logo
IWF Is a Great Choice for Most, But I Like VUG ETF Better

IWF Is a Great Choice for Most, But I Like VUG ETF Better

Globe and Mail5 hours ago

The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (NYSEMKT: IWF) is one of the largest and most popular exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on companies growing their earnings at above-average rates. It enables investors to target growth stocks, which can enhance their investment returns.
While I think the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF is great for most investors seeking to tap into the outsize return potential of growth stocks, I like the Vanguard Growth ETF (NYSEMKT: VUG) better. Here's why.
Nearly mirror images at the top
The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and the Vanguard Growth ETF focus on holding companies growing their earnings faster than the market's average. For example, VUG's holdings have grown their earnings at a 27.5% annual rate over the past five years.
While both ETFs track growth stocks, there's a subtle difference. The Vanguard Growth ETF tracks an index, the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, that holds only large-cap growth stocks, while the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF tracks an index, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, that consists of large- and mid-cap stocks. As a result, IWF has more holdings than VUG (392 to 166).
However, because both funds have a market weighting, their top holdings are identical with very similar weightings:
IWF
VUG
Microsoft (11.7%)
Microsoft (11.3%)
Nvidia (11.1%)
Nvidia (10.3%)
Apple (9.5%)
Apple (10.1%)
Amazon (6.6%)
Amazon (6.3%)
Meta Platforms (4.6%)
Meta Platforms (4.4%)
Broadcom (3.8%)
Broadcom (4%)
Alphabet Class A (3.4%)
Tesla (3.3%)
Tesla (3.1%)
Alphabet Class A (3.3%)
Alphabet Class C (2.8%)
Alphabet Class C (2.6%)
Eli Lilly (2.2%)
Eli Lilly (2.2%)
Data sources: BlackRock and ETF.com
The slight difference in allocation is primarily due to the dates of the last available holdings update for these funds. Given that their top 10 holdings -- which comprise nearly 60% of their assets -- areroughly mirror images, you could easily choose either fund for similar exposure to the top growth stocks.
Two notable differences
While the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Growth ETF have very similar holdings, there are two notable differences. The first one is cost. IWF's ETF expense ratio is 0.19%, while VUG's is much lower at 0.04%. That's due to Vanguard's emphasis on keeping costs low for investors so that they can keep more of the returns generated by its funds.
To put the cost difference into perspective, for every $10,000 invested, you'd pay the IWF fund manager $19 annually while only paying $4 per year for VUG. That higher cost will eat into IWF's returns over the long term.
Speaking of returns, that's another area where VUG stands out compared to IWF:
Data sources: BlackRock and Vanguard. NOTE: IWF fund inception is 5/22/00, while VUG's is 1/26/04.
As that table shows, VUG has delivered much higher returns than IWF in every period other than the past five years. That's because larger-cap growth stocks have generally produced higher returns than mid-cap growth stocks in more recent years. That drag and its higher expense ratio have weighed on IWF's returns.
Better returns and lower costs on the same strategy
The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF is a great ETF to buy to increase your portfolio's allocation to faster-growing companies. However, I think the Vanguard Growth ETF is a better option. It provides investors with exposure to most of the same holdings at a lower cost. Its strategy has enabled it to produce higher returns for its investors over the years. That's why I'd pick VUG over IWF to add more growth to your portfolio.
Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF right now?
Before you buy stock in Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Matt DiLallo has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Broadcom, Meta Platforms, and Tesla and has the following options: short August 2025 $250 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, and Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CODE27 AI Companion Exceeds Crowdfunding Expectations, Ignites Industry Buzz
CODE27 AI Companion Exceeds Crowdfunding Expectations, Ignites Industry Buzz

Globe and Mail

time30 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

CODE27 AI Companion Exceeds Crowdfunding Expectations, Ignites Industry Buzz

CODE27 Character Livehouse, first unveiled at CES 2025 this January, successfully concluded its Kickstarter campaign at the end of May, raising over $1.7 million from over 3,200 backers. Described as a Customizable 3D AI Companion Hub, CODE27 drew considerable attention at CES due to its integration of AI companionship, anime girl aesthetics, and otaku culture. It is claimed to be the world's first end-to-end customized AI companion that brings your favorite character to life. CODE27 has redefined success in the AI companion hardware space, achieving one of the most significant crowdfunding milestones in the category's history. This breakthrough significantly outpaces industry benchmarks, where similar projects, such as Ropet and Looi, historically averaged $300,000–$500,000 in funding. 'The funds raised far exceeded our expectations,' said Brandon, a core developer at Sybran Innovation, the company behind CODE27. With over 10 years of experience in global hardware development, Brandon has led core product and R&D efforts at DJI, OPPO, and RayNeo. Besides, the team's expertise also spans Bytedance, EcoFlow, and other major tech innovators. On its Kickstarter page, the CODE27 team shared the inspiration behind the project: We are a passionate group of anime enthusiasts and geeks, eager to share both moments of joy and times of solitude with the characters we love. Believing that we can be truly accompanied by our favorite characters, we've come together to make this dream a reality. Inspired by the seed of Amadeus from Steins;Gate, which has been planted in our hearts for over a decade, we are fully committed to this project. CODE27 allows users to freely customize characters, environments and expressions. Beyond appearances, CODE27 offers an open, highly customizable AI companion platform. Users can connect to any cloud or local AI model, upload custom 3D assets, and even program new behaviors using 'Spellbooks,' giving them deep creative control over how their companion looks, thinks, and interacts. The product launched at $429 for the base unit and $528 for the version that comes with a smart rotating base. AI-powered companion hardware is often referred to as 'desktop pets.' The rise of generative AI has significantly lowered the barrier to human-computer interaction, opening up new possibilities for companionship-based products. As the category grows, it's the products with real innovation and vision that will ultimately succeed. Media Contact Company Name: CODE 27 Contact Person: Amy Ma Email: Send Email Country: China Website:

Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says
Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says

Globe and Mail

time37 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says

Americans' support for green energy tax credits and renewable energies like wind and solar power has decreased in recent years, according to a new poll, driven by a softening in support from Democrats and independents. The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that U.S. adults' support for tax credits for electric vehicles and solar panels has weakened, as well as their enthusiasm for offshore wind farm expansion. While Democrats remain the strongest supporters of these initiatives, the poll reveals signs of growing cynicism within their ranks. The poll results coincide with sweeping changes President Donald Trump's Republican administration is making to regulations related to energy and climate change, including slashing the federal workforce in these departments. And although Democrats and independents have weakened their support for some green energy initiatives, there has not been an increase in support for Trump's energy policies. The poll found only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults — including only 1 in 10 Democrats and about 2 in 10 independents, along with three-quarters of Republicans — approve of the way Trump is handling climate change, which largely tracks with his overall approval rating. Democrats and independents drive decline in support for renewable energy credits About 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, favor tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle, down from about 7 in 10 in 2022. Among independents, support declined from 49% in 2022 to 28%. Only one-quarter of Republicans supported this policy in 2022, and that hasn't changed measurably. 'As far as the pollution goes ... the vehicles nowadays put out very little emissions to the air,' said JD Johnson, a 62-year-old Democrat from Meadowview, Virginia, who somewhat opposes tax credits to purchase an electric vehicle. That's partly because he sees the electric vehicle manufacturing process as energy intensive and believes gasoline-powered vehicles have made improvements with the pollutants they emit. The decline in favoring solar panel tax credits was across the board rather than being concentrated among Democrats. 'For solar panels, in all honesty, I don't think they're that efficient yet,' said Glenn Savage, 78, a left-leaning independent from Rock Hill, South Carolina. 'I'd rather see them pour money into research and try to get the solar panels more efficient before they start giving tax breaks to the public. I may be wrong on that, but that's just my thought.' Scientists say transitioning to renewable energies and ditching fossil fuels that release planet-warming emissions are essential to protect the planet. Billions of dollars in project grants for clean technologies awarded during President Joe Biden's Democratic administration have been canceled by the Trump administration, and the offshore wind sector has been stunted by Trump's executive order that paused approvals, permits and loans for wind energy projects. Fewer than half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say that offshore wind farms should be expanded in the U.S., down from 59% in 2022. About half favor expanding solar panel farms, while about two-thirds were in support in 2022. When people are concerned about the economy and their personal finances, environmental issues are sometimes prioritized less, said Talbot Andrews, an assistant professor in the department of government at Cornell University who was not involved in the poll. 'I think it makes people anxious to think about increased taxes or increased spending on environmental issues when the cost of eggs are going through the roof,' Andrews said. Low support for Trump's efforts to expand offshore drilling and coal mining Trump has championed the expansion of offshore oil drilling, as well as domestic coal production. Despite a decline in support for expanded renewable energies, the new poll shows that only about one-third of U.S. adults think offshore drilling for oil and natural gas should be expanded in the U.S., and only about one-quarter say this about coal mining. In both cases, Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to support expanding these energy sources. Trump has sought to open up national monuments for oil drilling, but more U.S. adults oppose than support auctioning off more public space for oil drilling. Only about one-quarter of U.S. adults favor this, while 4 in 10 are opposed. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats to be in support. Bipartisan support for consumer rebates and home appliance ratings The Energy Star program that certifies appliances, such as dishwashers and refrigerators, as energy efficient recently appeared in headlines when the EPA made plans to scrap the program. The blue and white logo is well recognized, and experts say the program has long had bipartisan support until recently. The poll found three-quarters of Democrats support providing consumer rebates for efficient home appliances, compared with 6 in 10 Republicans. Patrick Buck, 54, from Chicago, describes himself as a liberal Republican and is a fan of the consumer rebates for energy-efficient appliances. 'It seems to work in terms of transforming what people have in their houses, because a lot of people have a lot of old appliances and just can't afford new ones,' he said. Safe air, water, meat and produce The poll found only about 2 in 10 U.S. adults are 'extremely' or 'very' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of their drinking water, the air they breathe and the meat, poultry, fruits and vegetables they buy in grocery stores. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are 'somewhat' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of each of these, and about 4 in 10 are 'not very' or 'not at all' confident. The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back rules and policies related to limiting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, such as rules that limit pollution from power plants and blocking California's efforts to phase out cars that run on gas. The federal government has also cut staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency tasked with protecting public health and ensuring food supply safety. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

ZIM vs. FRO: Which Shipping Company is a Stronger Play Now?
ZIM vs. FRO: Which Shipping Company is a Stronger Play Now?

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

ZIM vs. FRO: Which Shipping Company is a Stronger Play Now?

ZIM Integrated Shipping ZIM and Frontline Plc FRO are two well-known names in the Zacks Transportation - Shipping industry. While ZIM is based in Israel, FRO is headquartered in Cyprus. ZIM is a leading container liner shipping company with a presence in more than 100 countries. The company serves approximately 33,000 customers in over 330 ports worldwide. Frontline focuses on the seaborne transportation of crude oil and refined products. Given this backdrop, let's take a closer look at which shipping company currently holds the edge, and more importantly, which might be the smarter investment now. The Case for ZIM ZIM's asset-light model, which means that the focus is more on leasing rather than owning vessels. The company's focus on niche markets and high-margin trade routes helps it avoid crowded, low-margin segments, thereby maintaining strong pricing power. This, too, aids profitability. The shipping company's operational efficiency is being aided by investments in digitalization and innovative technologies. ZIM's shareholder-friendly approach throws light on its financial prosperity. The shipping company's high dividend yield is a huge positive for income-seeking investors. This highlights confidence in its cash flow and prospects. In the December quarter, ZIM's board declared a regular dividend of approximately $382 million or $3.17 per ordinary share, together with the dividends shelled out in 2024. In the first quarter of 2025, ZIM's board of directors declared a regular cash dividend of approximately $89 million, or 74 cents per share, reflecting approximately 30% of the quarter's net income. ZIM has an excellent track record with respect to earnings surprise, having beaten the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the past four quarters, showing resilience despite tough conditions. The average beat is 34.5%. ZIM Price and EPS Surprise ZIM Integrated Shipping Services price-eps-surprise | ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Quote Due to the above-mentioned tailwinds and signs of easing trade tensions, the second-quarter 2025, third-quarter 2025, and full-year 2025 earnings estimates have been moving northward for ZIM. Earnings Estimates for ZIM The Case for FRO Frontline, which focuses on the seaborne transportation of crude oil and oil products worldwide, is being well-served by its fleet expansion initiatives. FRO's portfolio is one of the youngest among the tanker operators. The average fleet age is only 6.8 years. Frontline's shareholder-friendly attitude is also praiseworthy. The recent air strikes against Iran have lifted freight rates, aiding tanker stocks like FRO. Environmental regulations and shifting global trade patterns, including protectionist policies and sanctions, are, however, hurting Frontline. Geopolitical tensions could disrupt tanker routes, hurting FRO in turn. Supply-chain disruptions and escalated voyage operating costs are also hurting the company's bottom-line performance. Mainly due to the geopolitical woes, uncertainty regarding freight rates, and weakening demand from China, the second-quarter 2025, third-quarter 2025, and full-year 2025 earnings estimates have been moving southward for FRO. Earnings Estimates for FRO Unlike ZIM, FRO doesn't have an impressive earnings surprise history. The shipping company has lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate twice in the last four quarters and met the consensus mark on the other occasions. The average miss is 4.4%. Frontline Price and EPS Surprise Frontline PLC price-eps-surprise | Frontline PLC Quote Frontline's high debt burden, primarily due to the elevated capital expenditures on fleet renewal, is also a worry. FRO's high debt-to-equity ratio indicates that the financing of fleet upgrades is mainly carried out with borrowed funds. FRO Appears to be Pricier Than ZIM ZIM is trading at a forward sales multiple of 0.31 and has a Value Score of A. Meanwhile, FRO has a Value Score of C, with its forward sales multiple at 3.06. Conclusion The shipping industry is responsible for transporting goods involved in world trade. The slowdown in trade may disrupt trade routes, bringing down goods transportation, in turn hurting the industry players. Consequently, tariff-related concerns are present for both ZIM and FRO. However, ZIM has an advantage, courtesy of its business model, by virtue of which it can shift capacity to more profitable routes if trade lanes are hit by tariffs. Apart from the geopolitical risks, FRO's high debt burden is a concern. The high capital expenditure requirement dents cash flow. FRO's unfavorable valuation picture is a major deterrent. Moreover, with spot rates and contracted rates remaining elevated, ZIM is likely to perform well in 2025 despite the tariff-induced uncertainties. Given its better prospects driven by its business model to withstand uncertainties, ZIM seems a better pick than FRO now. While ZIM carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), FRO currently has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here Zacks' Research Chief Names "Stock Most Likely to Double" Our team of experts has just released the 5 stocks with the greatest probability of gaining +100% or more in the coming months. Of those 5, Director of Research Sheraz Mian highlights the one stock set to climb highest. This top pick is a little-known satellite-based communications firm. Space is projected to become a trillion dollar industry, and this company's customer base is growing fast. Analysts have forecasted a major revenue breakout in 2025. Of course, all our elite picks aren't winners but this one could far surpass earlier Zacks' Stocks Set to Double like Hims & Hers Health, which shot up +209%. Free: See Our Top Stock And 4 Runners Up Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Frontline PLC (FRO): Free Stock Analysis Report ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM): Free Stock Analysis Report

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store