CT State Colleges and Universities union warns of cuts: ‘Cutting the faculty will diminish … essential supports'

Anticipating faculty layoffs and up to 750 course section eliminations Connecticut State Colleges and University faculty are calling on leadership to use its reserve funds in the millions to stave off potential cuts.
Members of the CSU-AAUP urged the CSCU Board of Regents Wednesday to leverage the funds and protect faculty and students.
Cindy Stretch, an English professor at Southern Connecticut State University and vice president of CSU-AAUP, said the legislature expects the money accumulated by the System Office to be used for teachers.
'Instead the Board's Finance Committee is channeling Scrooge McDuck and stockpiling our funding in so-called reserve accounts,' she said.
CSU-AAUP members argue that the potential cuts would result in fewer course options, a reduction in faculty, larger class sizes, a heavier course load for faculty and fewer opportunities to work individually with students to help them excel.
But CSCU officials say that the CSCU reserves are dependent on the funding allocation from the state, which has yet to finalize its budget and that the Board has no authority on how the money is spent, with any cuts made to programs or faculty done at the individual college or university.
'CSCU's colleges and universities plan to use more than $130 million in institutional reserves over the next biennium,' said Samantha Norton, director of communications for Connecticut State Colleges & Universities. 'At this point we do not know how much funding the CSCU system will receive. Our reserve plan is dependent on our funding allocation from the state.'
CSCU requested $555.4 million in each year of the biennium, according to Norton. In fiscal year 2026, this is $83.7 million more than what Gov. Ned Lamont proposed in his budget; and in fiscal year 2027, it is $70.3 million more than what the governor proposed in his budget, Norton said.
CSCU is a system of four state universities – Central, Eastern, Western and Southern – one community college with 12 campuses and Charter Oak State College, the state's only public online college.
Madeline St. Amour, director of communications for the CSU-AAUP, said that the Board of Regents is planning potential cuts of at least $12 million at the four CSUs in fiscal year 2026 and 2027.
Guay told the Courant that no number has been finalized yet.
'We are waiting for the budget to be finalized in June,' he said. 'That will dictate what the ask is and what the cuts could be. A lot of the reserves sit at the institutional level and the institutions get together in a shared governance process to agree to how to move the institution forward with their fiscal constraints and reserves.'
Adam Joseph, vice chair for external affairs at CSCU, said putting together a budget is like putting together a puzzle.
'We are trying to adapt to what the state funding will be,' he said. 'Each year our institution is operating within the budget that is available to them.'
Joseph acknowledged that this has resulted in cuts in some cases over the years.
Wearing red shirts that read 'Opening Minds, Opening Doors,' the union members, all faculty members of CSU, attended the board meeting and went directly to Guay, wanting assurances that investments would be made in education.
But they said they were not given those assurances, and instead left with no answers.
Wendy Wallace, part-time faculty member in the English department at SCSU, said she believes the Board could allocate the funding from its reserves.
'They have the money,' she said. 'It is that simple. They need to allocate it.'
But Norton said the vast majority of the reserves at $89 million at the System Office are held for debt service and deferred maintenance and are not readily available.
'It is not required for the state to fund those reserves first as the money is in our accounts,' she said in an email.
The state has flat-funded the CSCU system for years, CSU-AAUP members say, leading to cuts over the years that have already left the CSCU system with fewer staff, with increased enrollment.
At Southern Connecticut State University, Provost Julia Irwin has proposed a $750,000 cut in the adjunct faculty for the 2025-26 year, which amounts to a 5% cut in part-time faculty across the university.
'I am very concerned about part-time faculty losing jobs, myself included, and I am concerned about how this would impact student learning and resources for students and their opportunity to get an effective education,' Wallace said.
Wallace went on further to say that with an evolving society changing so fast and the impact of COVID on learning, students need a lot of 'individual attention and they need to be cared for.
'They need the help, care and support that we as faculty provide,' she told the Courant. 'The value of that can't be understated. Cutting the faculty will diminish our ability to provide those essential supports and essential education that they require.'
Michael Brelsford, part-time faculty member in the English department at SCSU, said the cuts will have a huge impact on students, explaining that their whole college career and retention is at stake if they don't have a meaningful experience, also increasing the drop out risk.
St. Amour said the potential cuts will not only hurt students because of the limited course offerings but it may affect their ability to graduate on time because of a reduction in services and tutoring.
Wallace said, 'It is a matter of do we want to have a world class education in this state or are we going to sacrifice that for dollars?'
Stretch told the Courant the English department at SCSU is down a third since she has been there.
'There are a lot of people in our department that don't know if they are going to have a job in the fall,' she said.
She also spoke to the reduction in part-time faculty in her department, explaining that 20 years ago they had 80 teaching composition. That number is now down by half to 40.
'There is nothing else to cut without making significant impacts on things like class sizes,' she said.
'What I am concerned about is the Board of Regents does not seem to have a plan or a vision on how to get the reserves and make it possible for us to do the important work we have been doing and continue to do. Give us the resources to meet the needs of the students.'
She said students do not want large class sizes.
'They don't want that experience,' she said. 'They want faculty members that know their names.'
Fiona Pearson, CCSU sociology professor and chair, said in 2017 the department had a budget of $13,000. Now they are operating on $6,000. They are now expected to do more with less, she explained, with enrollment increasing and full-time faculty dropping in the department from 11 to nine. The department has doubled its part-time faculty, she said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

5 hours ago

• Yahoo

The US has changed the course of the conflict - how will Iran respond?

As Benjamin Netanyahu stood at the podium in the Israeli prime minister's office this morning, he did not at first address the Israeli people in Hebrew, to update them on the latest, dramatic development in this, his latest war. Instead he spoke in English, speaking directly to, and lavishing praise upon, US President Donald Trump after the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites. If Netanyahu's tone was triumphant, and the smile barely suppressed, it is hardly surprising. He has spent most of his political career obsessed with the threat he believes Iran poses to Israel. Netanyahu has spent much of the last 15 years attempting to persuade his American allies that only military action (and only American munitions) could destroy Iran's nuclear weapons programme. While congratulating Trump for a bold decision that "will change history", Netanyahu can also congratulate himself on changing the mind of a US president who campaigned against overseas military adventures, and whose supporters were overwhelmingly opposed to joining Israel's war against Iran. Follow live updates It should also be noted that Trump's own intelligence agencies had not shared Israel's assessment of how quickly Iran could seek to build a nuclear weapon, nor indeed whether it had taken the decision to do so. Throughout this conflict, which began just 10 days ago, Israel's government and military have insisted that Israel had the capacity to deal with the Iranian threat on its own. But it was no secret that only America possessed the massive ordnance capable of dealing with the strongest levels of protection around Iran's nuclear facilities, particularly at Fordo, built deep inside a mountain. If the nuclear sites bombed last night are now indeed out of use then Israel's prime minister will be able to declare his main war aim complete, perhaps bringing this conflict closer to an end. For its part, Iran says it had already moved its nuclear material out. But without last night's bombing, Israel would have continued working its way down the long list of targets its air force has spent years drawing up. Damage would continue to have been inflicted on the Iranian military, on its commanders, on nuclear scientists, on government infrastructure and on the parts of the nuclear programme accessible to Israel's bombs. But Netanyahu may have been denied a clear point at which Israel could say the nuclear threat had been definitively neutralised. Perhaps only regime change in Iran could have delivered that moment. The B2 bombers have undoubtedly changed the trajectory of the war. Whether it escalates even further will depend on how Iran and its allies respond. Last week Iran's supreme leader had vowed to hit back at the US were it to enter the war. "The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said. Only on Saturday the Houthi group in Yemen - staunch Iranian allies - had threatened to attack US ships transiting through the Red Sea if America entered the war. American military personnel, businesses, and citizens in the region are now potential targets. Iran can strike back in multiple ways, should it so chose, attacking US warships, or bases in the Gulf, and potentially disrupting the flow of oil from the Gulf, and sending the price of petrol soaring. The US has signalled that, for now, its military action is over, and it has no interest in bringing down the government in Tehran. That may encourage Iran to limit its response, perhaps attacking US targets in ways that do not lead to high casualties, or using proxies in the region to do the same. Iran chose to follow this course after Trump ordered the assassination of Iranian Revolutionary Guard leader Qasem Soleimani in 2020. On Saturday night, the US president repeated his own threat to Iran, to use overwhelming force to counter any retaliation. This morning the whole of the Middle East is holding its breath, waiting to see whether this marks the beginning of the end of this conflict, or the beginning of an even more deadly phase to the war. What we know about US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities Trump's Iran gamble fraught with risk - at home and abroad

Politico

7 hours ago

• Politico

New Texas law requires 10 Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom

AUSTIN, Texas — Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. 'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.

9 hours ago

New Texas law will require Ten Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom

AUSTIN, Texas -- Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. 'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.