HUNTER: Scolding, posturing has not solved one MMIWG cold case

We all remember the scoldings.
Daily, we were told that the crisis of Murdered and Missing Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) was our fault. In some ways, it was true, but in most ways, it wasn't.
So we launched a commission that cost a zillion dollars and had a pre-determined outcome.
Reality, however, scorched the commission's narrative and that of Justin Trudeau's Liberal government.
Now, six years after the final report was released in 2019, with a so-called action plan, Red Dress Days and myriad other faculty lounge-inspired endeavours, MMIWG remains a national crisis.
Little has been done except for the go-to vibes.
'Many of these murders of women and children could be easily solved, but it's like the government has an aversion to doing anything,' one homicide detective told me. 'They don't seem to want to bring closure, justice and relief to the families and communities affected.'
Easier to scold and virtue signal than to do anything constructive.
South of the border, it's a different story. It's a commitment and a promise.
On Thursday, Washington state's newly minted Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and People Cold Case Unit announced they arrested an Arkansas woman in a nine-year-old cold case.
While the victim was an Indigenous man, the result was an arrest and a charge of second-degree murder.
According to The Olympian, George David, 65, was a respected master woodcarver and a resident of the Port Angeles area. He was found murdered on March 28, 2016.
David had just returned from visiting family and attending a funeral in British Columbia.
Tina Alcorn appeared in Clallam County Superior Court on Tuesday. She remains in custody, held on $1 million bail.
Cops say Alcorn was on their radar as a primary suspect early in the investigation but fell through the cracks until last month.
'This case has never been forgotten,' Port Angeles Police Chief Brian S. Smith said. 'The renewed investigation, bolstered by our partnership with the MMIWP Task Force, reflects our commitment to justice and to honouring George David's memory.'
It's startling when you consider the hundreds of faces of missing and murdered Indigenous women in this country. Seemingly forgotten, except for the wails of anguish from their heartbroken families.
Instead of arrests and answers in Canada, victims' families are left with tiresome platitudes and a numbing limbo. A small coterie of loudmouths and their bureaucratic enablers leave survivors high and dry.
In the U.S., detectives with the new MMIWP are making arrests.
More than 40 years after 18-year-old Terri McCauley was murdered in Iowa, investigators made an arrest there. McCauley was a member of the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska.
'She could have been a successful person, a Native female, who could have made a big difference in this community. And unfortunately, that was taken from her,' family spokesman Joshua Taylor said.
McCauley vanished after a night out with friends in the fall of 1983. She was last seen getting into a vehicle outside a Sioux City watering hole. Her body was discovered days later in a wooded area miles away.
She had been shot to death. More lost promise.
HUNTER: Iowa MMIWG cold case bust shames virtue-signalling Canada
HUNTER: Winnipeg serial killer reveals MMIWG inquiry did nothing
COLD CASE EXPERT: MMIWG death tally likely double
Thomas Duane Popp has been charged with first-degree murder.
'I want to commend our cold case team for their work on behalf of victims and families,' Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said.
'This is a milestone on a long path toward accountability. The Legislature funded this work because so many people would not give up the pursuit of justice for their loved ones.'
And in Canada? MMIWG families are like those stranded in Casablanca in the classic Humphrey Bogart movie of the same name.
They wait, and wait, and wait.
bhunter@postmedia.com
@HunterTOSun

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

3 hours ago

• Boston Globe

Supreme Court allows vape companies to pick courts to hear challenges

Advertisement Liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the opinion, which sent the case back to a lower court for more proceedings. Jackson wrote that the majority's opinion allows Reynolds to make an 'end run around … venue restrictions.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The FDA had told the justices that R.J. Reynolds and other electronic cigarette manufacturers were gaming court system rules by filing the vast majority of product-denial appeals in the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in New Orleans, even though they were based in other appeals court circuits. The tactic was hindering the FDA's ability to regulate vapes that are used by hundreds of thousands of teenagers, the agency said. In the case before the justices, the 5th Circuit — widely seen as more sympathetic to the companies' arguments than other circuits — overturned the FDA's denial of an R.J. Reynolds application. Advertisement The electronic cigarette ruling was one of six decisions issued Friday, with at least a week left in the Supreme Court's term. Ten decisions remain, including cases involving the legality of age-verification laws to access online pornography and nationwide court orders blocking President Trump's ban on birthright citizenship. In addition to the vape decision, the Supreme Court on Friday revived lawsuits brought by US victims of terrorist attacks in Israel against the Palestine Liberation Organization. The opinion, written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., upheld a 2019 federal law passed in response to attacks that allows Americans to sue. The court said that law does not violate the rights of the PLO. In a 7-2 decision, the justices also cleared the way for fuel producers to sue the Environmental Protection Agency over California's stricter standards for vehicle emissions. California's efforts are already in flux after being targeted by Trump and Republicans in Congress. Under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, manufacturers must get FDA approval to sell some existing products, as well as new products, that are marketed in more than one state. The Vuse line of menthol vapes are the ones in question in the R.J. Reynolds case. Ryan J. Watson, who is representing R.J. Reynolds, told the justices at oral arguments that the company was permitted to file a challenge in the 5th Circuit because the act allows 'any person adversely affected' by a denial to file a challenge in the District of Columbia Circuit or the 'circuit in which such person resides or has their principal place of business.' Advertisement R.J. Reynolds partnered with a Texas vape store and the Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association to bring the challenge to the FDA ruling. The 5th Circuit covers Texas and Mississippi, while R.J. Reynolds is in the 4th Circuit. Vivek Suri, an assistant to the solicitor general, arguing on behalf of the government, said Congress never meant for retailers or their representatives, rather than manufacturers, to be parties to such litigation when it passed the act. He pointed out that retailers aren't notified when the FDA rejects manufacturers' applications to market vaping products and said the tactic defeats the venue restrictions laid out in the law. But the Supreme Court said Friday it has long established a broad interpretation of what it means to be adversely affected by a law, including in the category anyone even 'arguably within the zone of interests' that the statute regulates. Vape industry groups applauded the ruling. Watson, the attorney for R.J. Reynolds, said the court 'recognized that federal agency action can have downstream effects that can be devastating for parties that are not the most direct target of the agency's action.' The ruling ensures that 'the courthouse doors are not closed for those adversely affected parties,' he said. Yolonda C. Richardson, president and CEO of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said the decision will bolster efforts to market addictive products to young people. The ruling 'gives e-cigarette manufacturers an open invitation to forum-shop for friendly courts in their relentless quest to lure and addict kids with flavored, nicotine-loaded products,' she said. In her dissent to Friday's ruling, Jackson noted that two other appeals courts had rejected similar challenges filed by other manufacturers of flavored electronic cigarettes before R.J. Reynolds filed its appeal to the 5th Circuit. Advertisement 'It thus became (perhaps) imperative from RJR Vapor's perspective that its own lawsuit challenging the FDA's denial of its flavored e-cigarette marketing applications be filed somewhere else,' Jackson wrote.

Yahoo

2 days ago

• Yahoo

New charges accuse Bolsonaro of running spy ring from Brazil's presidential palace

Federal police have formally accused Brazil's former far-right president, Jair Bolsonaro, of presiding over an illegal spying network which allegedly snooped on political rivals, journalists and environmentalists during his administration. Bolsonaro is already facing the prospect of jail time over his alleged role in masterminding a military coup plot designed to help him keep power after losing the 2022 election to the leftwing veteran Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. There is broad consensus among analysts that Bolsonaro's conviction is a foregone conclusion and the 70-year-old populist is expected to face arrest in the coming months once a supreme court trial concludes. The latest accusations relate to a two-year federal police investigation into suspicions that a 'parallel' intelligence agency was set up during Bolsonaro's 2019-23 administration in order to monitor those considered government foes. On Tuesday, police accused Bolsonaro's alleged former spy chief, Alexandre Ramagem – who ran Brazil's intelligence agency, Abin, from 2019 to 2022 – of running the clandestine operation and accused more than 30 others of being involved, including the president's politician son Carlos Bolsonaro. The news website G1 said investigators had concluded that under Bolsonaro members of Abin 'formed a criminal organization in order to monitor people and public authorities, invading mobile phones and computers'. Some of the information gathered was allegedly provided to a covert social media team that operated within the presidential palace and allegedly used illegally collected information as ammunition to launch online attacks. The targets reportedly included four supreme court ministers and powerful politicians including the former president of Brazil's lower house, Arthur Lira, and the then governor of São Paulo, João Doria, a prominent rightwing rival to the president. Journalists and public servants were also reportedly spied on, including Hugo Loss, a respected member of the environmental agency, Ibama, who was on the front line of efforts to protect the Amazon at a time when illegal loggers and miners were emboldened by Bolsonaro's anti-environment rhetoric and climate denial. Loss had worked closely with Bruno Pereira, the Indigenous expert and former government employee who was murdered in the rainforest region three years ago this month with the British journalist Dom Phillips. The newspaper O Globo said police believed the Bolsonarista spy network was created in order 'to make it possible for Bolsonaro to remain in the presidential chair'. Bolsonaro and Ramagem made no immediate comment on the accusations but have previously denied such charges. Carlos Bolsonaro responded to the allegations on X, suggesting that they were the result of a political grudge against his father's political movement. 'Was anyone in any doubt that Lula's PF [federal police] would do this to me?' he tweeted.

Hamilton Spectator

4 days ago

• Hamilton Spectator

Want to run for Kanesatake's Council?

With the notice of nominations posted Wednesday, it's time for those considering vying for a seat on the Mohawk Council of Kanesatake (MCK) to begin organizing their candidacies. The nomination period will run from Wednesday, June 25, to Friday, June 27, with six seats as chief and one seat as grand chief up for grabs. During those dates, each nominee and their nominator must present themselves in person between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. and submit their paperwork to the chief electoral officer at the Kanesatake Education Center. Those who would like to run can contact chief electoral officer Graeme Drew by email at starting from June 18 at 8 a.m. to obtain the nomination forms. To be eligible to run for an MCK seat, prospective candidates must be a member of the Mohawks of Kanesatake, have 'had their place of ordinary residence for not less than three years' before the election, have lived in the J0N 1E0 postal code, be of Kanesatake Mohawk ancestry, and be at least 18 years old by June 27. Anyone convicted of a criminal offense without a pardon or record suspension, except if the offense involves the exercise of Indigenous rights, is ineligible, as well as those who have outstanding financial debts to the MCK or its departments. Those who have been removed by a vote of non-confidence following due process since the ratification of the Custom Electoral Code or have been previously suspended from the MCK because of being charged with a criminal offense, unless that person has been acquitted, are also ineligible. Candidates for grand chief must have already served a full term on Council, which is defined as four years. Anyone interested in running will need a nominator who is on the voter list, is of Kanesatake Mohawk ancestry, and is at least 18 years old by June 27. Each nominator can put forward a maximum of one candidate for chief and one for grand chief. Candidacies must also be seconded in writing by an elector, but the seconder does not have to present themselves in person like the nominee and nominator do. Electors can second more than one candidate. A provisional list of candidates will be posted on June 29, shortly after the nomination period closes, and candidates on the list can be contested by those concerned about their eligibility until July 1. On July 4, the final list of candidates will be posted for the August 2 election. marcus@ Marcus Bankuti, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .