Damning IAEA Report Has Given Israel Additional Pretext To Strike Iran
The International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) findings on Thursday that Iran has tried to hide its nuclear ambitions and Tehran's vow to build new uranium enrichment facilities as a result have given Israel additional pretext for an attack against its longtime nemesis. Meanwhile, a senior Israeli Defense Forces source told us that there 'are credible indications that Israeli operational preparations for a strike on Iran have been completed.' At the same time, what could be last-ditch negotiations between the U.S. and Iran are planned for this weekend, and it's clear that maximum pressure is being put on Iran in hopes of a breakthrough. You can catch up with our previous coverage of this situation here.
Iran immediately pushed back on the decision by the IAEA board of governors' demand that it provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites.
The head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) 'Mohammad Eslami has issued orders to establish a new enrichment center in a secure location,' the official Iranian Fars news outlet reported on Thursday. 'Advanced IR-6 centrifuges will replace the older first-generation centrifuges at the Shahid Dr. Alimohammadi (Fordow) site…Further measures are being planned and will be announced in due course, according to the atomic agency and the foreign ministry.'
Iran strongly condemns anti-Iran resolution at @iaeaorghttps://t.co/xC4amNo01k pic.twitter.com/IqhnPIVfcI
— IRNA News Agency (@IrnaEnglish) June 12, 2025
Iran's announcement about the enrichment sites comes as the Trump administration is working to freeze Iran's nuclear capabilities, and indications are increasing that Israel will attempt to strike at the heart of the country's nuclear program. U.S. President Donald Trump said he has vowed that Iran will not, under any circumstances, obtain nuclear weapons. However, he is also trying to keep Israel from an attack that will likely dive the Middle East into unprecedented turmoil and could have wide-ranging global effects on energy prices.
The United States has roughly four optional tiers of involvement if Israel were to execute strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, and possibly additional target sets, such as on its military capabilities and long-range weapons development and production capacity. The first would be to do nothing and let Israel go it totally alone. The second is to provide defensive capabilities only. This includes shooting down incoming missiles and drones headed for Israel, as well as supplying it with related intelligence. The third would be to provide limited support directly to Israel's military campaign. This would likely include aerial refueling — a critical capability of which Israel has a very limited capacity to sustain such an operation — as well as reconnaissance and other targeted intelligence products. Search and rescue outside of Iran could also be a capability provided. Finally, the fourth option would be to participate in the kinetic operation itself, leveraging many capabilities Israel does not possess that could prove highly valuable in significantly degrading Iran's nuclear program.
'I have provided the Secretary of Defense [Pete Hegseth] and the president a wide range of options,' U.S. Central Command Michael 'Erik' Kurilla testified before Congress on Wednesday.
The U.S. would likely provide 'aerial refueling or intelligence sharing' as well as the kinds of air and missile defenses seen during previous Iranian attacks on Israel in April 2024 and October 2024, in the event of an Israeli strike on Iran, officials told CBS News
'U.S. officials have been told Israel is fully ready to launch an operation into Iran,' CBS News explained, citing multiple sources. The Trump administration is weighing options to assist Israel without leading the attack, the network posited.
A source familiar with the planning told the network that the options are unlikely to include direct participation by B-2A Spirit stealth bombers that can carry the 30,000-pound GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster bombs that would be the best U.S. option for trying to penetrate Iran's deep underground fortified uranium enrichment facilities at Fordow and Natanz.
CBS News reports that the Trump administration is weighing options on how to support #Israel in its military strike on #Iran's nuclear program–options are aerial refueling or intelligence sharing.https://t.co/AKFOVUwKVa
— Jason Brodsky (@JasonMBrodsky) June 12, 2025
However, as we have previously noted, it is questionable that even the use of the MOP could achieve the desired effects of destroying these facilities. On the other hand, it would have a much better chance of damaging or at least destroying direct access to these installations for period of time. Israel currently has nuclear weapons, but it possesses no conventional munitions that can match that capability. Of note, we have discussed in the past the possibility that Israel could use its secretive, conventionally armed Jericho ballistic missile in any fight with Iran.
It is also possible that Israel could launch a special operations ground raid against Iran's most hardened nuclear facilities. Earlier this year, we shared vivid details about just such a mission Israel conducted against an underground Iranian missile facility in Syria that was something of a blueprint for such an operation. As we have stated for years, beyond using nuclear weapons or irradiating these facilities, Israel has limited options when it comes to nullifying them. This is where commando operations could come in, although they would be extremely risky.
Though the Pentagon is considering limiting its response, as we reported yesterday, it is preparing for an overwhelming response to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, Hegseth declined to offer any specifics in a public forum on what actions the U.S. may take in the region.
Israeli Prime Minister 'Bibi Netanyahu is going to put his country first, and we're going to put our country first, and we're positioned properly in the region to any potential contingency,' Hegseth said when pressed on whether the U.S. will be dragged into a conflict should Israel attack Iran.
Among those preparations are the diversion of counter-drone capabilities from Ukraine to the Middle East, which you can read more about in our previous coverage here.
In previous stories, we noted that B-2s were deployed to the remote island of Diego Garcia both to send a message to Iran as well as to attack Houthi targets in Yemen during the recently completed campaign against the rebel group, a U.S. official told The War Zone at the time. That campaign began March 15 with a series of aviation and missile strikes against the Iranian-backed group. You can read more about the deployment of B-2s to the remote Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia here.
While the Spirits are gone, B-52H bombers, as well as F-15E Strike Eagles, remain on that island even though the U.S. and Yemen have agreed to a ceasefire, another indication that the U.S. is getting ready for a potential conflict in Iran. There are many other U.S. capabilities, including fighter squadrons and air defense units, that have been deployed to the region to beef-up America's presence and provide additional force protection and kinetic options, if needed.
NSF Diego Garcia
They're back (or they never completely left
)….4x B-52 Stratofortress spotted at Diego Garcia along with 6x KC-135 Stratotanker, 6x F-15 and 1x C-5MSrc
: @esaDate: 9 June 2025@Schizointelpic.twitter.com/JtI0zjdJWj
— MT Anderson (@MT_Anderson) June 10, 2025
An Israeli attack is not a certainty, the senior IDF source told us, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational planning. He was quick to point out that his assessment is not based on classified information, but rather consultation with Israeli military experts and journalists.
He estimated that as of today, there is 'around 60% likelihood of some form of strike—limited or targeted—within the next few weeks, and 40% chance that the current posture remains part of a high-stakes deterrence game.'
Is Israel about to go kinetic on Iran, possibly the U.S. too? I don't know. There are indicators in the open source & certainly in the media. But if you wanted to put MAXIMUM pressure on Tehran to break free stalled negotiations this would be it. Just something to keep in mind.
— Tyler Rogoway (@Aviation_Intel) June 12, 2025
'Of course, this could shift rapidly based on new intelligence, diplomatic developments, or domestic political changes in either Israel or the U.S.,' he added. 'Furthermore, a critical factor increasing the volatility of the current situation is the mutual risk of miscalculation.'
'From an analytical standpoint, the probability of an Israeli strike on Iran in the near term appears to be higher than usual, though still not a certainty,' the source further explained.
'On the Iranian side, there is a real danger they may underestimate Israel's willingness—or immediate need—to act,' the source posited. 'Tehran may assess recent Israeli threats as political posturing tied to Netanyahu's domestic agenda, rather than genuine operational intent. If Iranian leadership assumes Israel is bluffing, they may continue advancing nuclear capabilities or escalating proxy activity without fully anticipating the consequences. This miscalculation could inadvertently trigger a severe Israeli response.'
For Israel, 'the calculus may lean toward preventive action, driven not only by intelligence on Iran's capabilities but also by uncertainty about Iran's intentions,' he continued. 'If Israeli intelligence identifies what it interprets as preparations for an Iranian strike—either directly or via proxies—Jerusalem might opt for a preemptive strike to disrupt or delay the threat, especially in a 'fog of war' atmosphere where waiting could mean absorbing the first blow.'
Amid the threats, the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said Iran is prepared to defend itself and issued a warning to the U.S. and Israel.
'The enemy sometimes threatens us with military action,' Maj. Gen.Hossein Salami said during a ceremony in Tehran on Thursday, according to the official IRNA news outlet. 'We have always warned the enemy against making any miscalculation.'
He added that the Iranian Armed Forces have been 'ready for war at any level' for years,' IRNA reported.
'Iranian officials have warned that any act of aggression against the country will trigger a swift and forceful retaliation, with American interests and military bases in the region identified as potential targets,' IRNA added.
On Wednesday, Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Aziz Nasirzadeh claimed 'that Tehran has successfully tested a missile with a warhead weighing two tons,' according to Fars.
'Iranian officials have repeatedly stressed that the country will not hesitate to enhance its military capacities, including its missile and drone power, which are entirely meant for defense, and that Iran's defense capacities will never be subject to negotiation,' the publication noted.
Meanwhile, Axios is reporting that 'White House envoy Steve Witkoff privately warned top Senate Republicans last week that Iran could unleash a mass casualty response if Israel bombs their nuclear facilities, according to a U.S. official and a source with direct knowledge.'
The U.S. 'is concerned Israel's air defenses would not be able to handle an Iranian response involving hundreds of missiles, the sources said,' Axios explained. 'Such an attack, Witkoff told the group, could cause massive casualties and damage.'
Scoop: White House envoy Steve Witkoff privately warned top Senate Republicans that Iran's retaliation to an Israeli strike on its nuclear program could overwhelm Israel's defenses and cause mass damage and casualties. My story on @axioshttps://t.co/w0SKisWJ2q
— Barak Ravid (@BarakRavid) June 12, 2025
Trump on Thursday hinted that open conflict may be near.
'Well, I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' he said in response to a reporter's question, according to the White House press pool. 'Look, it's very simple, not complicated. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful. … We'll help them be successful. We'll trade with them, we'll do whatever is necessary.'
TRUMP: "I don't want to say imminent but like it's something that could very well happen" he said when asked about Israel strike on Iran. pic.twitter.com/wcX3N3ZvVe
— Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) June 12, 2025
These developments have prompted warnings to U.S. personnel in the region.
'Due to the increased regional tensions, U.S. government employees and their family members are restricted from travel outside the greater Tel Aviv (including Herzliya, Netanya, and Even Yehuda), Jerusalem, and Be'er Sheva areas until further notice,' the embassy stated on its website. 'Transit between these three areas, including to and from Ben Gurion Airport, is authorized. Transiting Route 1 to and from Allenby Bridge is also permitted.'
Israel: Due to the increased regional tensions, U.S. government employees and their family members are restricted from travel outside the greater Tel Aviv (including Herzliya, Netanya, and Even Yehuda), Jerusalem, and Be'er Sheva areas until further notice. Transit between these… pic.twitter.com/cVukGzMsqC
— Travel – State Dept (@TravelGov) June 12, 2025
That move follows warnings the State Department and U.S. Central Command issued on Wednesday to U.S. personnel within striking distance of Iran due to the increasing tensions.
'Do not travel to Iraq due to terrorism, kidnapping, armed conflict, civil unrest, and the U.S. government's limited ability to provide emergency services to U.S. citizens in Iraq,' the State Department said in a statement. 'Do not travel to Iraq for any reason.'
'The safety and security of our service members and their families remains our highest priority and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East,' a U.S. defense official told The War Zone Wednesday afternoon. 'Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the CENTCOM AOR. CENTCOM is working in close coordination with our Department of State counterparts, as well as our Allies and partners in the region to maintain a constant state of readiness to support any number of missions around the world at any time.'
Speaking to reporters Wednesday night at the Kennedy Center in Washington, Trump explained the warnings to U.S. personnel and civilians in the region.
'They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place,' the president said. 'We'll see what happens. They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple.'
REPORTER: "Could you provide an update on Iran? US personnel are being moved out of the region."TRUMP: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place. We'll see what happens.""They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple." pic.twitter.com/yGZ0Kal7bi
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 11, 2025
All this comes ahead of what could be a last-ditch effort to avoid open conflict.
On Sunday, talks will take place in Oman between Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi, The Jerusalem Post reported on Thursday.
'This will be the sixth round of discussions on the nuclear deal. Western diplomats described this round as 'decisive,' amid the U.S . demand for a complete halt to uranium enrichment and Iran's assertion that enrichment is its 'natural right,'' the publication reported.
Prior to the talks, Witkoff will meet with Israel's Minister of Strategic Affairs, Ron Dermer, and Mossad chief, David Barnea.
Witkoff declared on Wednesday night that Iran must never be allowed to enrich uranium or develop any nuclear threat.
'A nuclear Iran poses an existential threat to Israel, as does an Iran armed with a large arsenal of missiles,' he said in a speech at a conference hosted by the United Hatzalah organization.
'This is as much an existential threat as the nuclear threat itself. It is an existential threat to the United States, the free world, and all Gulf states. We must stand firm and united against this danger and ensure that Iran never acquires the means to fulfill its deadly ambitions, no matter the cost.'
Author's note: Tyler Rogoway contributed to the technical aspects of this report.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Pledge of Quick China Magnet Flows Has Yet to Materialize
(Bloomberg) -- Almost 10 days since President Donald Trump declared a 'done' trade deal with Beijing, US companies remain largely in the dark on when they'll receive crucial magnets from China — and whether Washington, in turn, will allow a host of other exports to resume. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown While there has been a trickle of required permits, many American firms that need Chinese minerals are still waiting on Beijing's approval for shipments, according to people familiar with the process. China's system is improving but remains cumbersome, they said, contrary to Trump's assurances rare earths would flow 'up front' after a June 11 accord struck in London. The delays are holding an array of American industries hostage to the rocky US-China relationship, as some firms wait for magnets and others face restrictions selling to China. That friction risks derailing a fragile tariff truce clinched by Washington and Beijing in Geneva last month, and triggering fresh rounds of retaliation. Interviews with multiple Western buyers, industry insiders and officials familiar with discussions revealed frustration over vague policies in both countries and lingering confusion about what level of magnet approvals from China would trigger Trump to abandon his tit-for-tat export curbs. 'Even if export approvals accelerate, there are so many unknowns about the licensing regime that it's impossible for companies to have a strong sense of certainty about future supply,' said Christopher Beddor, deputy China research director at Gavekal Research. 'At a minimum, they need to factor in a real possibility that talks could break down again, and exports will be halted.' In response to China's sluggishness on magnets, Trump last month restricted US firms from exporting chip software, jet engines and a key ingredient to make plastic to China until President Xi Jinping restores rare-earth exports. Companies subject to Washington's curbs have halted billions of dollars in planned shipments as they wait for players in unrelated sectors to secure permits from Beijing, which could take weeks or even months to process, given the current pace. Corporate chiefs affected by the export-control spat have sought clarity from the administration on its strategy, according to people familiar with the matter. The Commerce Department — which administers the rules — has offered few details, they added. Oil industry executives have tried to convince Trump officials that blocking exports of ethane — a gas used to make plastics — is contrary to US national security interests, according to people familiar with the deliberations. Business leaders have asked for export restrictions to be removed but that's been unsuccessful so far, the people said. Energy and chemical giant INEOS Group Holdings SA has one tanker full of ethane waiting to go, while Enterprise Products Partners has three to four cargo ships stuck in limbo, according to a person familiar with the matter. That's particularly galling because China has adequate ethane supplies in reserve and can switch to using naphtha from the Middle East and other regions for much of their production, the people said. Representatives from the companies did not respond to requests for comment. Industry figures have consistently told the Trump administration the ethane export restrictions are inflicting more pain on US interests than on China, according to the people. China's Ministry of Commerce, which administers export licenses, hasn't responded to Bloomberg's questions on how many for rare earths have been granted since the London talks. At a regular briefing in Beijing on Thursday, spokesperson He Yadong said Beijing was 'accelerating' its process and had given the go-ahead to a 'certain number of compliant applications.' Access to rare earths is an issue 'that is going to continue to metastasize until there is resolution,' said Adam Johnson, chief executive officer of Principal Mineral, which invests in US mineral supply chains for industrial defense. 'This is just a spigot that can be turned on and off by China.' China only agreed to grant licenses — if at all — for six months, before companies need to reapply for approvals. Firms doing business in the US and China could see recurring interruptions, unless the Commerce Ministry significantly increases its pace of process applications. Adding an extra layer of jeopardy for US companies, Chinese suppliers to America's military-industrial base are unlikely to get any magnet permits. After Trump imposed sky-high tariffs in April, Beijing put samarium — a metal essential for weapons such as guided missiles, smart bombs and fighter jets — on a dual-use list that specifically prohibits its shipment for military use. Denying such permits could cause ties to further spiral if Trump believes those actions violate the agreement, the terms of which were never publicized in writing by either side. That sticking point went unresolved during roughly 20 hours of negotiations last week in the UK capital, people familiar with the details said. Complicating the issue, companies often buy magnets from third-party suppliers, which serve both defense and auto firms, according to a person familiar with the matter. That creates a high burden to prove to Chinese authorities a shipment's final destination is a motor not a missile, the person added. Beijing still hasn't officially spelled out the deal's requirements, nor has Xi publicly signaled his endorsement of it — a step Trump said was necessary. 'The Geneva and London talks made solid progress towards negotiating an eventual comprehensive trade deal with China,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. 'The administration continues to monitor China's compliance with the agreement reached at Geneva.' China's Commerce Ministry is working to facilitate more approvals even as it asks for reams of information on how the materials will be used, according to people familiar with the process. In some cases, companies have been asked to supply data including detailed product designs, one of the people said. Morris Hammer, who leads the US rare-earth magnet business for South Korean steelmaker Posco Holdings Inc., said Chinese officials have expedited shipments for some major US and European automakers since Trump announced the agreement. China's Advanced Technology & Materials said Wednesday it had obtained permits for some magnet orders, without specifying for which destinations. The company's customers include European aerospace giant Airbus SE, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Around half of US suppliers to Toyota Motor Corp., for example, have had export licenses granted, the company said – but they're still waiting for those materials to actually be delivered. It's likely some of the delays are transport-related, one of the people said. Even with permits coming online, rare-earth materials are still scarce because overseas shipments were halted for two months starting in April, depleting inventories. Trump's agreement 'will allow for rare earths to flow out of the country for a short period of time, but it's not helping the auto industry because they're still talking shutdowns,' Hammer said. 'Nobody trusts that this thaw is going to last.' For many automakers, the situation remains unpredictable – forcing some to hunt for alternatives to Chinese supplies. Two days after Trump touted a finalized trade accord in London, Ford Motor Co. Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley described a 'day-to-day' dynamic around rare-earths licenses – which have already forced the company to temporarily shutter one plant. General Motors Co. has emphasized it's on firmer footing in the longer term, because it invested in domestic magnet making back in 2021. The automaker has an exclusive deal to get the products from MP Materials Corp. in Texas, with production starting later in the year. It has another deal with eVAC of Germany to get magnets from a South Carolina plant starting in 2026. In the meantime, GM and its suppliers have applied for permits to get magnets from China, a person familiar with the matter said. Scott Keogh, the CEO of Scout Motors — the upstart EV brand of Volkswagen AG — told Bloomberg Television his company is re—engineering brakes and drive units to reduce the need for rare earths. Scout is building a plant in South Carolina to make fully electric and hybrid SUVs as well as trucks starting in 2027. Until the rare-earth supply line is re-opened to Washington's satisfaction, Trump has indicated that the US is likely to keep in place its own export restrictions. Senior US officials have suggested the curbs are about building and using leverage, rather than their official justification: national security. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the measures were used to 'annoy' China into complying with a deal US negotiators thought they'd already reached. Restrictions on sales to China of electronic design automation software for chipmaking are emblematic of the standoff. Those EDA tools are used to design everything, from the highest-end processors for the likes of Nvidia Corp. and Apple Inc. to simple parts, such as power-regulation components. Fully limiting China's access to the best software, made by a trio of Western firms, has been a longtime priority in some Washington national security circles — and would build on years of US measures targeting China's semiconductor prowess. While some senior Trump officials specifically indicated the administration would relax some semiconductor-related curbs if Beijing relents on rare earths, EDA companies still lack details on when, and whether, their China access will be restored, said industry officials who requested anonymity to speak candidly. Even if that happens, there's worry that heightened geopolitical risks will push Chinese customers to hunt for other suppliers or further develop domestic capabilities. 'The risk is there for the London deal to fall apart,' said Alicia Garcia Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis. 'Because rare earths is a very granular issue and mistakes can be made.' --With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy, David Welch, Lucille Liu, James Mayger, Jing Li, Joe Ryan and Nicholas Lua. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawmaker queries retailers in probe of link between tariffs and grocery prices
This story was originally published on Grocery Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Grocery Dive newsletter. Sen. Maggie Hassan has asked Albertsons, Kroger, Walmart, Costco and Dollar General for information about how increased tariffs the Trump administration has imposed on imported steel and aluminum could affect stores, suppliers and costs in the grocery supply chain. In June 18 letters to the chief executives of the retailers, the New Hampshire senator requested details including how they expect tariffs on the metals — which doubled to 50% on June 4 — to impact the cost of private label products, particularly canned foods and frozen meals. Hassan, the ranking member of Congress' Joint Economic Committee, indicated that Democrats on the Republican-controlled panel are especially interested in how increases in metal prices could impact canned good costs. She asked the retailers for details about their costs, revenue and profit margins for their best-selling canned food and aluminum foil products over the past five quarters. In addition, Hassan requested information about how customers who receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits shop for canned goods, including a breakdown of their purchases in terms of brand name and private label products. Hassan also said she wants an estimate of the number of jobs the retailers support in industries such as construction, food packaging and food processing. 'High grocery prices are a top economic concern for Americans, and experts state that tariffs could significantly increase the cost of canned foods,' Hassan wrote. 'Experts have also noted potential impacts from tariffs on the costs of shelving, equipment, transportation, and other inputs that grocery stores and their suppliers need to operate, which, in turn, could also lead to higher food prices for customers.' In the letters, Hassan cited data from the Consumer Brands Association indicating that the 50% levy on imported steel could push prices for canned foods up by between 9% and 15%. She also pointed to statistics showing that the U.S. imports almost 70% of the steel used for canned fruits and vegetables. Hassan gave the retailers until July 9 to supply the information she requested. Grocery prices rose at an annual rate of 2.2% in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported June 11. By comparison, food-at-home inflation came in at 2% in April and 2.4% in March. Recommended Reading Trump tariffs could hike canned food prices up to 15%, trade group says Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chip equipment stocks fall after US plans to revoke China waivers
-- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE:TSM) stock fell 2%, Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) shares tumbled 5%, and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) dropped 4% following reports that a U.S. official plans to revoke technology waivers for chipmakers operating in China. Jeffrey Kessler, who leads the export controls unit at the Commerce Department, has informed major semiconductor manufacturers including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Electronics (KS:005930), and SK Hynix of his intention to cancel blanket waivers that currently allow them to ship American chip-making equipment to their factories in China without applying for separate licenses each time, according to the Wall Street Journal. The potential policy change is reportedly part of the Trump administration's broader efforts to restrict critical U.S. technology from going to China. If implemented, the move could create significant disruption both diplomatically and economically, coming shortly after the U.S. and China established a trade truce in London. White House officials have stated that this action would not represent a new trade escalation but would instead align the licensing system for chip equipment with China's existing system for rare-earth materials. They added that the U.S. and China continue to make progress on completing their London agreement. "Chip makers will still be able to operate in China. The new enforcement mechanisms on chips mirror licensing requirements that apply to other semiconductor companies that export to China and ensure the United States has an equal and reciprocal process," a Commerce Department spokesman said. The semiconductor equipment sector is particularly vulnerable to changes in U.S.-China trade policy, as many companies rely on access to the Chinese market for significant portions of their revenue. Related articles Chip equipment stocks fall after US plans to revoke China waivers QXO won't participate in bidding war for GMS - source Reddit in talks to use Sam Altman's World ID for user verification - Semafor
