Miami mayor is lobbying behind the scenes for proposal to skip November election
Miami City Commissioner Damian Pardo is pushing forward with a controversial proposal to move the city's elections to even-numbered years through a City Commission vote, despite a new opinion from the Florida Attorney General's Office and a public rebuke from the governor, both saying the city needs to put the question out to voters instead.
Pardo is the official sponsor of the hotly debated City Commission legislation, a measure that would involve skipping the upcoming November election and giving the city's current elected officials an extra year in office.
But the Miami Herald has learned that, behind the scenes, Mayor Francis Suarez has been lobbying to push the proposal through. If the measure passes, Suarez — a former city commissioner who is reaching the end of his term limits as mayor — would get a 17th consecutive year in Miami City Hall.
The Miami mayor doesn't have a vote on the five-member City Commission, but he does have veto power. Because he does not have a vote, Suarez has the ability to meet privately with city commissioners to discuss legislation and whip up support. The commissioners, on the other hand, are bound by Florida Sunshine Law, which prohibits them from discussing legislative matters with each other outside of a public meeting.
In this case, Suarez's help may be essential to securing the three out of five votes needed to pass Pardo's proposal, which seeks to push the November election to 2026 through two City Commission votes, rather than letting voters weigh in via ballot referendum. To date, not a single city commissioner besides Pardo has publicly committed to voting in favor of it.
Commissioners Joe Carollo and Miguel Angel Gabela told the Herald they oppose the change and will be voting no. Newly elected Commissioner Ralph Rosado said that while he generally supports moving to even-year elections, he hasn't made up his mind yet. Commissioner Christine King, the chairwoman of the commission, declined to comment publicly on her stance ahead of the June 17 meeting where the commission is slated to cast the first of two votes on the measure. (The meeting was originally set for June 12 but has since been rescheduled.)
In need of two supporters on the dais to move his proposal forward, Pardo — who previously called for Suarez's resignation in late 2023 — has turned to the mayor for assistance.
'My general sense is that he thinks this is a good thing for Miami, and he has been willing to make those calls [at] my behest,' Pardo told the Herald. He said the mayor's goal is to 'garner support wherever possible.'
'Francis was involved from the beginning in order for us to find out if there was more support from the dais,' Pardo added.
When was the beginning, exactly? Pardo said he's been discussing various reform measures with the mayor since around early 2024, shortly after Pardo was sworn in. As far as their recent conversations, Pardo estimated that he and the mayor have spoken about this particular issue three to four times in the last couple of months, including this week.
Asked what has changed for Pardo since he called for Suarez's resignation in late 2023, Pardo cited the mayor's involvement in various city projects, including the Miami Marine Stadium development.
'He started doing his job,' Pardo said of Suarez, who declined to comment for this story.
Pardo added that while the mayor is involved in pushing for the election date change, 'This is not about Francis.'
'I think that's the fallacy here,' Pardo said. 'I'm the one pushing the initiative.'
Commissioners Rosado and Gabela both confirmed to the Herald that Suarez had discussed the proposal with them. While Gabela couldn't pinpoint exactly when the conversation took place, he said it happened 'a long time ago,' around when Pardo first introduced a separate proposal in April to introduce stricter term limits for elected officials — weeks before the proposal to push back the election was known about publicly.
Seeking more information on the legality of Pardo's proposal to delay the November 2025 election, Gabela asked for advice from the Florida Attorney General's Office, which issued a written opinion Wednesday saying the city cannot push its election back to 2026 without voter approval.
'My mind is made up,' Gabela said in light of the Attorney General's opinion. 'I'm a no.'
Nevertheless, in a statement Thursday responding to the Attorney General's opinion, Pardo indicated he plans to go full steam ahead: 'We are confident that this reform is both legal and necessary for the benefit of future generations of Miamians.'
Gabela's opposition makes Commissioner King a key vote to passing Pardo's proposal. But the Attorney General's opinion could create uncertainty for King, an attorney who has previously expressed concern at commission meetings about passing legislation that might not meet legal muster.
At a meeting in March, for example, King directed the city attorney to flag proposed legislation that 'clearly flies in the face of the law.'
'As a practitioner, although I am not representing myself as an attorney, but as an elected official here on this dais, I can still be held responsible by the Florida Bar if I pass any legislation that is not legal,' King said at the meeting, adding: 'I'm not voting on anything that I know is not legal.'
City Attorney George Wysong has said that the commission has the authority to move the election date under Florida law, and Pardo has pointed to two Miami-Dade cities that have done so already: Coral Gables and North Miami.
Unlike the Miami proposal, Coral Gables officials shortened their terms instead of extending them.
The stated purpose of Pardo's legislation is to move the city to even-year elections, which could increase the city's typically low voter turnout and also save the city hundreds of thousands of dollars in election costs. Miami residents have generally expressed support for moving to even years, and the mayor has also been a proponent of the change in the past.
But another benefit to the election date change is that — in a roundabout matter — it clears the way for Pardo's other reform measure, a proposal to create lifetime term limits for elected officials. Although the two proposals — even-year elections and lifetime term limits — are different items that will be voted on separately, they've become linked for both practical and political reasons.
Currently, elected officials in Miami are limited to two four-year terms as mayor and two four-year terms as a commissioner, but they are allowed to return to the same position a few years later. Under Pardo's term limits proposal, elected officials would be capped at two terms in each position for their lifetime.
In its current form, that legislation would block Suarez from seeking elected office in Miami again. It would also block Carollo from office since he has already served at least two terms as both mayor and a commissioner, and it would keep his younger brother, former City Commissioner Frank Carollo, from running for the City Commission again. Frank Carollo has already filed to run for the District 3 City Commission seat — currently occupied by his brother — in November, and Joe Carollo has long been mulling another run for mayor.
The issue is that the term limits proposal would need to go to voters for approval, and Pardo is aiming to get it on the ballot in November, when residents are scheduled to head to the polls to vote in three races: mayor, District 3 commissioner and District 5 commissioner. But that timing could create legal roadblocks, according to Pardo, because the term limits proposal would be on the same ballot as candidates who would be affected by it.
For example, if Frank Carollo or Joe Carollo win in the November election and the term limits proposal also passes and invalidates their victories, they could have standing to sue the city.
Why can't the term limits proposal just go on the ballot next year instead?
Pardo said he didn't want to risk changes to the 'composition' of the City Commission as a result of the November election that could thwart his efforts. In other words, come November, he might not have the votes for it, depending on who wins.
'I don't want to run that risk of the reshuffling of the cards,' Pardo said.
Pardo added that while he is concerned about the possibility of Joe Carollo becoming mayor in November, 'none of this was targeted at anybody.'
Carollo sees it differently.
'Damian Pardo and the people that own him are petrified that I might decide to run for mayor,' Carollo said, ' ... because they don't feel they can beat me, and they certainly know that my brother — they have nobody to beat him, either.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
Insurance reform fizzles in Florida. ‘We didn't see as much happen as we'd like'
Florida's legislative leaders ushered in this year's session vowing to investigate insurance company profits and holding the industry accountable if it wasn't paying claims. A House committee held rare hearings to grill the state's current and former insurance regulators. Republicans and regulators proposed several pro-consumer bills. But 105 days later, it didn't amount to much. After one of the longest and most contentious sessions in memory, lawmakers left Tallahassee late Monday night without taking significant action to reduce premiums or increase scrutiny on the insurance industry. 'We didn't see as much happen as we'd like,' said Rep. Brad Yeager, the New Port Richey Republican who leads the House's insurance committee. Lawmakers are promising more action in the next session. Committees are scheduled to begin meeting again in October. They did devote $280 million to renew the popular My Safe Florida Home program, which awards $10,000 grants to help homeowners harden their homes. But lawmakers limited future eligibility to homeowners with low or moderate incomes. Legislative leaders began the session by talking tough about reining in the industry, receiving standing ovations in the House and Senate. Miami Republican House Speaker Daniel Perez ordered hearings into a never-before-seen study by Florida's Office of Insurance Regulation revealed by the Herald/Times weeks before the session. The study showed that at the start of the state's insurance crisis, insurers claimed to lose millions of dollars while their affiliate companies made billions. The study was never shared with lawmakers until the Herald/Times reported on it. Yeager's committee held two hearings during which regulators said the study 'raised red flags.' But they said the report wasn't shared with lawmakers because it was never completed. The author of the report, a government contractor, testified that the report was finished but that regulators never followed up with her on it. The hearings were the extent of the House's public investigation. Lawmakers also did not propose spending money to duplicate the study or pass legislation to enhance regulators' oversight. Yeager said the hearings 'validated our concerns' about companies shifting profits, but said there were outstanding questions about the data underlying the report. He said the House is considering hiring a forensic accountant this summer to analyze the full dataset, which was turned over to his committee. 'We're not done. This was not a one-session project,' he said. Insurance executives in Florida have earned incredible paydays over the years by shifting premiums to affiliate companies and away from the eyes of state regulators. Late in the session, the trade publication Insurance Journal revealed that the CEO of Tampa-based Slide Insurance and his wife earned $50.3 million in two years. Perez said the House's work looking into profit-shifting would continue. 'I think it's disgusting,' he said of the compensation. 'Internally, we're having discussions on what we can do to look into that,' he said. 'It is something that we will address. It is not something that we are putting on the back burner.' Legislators cited different reasons for why legislation stalled this year. House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell, a Tampa Democrat, said the session was distracted by Republican infighting, including over Hope Florida. The program created by Gov. Ron DeSantis to move people off government aid was investigated by House lawmakers during the session. 'I think that we lost momentum in terms of big policies and big ideas because so much had to be worked out between personalities,' Driskell said. Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, a Republican from Spring Hill who leads the Senate's insurance committee, said legislation mostly failed because 'some were trying to undo the reforms that have stabilized our insurance market.' Those reforms largely made it harder to sue insurance companies. Some Republicans, including Donald Trump, have been critical of those recent changes. House lawmakers this session introduced bills that would have allowed homeowners to recoup their legal fees when they sue insurance companies. DeSantis repeatedly railed against the idea, and the legislation failed. 'This would have led to increased costs and higher rates for everyone,' Ingoglia said.
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
They talked big about making Florida more affordable, but lawmakers disappointed
Florida lawmakers had one big job this year and, with some exceptions, they failed at it: They didn't address the lack of affordability that's forcing people to leave the state, especially in expensive areas like South Florida. The passage of a $115 billion state budget this week marked the end of an unusually long and tense legislative session in which Senate and House leaders disagreed over funding matters. We're glad they came to a consensus, but 2025 did not turn out to be the year of affordability as advertised when the session began in early March. The Herald Editorial Board met with dozens of candidates, Republican and Democratic, ahead of last year's legislative elections. Back then, virtually all of them told us that the biggest concern they were hearing from voters was the exorbitant price of homeowners' insurance and housing. As the Editorial Board wrote on March 4: 'Lawmakers will return to their districts at the end of the two-month session and explain whether they have done enough to address what's behind the increased cost of living in Florida.' They will have a lot of explaining to do. To be fair, the Legislature did make disaster-relief sales-tax cuts year round and extended the back-to-school sales tax holiday for a full month, the Herald reported. These cuts will go into effect every year without the need for legislative approval. Lawmakers also eliminated the business-rent tax, which is supposed to help small businesses, and doubled the funding to address food insecurity. These measures will provide some relief for Floridians, but, as the Herald reported, most tax breaks passed this year actually went toward businesses, many of which have an army of lobbyists in Tallahassee. For example, lawmakers eliminated the aviation fuel tax, helping airlines, and reduced a tax on cardrooms operated by parimutuels. House Speaker Danny Perez, R-Miami, told the Herald that the sales tax holidays are a 'win' for consumers — 'I believe we batted 1,000,' he said. (Perez originally wanted to reduce the state's sales tax from 6% to 5.25% but that didn't make into the budget.) Perez and his colleagues are naive if they think their constituents will be satisfied. Even longtime homeowners cannot keep up with the cost of everything, especially, property insurance. A few years ago, the Legislature passed a reform package that made it harder to sue insurance companies, which said they were forced to pass their high legal costs onto consumers in the form of higher premiums. President Donald Trump once blasted the changes as a 'bailout' to insurers and even Perez hinted the reforms were a giveaway to the industry, the Herald reported. After years of instability, Florida's insurance market has stabilized with premium increases slowing down, but the crisis for homeowners is far from over and many are paying more than they can afford. Last November, the Herald reported that Republican leaders were surprising their colleagues with 'tough talk' on insurance companies and the affordability crisis. '[Floridians] don't want our state's insurance laws to be written by insurance companies,' Perez told the House. The political appetite for more accountability grew when, in March, the Herald/Times uncovered a 2022 study that found that insurance executives distributed $680 million in dividends to shareholders and diverted billions more to affiliate companies while justifying big premium increases to cover their losses. Perez even ordered legislative hearings to look into the issue. In the end, no meaningful comprehensive reform on the insurance industry passed, even though Republicans put forward proposals to demand more transparency on the compensation of insurance executives. That legislation died and would have, according to sponsors, sped up the insurance claims process and cooled rates. Lawmakers always have next year to tackle broader reforms. Caution, in some cases, is needed. Lawmakers, for example, did not try to eliminate property taxes as Gov. Ron DeSantis wanted, which would have wreaked havoc in local governments and public schools, choosing instead to study the proposal. The real issue making Florida increasingly too expensive for those who aren't millionaires remains the cost of owning a home and insuring it. That hasn't changed. Floridians need meaningful reforms ASAP. Click here to send the letter.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Proposal to cancel Miami's November election, push it to 2026 passes first vote
The city of Miami has moved one step closer to postponing the upcoming November election without voter input. On Tuesday night, the Miami City Commission voted 3-2 in favor of switching the city from odd- to even-year elections, pushing forward a proposal that entails moving the November election to 2026 and giving the city's current elected officials an extra year in office — including those who will have reached their term limits. The yes votes were Commissioner Damian Pardo — the item's sponsor — as well as Commissioners Ralph Rosado and Christine King. Commissioners Miguel Angel Gabela and Joe Carollo voted no. The proposal must pass a second City Commission vote to become official. It's slated to come back at next week's meeting on June 26. Pardo has the support of Mayor Francis Suarez, who has been lobbying behind the scenes to push the legislation through. Suarez has veto power but does not have a vote on the City Commission. The circumstances are such that Rosado — whom Suarez supported in his special election earlier this month — voted to give himself an extra year in office during his first meeting as a Miami city commissioner. Pardo's proposal has faced pushback from Florida officials. Last week, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier issued a written opinion saying the city does not have the legal authority to move the election without voter approval. Gov. Ron DeSantis weighed in on social media, saying that 'city of Miami politicians do not have the authority to cancel this year's elections and extend their terms in office without voter approval.' In response to Uthmeier's opinion, City Attorney George Wysong issued an opinion last week in which he cited Florida law to argue that the city has the authority to move the election date via a City Commission vote. Pardo has pointed to two Miami-Dade cities that have done so already: North Miami and Coral Gables. Commissioners in North Miami extended their terms, while Gables commissioners voted to shorten their terms. At Tuesday's meeting, several people spoke in favor of moving the city to even-year elections, describing it as a 'common sense' solution to raising the city's paltry voter turnout, which typically hovers between 10% to 15%. 'You will hear a lot about the extra year in office, and that is far from ideal,' downtown resident Steven Smith said. However, he described it as a 'sacrifice' worth making. Others expressed concern — particularly about the prospect of the extra year for elected officials. Resident Xiani Cox supported moving to even years but 'only if it's done right.' Cox described this particular proposal as 'stealing an extra year.' 'It's a power grab dressed up as reform,' Cox said. 'Voters elected you for four years ... not five. Canceling the 2025 elections without a public vote is a direct attack on our democracy, and it's unethical and an abuse of power.' Miami pollster Fernand Amandi commended Pardo for his efforts toward reform but said it was 'indefensible' to cancel an election without voter consent. 'I find myself in the unfamiliar position today where I wholeheartedly agree with Governor DeSantis and Attorney General Uthmeier, and even Commissioner Joe Carollo,' he said. The commission also advanced another proposal from Pardo that's related to his push to change the election date. That proposal, which would create lifetime term limits for elected officials, also passed a City Commission vote 3-2 on Tuesday — but with a different makeup than the election date change vote. Pardo, Gabela and Rosado voted in favor of sending the term limits proposal to voters, while Carollo and King voted against. The change needs to come back to the commission for a second vote, after which point it will be sent to voters as a ballot referendum. That means it will ultimately be up to voters to decide whether the city should limit elected officials to two terms as city commissioner and two terms as mayor for their entire lifetime. It will also, however, be subjected to campaigning efforts by those invested in keeping the city's term limits as-is. Currently, elected officials in Miami must leave office after two terms but can run again after sitting out a term. The term limits proposal is connected to the election date change proposal because it clears the way for term limits to get voted on ahead of the city's next municipal election. Assuming the even-year election change gets commissioners' approval in a second, final vote on June 26, that means there would be a special election in November to ask voters about lifetime term limits, while the general election to select a mayor, a District 3 commissioner and a District 5 commissioner would be held in November 2026. If voters approve the lifetime term limits, that legislation would block Suarez from seeking elected office in Miami again. It would also block Carollo from office since he has already served at least two terms as both mayor and a commissioner, and it would keep his younger brother, former two-term City Commissioner Frank Carollo, from running for the City Commission again. Frank Carollo has already filed to run for the District 3 City Commission seat — currently occupied by his brother — and Joe Carollo has long been mulling another run for mayor. If the general election remained scheduled for November 2025, that could create legal roadblocks because the term limits proposal would be on the same ballot as candidates who would be affected by it, like Frank Carollo. Joe Carollo has argued that Pardo's proposals are designed to block him from becoming mayor, while Pardo has said that he's not targeting anybody.
