Texas HBCU Legislative Caucus, Huston-Tillotson students plea for more college funding
On the floor of the Texas House on Thursday, a state representative from the Houston area asked his fellow lawmakers to "meaningfully invest" in historically Black colleges and universities. It was the first time such a resolution had been introduced and passed in the House, he believes.
Lawmakers and students want that to change.
In its first full legislative session, the HBCU Legislative Caucus, chaired by Rep. Ron Reynolds, D-Missouri City, is working to secure more funding and recognition for Texas' nine historically Black colleges and universities at a time when diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives have drawn the ire of Republican lawmakers at the national and state levels.
On Friday, dozens of students from Huston-Tillotson University in East Austin walked to the Capitol in a peaceful march recalling activism from the civil rights movement. The event was part of the fourth annual Texas HBCU Democracy Schools Conference, which brought students from seven Texas HBCUs together for events and discussions on civic engagement and democracy Friday and Saturday.
"It was the students, really, who approached me (and) saw the need" for a caucus, Reynolds said in an interview. "We see it heightened nationally, but these students were seeing it since last session."
The Trump administration has promised to rid the country of DEI practices, and Texas in 2023 barred DEI offices in institutions of higher education in a move that Republican lawmakers said restored the system to a merit-based approach. Students, however, say those legislative actions make them feel unwelcome.
The political climate has appeared to make HBCUs more popular for Black students seeking belonging.
The HBCU Caucus is advocating to pass House Bill 3296, a proposal that would create a grant program to fund all HBCUs that participate in a new higher education consortium to offer free civic education to students and community members. Reynolds, who authored the bill, said this would help rectify historic disparities in how HBCUs are funded compared with primarily white institutions.
HB 3296 would also help create more informed citizens and voters, said Austin City Council Member Natasha Harper-Madison, who represents the city's east side.
"People always say, 'Young people, you have to vote, you have to get involved, you have to participate.' They don't teach you how," Harper-Madison told the American-Statesman in an interview. When people are informed and get involved, "they have ownership, they are a stakeholder in democracy, and that's what we have to reclaim. And we do that by way of giving everybody equal access to all the information."
Both the HBCU Caucus and the democracy conference give students a voice, they said.
As Republican lawmakers seek to offer K-12 students public money to pay for their private schooling — a "school choice" priority for Gov. Greg Abbott — Mason Thompson, a Huston-Tillotson student ambassador for the HBCU Caucus who is also a staffer for Rep. Aicha Davis, D-Dallas, wants the state to fund private HBCUs.
"There's a historic reason why we're private," he said. When Huston-Tillotson was founded 150 years ago, for instance, Black students were not allowed to enroll at primarily white institutions, he said. Today, HBCUs contribute $1.6 billion to the Texas economy, Thompson said, but Huston-Tillotson relies on tuition, fees and donations for its income.
The HBCU Caucus is a "communications bridge between the legislative session" and campus, Thompson said, through which they can share their ideas and experiences with lawmakers. With the democracy conference, the students gain experience and support on how to make political change, he said.
Through the HBCU Caucus, Reynolds said, students gain access to internships and experience in the Capitol, and he hopes to expand it.
Freeman Crawford, the student director for the HBCU Caucus who also is a staffer for Reynolds, said funding from the Legislature, such as through HB 3296, could help Huston-Tillotson update its dormitories and strengthen weak campus internet connection.
"We wanted everybody that has an HBCU in their district to support this conference because we have problems at our schools. The power of us going to our rep to (say,) 'We are a constituent of your district, and we are struggling. How can we get more money? How can we do this?' This caucus is important because we go hand in hand," Crawford said.
Crawford, who also served on the planning committee for the conference, said bringing HBCUs together can show their collective strength and power, and it serves as a way to demystify assumptions about the colleges. Huston-Tillotson is growing its international student population and is very diverse, he said. It also strives to have a large community impact, such as with its first HBCU artificial intelligence conference last week.
Reynolds said the HBCU Caucus plans to talk about the importance of investing in HBCUs on the House floor when the chamber votes on the budget. The caucus' other goals are to have equitable funding for HBCUs; expand student support and mental health; enhance research; and promote civic engagement.
Niela Williams, a graduating senior at Huston-Tillotson who attended the conference, said she is passionate about health care access and safety, as well as women's rights.
"HBCUs don't get a lot of recognition," Williams said. "We made these schools to be safe because we didn't have education."
Even today, Huston-Tillotson feels like "home more than a campus," she said.
"You build a family," Williams said. "These connections last forever."
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: HBCU students march to Capitol, speak in caucus, advocate for support
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
NYC business leaders are terrified of what socialist Zohran Mamdani may do as mayor
Friends of mine, prominent players in the New York City business community, tell me they are horrified that a certified socialist, Zohran Mamdani, might become our next mayor. Their next step is Florida, or somewhere, anywhere out of his grasp if Mamdani does become mayor as the polls suggest could happen — even with the more moderate, albeit flawed, Andrew Cuomo, the former governor, seemingly in the lead for the Democratic nomination. In this one-party town, that usually means a ticket into Gracie Mansion. 'We need Cuomo to win or we're doomed,' is how one brand-named, uber-rich New Yorker put it over dinner the other night at Elio's, the Upper East Side restaurant frequented by New York's top business leaders. Advertisement Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani campaigning in East Harlem on June 18, 2025. Robert Miller Yes, 'Mayor Mamdani' is a scary thought. He sees anyone with a heartbeat and a job as part of the problem, an oppressor class that needs to be exploited to pay for an ever larger welfare state. His positions on Israel are so noxious, they don't bear repeating. Advertisement But his type has been here before — and for a long time, which is why crying over Mamdani is, as they say, a bit rich when it comes from the rich. New York City and state have been experiencing massive outmigrations of people and business for years because the Big Apple and the Empire State have been run largely by the radical left for the better part of two decades. Our tax base is being decimated by crime and the cost of living. Banks are moving more of their operations to lower-taxed Texas and Florida. Real estate is sinking. All of this has picked up steam in recent years, but it's hardly a new phenomenon and you can blame the now-sweating fat-cat class for allowing it to happen. Their money could have informed the public of the city and state's death spiral and backed sensible mayoral candidates, people like John Catsimatidis, an entrepreneur and true New Yorker. Advertisement The current Republican candidate and Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa is smart enough to appoint people who successfully ran the city under Rudy Giuliani and Mike Bloomberg. Sliwa also ran four years ago, and would have been a far better choice than the ethically challenged Eric Adams. Speaking up too late Instead, the city's business class sat idly by. They acquiesced as a defund-the-police prosecutor, the hapless Alvin Bragg, became Manhattan DA. Only after a violent-crime spree against their own employees perpetrated by criminals allowed to roam the streets because of Bragg's policies did they say a word. Where were they during Comrade Bill de Blasio's reign of terror and error? Recall in 2021, Adams ran as mayor promising to address the crime wave and with business support. But only after crime coverage by this newspaper did he step up policing by appointing the highly competent Jessica Tisch as police commissioner. Advertisement Likewise, where's the outrage over the emergence of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the fatuous Bronx and Queens congresswoman? She comes from similar lineage as Mamdani — leftist education, devoid of private sector experience, dimwitted when answering tough policy questions, though good at social media — the main qualifications for the leadership in New York's Democratic Party, and increasingly the national party as well. Which brings us to the business community's preferred choice, Cuomo. They see him as a smart, moderating influence on the left. Most are unimpressed by the reasons he was forced out as governor, as they should be. The sexual-impropriety case mounted by state AG Tish James was at best a political hit job from someone who wanted his job and searched for stuff that couldn't stand legal scrutiny. You can criticize him for locking down the city during COVID, but those were perilous times, and confusion from DC on how to react didn't help. Count me as highly skeptical that he was solely responsible for those nursing home deaths since hospitals were calling on the state to return the elderly once they appeared to clear the virus to make room for others as the pandemic spread. My problem with Cuomo is doubts over whether he will stand up to the progressives who are destroying New York City and the state in general. His instincts are moderate — maybe even a bit conservative given the leftism that permeates the Democratic Party. I've sat down with him, and he talks a good game about preserving the business class in the city, how they produce jobs and will produce them elsewhere if he taxes them out of the state. Advertisement He understands the need for public safety, how the economy is inextricably tied to people feeling safe, which makes him an anomaly in New York's Dem Party. Housing values increase when you're not worried about them getting robbed. If people can't take the subway to work, they can now work from home, depriving small businesses of that end of the wealth effect. And yet, in his later years as governor, he gave in far too much to the lefty loons. New York state should be a fracking capital given shale supplies upstate. Cuomo blocked that. His bail reform law has been a disaster. Taxes were too high when he was governor, as they are now. He made the incompetent Kathy Hochul his No. 2 and now we're stuck with her running the state in his absence. That said, Cuomo's first term was decidedly centrist on taxes and a lot more. His dad, Mario Cuomo, a three-term governor, was among the greatest politicians of our time, so Andrew learned from the best. Will Cuomo 2.0 beat back the misguided support for Mamdani? The business class — and the future of this great city — are depending on it.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
With US airstrikes, Trump aims to deliver a decisive blow to a weakened Iran
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump with his decision to order U.S. military strikes on Iran's nuclear facility is gambling that direct U.S. involvement can deliver a decisive blow to a weakened Tehran while managing to avoid bringing the U.S. into an expansive regional conflict. Trump announced the strikes on three Iranian enrichment facilities — Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan — and said that a 'full payload of BOMBS was dropped' on Fordo. 'All planes are safely on their way home,' Trump added in his post. 'Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' It remained to be seen whether the attacks mark the totality of direct American involvement in strikes against Iran or the opening salvo of a larger campaign. The decision to directly involve the U.S. comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defenses and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. The strikes are a perilous decision for the U.S., as Iran has pledged to retaliate if it joined the Israeli assault. The stakes are also high for Trump personally — he won the White House on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. U.S. and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and the U.S. 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear program buried deep underground, including at Fordo. It was not immediately clear if the U.S. bombers did in fact drop the bunker busters on the Iranian facilities. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned the United States in advance that strikes targeting the Islamic Republic would 'result in irreparable damage for them.' And Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei declared 'any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region.' The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the damage inflicted by the bombings. Trump has vowed that he would not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped that the threat of force would motivate the country's leaders to give up their nuclear program peacefully. But Trump appears to have made the calculation — at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republican lawmakers — that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear program, perhaps permanently. The Israelis have said their offensive has already crippled Iran's air defenses, allowing them to already significantly degrade multiple Iranian nuclear sites. But to destroy the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, Israel had appealed to Trump for the U.S. bunker-busting bombs, the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which uses its immense weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets and then explode. The penetrator is currently only delivered by the B-2 stealth bomber, which is only found in the American arsenal. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, and is believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. Trump's decision for direct U.S. military intervention comes after his administration made an unsuccessful two-month push — including with high-level, direct negotiations with the Iranians — aimed at persuading Tehran to curb its nuclear program. For months, Trump said he was dedicated to a diplomatic push to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions. And he twice — in April and again in late May — persuaded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on military action against Iran and give diplomacy more time. The U.S. in recent days has been shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the Middle East to protect Israel and U.S. bases from Iranian attacks. All the while, Trump has gone from publicly expressing hope that the moment could be a 'second chance' for Iran to make a deal to delivering explicit threats on Khamenei and making calls for Tehran's unconditional surrender. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Trump said in a social media posting. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' The military showdown with Iran comes seven years after Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The 2015 deal, signed by Iran, U.S. and other world powers, created a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Trump decried the Obama-era deal for giving Iran too much in return for too little, because the agreement did not cover Iran's non-nuclear malign behavior. Trump has bristled at criticism from some of his MAGA faithful, including conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, who have suggested that further U.S. involvement would be a betrayal to supporters who were drawn to his promise to end U.S. involvement in expensive and endless wars. Vice President JD Vance in a lengthy posting on X earlier this week defended his boss, while acknowledging that 'people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.' 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' Vance wrote. He added, 'I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals.' ___ Madhani reported from Morristown, N.J.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Republicans line up behind Trump after strike on Iran — with few detractors
Republicans on Capitol Hill quickly lined up behind President Trump after he announced that the U.S. conducted a strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities, a strong show of support for the White House with few detractors inside the GOP. Trump announced on Truth Social just before 8 p.m. EDT on Saturday that the U.S. 'completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran,' including Fordow, the nuclear site hidden in a mountain south of Tehran. He is scheduled to address the nation from the White House at 10 p.m. Republican leaders in the House and Senate backed the action, which had become a debate of sorts in Washington — especially among GOP — since Israel struck Iranian nuclear facilities earlier this month in what it called a 'pre-emptive' attack. 'The military operations in Iran should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) wrote in a statement on X. 'The President gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement. President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated. That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision, and clarity.' 'The President's decisive action prevents the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants 'Death to America,' from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet,' he added. 'This is America First policy in action. God bless our brave men and women in uniform – the most lethal fighting force on the planet – as we pray for their safe return home. May God bless America.' Johnson was briefed on the strike beforehand, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) wrote in a statement with X: 'I stand with President Trump.' 'The regime in Iran, which has committed itself to bringing 'death to America' and wiping Israel off the map, has rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace. The mullahs' misguided pursuit of nuclear weapons must be stopped,' he said. 'As we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), similarly, backed Trump after the strike and applauded him for making the 'right call.' 'Iran has waged a war of terror against the United States for 46 years. We could never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. God bless our brave troops. President Trump made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans,' Cotton wrote on X. 'As I have said multiple times recently, I regret that Iran has brought the world to this point,' Crawford echoed in a statement. 'That said, I am thankful President Trump understood that the red line — articulated by President of both parties for decades — was real. The United States and our allies, including Israel, are making it clear that the world would never accept Iran's development of a nuclear weapon.' While the majority of Republicans backed Trump in the wake of the strike, there were some GOP detractors on Capitol Hill. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been advocating for the U.S. to avoid intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, wrote on X minutes after Trump announced the offensive: 'This is not Constitutional.' Massie helped lead a bipartisan war powers resolution to prohibit U.S. involvement in the Middle East dispute. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) suggested that the move was unconstitutional. 'While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional. I look forward to his remarks tonight,' he wrote on X. Trump's decision to strike a trio of Iranian nuclear sites came after a week of debate on Capitol Hill over whether the U.S. should take action in Iran after Israel launched an attack on Iran, prompting a back-and-forth between the two countries. Trump on Thursday said he would decide whether to take action within the next two weeks. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiation that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go in the next two weeks,' Trump said in the statement read by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. The big question had been whether the U.S. would deploy a large bomb known as a 'bunker buster' to strike the Fordow facility, which is underground. While some lawmakers advocated for the move, others — including some of the president's most vocal supporters on the right-flank — pushed against the U.S. directly getting involved in the conflict. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), for example, said 'Me and my district support President Trump and his MAGA agenda, it's what we voted for in November, and foreign wars weren't a part of it.' On Saturday night, she offered prayers for the safety of U.S. troops and Americans in the Middle East. 'Let us pray that we are not attacked by terrorists on our homeland after our border was open for the past 4 years and over 2 Million gotaways came in.🙏 Let us pray for peace. 🙏,' she added. But across the GOP conferences on Capitol Hill, Republicans were quick to back the move by the president. 'Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate —and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime,' Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) wrote in a statement on X. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east. Well-done to our military personnel. You're the best!' House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), the No. 3 House Republican, said Trump 'was right then, and he is right today: NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE.' 'A nuclear Iran posed a threat to the Middle East and to the world. @POTUS has been consistent that this dangerous regime should NEVER possess a nuclear weapon,' he added in a statement on X.
