Prudential Unit Lends $500 Million in Private Credit to Affirm
An investment arm of insurer Prudential Financial will buy up to $500 million of consumer loans from technology-backed consumer lender Affirm Holdings for a period of three years.
Most of the loans come due in six months and Affirm will be able to re-lend the investment throughout the life of the deal, allowing it to finance $3 billion of buy-now-pay-later loans.
Trump Bill Would Raise Estate Tax Exemption to $15 Million and Make It Permanent
Pope Leo Takes On AI
Trump Family's New Business Partner Is India's Richest Man
How a Chinese-Owned Battery Maker's Bet on U.S. EVs Went Wrong
Amazon CEO Says AI Will Lead to Smaller Workforce
The deal is part of a growing wave of transactions pairing a handful of large private-credit investors with financial technology companies that are replacing banks as go-to lenders for the American public.
Prudential's PGIM Fixed Income also purchased $500 million of Affirm loans in December and made a private investment in a $525 million securitization of consumer loans from SoFi Technologies. Affirm announced a $4 billion partnership with Sixth Street Partners in December and a $750 million deal with Liberty Mutual Investments in January.
The insurers and pensions whose money PGIM manages are hungry to own private ABS, or asset-backed securities, because such debt pays a higher interest rate than publicly traded and even private corporate debt.
PGIM aims to buy private ABS that returns about 1.5 percentage points more than public variants, said Edwin Wilches, the firm's co-head of securitized products. The company recently hired a new head of private ABS, Oliver Nisenson from private investment powerhouse Blackstone, to expand the business.
Nonbank lenders like Affirm are cultivating stables of large financing partners to ensure they have sufficient capital to lend, even when public debt markets freeze up. Affirm focuses on three channels: warehouse loans from banks, public ABS bond sales and negotiated deals from private-credit firms, said Chief Capital Officer Brooke Major-Reid.
Insurers, investment firms and nonbank lenders are increasingly teaming up to do lending that used to come from banks. That is creating complex entanglements that are new to regulators. Advocates say the new lenders are more stable than banks because they are disbursing cash from long-term investors rather than from daily deposits.
Write to Matt Wirz at matthieu.wirz@wsj.com
If Iran's Oil Is Cut Off, China Will Pay the Price
The American Investor Taking On Swatch's Founding Family
The Fed's Dot-Plot Predicament: False Precision in Uncertain Times
More of Us Are Putting in Extra Hours After the Workday
How to Make Sure Information on Your Old Computer Is Really, Truly Deleted
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
25 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Tesla signs deal for $556 million grid-scale battery storage station in China
Tesla Friday signed a $556.8 million agreement to build a grid-scale battery storage station in China. The deal is with China Kangfu International Leasing Co., as well as the Shanghai local government. It's the first Tesla large-scale battery storage facility in China. In a statement on Chinese social media site Weibo, Tesla said, 'Tesla's first grid-side energy storage power station project in mainland China has been officially grid-side energy storage power station is a 'smart regulator' for urban electricity, which can flexibly adjust grid resources.' Tesla said that, when complete, this project is expected to become the largest grid-side energy storage project in China. Utility-scale battery energy storage assists energy grid management by keeping supply and demand in balance. More is being built worldwide. Tesla competed against two Chinese companies that offer similar products. CATL and automaker BYD have significant global market share in these battery storage products. China plans to add nearly 5 gigawatts of electricity supply powered by batteries by the end of 2025, which would bring the total capacity to 40 gigawatts. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Europe's growing fear: How Trump might use US tech dominance against it
LONDON -- When President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February against the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court for investigating Israel for war crimes, Microsoft was suddenly thrust into the middle of a geopolitical fight. For years, Microsoft had supplied the court -- which is based in The Hague in the Netherlands and investigates and prosecutes human rights breaches, genocides and other crimes of international concern -- with digital services such as email. Trump's order abruptly threw that relationship into disarray by barring U.S. companies from providing services to the prosecutor, Karim Khan. Soon after, Microsoft, which is based in Redmond, Washington, helped turn off Khan's ICC email account, freezing him out of communications with colleagues just a few months after the court had issued an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel for his country's actions in the Gaza Strip. Microsoft's swift compliance with Trump's order, reported earlier by The Associated Press, shocked policymakers across Europe. It was a wake-up call for a problem far bigger than just one email account, stoking fears that the Trump administration would leverage America's tech dominance to penalize opponents, even in allied countries like the Netherlands. 'The ICC showed this can happen,' said Bart Groothuis, a former head of cybersecurity for the Dutch Ministry of Defense who is now a member of the European Parliament. 'It's not just fantasy.' Groothuis once supported U.S. tech firms but has done a '180-degree flip-flop,' he said. 'We have to take steps as Europe to do more for our sovereignty.' Some at the ICC are now using Proton, a Swiss company that provides encrypted email services, three people with knowledge of the communications said. Microsoft said the decision to suspend Khan's email had been made in consultation with the ICC. The company said it had since enacted policy changes that had been in the works before the episode to protect customers in similar geopolitical situations in the future. When the Trump administration sanctioned four additional ICC judges this month, their email accounts were not suspended, the company said. Brad Smith, Microsoft's president, said concerns raised by the ICC episode were a 'symptom' of a larger erosion of trust between the United States and Europe. 'The ICC issue added fuel to a fire that was already burning,' he said. Khan has been on leave from the ICC since last month, pending a sexual misconduct investigation. He has denied the allegations. An ICC spokesperson said it was taking steps to 'mitigate risks which may affect the court's personnel' and 'taking extensive measures to ensure the continuity of all relevant operations and services in the face of sanctions.' The episode has set off alarms across Europe about how dependent European governments, businesses and citizens are on U.S. tech companies like Microsoft for essential digital infrastructure -- and how hard it will be to disentangle themselves. Concerns about how else Trump might leverage technology for political advantage has jump-started efforts across the region to develop alternatives. Casper Klynge, a former Danish and European Union diplomat who worked for Microsoft, said the episode was in many ways the 'smoking gun that many Europeans had been looking for.' 'If the U.S. administration goes after certain organizations, countries or individuals, the fear is American companies are obligated to comply,' said Klynge, who now works for a cybersecurity company. 'It's had a profound impact.' The tech debate adds to an increasingly fractious U.S.-European relationship over trade, tariffs and the war in Ukraine. Trump and Vice President JD Vance have criticized how Europe regulates U.S. tech companies, and U.S. officials have made digital oversight and taxation part of ongoing trade negotiations. European regulators have argued that they need to be able to police the biggest digital platforms in their own countries without worrying that they will face political pressure and punishment from a foreign government. 'If we don't build adequate capacity within Europe, then we won't be able to make political choices anymore,' said Alexandra Geese, a member of the European Parliament. Since Edward Snowden's leak of scores of documents in 2013 detailing widespread U.S. surveillance of digital communications, Europeans have sought to diminish their reliance on U.S. tech. Lawmakers and regulators have targeted Apple, Meta, Google and others for anticompetitive business practices, privacy-invading services, and the spread of disinformation and other divisive content. Yet without viable alternatives, institutions across the region have turned to U.S. digital services. Amazon, Google, Microsoft and other U.S. firms control more than 70% of the cloud computing market in Europe, which is the essential way for storing files, retrieving data and running other programs, according to Synergy Research Group. The ICC has been a longtime customer of Microsoft, which provides the court with services including the Office software suite and software for evidence analysis and file storage, according to an ICC lawyer who declined to be identified discussing internal procedures. Microsoft has also provided cybersecurity software to help the court withstand digital attacks from adversaries like Russia, which is being investigated for war crimes in Ukraine. In February, after Trump issued penalties against Khan, Microsoft met with ICC officials to decide how to respond. They concluded that Microsoft's broader work for the court could continue but that Khan's email should be suspended. He switched his correspondence to another email account, said a person who has communicated with him. Sara Elizabeth Dill, a lawyer who specializes in sanctions compliance, said the Trump administration was increasingly using sanctions and executive orders to target international institutions, universities and other organizations, forcing companies to make hard choices about how to comply. 'This is a quagmire and places these corporations in a very difficult position,' she said. How tech companies with global services respond is especially important, she added, 'as the broad repercussions are what people and organizations are primarily worried about.' Microsoft and other U.S. companies have sought to reassure European customers. On Monday, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella visited the Netherlands and announced new 'sovereign solutions' for European institutions, including legal and data security protections for 'a time of geopolitical volatility.' Amazon and Google have also announced policies aimed at European customers. Still, many institutions are exploring alternatives. In the Netherlands, the 'subject of digital autonomy and sovereignty has the full attention of the central government,' Eddie van Marum, the state secretary of digitalization in the Ministry of Interior Affairs, said in a statement. The country is working with European providers on new solutions, he said. In Denmark, the digital ministry is testing alternatives to Microsoft Office. In Germany, the northern state of Schleswig-Holstein is also taking steps to cut its use of Microsoft. In the European Union, officials have announced plans to spend billions of euros on new artificial intelligence data centers and cloud computing infrastructure that rely less on U.S. companies. Groothuis, the Dutch member of the European Parliament, said lawmakers in Brussels were discussing policy changes that would encourage governments to favor buying tech services from EU-based companies. 'The situation is not tenable, and we see a big push from European governments to become more independent and more resilient,' said Andy Yen, CEO of Proton. European tech companies see an opportunity to win customers from their U.S. rivals. Cloud service providers like Intermax Group, based in the Netherlands, and Exoscale, based in Switzerland, said they had seen a jump in new business. 'A few years ago, everyone was saying, 'They're our trusted partners,'' Ludo Baauw, Intermax's CEO, said of U.S. tech companies. 'There's been a radical change.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Jeep parent Stellantis ponders drastic action on struggling brand
The merger between Fiat Chrysler and PSA Group in 2021 brought so much promise for the brand. It created Stellantis (STLA) , a company with a portfolio of over 14 automotive brands, including iconic U.S. names like Chrysler, Jeep, and Dodge that, combined with its European counterparts like Citroën, Peugeot, Fiat, and Maserati, would offer an unrivaled global footprint. But it has been a rough four years for Stellantis. Related: Jeep, Dodge parent has no solution for this emerging problem Under former CEO Carlos Tavares' leadership, Stellantis laid off American factory workers, shuffled its C-suite, and forced its U.S. brands to push products that American customers didn't like. Stellantis and Tavares separated in December, leaving the conglomerate rudderless for about six months before the company made a late May announcement. Last month, Stellantis named Antonio Filosa its new CEO, and it plans to elect him to the board of directors and make him an executive director in the coming weeks. Filosa cut his teeth as Stellantis Chief Operating Officer of South America, where he has led its Fiat brand to much success while also boosting Peugeot, Citroën, Ram, and Jeep sales on the continent. "I have worked closely with Antonio over the past six months, during which time his responsibilities have increased, and his strong and effective leadership spanning both North and South America at a moment of unprecedented challenge have confirmed the excellent qualities he brings to the role," said John Elkann, Stellantis executive chairman. "Together with the entire Board, I look forward to working with him." While Filosa's tenure doesn't officially begin until Monday, June 23, part of the interview process for the gig involved his thoughts on the viability of each of the brands in the company's portfolio, according to a new report citing multiple sources with knowledge of the process. Stellantis is considering the possible sale of its luxury Maserati unit, among other options, Reuters reported. McKinsey, which is advising Stellantis on the matter, has also said divestment of its only luxury brand is a viable option. Stellantis responded bluntly to the reports: "Respectfully, Maserati is not for sale," a company spokesperson said. Related: Major U.S. automaker makes harsh decision in wake of tariff tussle But low sales in North America was one of the reasons Tavares is no longer head of Stellantis. So is the fact that Maserati saw sales decline by more than half in 2024 to 11,300 units, while posting an operating loss of 260 million euros ($298 million) last year. Maserati doesn't have any new model launches scheduled after Stellantis put its previous business plan on hold last year. Although the brand currently doesn't have a business plan in place, Brand Head Santo Ficili has said that one will be presented soon after the new boss starts on Monday. Some board members apparently are not sure Maserati is a sustainable asset, however. Shortly after President Donald Trump announced his reciprocal tariffs on U.S. trading partners, Stellantis temporarily halted production at its auto assembly factories in Mexico and Canada. The Wall Street Journal reported that Stellantis would idle its minivan plant in Windsor, Canada, for two weeks and shutter its Jeep facility in Toluca, Mexico, for the rest of the month. "With the new automotive sector tariffs now in effect, it will take our collective resilience and discipline to push through this challenging time," Filosa told the Journal. "But we will quickly adapt to these policy changes and will protect our company, maintain our competitive edge, and continue delivering great products to our customers." Stellantis reported that total first-quarter U.S. sales decreased 12% year-over-year, despite a 16% increase in Ram brand sales and a 1% increase in Chrysler brand sales. Jeep brand sales saw a 2% increase. The company reported total sales of 293,225 vehicles in the first three months of the year. Related: Maserati launches program targeting Ferrari's elitist snobbery The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
