Opinion: Why SCOTUS' Monstrous Egos are Handing Trump Undeserved Wins
The U.S. Supreme Court has continued its expansion of President Trump's powers and the use of its emergency docket in its recent ruling allowing him to fire members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)—an action that up until now was prohibited by precedent dating back 90 years.
The Humphrey's Executor case is a foundational building block for the principle that the President isn't a ruler but rather heads one branch of a government—and in a system where any head of the executive branch is restricted from simply remaking the other branches to fit their own agenda, or chopping them off entirely.
William Humphrey was a Federal Trade Commission member appointed by President Coolidge and then reappointed by President Hoover pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Act which allowed his removal from that position only for 'inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance.' Despite this, F.D.R., three months into office and desiring commissioners more sympathetic to his New Deal, asked Humphrey to resign. Humphrey refused to do so and F.D.R. fired him.
Five months later, Humphrey died, but his executor litigated the case all the way to the Supreme Court seeking Humphrey's backpay. The high court ruled unanimously in favor of Humphrey, finding that F.D.R. had exceeded his Constitutional authority.
Like the 1935 Supreme Court, two different federal trial courts found it quite plain that President Trump lacked the power to remove Gwynne Wilcox from the NLRB and Cathy Harris from the MSPB. Both ordered Trump to keep the officials in their respective jobs. But in a 6-3 decision, the current Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration. Troublingly, the Court did so despite recognizing 'the relevant statutes prohibit the president from removing these officers without cause' and that 'no qualifying cause was given.'
Even more troubling is the fact that the case was resolved through the emergency docket process, by which full arguments and briefings are skipped and 'orders' rather than opinions are issued under the idea that the expedited process is necessitated by emergency.
This decision continues the alarming trend from the conservative majority—respecting precedent only when it suits their ideology. Enhancing the power of the President under a unitary executive theory has been a long-game effort by legal conservatives, but the combination of that transactional judicial analysis with overuse of the emergency docket may not only put stare decisis on a path towards its deathbed but also the effectiveness the high court.
The unprecedented increase in the use of the emergency docket similarly undermines the lower courts and the processes in place to check excesses by the executive branch. It also makes one question who is really making the call as to what cases merit emergency attention. As The Hill put it: 'Forget 911. When the Trump administration has an emergency, it just calls nine—justices, that is.' This willingness to take on all cases immediately may reflect a conceit that the justices (at least the conservative ones) increasingly don't hide: That the high court's ability to act fast negates the need for lower courts to issue nation-wide injunctions. This approach, if fully implemented, would make the Supreme Court not the court of last resort but the only court.
In theory, the court's taking on these cases could be seen as perhaps a willingness to take on the task of reining in Trump's excesses. But thus far they seem avoidant of direct confrontation. The instructions to the Department of Justice in the illegal deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a brutal Venezuelan prison were not a forceful 'bring him back' but rather a wishy-washy directive to 'facilitate' his return.
Fear of an outright refusal by Trump to obey rulings might motivate the court's hesitancy; they may calculate that piecemeal capitulations will postpone confrontation thus protecting their authority. But robust rulings set by lower courts cases allow the high court to use judicial restraint in its decisions. Without it, restraint becomes avoidant behavior that undermines the court's effectiveness while emboldening the Trump administration's overreach.
Perhaps blinded by their own egos and sense of self-importance, the Roberts-led conservative majority seems to relish the conceit that only they have the legal chops to manage legal cases in the Trump era. But such hubris actually undercuts the judiciary's effectiveness and, up against a figure like Trump who will seek to convert every inch given him into a mile, it may be undercut to the point of irrelevance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Montreal's Canada Day parade cancelled for a second year in a row, organizer says
MONTREAL — For the second year in a row, organizers of Montreal's Canada Day parade say it won't go ahead. In a news release issued this week, chief organizer Nicolas Cowen says the reason for this year's cancellation includes potential municipal worker job action, difficult relations with city departments and planning problems. It's the second consecutive year Montreal won't have a parade — an event that began in 1977. In 2024, Cowen blamed red tape and politics for the cancellation. A City of Montreal spokeswoman disputes the assertions, saying the organizer failed to submit a project proposal for the parade. Other activities will go ahead in the city, including an annual event at Montreal's Old Port. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 21, 2025. The Canadian Press
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Admin Is Policing Foreign Students' Social Media for ‘Political Activism'
Donald Trump's State Department ended a three-week pause on student visa processing, but people applying for those visas now could be rejected if they do not make their social media profiles public. Immigration officials are vetting students for their political stances, particularly any pro-Palestine activism. 'A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,' the State Department said in a statement on Saturday. The State Department said it is screening applicants for those who 'pose a threat to U.S. national security.' A cable was circulated about the news on Wednesday, the Free Press reported. 'Under new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications,' the State Department said in its Saturday statement. 'To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas will be instructed to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to 'public.'' All three visas are related to studying in the U.S. Wednesday's cable, sent by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, emphasized that the agency would be scanning for political activists. 'Applicants who demonstrate a history of political activism,' he wrote, 'especially when it is associated with violence… you must consider the likelihood they would continue such activity in the United States.' 'During an online presence search, you might discover on social media that an applicant endorsed Hamas or its activities,' Rubio wrote, which could be grounds for rejection. Rubio also said that private social media posts could be interpreted as an effort to 'hide certain activity.' In March, Rubio said that he had canceled more than 300 visas over pro-Palestine activism. Colleges and universities have been a point of focus for the Trump administration as it seeks to crack down on immigrants and protests. On Friday, Columbia University pro-Palestine student activist Mahmoud Khalil was released from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center after spending three months there, missing the birth of his child. To justify revoking Khalil's visa and seeking his deportation, Rubio declared that his continued presence in America 'would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.' Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk was detained by ICE for six weeks. She alleges that the detention was due to a pro-Palestine op-ed she wrote. Also on Friday, a federal judge blocked the Trump administration from preventing Harvard from admitting international students. Universities have warned international students to avoid traveling abroad over the summer in case they have their visas revoked or are not allowed back into the U.S. for another reason. 'The enhanced social media vetting will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country,' a senior State Department official told The Wall Street Journal. 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision,' the State Department said. 'The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests, and that all applicants credibly establish their eligibility for the visa sought, including that they intend to engage in activities consistent with the terms for their admission.' Yale's Office of International Students and Scholars instructed students to follow the guidance and assess their digital footprints and speak with an attorney if they have concerns. 'You should evaluate your risk regarding your social media presence and digital footprint to determine what, if any, action you should take before applying for a visa,' said Ozan Say, the office's director, The Yale Daily News reported. More from Rolling Stone Nuclear Fears Become a Call for Regime Change in Iran Judge Orders Trump to Release Mahmoud Khalil Treasured Public Lands on the Auction Block in Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Iranian military fighter jets hit by Israeli forces: video
All times eastern The Journal Editorial Report Fox Report with Jon Scott Fox Report with Jon Scott FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Failed senate candidate Beto O'Rourke joins Senator Bernie Sanders on the 'Fighting Oligarchy' Tour
