Key admission in social media ban update
The brains tasked with finding a way to enforce Labor's world-leading social media ban for under 16s say it is possible but that there is no 'silver bullet'.
The preliminary findings of the Age Assurance Technology Trial (AATT) were released on Friday just six months before the ban was set to come into force.
Project chief Tony Allen said his team found 'there isn't a one solution fits all' but rather a range of options that parties could use.
'There isn't like a silver bullet that will solve everything,' Mr Allen told Sky News.
'And different providers of social media services, for instance, will need to explore exactly what will work for them and their users, and that's really for them to assess their risk and to consider what they might want to implement.'
In terms of what it might look like in practice, he suggested 'successive validated' – a series of tests designed to firm up a user's age.
Mr Allen said it could start with 'something which is fairly simple, like holding your hand up or showing your face or talking'.
'And then that might not give you sufficient level of confidence, so then move on to maybe age inference techniques, or ultimately, they may need to move on to age verification where you need some sort of record or document,' he said.
The trial uncovered some challenges.
It found parental control and consent systems could be effective when first rolled out but could not 'cope with the evolving capacity of children' or properly protect a 'child's digital footprint'.
It also warned that 'service providers were over-anticipating the eventual needs of regulators' and over-collecting user data.
This consequently 'increased risk of privacy breaches', according to the findings.
But Mr Allen said the 'clear conclusion' was that enforcing age limits could be enforced safely.
He held back on putting a figure on the efficacy, noting the measurers were not 'foolproof'.
'There are ways that they (children) can get around them,' Mr Allen said.
'But then we've had tobacco laws for 100 years to stop children accessing tobacco, and it doesn't stop them from accessing some children from tobacco.
'So you have to try and work on how you reduce the risk and reduce the instance.
'You'll never completely eliminate it.'
NewsWire understands the full findings will be handed to the government later this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie blocked from her own account exposes bank's 'insane' request to unblock it
An ING customer is urging banks to rethink their fraud processes after she said she was blocked from her bank account and unable to access her money for days due to two innocuous transactions. Katie McMaster has been a long-time customer of the digital bank, which is one of the biggest in the country. The Melbourne resident received an email from the bank's fraud department on Tuesday saying her account had been suspended due to 'suspicious activity'. She immediately contacted ING and was told she needed to wait for the fraud team to contact her via email and she couldn't speak to them on the phone. The 35-year-old told Yahoo Finance she had to verify her identity over email and had to reply with her full name, date of birth and mobile number. RELATED Commonwealth Bank customer rages over threat to cut access to his money Centrelink age pension changes coming into effect from July 1 Centrelink rule change gives more Aussies access to $5,000 cash boost 'I just thought that was insane in itself to be sending that data across email to verify. For a bank of their size, I just thought that shouldn't be the process, especially when you're trying to get in touch with the fraud department,' she said. She was later sent a verification text from the bank and told to upload her identification. After that, she said she heard nothing from the bank and was still unable to get someone on the phone. She was told the fraud team could take two business days to respond. Meanwhile, the personal assistant was unable to access her funds, use her card or get money out. She said she had to rely on her credit card for funds, which ING did not block.'It was stressful in the fact that I could obviously see the balance, but the available balance was zero,' she said. 'But what was sort of frustrating was that they didn't block my credit card with them. They were happy for me to keep using my credit card, but then I would have to pay interest on that, but they wouldn't let me access my funds, and I couldn't withdraw any cash.' It wasn't until 5pm on Thursday that she received an email from ING asking her to verify two transactions flagged as suspicious. They were her monthly salary, which goes into her account at the same time each month, and a $300 transfer from a friend for Usher tickets. After she confirmed the purpose of the funds, she finally received a call from the ING fraud department, and they were able to unblock her accounts "on the spot". McMaster said the worker she spoke to was confused why the transactions had been flagged as suspicious and apologised for taking so long to resolve the issue. She claimed she was the only one manning the fraud email inbox. 'The lack of communication was frustrating me the most. I understand banks have their processes, but I'd rather sit on hold for an hour knowing I'd get through than wait a couple of days,' she said. An ING spokesperson told Yahoo Finance safeguarding customers' funds and identities was "central" to how it operated. "When our systems detect suspicious transactions, we proactively act on behalf of customers to protect their funds. This often involves temporarily placing a hold on a customer's account until we can confirm the transactions with the customer," the spokesperson said. "To reactivate account activity, we verify the customer's identity through our secure fraud portal. During this process, the customer's biometrics are matched against the identity documents we securely hold on record. "We recognise that temporarily pausing activity on an account can impact customers, so we always check they have access to essential funds, ensuring they are not placed in financial hardship." McMaster shared her experience online and was met with hundreds of responses from other Australians, with several others saying they also had their ING accounts blocked. "This happened to me in 2019, I was overseas and there was no help. For the rest of my trip I had to use a friend's money to be able to pay for anything. They cancelled the card and that was it," one wrote. "Same happened with me! You feel so vulnerable not being able to get access to money! Luckily, I was able to borrow cash from someone because you literally can't get access to any money, it's crazy," another said. "It's actually terrifying that they can do this," a third added. Others agreed they would feel uneasy about providing their personal information over email. "I'd refuse to send personal details over email, that's ridiculous!!" one said. "It's a very odd process for fraud verification, and goes against our basic security instincts ... It adds even more stress and confusion to the situation," another said. McMaster said she was now in the process of changing banks and was considering opening up accounts with multiple banks to avoid getting stuck in the same position. She has called on ING and other banks to reconsider their fraud verification processes, including the requirement for customers to provide sensitive information via email. 'The main concern of all of this is the verification process. It was just having to click on a link to upload my ID from a text message. It's just everything we're told not to do,' she said. She has urged other Aussies to continue to remain diligent when it comes to scams and to double-check any messages received were legitimate.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major bank deals double blow for Aussie savers with interest rate cut: 'Disappointing'
NAB has cut the interest rate on one of its popular savings accounts today. It's a double blow for customers, after the major bank already cut rates following the Reserve Bank of Australia's (RBA) cash rate cut last month. NAB has cut its Reward Saver account by 0.05 per cent, bringing the new maximum rate down to 4.35 per cent. It follows a 0.25 per cent cut on May 23, bringing the total cut to 0.30 per cent. While the bank's move is a small one, it's a sign of a bigger trend when it comes to falling savings rates. Canstar research found other banks were cutting rates above and beyond the RBA cuts, including ING and Rabobank. RELATED RBA urged to cut interest rates in weeks as unemployment 'blow out' fears escalate Centrelink age pension changes coming into effect from July 1 Centrelink rule change gives more Aussies access to $5,000 cash boost 'It shows that banks don't need a cash rate change to move the goalposts for customers. It's a small move but a disappointing one nevertheless,' Canstar data insights director Sally Tindall said. The average savings rate on its database is currently 3.07 per cent. There are just six banks still offering an ongoing savings rate of 5 per cent or more. 'That said, if the RBA wields its knife again in July or August, savings rates starting with a 5 won't last beyond winter,' Tindall said. NAB expects the RBA will cut interest rates again in July, August and November, to bring the cash rate down to 3.10 per cent. CBA, Westpac and ANZ think the next cut won't be until August, with Westpac recently doubling its forecast to expect cuts in August, November, February and May. CBA and ANZ expect there will only be two more cuts in this cycle. BOQ Future Saver for 14 to 35 year olds offers the highest ongoing savings account rate at 5.10 per cent, according to Canstar. That's despite the bank cutting the maximum rate yesterday from 5.25 to 5.10 per cent. Customers have to deposit $1,000 and make at least five transactions in a linked bank account to get this maximum rate. Other accounts currently offering 5 per cent savings rates are BCU Bank Boss Saver, P&N Bank Savvy Saver, Westpac Life Spend&Save, Move Bank Growth Saver and ING Savings Maximiser. Term deposit rates have also been falling, with more than 50 banks cutting at least one rate in the last month, including all of the Big Four banks. 'Term deposit rates are, unsurprisingly, falling faster than at-call savings rates, as banks continue to bake in further cash rate cuts into the fixed rate term,' Tindall said. 'If you're someone who likes the certainty and security a term deposit can bring, time is of the essence as these rates are likely to keep on falling in the weeks ahead.'Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Australia social media teen ban software trial organisers say the tech works
By Byron Kaye SYDNEY (Reuters) -Some age-checking applications collect too much data and no product works 100% of the time, but using software to enforce a teenage social media ban can work in Australia, the head of the world's biggest trial of the technology said on Friday. The view from the government-commissioned Age Assurance Technology Trial of more than 1,000 Australian school students and hundreds of adults is a boost to the country's plan to keep under 16s off social media. From December, in a world first ban, companies like Facebook and Instagram owner Meta, Snapchat and TikTok must prove they are taking reasonable steps to block young people from their platforms or face a fine of up A$49.5 million ($32 million). Since the Australian government announced the legislation last year, child protection advocates, tech industry groups and children themselves have questioned whether the ban can be enforced due to workarounds like Virtual Private Networks, which obscure an internet user's location. "Age assurance can be done in Australia privately, efficiently and effectively," said Tony Allen, CEO of the Age Check Certification Scheme, the UK-based organisation overseeing the Australian trial. The trial found "no significant tech barriers" to rolling out a software-based scheme in Australia, although there was "no one-size-fits-all solution, and no solution that worked perfectly in all deployments," Allen added in an online presentation. Allen noted that some age-assurance software firms "don't really know at this stage what data they may need to be able to support law enforcement and regulators in the future. "There's a risk there that they could be inadvertently over-collecting information that wouldn't be used or needed." Organisers of the trial, which concluded earlier this month, gave no data findings and offered only a broad overview which did not name individual products. They will deliver a report to the government next month which officials have said will inform an industry consultation ahead of the December deadline. A spokesperson for the office of the eSafety Commissioner, which will advise the government on how to implement the ban, said the preliminary findings were a "useful indication of the likely outcomes from the trial. "We are pleased to see the trial suggests that age assurance technologies, when deployed the right way and likely in conjunction with other techniques and methods, can be private, robust and effective," the spokesperson said. The Australian ban is being watched closely around the world with several governments exploring ways to limit children's exposure to social media. ($1 = 1.5427 Australian dollars) (Additional reporting by Cordelia Hsu; Editing by Kate Mayberry)
