Sugababes' Keisha Buchanan's ex set for trial next year on harassment and controlling behaviour charges
Sugababe Keisha Buchanan's footballer ex-partner is set to stand trial next Spring over claims he harassed the singer and controlled parts of her life.
Taiwo Leo Atieno, 39, is accused of blocking the singer from wearing red lipstick, watching TV and going to the gym, and allegedly controlled what she ate when they were in a relationship.
After the breakdown of the romance, it is said he harassed her with texts, emails and social media contact, as well as an alleged request for £25,000.
He is also accused - in criminal charges spanning a decade - of attacking Ms Buchanan.
Atieno appeared on Thursday at Harrow Crown Court for a preliminary hearing, when Judge Charles Bourne KC set the case down for a five-day trial starting on April 13 next year.
The defendant appeared for the hearing on a videolink from HMP Wormwood Scrubs, having been held in custody since first being charged last month. The judge agreed on Thursday that he could be released from prison to await his trial, as long as he abides by bail conditions including the surrender of his passport.
Ms Buchanan, 40, was one of the original members of Sugababes alongside Mutya Buena and Siobhan Donaghy, and was part of the band as they became one of the 21st Century's most successful pop acts.
She enjoyed chart-topping hits such as Round Round and Push the Button, before ultimately being forced out of the band in 2009.
Ms Buchanan had solo success before reuniting with her former bandmates under the title Mutya Keisha Siobhan – and together they seized back control of the Sugababes name in 2019.
Atieno was a professional footballer who made appearances for Kenya in qualifiers for the World Cup and African Cup of Nations.
The Brixton-born forward made appearances for Walsall, Tamworth, Luton Town, Stevenage and Torquay United before retiring in 2013, and he also had spells playing in Puerto Rico and Rochester in New York state.
He is charged with controlling and coercive behaviour towards Ms Buchanan between December 2015 and May 2018, assault occasioning actual bodily harm between January 2012 and January 2015, harassment between January 2021 and December last year, and an alleged breach of a non-molestation order.
A previous court hearing was told the singer alleges Atieno controlled her finances and use of the shower while they were living together, allegedly intervened in her eating habits, and only allowed her to go to the gym 'at certain times'.
It is said he 'did not allow her to watch TV and did not allow her to wear red lipstick' and also subjected her to verbal abuse, according to the charges.
Atieno is also accused of grabbing Ms Buchanan around the neck, punching her on the arm and striking her on the back in a series of alleged assaults, the court heard.
When blocked from contacting the singer by a family court order, it is alleged Atieno sent emails to her and he is also accused of harassment over the course of three years with texts, emails, social media contact and a request for £25,000.
According to reports, Ms Buchanan was once engaged to Atieno and they had begun making plans for a wedding.
Atieno was not asked to enter pleas to any of the charges at Thursday's hearing.
He told the magistrates court hearing he denies all the allegations.
Atieno, of Langton Road, Kennington, southwest London, is set to return to court to enter pleas in August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Parole officers at the crossroads: Are they social workers or cops?
And they exercise enormous power over the lives of those ex-prisoners they are charged with supervising. A beer can on the table can mean a violation and that could eventually lead to reincarceration — and with it the loss of a job, housing, and those ties to community that take time to build or rebuild. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But Governor Maura Healey's personnel choices signal that a shift is well underway. The man Advertisement But he is also the son of Puerto Rican-born parents, who, he told the Governor's Council Wednesday, came north with little money, and depended on a variety of social services for a 'hand up.' 'I believe those who come before the Parole Board are looking for a hand up,' he said, adding his guiding principle has been and remains ' ser justo , to be just.' He also told the council that since the passage of a major 'We're not police. Our mission is different,' he added. 'We have evolved dramatically.' Well, yes and no. Even a cursory read of the parole officer In fact, as recently as the last available Now keep in mind, parole field officers were never a part of the 2020 Advertisement And, as state Senator Will Brownsberger (D-Belmont), who helped draft and shepherd the police reform bill through the Legislature, explained, 'We don't really think of them as law enforcement officers. Their job is primarily supervisory.' And so both parole and probation officers were never part of the regulatory scheme. But that hasn't stopped some parole officers from joining in the police action when the occasion presented itself — that is until a new agency protocol was signed, effective March 19, expressly prohibiting their participating 'in other investigations and warrants' unless they directly involve a parolee. The edict provided the impetus for at least one angry letter to the Governor's Council, from Bryan Westerman, a parole field officer, who opposed Gomez's confirmation and blamed him for 'dismantled law enforcement partnerships.' There is no hiding the tension between what the Healey administration, officials like Gomez, and his supporters want for the direction of the agency and what they are up against in moving the parole system into the 21st century. 'The newer parole officers are much like social workers,' said Senator Jamie Eldridge (D-Acton), a champion of criminal justice reform and a supporter of Gomez's confirmation. 'They recognize that people want to find a job and housing and don't want to go back to prison.' They see their roles as 'coaches, not referees,' he added. 'But if you have a parole officer focused on technical violations, they're not really serving the cause of justice.' Advertisement And those who simply want the adrenaline rush of a police raid ought to be looking for another job. Gomez, whose confirmation comes up for a vote before the Governor's Council next week, is the right man at a critical time. But he and his fellow board members are up against a workforce that has had things its way for decades. Turning that ship around will be everybody's job. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Indianapolis Star
4 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
This TikTok-famous retro pink toothpaste is 15% off ahead of Prime Day
If you've ever scrolled through TikTok lately, chances are you've seen the iconic pink tube of Euthymol Whitening Toothpaste. With its vintage-inspired packaging, bold minty flavor and cult following, this British-born toothpaste is making waves stateside. Right now, you can grab the Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste for up to 15% off on Amazon as part of the retailer's early Prime Day deals. Whether you're restocking your bathroom cabinet or want to try a new whitening toothpaste for summer 2025, this is the perfect opportunity to upgrade your oral care routine on a budget. Euthymol isn't your average toothpaste. With a unique pink shade, it is immediately a more playful and fun toothpaste. But, it is backed by very serious results like offering visibly brighter teeth and fresher breath. Here are some highlights: Plus, it comes in a recyclable aluminum tube that is a great perk for eco-conscious shoppers. With over 120 years of oral care heritage, Euthymol has earned a loyal fanbase for its no-nonsense formula and retro charm. It's especially loved by those with sensitive gums, thanks to its gentle yet effective ingredients. Save up to 15% at Amazon
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Pro-Palestinian protest leader released from US custody
Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University student who was one of the most visible leaders of nationwide pro-Palestinian campus protests, was released Friday from a federal detention center. Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to a US citizen and has a US-born son, has been in custody since March facing potential deportation. "This shouldn't have taken three months," Khalil, wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh scarf, told US media outside an immigration detention center in Jena, Louisiana hours after a federal judge ordered his release. "(President Donald) Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this," he said. "There's no right person who should be detained for actually protesting a genocide." The Department of Homeland Security criticized District Judge Michael Farbiarz's ruling Friday as an example of how "out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining our national security." Under the terms of his release, Khalil will not be allowed to leave the United States except for "self-deportation," and faces restrictions on where he can travel within the country. Khalil's wife, Michigan-born dentist Noor Abdalla, said her family could now "finally breathe a sigh of relief and know that Maumoud is on his way home." "We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family and so many others the government is trying to silence for speaking out against Israel's ongoing genocide against Palestinians," added Abdalla, who gave birth to the couple's first child while her husband was in detention. - Visas revoked - Since his March 8 arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, Khalil has become a symbol of Trump's campaign to stifle pro-Palestinian student activism against the Gaza war, in the name of curbing anti-Semitism. At the time a graduate student at Columbia University in New York, Khalil was a prominent leader of nationwide campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza. Following his arrest, US authorities transferred Khalil, who was born in Syria to Palestinian parents, nearly 2,000 kilometers (1,242 miles) from his home in New York to the detention center in Louisiana, pending deportation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has invoked a law approved during the 1950s Red Scare that allows the United States to remove foreigners seen as adverse to US foreign policy. Rubio argues that US constitutional protections of free speech do not apply to foreigners and that he alone can make decisions without judicial review. Hundreds of students have seen their visas revoked, with some saying they were targeted for everything from writing opinion articles to minor arrest records. Farbiarz ruled last week that the government could not detain or deport Khalil based on Rubio's assertions that his presence on US soil poses a national security threat. The government has also alleged as grounds to detain and deport Khalil that there were inaccuracies in his application for permanent residency. Amol Sinha, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, which is among the groups representing Khalil, welcomed the release order. "This is an important step in vindicating Mr Khalil's rights as he continues to be unlawfully targeted by the federal government for his advocacy in support of Palestinian rights," Sinha said. bur-cl/bjt/acb
