logo
Supreme Court upholds child sex change ban in Tennessee

Supreme Court upholds child sex change ban in Tennessee

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Tennessee law on Wednesday that bans sex changes for minors in the state, ruling that the prohibition on 'certain medical treatments for transgender minors' is not discrimination under the Fourteenth Amendment.
In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court said, 'Tennessee's law prohibiting certain medical treatments for transgender minors is not subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and satisfies rational basis review.'
According to Fox News, the case, 'United States v. Skrmetti,' was originally brought against Tennessee's Senate Bill 1, which bans 'all medical treatments intended to allow 'a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex' or to treat 'purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor's sex and asserted identity.''
Tennessee's Senate Bill 1 prevents healthcare providers from performing sex change procedures for minors with gender dysphoria and from using hormone and puberty blocker treatments to allow minors to transition to a different sex.
READ MORE: Supreme Court allows AR-15, high-capacity magazine bans to continue
In the Supreme Court's majority opinion on Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, 'This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field. The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound.'
'The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements. Nor does it afford us license to decide them as we see best,' Roberts added. 'Our role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' of the law before us, Beach Communications, 508 U. S., at 313, but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment. Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.'
Following the Supreme Court's ruling on Wednesday, conservative political commentator Matt Walsh released a statement saying that he was 'grateful' to be a part of a 'truly historic victory' after years of fighting against child sex change procedures.
'Three years ago, we launched our investigation into Vanderbilt's child mutilation practices. We rallied in the state capital. Our lawmakers responded with a law banning child mutilation in the state,' Walsh tweeted. 'Today the Supreme Court upheld our law, which means child mutilation can be banned anywhere and everywhere in the country. And should be.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Today in History: June 20, Muhammad Ali convicted of draft evasion
Today in History: June 20, Muhammad Ali convicted of draft evasion

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Today in History: June 20, Muhammad Ali convicted of draft evasion

In 1837, Queen Victoria acceded to the British throne following the death of her uncle, King William IV. In 1893, a jury in New Bedford, Mass., found Lizzie Borden not guilty of the ax murders of her father and stepmother. In 1943, race-related rioting erupted in Detroit, Mich. Federal troops were sent in by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to quell the violence that resulted in more than 30 deaths. Advertisement In 1947, gangster Benjamin 'Bugsy' Siegel was shot dead at the Beverly Hills, Calif., home of his girlfriend, Virginia Hill, likely at the order of mob associates. In 1967, boxer Muhammad Ali was convicted in Houston, Texas, of violating Selective Service laws by refusing to be drafted and was sentenced to five years in prison. (Ali's conviction would ultimately be overturned by the US Supreme Court). In 1972, three days after the arrest of the Watergate burglars, President Richard Nixon met at the White House with his chief of staff, H.R. Haldeman; the secretly made tape recording of this meeting ended up with a notorious 18 1/2-minute gap. Advertisement In 2002, in the case Atkins v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that executing people with intellectual disabilities qualified as cruel and unusual punishment and was therefore in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Young woman who regrets gender transition celebrates Supreme Court decision on youth trans treatments
Young woman who regrets gender transition celebrates Supreme Court decision on youth trans treatments

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Young woman who regrets gender transition celebrates Supreme Court decision on youth trans treatments

A young woman who regrets trying to change her gender as a troubled teenager celebrated Wednesday's landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding a Tennessee law banning transgender medical treatments for minors. "I'm really grateful," Independent Women's Ambassador Prisha Mosley told Fox News Digital. Mosley, 27, is part of the growing community of young people who are speaking out about their regrets after undergoing medical treatments to treat their gender dysphoria. After being prescribed puberty blockers and testosterone as a teen and having a double mastectomy, Mosley feels medical professionals preyed on her vulnerability and treated her as an "experiment." As an ambassador for the conservative group Independent Women, she's provided testimony advocating for states, including Tennessee, to enact legislation to stop medical providers from assisting in the gender transition of children. Scotus Rules On State Ban On Gender Transition 'Treatments' For Minors In Landmark Case Mosley told Fox News Digital she wasn't that surprised by the ruling, as she considered the plaintiffs' case weak. Read On The Fox News App "The arguments were not good on the side of this type of harm for minors," she recalled. "And their representation from the ACLU had to admit under oath that 'gender-affirming care' does not even reduce the suicide rate for anyone." Mosley has taken legal action against the medical professionals she says pushed her into gender transition as a teen when she struggled with mental illnesses, including anorexia, OCD, suicidal thoughts and trauma from being raped. She was about 16 years old when she started socially transitioning after being convinced by transgender activists online that she was unhappy because her "body was fighting to be a boy." At 17, medical professionals affirmed this belief and quickly put her on puberty blockers and testosterone. The Supreme Court Did The Right Thing. I Know Because I Was Part Of A Horrifying Gender Transition. She later underwent a double mastectomy and now faces chronic pain and major health problems due to these treatments. She's spent the last several years warning others of the dangers and devastating consequences that can result from hormones and sex reassignment surgeries. "They're completely irreversible. It's impossible to actually have a sex change which children are duped into believing they're having by activists, doctors who are lying. And they lie to you along the entire way with euphemisms and a refusal to use actual medical terminology, but a sex exchange never takes place. All you transition into is a less healthy version of yourself with the same problems that brought you to reject your sex," Mosley told Fox News Digital. She dismissed headlines from some media outlets Wednesday decrying the ruling as a "setback" or "new attack" on transgender rights. Detransitioner Slams Trans 'Psuedoscience' That Doctors Said Would Solve Her Mental Distress: 'It's Quackery' "It's insincere," she reacted to the media coverage. "This ruling is good for people, for children who identify as trans too." She argued the law would protect children who've been caught up in a "social contagion" from being pressured into medical treatments that could leave irreparable changes to their bodies. "And in states that have banned this type of care, they're going to be lawfully protected from doctors who would take advantage of them in their vulnerable state while they have strange beliefs and take away their health and their body parts. And it's now lawful to ban doctors from doing that," she continued. At issue in the case, United States v. Skrmetti, was whether Tennessee's Senate Bill 1 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. That law prohibits states from allowing medical providers to deliver puberty blockers and hormones to facilitate a minor's transition to another sex. It also targets healthcare providers in the state who continue to provide such procedures to gender-dysphoric minors— opening these providers up to fines, lawsuits and other liability. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) asked the Supreme Court to hear the case on behalf of the parents of three transgender adolescents and a Memphis-based doctor who treats transgender patients. The court upheld the Tennessee law in a 6-3 ruling. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said, "The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements. Nor does it afford us license to decide them as we see best. Our role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' of the law before us… but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment. Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process." Fox News' Breanne Deppisch and Bill Mears contributed to this article source: Young woman who regrets gender transition celebrates Supreme Court decision on youth trans treatments

Did Iran Try to Kill Trump? What to Know
Did Iran Try to Kill Trump? What to Know

Time​ Magazine

time3 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Did Iran Try to Kill Trump? What to Know

One thing is clear: Israel openly wants to kill Iran's Supreme Leader. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ' can no longer be allowed to exist,' Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Thursday, just days after U.S. President Donald Trump publicly announced that the U.S. knows Khamenei's location but is holding off on killing him ' for now.' Another isn't so much, depending on who you ask. 'I've never heard that before,' former Fox News host Tucker Carlson responded quizzically after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) asserted that Iran has tried—and is trying—to kill Trump. 'We should attack Iran immediately if that's true,' Carlson, one of the flagbearers of the anti-war wing within the factious MAGA right, facetiously continued. Cruz argued that he doesn't think the U.S. military attacking Iran or killing Khamenei would necessarily be the most appropriate response to the threat against the U.S. President, but he insisted that 'nobody disputes' Iran is indeed trying to assassinate Trump. 'It's an objective fact,' Cruz posted on X after the interview. A U.S. attack on Iran, including potentially targeting Khamenei, may yet be in the cards, despite Trump's political campaigns against military interventions aimed at ' regime change.' But it's unlikely to be in retaliation to an Iranian assassination plot—unless such a plot is successful. Earlier this year, Trump said he had ordered the annihilation of the state of Iran if it assassinates him. 'That would be a terrible thing for them to do,' he told reporters in February. 'Not because of me. If they did that, they would be obliterated. That would be the end. I've left instructions: if they do it, they get obliterated. There won't be anything left.' Iran is known to conduct assassination plots overseas, usually targeting Iranian dissidents and not always successful. Iranian officials have also been vowing to kill Trump for years after he ordered the assassination of Gen. Qasem Soleimani, who led the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' Quds Force, in January 2020. Still, as the U.S. has even charged would-be assassins, Iran has denied ever targeting Trump. Politico reported last July that the U.S. intelligence community had collected increasing evidence suggesting Iran was actively working on plots to kill Trump. Neither of the attempts that summer on Trump's life in Butler, Pa., or West Palm Beach, Fla., have been linked to Iran, though the shooter in the latter expressed support for Iran in public writings. But around the same time, a 46-year-old Pakistani national named Asif Merchant was arrested in Texas and charged with seeking to kill high-ranking U.S. politicians or officials—potentially including Trump—allegedly under the instructions of Iran. 'We have not received any reports on this matter from the U.S. Government,' a spokesperson for Iran's United Nations Mission told CNN at the time. 'However, it is evident that the modus operandi in question contradicts the Iranian Government's policy of legally prosecuting the murderer of General Soleimani.' In September, Trump's campaign said he had been briefed on 'real and specific threats from Iran to assassinate him.' 'Big threats on my life by Iran,' Trump posted on social media. 'The entire U.S. Military is watching and waiting. Moves were already made by Iran that didn't work out, but they will try again.' The Biden Administration sent a warning through Switzerland in September that an assassination attempt against Trump would be seen as an act of war, to which Iran responded in October—again via Swiss diplomats—that it would not try to kill Trump, U.S. officials told the Wall Street Journal. In November 2024, after Trump was elected, the Justice Department announced charges against a 51-year-old Afghan national named Farhad Shakeri, who was allegedly tasked by Iranian officials to assemble a plan to surveil and assassinate Trump. 'A new scenario is fabricated,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X. 'The American people have made their decision. And Iran respects their right to elect the President of their choice. The path forward is also a choice. It begins with respect.' Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei claimed the allegations were part of a 'repulsive' plot by Israel to sabotage U.S.-Iran relations. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told NBC in January that Iran 'never attempted' to kill Trump, 'and we never will.' 'This is another one of those schemes that Israel and other countries are designing to promote Iranophobia,' Pezeshkian said. 'Iran has never attempted to nor does it plan to assassinate anyone. At least as far as I know.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who derailed U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations by launching strikes last week against Iran and is reportedly trying to sway Trump to authorize more direct U.S. military involvement in the conflict, claimed in a Fox News interview on Sunday that Iran actively worked to assassinate Trump because he's 'forceful' and 'decisive.' 'They want to kill him,' Netanyahu insisted. 'He's enemy number one.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store