Christian teacher 'sacked after pupil pronouns row'
A Christian teacher allegedly sacked after refusing to use male prounouns for an eight-year-old girl has told an employment tribunal she "could not go against her conscience".
The teacher, who cannot be named and is referred to as A, was dismissed for gross misconduct after raising concerns about the safeguarding of the girl who wanted to "socially transition" and use male pronouns.
Supported by advocacy group Christian Concern, A is bringing a case against Nottinghamshire County Council, which runs the school, on the grounds of victimisation for whistleblowing, unfair dismissal and discrimination because of her beliefs.
The tribunal is expected to last until 14 March.
In her witness statement, heard at Nottingham Employment Tribunal Centre, A said she was told by her school in 2021 that a child who had been born female, referred to as Child X, would be joining her class but she should refer to the child with a male name and pronouns at the parent's request, which left her uncomfortable.
A said staff were provided with literature largely informed by campaign group Stonewall that was "trans-affirming", biased and "ideologically informed and promoted gender ideology over scientific fact".
She said she felt affirming the child would cause "irreversible harm" and that it was "coercive and disrespectful" of the school to force her to use male pronouns for the pupil.
After carrying out research over the summer holidays, which included watching YouTube videos of de-transitioners who had regretted their decision, A said she felt she needed to "speak up" about the potential harm the school's approach could cause Child X.
She is said to have raised her concerns with the school's head teacher who told her she had no choice but to use Child X's preferred pronouns because it was the parent's request and that she had to "go along with it".
After telling the head teacher she did have a choice and could not "in good conscience go along with it", Child X was moved to a different class and A was suspended later that month while a disciplinary investigation was carried out for failing to comply with a "reasonable request".
A said she felt the school had ignored her attempts to navigate the situation by using a gender-neutral name for the child and had shown a "draconian" response to her safeguarding concerns.
She was reinstated the next month after agreeing she would not breach confidentiality about the child's birth name or gender by telling anyone else about the issue.
After returning to school, A's concerns about Child X continued and she lodged a safeguarding letter to the school's governing body but she said her concerns were "ignored at every level".
Deciding she could not resolve the issue internally, A said she had "no other option than to consider disclosing information about the child externally" and a report was made to Nottinghamshire County Council, which subsequently concluded it was satisfied the appropriate action had been taken by the school.
After involving lawyers and pursuing legal action, A said the school raised concerns that she had broken confidentiality by sharing information with a third party and was suspended, before she was later dismissed and reported to the Teaching Regulation Agency, the Disclosure and Barring Service and the Information Commissioner's Office.
A said she felt the school had been "encouraging Child X on a path to self-destruction".
She said: "I pursued this course of action because I care enough about children to insist we ask if we are doing harm.
A said she felt she was "cut off from her colleagues" following the suspension and had been "treated like a criminal".
"I miss the children and it is sad to think that they do not even know why I left. I was treated as if I was a danger to them," she said.
The tribunal was told A had accessed information about Child X on CPOMS, an online system used by schools to log and monitor child protection and other pupil welfare issues.
Acting on behalf of the county council, barrister Ed Beever said A had "gone behind the back" of the school's designated safeguarding lead in doing so.
The tribunal was told A had accessed the system several times to view information about Child X, which she said was "professional curiosity" because she had heard the child's behaviour was poor.
"What I found was very sobering, it seemed to line up with what the experts were saying. That I had a point.
"I felt the head and the school did not want me to see anything which would demonstrate that the expert reports they dismissed might be accurate and correct."
The tribunal continues.
Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Nottinghamshire County Council
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Court blocks Louisiana law requiring schools to post Ten Commandments in classrooms
NEW ORLEANS -- A panel of three federal appellate judges has ruled that a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in each of the state's public school classrooms is unconstitutional. The ruling Friday marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the mandate violates the separation of church and state, and that the poster-sized displays would isolate students — especially those who are not Christian. The mandate has been touted by Republicans, including President Donald Trump, and marks one of the latest pushes by conservatives to incorporate religion into classrooms. Backers of the law argue the Ten Commandments belong in classrooms because they are historical and part of the foundation of U.S. law. The plaintiffs' attorneys and Louisiana disagreed on whether the appeals court's decision applied to every public school district in the state or only the districts party to the lawsuit. 'All school districts in the state are bound to comply with the U.S. Constitution,' said Liz Hayes, a spokesperson for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. The appeals court's rulings 'interpret the law for all of Louisiana,' Hayes added. "Thus, all school districts must abide by this decision and should not post the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.' Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said she disagreed and believed the ruling only applied to school districts in the five parishes that were party to the lawsuit and that she would seek to appeal the ruling. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' order stems from a lawsuit filed last year by parents of Louisiana school children from various religious backgrounds, who said the law violates First Amendment language guaranteeing religious liberty and forbidding government establishment of religion. The mandate was signed into law last June by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. The court's ruling backs an order issued last fall by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles, who declared the mandate unconstitutional and ordered state education officials not to take steps to enforce it and to notify all local school boards in the state of his decision. Law experts have long said they expect the Louisiana case to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, testing the conservative court on the issue of religion and government. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says Congress can 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion.' The high court found that the law had no secular purpose but served a plainly religious purpose. In 2005, the Supreme Court held that such displays in a pair of Kentucky courthouses violated the Constitution. At the same time, the court upheld a Ten Commandments marker on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol in Austin.
American Press
2 hours ago
- American Press
Court blocks Louisiana law requiring schools to post Ten Commandments in classrooms
Gov. Jeff Landry on Wednesday signed a bill mandating the displays of the 10 Commandments in all Louisiana public schools. (Crystal Stevenson / American Press) A panel of three federal appellate judges has ruled that a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in each of the state's public school classrooms is unconstitutional. The ruling Friday marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the mandate violates the separation of church and state, and that the poster-sized displays would isolate students — especially those who are not Christian. The mandate has been touted by Republicans, including President Donald Trump, and marks one of the latest pushes by conservatives to incorporate religion into classrooms. Backers of the law argue the Ten Commandments belong in classrooms because they are historical and part of the foundation of U.S. law. The plaintiffs' attorneys and Louisiana disagreed on whether the appeals court's decision applied to every public school district in the state or only the districts party to the lawsuit. 'All school districts in the state are bound to comply with the U.S. Constitution,' said Liz Hayes, a spokesperson for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. The appeals court's rulings 'interpret the law for all of Louisiana,' Hayes added. 'Thus, all school districts must abide by this decision and should not post the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.' Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said she disagreed and believed the ruling only applied to school districts in the five parishes that were party to the lawsuit and that she would seek to appeal the ruling. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' order stems from a lawsuit filed last year by parents of Louisiana school children from various religious backgrounds, who said the law violates First Amendment language guaranteeing religious liberty and forbidding government establishment of religion. The mandate was signed into law last June by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. The court's ruling backs an order issued last fall by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles, who declared the mandate unconstitutional and ordered state education officials not to take steps to enforce it and to notify all local school boards in the state of his decision. Law experts have long said they expect the Louisiana case to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, testing the conservative court on the issue of religion and government. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says Congress can 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion.' The high court found that the law had no secular purpose but served a plainly religious purpose. In 2005, the Supreme Court held that such displays in a pair of Kentucky courthouses violated the Constitution. At the same time, the court upheld a Ten Commandments marker on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol in Austin.
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Court blocks Louisiana law requiring schools to post Ten Commandments in classrooms
NEW ORLEANS — A panel of three federal appellate judges has ruled that a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in each of the state's public school classrooms is unconstitutional. The ruling Friday marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the mandate violates the separation of church and state, and that the poster-sized displays would isolate students — especially those who are not Christian. The mandate has been touted by Republicans, including President Trump, and marks one of the latest pushes by conservatives to incorporate religion into classrooms. Backers of the law argue the Ten Commandments belong in classrooms because they are historical and part of the foundation of U.S. law. The plaintiffs' attorneys and Louisiana disagreed on whether the appeals court's decision applied to every public school district in the state or only the districts party to the lawsuit. 'All school districts in the state are bound to comply with the U.S. Constitution,' said Liz Hayes, a spokesperson for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. The appeals court's rulings 'interpret the law for all of Louisiana,' Hayes added. 'Thus, all school districts must abide by this decision and should not post the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.' Louisiana Atty. Gen. Liz Murrill said she disagreed and believed the ruling applied only to school districts in the five parishes that were party to the lawsuit and that she would seek to appeal the ruling. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' order stems from a lawsuit filed last year by parents of Louisiana schoolchildren from various religious backgrounds, who said the law violates 1st Amendment language guaranteeing religious liberty and forbidding government establishment of religion. The mandate was signed into law last June by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. The court's ruling backs an order issued last fall by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles, who declared the mandate unconstitutional and ordered state education officials not to take steps to enforce it and to notify all local school boards in the state of his decision. Law experts have long said they expect the Louisiana case to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, testing the conservative court on the issue of religion and government. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says Congress can 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion.' The high court found that the law had no secular purpose but served a plainly religious purpose. In 2005, the Supreme Court held that such displays in a pair of Kentucky courthouses violated the Constitution. At the same time, the court upheld a Ten Commandments marker on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol in Austin. Cline and Brook write for the Associated Press.
