logo
‘Far reaching consequences' — UMass Amherst sounds the alarm amid federal uncertainty

‘Far reaching consequences' — UMass Amherst sounds the alarm amid federal uncertainty

Yahoo11 hours ago

As the federal government cuts back on research and curtails foreign student enrollment, the University of Massachusetts Amherst is sounding the alarm and preparing for the worst, according to a Wednesday email from school administrators.
All academic and administrative departments on campus have been asked to develop budget scenarios that include 3% and 5% reductions, according to the administrators.
The departments are also being instructed to only hire for positions deemed critical to university operations. Hires that cost more than $50,000 must be approved by the vice chancellor or provost, the administrators wrote.
UMass Amherst has already received $29 million less in federal research awards compared to this time last year, the university said.
Read more: UMass Amherst delays maintenance projects to pay for expected federal cuts
The institution receives about $180 million in annual federal research grants and contracts. With proposed cuts to a variety of federal agencies, the university could see a reduction in its annual funding by up to tens of millions of dollars, according to the university.
For instance, as part of the $180 million in funding, during fiscal year 2024, the institution received around $51 million in facilities and administration costs, also known as indirect costs. However, the U.S. Department of Defense recently issued a new 15% cap on indirect costs.
The university created the Research Continuity Emergency Matching Fund to support researchers who have been impacted by federal cuts. The institution has already committed more than $700,000 in salary and research continuity funding for nearly 50 graduate students, postdoctoral students and staff.
However, the university warned it is 'not sustainable long-term' and that their focus 'must shift from terminated grants to those not being renewed.'
UMass Amherst could also see a reduction in enrollment next academic year due to travel bans and visa terminations threatening foreign students and proposed reductions in Pell grants.
'These grants have helped nearly a quarter of our students access a world-class education while providing a direct investment by the United States in the future of its own economic, social and intellectual strength,' the institution said.
'Limiting our capacity to serve all students—regardless of means or identity — undercuts the mission of public higher education. Further, these threats compromise our ability to plan and operate effectively as a global institution in service to a community that has contributed immeasurably to our strength," the university said.
The announcement from UMass Amherst comes after a Monday court order from a federal judge that told the Trump administration to restore more than 360 National Institutes of Health grants nationwide — including 20 grants previously awarded to the University of Massachusetts system.
UMass Amherst is also part of a list of 60 higher education institutions under federal investigation for not protecting Jewish students from antisemitic discrimination and harassment.
Columbia University is also on the list and had $400 million pulled by the Trump administration, canceling grants and contracts because of what the government describes as the Ivy League school's failure to squelch antisemitism on campus.
UMass Chan Medical School in Worcester announced a hiring freeze, spending freeze and rescinded admissions for one of its biomedical science doctorate programs this week, citing ongoing uncertainty regarding federal funding.
There will also be targeted furloughs and layoffs at the medical school, according to an internal announcement.
The University of Massachusetts Dartmouth is requiring approval for hiring, limiting overtime and scrutinizing non-personnel expenditures, according to an internal announcement on Wednesday.
Read more: As Trump cuts funding, these Harvard scholars consider leaving US — and academia
'To be clear, while these proposed cuts and actions pose a serious threat to all of UMass, they are not yet law. UMass, alongside partners across higher education, is actively working to push back on these proposals and advocate for continued support of our critical mission in service of our nation's scientific and educational enterprise,' the university said.
'That said, the proposals currently under discussion would have far-reaching consequences for universities nationwide. UMass would not be exempt, and no area of our campus would remain untouched by the effects of such cuts. Whether the cuts are as deep as described in the President's proposed budget, or are somewhat less severe, a more constrained budget is anticipated in the year ahead,' it said.
MIT joins group of universities suing the DOD over funding cuts
As federal funding cuts hit Harvard, a private investment firm and other donors step up
20 NIH grants restored to UMass system after judge rules against Trump admin
Trump admin asks court to rule against Harvard without a trial
Federal judge orders Trump admin to reinstate hundreds of NIH grants
Read the original article on MassLive.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SoftBank founder proposes $1trn AI and robotics hub in US
SoftBank founder proposes $1trn AI and robotics hub in US

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SoftBank founder proposes $1trn AI and robotics hub in US

SoftBank Group founder Masayoshi Son is pursuing a plan to establish a $1trn industrial complex in Arizona, the US, to create a major hub for AI and robotics manufacturing, reported Bloomberg. The Japanese investment firm has approached Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) to play a key role in the project, though the specifics of TSMC's potential involvement remain unclear. The proposed complex, dubbed 'Project Crystal Land,' envisions a high-tech manufacturing hub akin to China's Shenzhen, individuals familiar with the plan told the publication. The park could include production lines for AI-powered industrial robots, they said, though the discussions remain private. SoftBank has also engaged with Samsung Electronics executives to gauge interest, alongside a range of other technology companies, the report added. SoftBank officials have held discussions with US federal and state government officials, including US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, to explore potential tax incentives for companies investing in the industrial park. Son has compiled a list of SoftBank Vision Fund portfolio companies, such as robotics firm Agile Robots SE, that could establish production facilities at the site. The project's feasibility depends on support from the Trump administration and state authorities. While the envisioned cost could reach $1trn, as previously reported by the Nikkei, the actual scale will hinge on participation from major technology firms, Bloomberg's report said. If successful, Son has suggested the possibility of developing additional advanced industrial parks across the US. TSMC, which has already begun mass production at its first Arizona factory as part of a $165bn US investment, indicated that SoftBank's project does not impact its existing plans in Phoenix. Representatives from SoftBank, TSMC, and Samsung declined to comment, and the US Commerce Department did not immediately respond to Bloomberg's inquiries. In March 2025, SoftBank agreed to acquire Ampere Computing, a US-based semiconductor design company, for $6.5bn. As per the deal, Ampere Computing will be acquired by SBG through its subsidiary Silver Bands 6 (US) Corp. Ampere Computing is engaged in developing high-performance, energy-efficient processors tailored for cloud computing and AI workloads. The company currently employs approximately 1000 engineers. "SoftBank founder proposes $1trn AI and robotics hub in US" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Who's who in the secret group advising Trump on Iran - who has been left out of the planning?
Who's who in the secret group advising Trump on Iran - who has been left out of the planning?

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Who's who in the secret group advising Trump on Iran - who has been left out of the planning?

President Donald Trump let it be known on Thursday that he will make a decision on whether to involve the U.S. in Israel's war with Iran within the next two weeks, as tensions over the question continue to divide conservatives. The president, who signed off on attack plans on Tuesday but resisted giving the go-ahead, is reportedly taking soundings from a small coterie of trusted advisers while also throwing the conversation open to fellow world leaders, as well as allies such as the hawkish Republican senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Tom Cotton of Arkansas. Outside of his inner circle, MAGA personalities Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Steve Bannon, and Candace Owens have been speaking out against the prospect of the U.S. wading into another prolonged Middle Eastern war. At the same time, other Trump cheerleaders on Capitol Hill and the media have made the case for intervention. Here's a look at the people Trump is listening to, according to NBC News. Vice President Vance has previously struck a non-interventionist posture on foreign wars, notably opposing American support for Ukraine. He appears to favor a diplomatic solution to the dispute with Iran, applauding Trump for showing 'remarkable restraint' and making the safety of American troops and assets his top priority. The president's White House Chief of Staff and former campaign manager is known as the 'Ice Maiden' and regarded as an important restraining presence, in place to shield Trump from his own worst instincts. A senior adviser and Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, Miller is known as an anti-immigration hardliner and one of the faces of Trump's mass deportation push. A regular talking head on conservative media loathed by liberals, Miller has reportedly been nicknamed 'Weird Stephen' behind the scenes by the president, which does not suggest he commands the level of respect to which he aspires. Once a bitter enemy of Trump and rival for the Republican nomination, the Secretary of State now has such a full plate he has been dubbed the 'Secretary of Everything.' Rubio was out quickly last week to deny American involvement in Israel's initial onslaught but has since largely left the public messaging to the president. Trump's Middle East envoy, like him, a former luxury real estate developer, has led talks with both Israel and Iran since taking office earlier this year and, like Rubio, has cut a busy figure, also serving as the president's de facto liaison with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The lieutenant general serving as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff boasts the tough-guy nickname 'Razin' Caine' and previously served as a counterterrorism specialist to George W. Bush's Homeland Security Council. He reportedly first befriended Trump at the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2019 and impressed him by suggesting that Isis could be stamped out within a week. 'One week? I was told two years!' Trump marvelled. The head of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) is a career army officer who also has a cool nickname, 'The Gorilla.' He has reportedly been granted an unprecedented amount of leeway by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. He has seen an increasing allocation of resources to his areas of responsibility, which include the Middle East. The CIA Director is an influential voice, having also served in the first Trump administration. He was previously a Texas congressman and a mayor of a small town. Two names conspicuous by their absence from that list are Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell has pushed back against the suggestion that Hegseth has been sidelined. 'This claim is completely false,' he told NBC. 'The secretary is speaking with the president multiple times a day, and has been with the president in the Situation Room this week. 'Secretary Hegseth is providing the leadership the Department of Defense and our Armed Forces need, and he will continue to work diligently in support of President Trump's peace through strength agenda.' Trump is meanwhile reported to have fallen out with Gabbard for going 'off-message' after she posted a video on X attacking the 'political elite and warmongers' for 'carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers' and placing the world 'on the brink of nuclear annihilation.' Asked by CNN's Kaitlan Collins aboard Air Force One about Gabbard's statement to Congress in March that, although Iran's enriched uranium levels are at an all-time high, the expert opinion is that Tehran is not currently seeking to develop a nuclear bomb. 'I don't care what she said,' the president snapped. 'I think they were very close to having a weapon.' One Trump supporter to deny any involvement in Trump's discussions about the conflict is MAGA die-hard Laura Loomer, who attacked former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson on X on Thursday night for reporting that she was playing an advisory role, dismissing the claim as 'fake news.'

How to ask for a raise: 6 mistakes that can hurt your chances — and what to do instead
How to ask for a raise: 6 mistakes that can hurt your chances — and what to do instead

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How to ask for a raise: 6 mistakes that can hurt your chances — and what to do instead

Only 13% of full-time employees requested a raise in 2023, but 66% of those who did received one, according to a May 2024 Federal Reserve survey. It goes to prove the old saying right: Ask, and you shall receive. Still, asking for a raise at work can be a stressful conversation for many employees. If you ask at the wrong time or in the wrong way, you could hurt your chances. From asking too soon to giving ultimatums, even minor missteps can work against you. In many ways, it's a skill of its own. Here are six mistakes to avoid, along with practical tips to approach salary discussions with confidence and increase your odds of success. Before asking for a raise, it's essential to establish a strong relationship with your manager. Otherwise, the conversation won't go far. 'Before giving a raise, I would want to know what my employee is doing and have a regular cadence where we're meeting consistently,' says Patrice Williams-Lindo, a career coach and manager of five. 'If it's the first time we're meeting, it's impractical to ask for a raise then and there. It's like asking someone to marry you on the first date,' she explains. Set up regular one-on-one meetings with your manager if you haven't already done so. Use that time to keep them updated on your progress, share your wins and make sure you're aligned on goals, including earning a salary increase. It will also give your manager a clear understanding of how you and your work contribute to the team. Do you work for a great organization? Nominate it as one of America's Top Workplaces. Even after you've established a relationship with your manager, avoid requesting a raise in an arbitrary one-on-one meeting, via email or during a casual conversation. Your manager should know the conversation is coming. 'It shouldn't be an ambush,' Williams-Lindo says. 'When you book the meeting, say, 'I'd like to talk about compensation and share the results I've driven,'' she advises. Schedule a dedicated meeting and clearly state its purpose. That way, your manager has time to prepare and come to the conversation with the right mindset. Timing can significantly impact whether your raise request is granted. If you're unsure when your company typically handles raises or promotions, bring it up during your one-on-ones, then use the intervening time to work toward that raise. 'If I'm setting myself up for mid-year, then I need to start at the beginning of the year — if not before — building that case,' Williams-Lindo says. Map out what you want to achieve for the year ahead and start gathering proof points early, so by the time you discuss a raise or promotion with your manager, your case will already be well established. Avoid asking for a raise out of fear or personal financial pressure. Instead, keep the focus on your performance and value. Williams-Lindo suggested saying something like, ''It's been X months — here's what I've done, the caliber of my work and the outcomes I've delivered. That's why I believe I'm qualified for X, Y or Z.' That gives off a different energy than, 'Hey, I don't know how I'm going to pay my rent, and I need a raise.'' Center the conversation on your professional achievements and value. Know what the market is paying for your role and what peers in similar roles (even at other organizations) are making. If you can demonstrate the gap, you're more likely to have a productive outcome. Giving an ultimatum when asking for a raise is a major mistake. Even if you do get the raise, this type of communication can antagonize your manager, damage your professional reputation and ultimately undermine your value. 'This might sound like, 'I need a raise, or I'm quitting.' I appreciate that bravado, but for me, it's a bit of a turn-off, because how did we get here?' Williams-Lindo says. Rehearse your talking points. Calm, professional conversations are far more effective than explosive ones. Be open to negotiation and prepared to compromise on the final amount. Even if you've thoroughly prepared and presented your case well, your raise request could still be denied. If you're told "not right now," ask your manager for specific feedback. There may be outside factors influencing the decision or specific goals you'll need to meet to be considered for a raise in the future. A good manager will explain the reason — whether it's because the company is facing a downturn or because there are performance gaps to work on — and then help you to fix them. Set up a follow-up time — in three to six months — to revisit the conversation. This will indicate that you are engaged and goal-oriented. If your manager is dismissive and doesn't provide clear, achievable paths to advancement, it may be time to reassess if this is still the right place for your growth. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: how-to-ask-for-raise

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store