Carole McNeil now lives in Bournemouth. Her daughter Sarah was born in 1989 and is now aged 35. She has mobility problems, speech difficulties and learning difficulties. She also had to have an operation for scoliosis when she was 14. Carole McNeil Carole had been on sodium valproate since the age of two. She was concerned about taking the medication while she was pregnant. "I asked if there was any side effects and was told no, you'll be fine," she said. She says she was initially told by doctors that Sarah was double jointed - but later on a five year battle showed she had sodium valproate syndrome. She's angry that information about the drug wasn't shared with patients earlier. "Why, why didn't they tell us?" "The government that knew in 1973 that there was the problem with this drug and Sarah was born in 1989, 16 years after. "It's not right. It's not right." ITV Meridian's Social Affairs correspondent Christine Alsford has been speaking to Penny Johnson about her experience. An estimated 20,000 children have been affected by sodium valproate damage - which is twice the number in the Thalidomide scandal, a drug that also caused birth defects. Women took the epilepsy medication to control their seizures but say they weren't given the opportunity to switch to alternatives and had no idea the drug increased the risk of birth defects and developmental delays. Penny Johnson's son Alan was born ten years after Sarah in 1999. He has mobility problems and autism. "There was no warnings on the box," said Penny. "Nothing said that I shouldn't take the medication before trying for a baby. There was nothing." Penny Johnson She says the government needs to take urgent action to help families. "I feel very alone and abandoned," she said. "I feel forgotten. I need things put in place for my son. I'm 56 years old." Penny from Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire, believes that three miscarriages that she suffered, are also a result of the medication. One happened at 16 weeks. She added she was denied the chance to make choices. "I feel that I could have had the medication changed so easily because my epilepsy was not severe. In fact, I don't know medication now. I haven't been on medication since 2002." ITV Meridian's Social Affairs correspondent Christine Alsford has been speaking to Jo Gamblin about her experience. Parents including Jo Gamblin from Fareham in Hampshire say they've been let down by the system. "They've known for years the dangers of it," said Jo. " And to just leave women to carry on having children. I just don't understand how they can even sleep at night." Jo's son Lewis is aged 19 and was born with signs of sodium valproate syndrome and has now been diagnosed with ADHD and autism and registered as disabled. "What I really want to get across is what has happened to our children," said Jo. "They need help. "This wasn't his fault. It's not my fault. And what they seem to be forgetting is that we were given the medication to help us in the first place because we've got an illness that is life threatening and now we've got more stress. And stress is one of the biggest triggers for epilepsy." Jo Gamblin Well over a year ago a major report that set out how a redress scheme for sodium valproate should work was published. Written by the Patient Safety Commissioner, Professor Henrietta Hughes, it said there was a "clear case for redress based on the systematic healthcare and regulatory failures". Sixteen months on, there has been no response from the government, which she describes as "disappointing". "The responsibility of all government should be to keep their citizens safe and in this situation I believe patients and families have been let down by a system that hasn't focused on safety," she said. "The disjointed and dismissive nature of the health system is what led to those patients being harmed." The Department for Health and Social Care said they would provide an update "at the earliest opportunity". A spokesperson said: "We are fully focused on how best to support patients and prevent future harm. "This is a complex area of work and the government is carefully considering the Patient Safety Commissioner's recommendations in full." Medical regulator the MHRA said: "Since 1974 product information for healthcare professionals has always included a warning about the risks of valproate use during pregnancy. "In the 70s and 80s, few medicines were supplied with any printed information for patients. "The first patient information leaflet for valproate, approved in 1989, advised patients to contact their doctor if pregnant or planning a pregnancy so risks could be discussed." Watch an ITV Meridian vodcast where Social Affairs Correspondent Christine Alsford speaks at length to Carole McNeil and Jo Gamblin. In 2018 new warnings were added to boxes of sodium valproate warning that the drug shouldn't be taken by pregnant women. There is also now a Pregnancy Prevention Programme in place for women under the age of 55. Sanofi, manufacturers of one of the main brands of sodium valproate called Epilim, told us: "We have always worked closely with the MHRA and fully met all our legal and regulatory obligations in relation to valproate which is an essential medicine used to treat a serious and potentially life-threatening condition. "The use of valproate in pregnancy is an incredibly complex issue that involves many different parties including government, regulators, doctors and other prescribers, pharmacists, manufacturers, patients and other people affected. "All partners in the healthcare system, including health authorities, healthcare professionals and pharmaceutical companies, have a role to play in providing information on risks and benefits of medicine to all patients who take them, consistent with scientific and medical knowledge."
