
ADOR wins third appeal against NewJeans, reinforcing exclusive management rights
In the latest development in the ongoing legal dispute between ADOR and the members of NewJeans, the Seoul High Court has ruled in favour of the label, once again reaffirming its exclusive rights as the group's sole management agency.The decision comes after the five members of NewJeans filed an appeal against a preliminary injunction that restricts them from pursuing independent entertainment activities without ADOR's prior approval. On June 17 KST, the court dismissed the appeal, marking the third time in a row that the courts have sided with ADOR, following similar rulings by the Seoul Central District Court in March and April 2025.advertisementIn an official statement issued after the ruling, ADOR said, 'We sincerely appreciate the court's decision. We hope that this ruling will serve as an opportunity for the members to return to their rightful place as NewJeans and resume their activities. As they approach their third debut anniversary next month, ADOR is committed to providing full support for the artists' further growth and success.'
While the group has remained largely silent publicly, fans are now waiting to see how the verdict may impact NewJeans' upcoming schedules, especially with their third debut anniversary just around the corner.Whether the ruling helps de-escalate tensions between the label and the artists remains to be seen, but for now, the court has once again thrown its weight behind ADOR.advertisement

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
'3 out of 4 are minors': Baby DONT Cry's 'F Girl' teaser sparks concern over candy packaging
Even before they could make their debut, Baby DONT Cry - the upcoming girl group under PSY's label P Nation and partially produced by I-DLE's Soyeon - is already drawing controversy. The backlash stems from the group's teaser and debut concept, particularly the visuals, as three out of the four members are minors. Baby DONT Cry's teaser sparks debate The group unveiled the teaser for their debut single, F Girl, on June 20 (KST). In the clip, a member approaches a store counter and places a small packet down, prompting a confused and disapproving glance from the male clerk. She then opens the packet, revealing a piece of candy, which she pops into her mouth without hesitation. The moment quickly drew attention as viewers noticed the packet's design closely resembled a condom wrapper - a deliberate visual choice that sparked immediate discussion and controversy online. 'F Girl' MV Teaser 1🔗 Single [F Girl]2025. 6. 23. 6PM 💿 Pre-save : #BabyDONTCry #BDC #FGirl #250623_6pmKST #PNATION #피네이션 Fans raise concerns over minors While some fans interpreted the teaser as cheeky and bold, the overall response has been largely critical. Many fans voiced concern over the suggestive nature of the imagery, given that three of the four members are minors. Paired with the provocative title, F Girl, the teaser has sparked serious debate about the appropriateness of the group's debut concept. 3/4 members are minors btw 3 minors, condom wrapper, song called f girl… 'noooo the condom is an intentional artistic message' ok why does a minor filled group have to portray that message These concepts only work with adults Soyeon also dragged by netizens The controversy has also seen Soyeon, who played a role in producing Baby DONT Cry face criticism. While some fans were quick to defend her, insisting she likely had no say in the visual or conceptual elements, others felt that her involvement with the group made her partially responsible for the group's problematic debut presentation. What disgusts me the most is how her fans are still making feminist theories, do you realise that there is nothing wrong with holding your fav accountable? Calling people perverted when the song name, teaser and first mv were flat out weird and sickening. soyeon weird as fuck for this actually Larger debate over K-pop and minors While P Nation and the creative team behind Baby DONT Cry are facing criticism, the controversy has also reignited broader discussions around the use of sexualized imagery involving minors in K-pop. With the group's official debut drawing near, attention is now focused on how the label will respond - and whether any adjustments will be made to the group's concept or rollout. For all the latest K-drama, K-pop, and Hallyuwood updates, keep following our coverage here.


Pink Villa
2 days ago
- Pink Villa
Did THE BOYZ's Eric hint at Ju Haknyeon's exit 1-day before announcement? Fans revisit crying moment
Recently, THE BOYZ member Eric was spotted visibly tearful while interacting with fans. Initially, his emotional state was attributed to his reaction to the love and support from fans. However, speculation has now emerged that his tears might be linked to the Joo Haknyeon-Kirara Asuka scandal. As Eric's emotional moment occurred just a day before Ju Haknyeon's sudden hiatus announcement, it led fans to draw connections between the two events. THE BOYZ's Eric crying moment ahead of Ju Haknyeon's exit gets revisited Eric has been serving as the DJ for the program Idol Radio since January 2025. Following the end of the shoot for the June 16 episode with the project group DOUBLE ONE, he was set to head home. During then, he saw a bunch of enthusiastic fans waiting for him outside, and courteously greeted them from his car's window. However, at one point he was seen almost tearing up, and even covered his face with his hands to avoid being seen getting emotional. THE BOYZ member quickly retreated his face back inside the car, probably to shield his vulnerable side from public view. Fans revisited the moment, linking it with the ongoing Ju Haknyeon controversy. Why do fans think Eric cried because of Ju Haknyeon? When the video of Eric's emotional moment first emerged, fans believed it was a heartfelt expression of appreciation for their love and support. However, in light of recent developments, many now speculate that it was a response to the controversy surrounding Ju Haknyeon's situation, including the threat of the latter's removal from the group. Notably, Ju Haknyeon's initial hiatus was announced on June 16 at 10:20 AM KST, while Idol Radio began at 9 PM KST the same day. The B (THE BOYZ's fandom) felt that the members were already aware of what was to come, and Eric's tearing up was a subtle indication to that. As per their agency's mention of Ju Haknyeon's contract termination being for the other members' best interest, it is quite likely that Eric and the other 9 of them knew about the impending event.


India Today
3 days ago
- India Today
ADOR wins third appeal against NewJeans, reinforcing exclusive management rights
In the latest development in the ongoing legal dispute between ADOR and the members of NewJeans, the Seoul High Court has ruled in favour of the label, once again reaffirming its exclusive rights as the group's sole management decision comes after the five members of NewJeans filed an appeal against a preliminary injunction that restricts them from pursuing independent entertainment activities without ADOR's prior approval. On June 17 KST, the court dismissed the appeal, marking the third time in a row that the courts have sided with ADOR, following similar rulings by the Seoul Central District Court in March and April an official statement issued after the ruling, ADOR said, 'We sincerely appreciate the court's decision. We hope that this ruling will serve as an opportunity for the members to return to their rightful place as NewJeans and resume their activities. As they approach their third debut anniversary next month, ADOR is committed to providing full support for the artists' further growth and success.' While the group has remained largely silent publicly, fans are now waiting to see how the verdict may impact NewJeans' upcoming schedules, especially with their third debut anniversary just around the the ruling helps de-escalate tensions between the label and the artists remains to be seen, but for now, the court has once again thrown its weight behind